RESUMEN
The modern management of colonic diverticular disease involves grouping patients into uncomplicated or complicated diverticulitis, after which the correct treatment paradigm is instituted. Recent controversies suggest overlap in management strategies between these two groups. While most reports still support surgical intervention for the treatment of complicated diverticular disease, more data are forthcoming suggesting complicated diverticulitis does not merit surgical resection in all scenarios. Given the significant risk for complication in surgery for diverticulitis, careful attention should be paid to patient and procedure selection. Here, we define complicated diverticulitis, discuss options for surgical intervention, and explain strategies for avoiding operative pitfalls that result in early and late postoperative complications.
RESUMEN
CASE SUMMARY: A 63-year-old woman with history of stage II rectal adenocarcinoma status postneoadjuvant chemoradiation and subsequent abdominoperineal resection presented with worsening bulge and inability to pouch stoma. CT scan revealed a 4-cm parastomal hernia. After discussion with the patient regarding management options, she elected to undergo repair of hernia defect. A robot-assisted laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair with synthetic mesh via the Sugarbaker technique was performed. After a short stay in the hospital, the patient recovered well and reported no recurrent symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Colostomía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Colostomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/diagnóstico , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Laparoscopía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estomas QuirúrgicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trauma recidivism accounts for approximately 44% of emergency department admissions and remains a significant health burden with this patient cohort carrying higher rates of morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A level 1 trauma center registry was queried for patients aged 18-25 y presented between 2009 and 2015. Patients with nonaccidental gunshot wounds, stab wounds, or blunt assault-related injuries were categorized as violent injuries. Primary outcomes included mortality and recidivism, which were defined as patients with two unrelated traumas during the study period. Hospital records and the Social Security Death Index were used to aid in outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 6484 patients presented with 1215 (18.7%) sustaining violent injuries (87.4% male, median age 22.2 y). Mechanism of violent injuries included 64.4% gunshot wound, 21.1% stab, and 14.8% blunt assault. Compared with nonviolent injuries, violent injury patients had increased risk of mortality (9.3% versus 2.1%, P < 0.0001). Out-of-hospital mortality was 2.6% (versus 0.5% nonviolent, P < 0.0005), with an average time to death being 6.4 mo from initial injury. Recidivism was 24.9% with mean time to second violent injury at 31.9 ± 21.0 mo; 14.9% had two trauma readmissions, and 8.0% had ≥3. Ninety percent of subsequent injuries occurred within 5 y, with 19.1% in the first year. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of injury after violent trauma extends past discharge as patients have significantly higher mortality rates following hospital release. Over one-quarter present with a second unrelated trauma or death. Improved medical, psychological, and social collaborative treatment of these high-risk patients is needed to interrupt the cycle of violent injury.
Asunto(s)
Víctimas de Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas Punzantes/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Costo de Enfermedad , Víctimas de Crimen/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Apoyo Social , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & control , Heridas no Penetrantes/prevención & control , Heridas Punzantes/prevención & control , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in technique and technology, using prophylactic ureteral catheters to avoid iatrogenic ureteral injury during colectomy remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and costs attributable to prophylactic ureteral catheters with colectomy. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS: The colectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2014 was queried. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the rate of 30-day ureteral injury after colectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined factors associated with ureteral injury and urinary tract infection in patients undergoing colectomy. RESULTS: A total of 51,125 patients were identified with a mean age of 60.9 ± 14.9 years and a BMI of 28.4 ± 6.7 k/m; 4.90% (n = 2486) of colectomies were performed with prophylactic catheters, and 333 ureteral injuries (0.65%) were identified. Prophylactic ureteral catheters were most commonly used for diverticular disease (42.2%; n = 1048), with injury occurring most often during colectomy for diverticular disease (36.0%; n = 120). Univariate analysis of outcomes demonstrated higher rates of ileus, wound infection, urinary tract infection, urinary tract infection as reason for readmission, superficial site infection, and 30-day readmission in patients with prophylactic ureteral catheter placement. On multivariate analysis, prophylactic ureteral catheter placement was associated with a lower rate of ureteral injury (OR = 0.45 (95% CI, 0.25-0.81)). