An in vitro assessment of the influences of different wire materials and bracket systems when correcting dental crowding.

A recently developed orthodontic wire alloy known as GUMMETAL® is claimed to deliver more physiological forces to correct dental mispositioning. However, its mechanical characteristics have not been fully characterized yet. This study aimed to determine and compare the elastic properties of different wire alloys, such as nickel-titanium (NiTi), stainless steel (SS), and GUMMETAL®, and assess their unloading forces when combined with either conventional or self-ligating brackets (CL and SL) when correcting dental crowding. All wires had a 0.016″ cross-section diameter. A three-point bending test was performed to assess the maximum deflection of each wire. Then, a subsequent analysis measured the unloading force for each wire/bracket system in a dental crowding clinical simulation device. The test was carried out in a universal testing machine with a cross-speed displacement of 0.5 mm/min. Data were recorded in different ranges and statistically evaluated using two-way analysis of variance. GUMMETAL® displayed higher unloading mean forces in SL brackets (2228.78 cN) than CL brackets (1967.38 cN) for the 1.6-3.0 deflection interval (p = 0.018). Within this interval, NiTi showed higher forces when used with CL brackets (2683.06 cN) than with SL brackets (1179.66 cN) (p < 0.0001). For the CL bracket systems, SS wires showed higher forces (2125.31 cN) in the 1.0-1.6 deflection interval than the other two wire alloys (NiTi, 1541.52 cN and GUMMETAL®, 852.65 cN) (p < 0.0001). SS wires also displayed lower forces with SL brackets (1844.01 cN) than in CL brackets (2125.31 cN) (p = 0.049). Thus, only GUMMETAL® revealed to be an optimal choice for SL brackets, whereas NiTi for CL brackets.

Effects of a peripheral enamel margin on the long-term bond strength and nanoleakage of composite/dentin interfaces produced by self-adhesive and conventional resin cements.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effects of peripheral enamel margins on the long-term bond strength (µTBS) and nanoleakage in resin/dentin interfaces produced by self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five self-adhesive [RelyX-Unicem (UN), RelyX-U100 (UC), GCem (GC), Maxcem (MC), Set (SET)] and 2 conventional resin cements [RelyX-ARC(RX), Panavia F(PF)] were used. An additional group included the use of a two-step self-etching adhesive (SE Bond) with Panavia F (PS). One hundred ninety-two molars were assigned to 8 groups according to luting material. Five-mm-thick composite disks were cemented and assigned to 3 subgroups according to water-exposure condition (n = 6): 24-h peripheral exposure (24h-PE-enamel margins), or 1 year of peripheral (1 yr-PE) or direct exposure (1 yr-DE-dentin margin). Restored teeth were sectioned into beams and tested in tension at 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Two additional specimens in each group were prepared for nanoleakage evaluation. Nanoleakage patterns were observed under SEM/TEM. RESULTS: Except for RX, no significant reduction in µTBS was observed between 24h-PE and 1 yr-PE. 1 yr-DE reduced µTBS for RX, PF, GC, MC, and SET. No significant reduction in µTBS was observed for PS, UC, and UN after 1 year. After 1 yr-DE, RX and PS presented the highest µTBS, and SET and MC the lowest. Nanoleakage was reduced when there was a peripheral enamel margin. SET and MC presented more silver deposition than other groups. CONCLUSION: The presence of a peripheral enamel margin reduced the degradation rate in resin/dentin interfaces for most materials. The µTBS values produced by the multi-step luting agents RX and PS were significantly higher than those observed for self-adhesive cement.

Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Several self-adhesive luting agents have recently been introduced on the market. It is crucial to know the effectiveness of such luting agents prior to their clinical application. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strengths (microTBS) produced by different self-adhesive cements and compare them with conventional luting agents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six self-adhesive cements (RelyX Unicem (UN), RelyX U100 (UC), SmartCem 2 (SC), G-Cem (GC), Maxcem (MC), and SeT (SET), and 2 conventional luting agents, one that uses a 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (RelyX ARC (RX)), and one that uses a 1-step self-etching adhesive (Panavia F (PF)), were used in this study. An additional group included the use of a 2-step self-etching primer adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond) prior to the application of Panavia F (PS). Fifty-four human molars were abraded to expose occlusal surfaces and were assigned to 9 groups according to the luting material (n=6). Five composite resin (Filtek Z250) discs (12 mm in diameter, 5 mm thick) were cemented on the teeth according to manufacturers' instructions. After 24 hours of water storage, restored teeth were serially sectioned into beams with a cross-sectional area of approximately 1 mm2 at the bonded interface and were tested in tension with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Failure mode was determined using scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's studentized range HSD test (alpha =.05). RESULTS: Mean bond strengths (SD) in MPa were: RX, 69.6 (16.6)A; PS, 49.2 (9.7)A; PF, 33.7 (13.9)AB; GC, 16.9 (10.3)BC; UC, 15.3 (3.4)BC; UN, 12.5 (2.4)C; MC 11.5 (6.8)CD; SC, 8.5 (4.9)CD; SET, 4.6 (0.5)D. Groups with different uppercase letters were significantly different from each other (P<.05). The predominant failure mode of the self-adhesive cements was adhesive between the resin cement and dentin. CONCLUSIONS: The bond strengths produced by the multistep luting agents were significantly higher than those observed for most self-adhesive cements.

Aplicação clínica de sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes / Clinical aplication of self-etching adhesive systems

O desenvolvimento dos sistemas autocondicionantes surgiu com o intuito de reduzir as dificuldades da técnica úmida de adesão e simplificar os procedimentos clínicos de aplicação dos adesivos. Nesta técnica, primers autocondicionantes compostos de monômeros ácidos são aplicados sobre a dentina coberta pela smear layer, sem a necessidade de remoção do material com água, subsequentemente. O objetivo do presente artigo é apresentar ao leitor algumas aplicações clínicas dos sistemas adesivos que utilizam primers autocondicionantes, evidenciando a sua técnica de aplicação, através de restaurações adesivas diretas e indiretas.