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study using a clinical data set. CONCLUSIONS: Here, prophylactic ureteral catheters were used in 4.9% of colectomies and most commonly for diverticulitis. On multivariate analysis, prophylactic catheter placement was associated with a lower rate of ureteral injury. Additional research is needed to delineate patient populations most likely to benefit from prophylactic ureteral stent placement. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A482.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Uréter/lesiones , Enfermedades Ureterales/prevención & control , Catéteres Urinarios , Anciano , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Ureterales/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical trainee association with operative outcomes is controversial. Studies are conflicting, possibly due to insufficient control of confounding variables such as operative time, case complexity, and heterogeneous patient populations. As operative complications worsen long-term outcomes in oncologic patients, understanding effect of trainee involvement during laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is of utmost importance. Here, we hypothesized that resident involvement was associated with worsened 30-day mortality and 30-day overall morbidity in this patient population. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for oncologic diagnosis from 2005 to 2012 were assessed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset. Propensity score matching accounted for demographics, comorbidities, case complexity, and operative time. Attending only cases were compared to junior, middle, chief resident, and fellow level cohorts to assess primary outcomes of 30-day mortality and 30-day overall morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 13,211 patients met inclusion criteria, with 4075 (30.8%) cases lacking trainee involvement and 9136 (69.2%) involving a trainee. Following propensity matching, junior (PGY 1-2) and middle level (PGY 3-4) resident involvement was not associated with worsened outcomes. Chief (PGY 5) resident involvement was associated with worsened 30-day overall morbidity (15.5 vs. 18.6%, p = 0.01). Fellow (PGY > 5) involvement was associated with worsened 30-day overall morbidity (16.0 vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001), serious morbidity (9.3 vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001), minor morbidity (9.8 vs. 13.1%, p = 0.002), and surgical site infection (7.9 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.006). No differences were seen in 30-day mortality for any resident level. CONCLUSION: Following propensity-matched analysis of cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy, chief residents, and fellows were associated with worsened operative outcomes compared to attending along cases, while junior and mid-level resident outcomes were no different. Further study is necessary to determine what effect the PGY surgical trainee level has on post-operative morbidity in cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy in the context of multiple collinear factors.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/educación , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Internado y Residencia , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/educación , Tempo Operativo , Anciano , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/complicaciones , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Puntaje de Propensión , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Optimal timing of surgery for acute diverticulitis remains unclear. A non-operative approach followed by elective surgery 6-week post-resolution is favored. However, a subset of patients fail on the non-operative management during index admission. Here, we examine patients requiring emergent operation to evaluate the effect of surgical delay on patient outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing emergent operative intervention for acute diverticulitis were queried using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2012. Primary endpoints of 30-day overall morbidity and mortality were evaluated via univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2,119 patients identified for study inclusion, 57.2 % (n = 1212) underwent emergent operative intervention within 24 h, 26.3 % (n = 558) between days 1-3, 12.9 % (n = 273) between days 3-7, and 3.6 % (n = 76) greater than 7 days from admission. End colostomy was performed in 77.4 % (n = 1,640) of cases. Unadjusted age and presence of major comorbidities increased with operative delay. Further, unadjusted 30-day overall morbidity, mortality, septic complications, and post-operative length of stay increased significantly with operative delay. On multivariate analysis, operative delay was not associated with increased 30-day mortality but was associated with increased 30-day overall morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Hartmann's procedure has remained the standard operation in emergent surgical management of acute diverticulitis. Delay in definitive surgical therapy greater than 24 h from admission is associated with higher rates of morbidity and protracted post-operative length of stay, but there is no increase in 30-day mortality. Prospective study is necessary to further answer the question of surgical timing in acute diverticulitis.
Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis/mortalidad , Diverticulitis/cirugía , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/cirugía , Enfermedad Aguda , Diverticulitis/complicaciones , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Análisis Multivariante , Periodo Posoperatorio , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Sepsis/complicaciones , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a commonly performed bariatric procedure. Readmissions are used as a quality indicator with a nationwide emphasis on reduction. In LRYGB surgery, surgeon volume studies have focused on correlation with technical outcomes, offering limited data on readmissions. Our aim was to evaluate nationwide data to explore the relationship between surgeon case volume and hospital readmissions following LRYGB. METHODS: The Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database from 2011 was used for this study. Analysis was restricted to patients who underwent non-revisional LRYGB. Surgeons performing more than 50 LRYGB during the study period were defined as high-volume surgeons (HVS). Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to control for patient demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: We identified 32,521 patients who underwent LRYGB with an overall 30-day readmission rate of 5.5 %, mean age 45.7 (12.0) years, and mean BMI 47.2 (8.0) kg/m2. There were no major differences in BMI (47.3 ± 8.1 vs 47.1 ± 7.9, p = 0.282) or age (45.5 ± 12.0 vs 45.8 ± 12.0, p = 0.030) between low-volume surgeon (LVS) and HVS patients. After controlling for baseline characteristics, HVS patients were less likely to be readmitted compared to those with a LVS (OR = 0.85, 95 % CI 0.77-0.94), with a readmission rate of 5.2 vs 6.1 % (p = 0.001). Additionally, HVS patients had lower rates of 30-day mortality (OR = 0.50, 95 % CI 0.27-0.91), complication (OR = 0.81, 95 % CI 0.75-0.87), reoperation (OR = 0.82, 95 % CI 0.72-0.93), and anastomotic leak (OR = 0.64, 95 % CI 0.46-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission following LRYGB is significantly associated with surgeon operative volume; surgeons that perform fewer than 50 LRYGB per year are more likely to have 30-day readmissions and complications. Our findings support other more generalized studies suggesting surgeon case volume is inversely associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes and complications. As such, performance of LRYGB by HVS may decrease patient morbidity, hospital readmission, and overall healthcare utilization.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The disproportionate increase in the super obese (SO) is a hidden component of the current obesity pandemic. Data on the safety and efficacy of bariatric procedures in this specific patient population are limited. Our aim is to assess the comparative effectiveness of the two most common bariatric procedures in the SO. METHODS: Using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database from 2007 to 2012, we compared SO patients (BMI ≥ 50) undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Stepwise logistic regression modeling was used to calculate a propensity score to adjust for patient demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: We identified 50,987 SO patients who underwent RYGB (N = 42,119) or SG (N = 8868). There was no difference in adjusted overall 30-day complication rate comparing RYGB and SG patients (11.5 vs. 11.1 %, p = 0.250). RYGB patients had higher adjusted rates of 30-day mortality (0.3 vs. 0.2 %, p = 0.042), reoperation (4.0 vs. 2.4 %, p < 0.001), and readmission (6.9 vs. 5.5 %, p < 0.001) compared to SG patients. The percent of total weight loss (%TWL) was significantly higher for RYGB patients compared to SG at 3 months (14.1 vs. 13.1 %, p < 0.001), 6 months (25.2 vs. 22.4 %, p < 0.001), and 12 months (34.5 vs. 29.7 %, p < 0.001). RYGB patients had increased resolution of all measured comorbidities: diabetes mellitus (61.6 vs. 50.8 %, p < 0.001), hypertension (43.1 vs. 34.5 %, p < 0.001), gastroesophageal reflux disease (53.9 vs. 32.5 %, p < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (39.7 vs. 32.5 %, p < 0.001), and obstructive sleep apnea (42.8 vs. 40.6 %, p = 0.058) at 12 months compared to SG patients. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in comorbidity improvement and resolution as well as weight loss between RYGB and SG in the SO population. There was no difference in overall 30-day complications, but more RYGB patients required readmission and reoperation. However, RYGB was considerably more effective in controlling obesity-related comorbidities. Our results favor performance of RYGB in SO patients of appropriate risk.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/terapia , Hipertensión/terapia , Masculino , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Operative results of volvulus are largely unknown because of infrequent diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: We examined the results of operative intervention for colonic volvulus. DESIGN: We merged trackable data from the California Inpatient Database with Supplemental Files for Revisit Analyses between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007. SETTINGS: Trackable data from California discharge records. PATIENTS: We identified all of the patients with colonic volvulus who underwent 1 of 4 surgical procedures, including manipulation/fixation of the colon, right colectomy, left colectomy, or total colectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: During the 36-month study period, we identified recurrence risk, recurrence requiring reoperation, time to reoperation, stoma formation, disposition on discharge, and in-hospital mortality. Fisher exact, χ(2), and ANOVA tests were used when appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 2141 patients with colonic volvulus who were undergoing intraoperative manipulation/fixation of the colon (n = 209 (12%)), right (n = 728 (41%)), left (n = 781 (44%)), or total colectomy (n = 56 (3%)). Patients treated with intraoperative manipulation/fixation were younger, more likely to be women, and more likely to have private insurance. Patients who underwent total colectomy had the highest risk of mortality (21%), highest risk of stoma creation (64%), and longest length of stay (18 days); were more likely to be readmitted (9%); and were the most likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (48%). Patients treated with intraoperative manipulation/fixation had the lowest mortality, risk of stoma formation, length of stay, and likelihood of discharge to skilled nursing facility but the highest risk of subsequent procedures for volvulus (26%) over a follow-up ranging from 0 to 687 days. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by retrospective study design, heterogeneous patient factors, and inability to identify the time of last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with volvulus underwent a resectional procedure. A subset without resection had favorable initial outcomes but remained at high risk for subsequent procedures. There may be a potential role for evaluating intraoperative manipulation/fixation in a small subset of patients with colonic volvulus.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Vólvulo Intestinal/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California , Colectomía , Colostomía , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Técnicas de Sutura , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Delayed operative intervention in the setting of adhesive bowel obstruction has been recently shown to increase the rate of surgical site infection (SSI), raising the concern for bacterial translocation. The effect of obstruction on SSI rate in patients with ventral hernia is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the association between bowel obstruction and SSI in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective database review. Patients undergoing isolated VHR from 2005-2011 were identified from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Demographics, comorbidities, and 30-d outcomes were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was used for variables with a P value of <0.1. RESULTS: A total of 68,811 patients underwent isolated VHR; 53.1% were male with mean age of 53 ± 15 y and body mass index of 32 ± 8. Hernia-related obstruction was found in 17,058 (24.8%). In patients with obstruction, SSI was more frequent (3.2% versus 2.6%, P < 0.001). Obesity, advanced age, vascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal disease, and diabetes were more prevalent. After controlling for confounding baseline variables, bowel obstruction was not independently associated with SSI (odds ratio, 0.983, 95% confidence interval, 0.872-1.107). Subgroup analysis of clean classified cases also demonstrated the lack of independent association between obstruction and SSI. CONCLUSIONS: Obstruction in patients undergoing VHR is not independently associated with SSI. Our results suggest that mesh implantation remains a viable option in this setting. Other confounding comorbid conditions should be assessed at the time of surgical intervention to identify patients appropriate for mesh repair.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Obstrucción Intestinal/complicaciones , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hernia Ventral/complicaciones , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common general surgical procedures performed. Conversion to an open procedure (CTO) is associated with increased morbidity and length of stay. Patients presenting with acute cholecystitis are at higher risk for CTO. Studies have attempted to examine risk factors for CTO in patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis but are limited by small sample size. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative variables that predict higher risk for CTO in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis from 2005-2011 were identified from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File. Patients who underwent successful laparoscopic surgery were compared with those who required CTO. Demographics, comorbidities, and 30-d outcomes were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used for variables with P value <0.1, with CTO used as the dependent variable. RESULTS: A total of 7242 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. CTO was reported in 436 patients (6.0%). Those who required conversion were older (60.7 ± 16.2 versus 51.6 ± 18.0, P = 0.0001) and mean body mass index was greater (30.8 ± 7.6 versus 30.0 ± 7.3, P = 0.033) compared with those whose procedure was completed laparoscopically. Vascular, cardiac, renal, pulmonary, neurologic, hepatic disease, diabetes, and bleeding disorders were more prevalent in CTO patients. Mortality (2.3% versus 0.7%, P < 0.0001), overall morbidity (21.8% versus 6.0%, P < 0.0001), serious morbidity (14.9% versus 3.8%, P < 0.0001), reoperation (3.4% versus 1.4%, P = 0.001), and surgical site infection (9.2% versus 1.8%, P < 0.0001) rates, as well as length of stay (8.6 ± 13.0 versus 3.4 ± 6.7, P < 0.0001) were greater in those requiring CTO. The following factors were independently associated with CTO: age (odds ratio [OR], 1.01, P = 0.015), male gender (OR, 1.77, P = 0.005), body mass index (OR, 1.04, P < 0.0001), preoperative alkaline phosphatase (OR, 1.01, P = 0.0005), white blood cell count (OR, 1.06, P = 0.0001), and albumin (OR, 0.52, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CTO for acute cholecystitis remains low but not clinically negligible. The identified risk factors can potentially guide management and patient selection for delayed intervention for acute cholecystitis.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is an accelerated effort to reduce hospital readmissions despite minimal data detailing risk factors associated with this outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data from January 1, 2011-December 31, 2011, evaluating all patients undergoing one of 34 targeted operative procedures across all surgical specialties. Multivariate regression models of risk for readmission were developed including targeted procedure codes, demographic variables, preoperative variables, intraoperative variables, and postoperative adverse events. Our main outcome measure was hospital readmission. RESULTS: A total of 217, 389 patients met study inclusion criteria. Minimal associations existed between patient factors and risk of readmission. Adverse events including unplanned operating room return (odds ratio [OR] 8.5; confidence interval [CI] 8.0-9.0), pulmonary embolism (OR 8.2; CI 7.1-9.6), deep incisional infection (OR 7.5; CI 6.7-8.5), and organ space infection (OR 5.8; CI 5.3-6.3) were associated with increased risk of readmission. Our data suggest the type of procedure performed is significantly associated with risk of readmission. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed procedures, involving the pancreas, rectum, bladder, and lower extremity vascular bypass, were associated with the highest risk of readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications demonstrated stronger association with readmission than patient factors. Focused analysis of higher risk procedures may provide insight into strategies for risk reduction.
Asunto(s)
Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Complete obstruction of the distal colon or rectum often presents as a surgical emergency. This study evaluated the efficacy of blowhole colostomy versus transverse loop colostomy for the emergent management of distal large intestinal obstruction. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all colostomy procedures (CPT 44320) performed for complete distal large bowel obstruction during the past 6 y in a university hospital practice was undertaken. Blowhole was compared with loop colostomy with a primary endpoint of successful colonic decompression. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one patients underwent colostomy creation during the study period. Of these, 61 were completed for acute obstruction of the distal colon or rectum (19 blowhole versus 42 loop colostomy). No differences between study groups were seen in age, gender, body mass index, malnutrition, American Society of Anesthesiology class, time to liquid or regular diet, 30-d or inhospital mortality, or rates of complications. Patients undergoing blowhole colostomy had significantly higher cecal diameters at diagnosis (9.14 versus 7.31 cm, P = 0.0035). Operative time was shorter in blowhole procedures (43 versus 51 min, P = 0.017). Postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter for blowhole colostomy (6 versus 8 d, P = 0.014). The primary endpoint of successful colonic decompression was met in all colostomy patients. CONCLUSIONS: Diverting blowhole colostomy is a safe, quick, and effective procedure for the urgent management of distal colonic obstruction associated with obstipation and massive distention.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Colostomía/métodos , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades del Colon/etiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sepsis and subsequent multiorgan system failure is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is a cytokine that can be produced by keratinocytes and epithelial cells. Primarily, TSLP has been shown to promote counter-inflammatory processes. However, its potential expression or role in the pathogenesis of sepsis is largely unexplored. We hypothesized that TSLP is expressed during sepsis and TSLP blockade would alter the immune response and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice underwent cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) to produce a physiologically relevant murine model for sepsis. Cohorts were either treated with neutralizing TSLP antibodies or isotype controls before the CLP to determine changes in survival, bacterial loads, cytokine levels, and neutrophil function. RESULTS: It was observed that TSLP levels peaked at 6 h and remained detectable up to 48 h after CLP. Mice pretreated with neutralizing TSLP showed decreased mortality and bacterial load after CLP. Additionally, we determined that septic mice pretreated with the anti-TSLP antibody had increased tumor necrosis factor alpha and oxidative burst as well as increased interleukin 17 and neutrophil numbers compared with mice pretreated with isotype controls. CONCLUSIONS: TSLP levels peak early but are sustained during the first 48 h of sepsis. We speculate that TSLP blunts the neutrophil response resulting in increased bacterial load and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Citocinas/inmunología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Sepsis/inmunología , Sepsis/mortalidad , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Bacteriemia/inmunología , Bacteriemia/metabolismo , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Ciego/lesiones , Citocinas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Masculino , Ratones Endogámicos , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/inmunología , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/metabolismo , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/mortalidad , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Estallido Respiratorio/efectos de los fármacos , Estallido Respiratorio/inmunología , Sepsis/metabolismo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Linfopoyetina del Estroma TímicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Administrators have focused on decreasing postoperative readmissions for cost reduction without fully understanding their preventability. This study describes the development and implementation of a surgeon-led readmission review process that assessed preventability. METHODS: A gastrointestinal surgical group at a tertiary referral hospital developed and implemented a template to analyze inpatient and outpatient readmissions. Monthly stakeholder assessments reviewed and categorized readmissions as potentially preventable or not preventable. Continuous variables were examined by the Student's t test and reported as means and standard deviations. Categorical variables were examined by the Pearson χ2 statistic and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: There were 61 readmission events after 849 inpatient operations (7.2%) and 16 after 856 outpatient operations (1.9%), the latter of which were all classified as potentially preventable. Colorectal procedures represented 65.6% of readmissions despite being only 37.2% of all cases. The majority (67.2%) of readmission events were not preventable. Compared to the not-preventable group, the potentially preventable group experienced more dehydration (30.0% vs 9.8%, P = .045) and ileostomy creation (78.6% vs 33.3%, P = .017). The potential for outpatient management to prevent readmission was significantly higher in the potentially preventable group (40.0% vs 0.0%, P < .001), as was premature discharge prevention (35.0% vs 0.0%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The use of the standardized template developed for analyzing readmission events after inpatient and outpatient procedures identified a disparate potential for readmission prevention. This finding suggests that a singular focus on readmission reduction is misguided, with further work needed to evaluate and implement appropriate quality-based strategies.
Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente InvasivosRESUMEN
To describe an obstetrics and gynecology residency robotic curriculum, facilitated by a web-based feedback and case-tracking tool, allowing for self-selection into advanced training. Phase I (Basic) was required for all residents and included online training modules, online assessment, and robotic bedside assistant dry lab. Phase II (Advanced) was elective console training. Before live surgery, 10 simulation drills completed to proficiency were required. A web-based tool was used for surgical feedback and case-tracking. Online assessments, drill reports, objective GEARS assessments, subjective feedback, and case-logs were reviewed (7/2018-6/2019). A satisfaction survey was reviewed. Twenty four residents completed Phase I training and 10 completed Phase II. To reach simulation proficiency, residents spent a median of 4.1 h performing required simulation drills (median of 10 (3, 26) attempts per drill) before live surgery. 128 post-surgical feedback entries were completed after performance as bedside assistant (75%, n = 96) and console surgeon (5.5%, n = 7). The most common procedure was hysterectomy 111/193 (58%). Resident console surgeons performed portions of 32 cases with a mean console time of 34.6 ± 19.5 min. Mean GEARS score 20.6 ± 3.7 (n = 28). Mean non-technical feedback results: communication (4.2 ± 0.8, n = 61), workload management (3.9 ± 0.9, n = 54), team skills (4.3 ± 0.8, n = 60). Residents completing > 50% of case assessed as "apprentice" 38.5% or "competent" 23% (n = 13). After curriculum change, 100% of surveyed attendings considered residents prepared for live surgical training, vs 17% (n = 6) prior to curriculum change [survey response rate 27/44 (61%)]. Attendings and residents were satisfied with curriculum; 95% and recommended continued use 90% (n = 19).This two-phase robotic curriculum allows residents to self-select into advanced training, alleviating many challenges of graduated robotic training.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Femenino , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Retroalimentación , Curriculum , Competencia Clínica , InternetRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Older adults are at risk for adverse outcomes after trauma, but little is known about post-acute survival as state and national trauma registries collect only inpatient or 30-day outcomes. This study investigates long-term, out-of-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients. METHODS: Level I Trauma Center registry data were matched to the US Social Security Death Index (SSDI) to determine long-term and out-of-hospital outcomes of older patients. Blunt trauma patients aged ≥65 were identified from 2009 to 2015 in an American College of Surgeons Level 1 Trauma Center registry, n = 6289 patients with an age range 65-105 years, mean age 78.5 ± 8.4 years. Dates of death were queried using social security numbers and unique patient identifiers. Demographics, injury, treatments, and outcomes were compared using descriptive and univariate statistics. RESULTS: Of 6289 geriatric trauma patients, 505 (8.0%) died as an inpatient following trauma. Fall was the most common mechanism of injury (n = 4757, 76%) with mortality rate of 46.5% at long-term follow-up; motor vehicle crash (MVC) (n = 1212, 19%) had long-term mortality of 27.6%. Overall, 24.1% of patients died within 1 year of trauma. Only 8 of 488 patients who died between 1 and 6 months post-trauma were inpatient. Mortality rate varied by discharge location: 25.1% home, 36.4% acute rehabilitation, and 51.5% skilled nursing facility, P < .0001. CONCLUSION: Inpatient and 30-day mortality rates in national outcome registries fail to fully capture the burden of trauma on older patients. Though 92% of geriatric trauma patients survived to discharge, almost one-quarter had died by 1 year following their injuries.
Asunto(s)
Heridas y Lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización , Alta del Paciente , Accidentes por Caídas , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: CXC chemokines mediate hepatic inflammation and injury following ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). More recently, signaling through CXC chemokine receptor-2 (CXCR2) was shown to delay liver recovery and repair after I/R injury. The chemokine receptor CXCR1 shares ligands with CXCR2, yet nothing is known about its potential role in liver pathology. In the present study, we examined the role of CXCR1 in the injury and recovery responses to I/R using a murine model. CXCR1 expression was undetectable in livers of sham-operated mice. However, after ischemia CXCR1 expression increased 24 hours after reperfusion and was maximal after 96 hours of reperfusion. CXCR1 expression was localized largely to hepatocytes. In order to assess the function of CXCR1, CXCR2(-/-) mice were treated with the CXCR1/CXCR2 antagonist, repertaxin. Prophylactic treatment with repertaxin had no effect on acute inflammation or liver injury. However, when repertaxin was administered 24 hours postreperfusion there was a significant increase in hepatocellular injury and a delay in recovery compared to control-treated mice. CXCR1(-/-) mice also demonstrated delayed recovery and regeneration after I/R when compared to wild-type mice. In vitro, hepatocytes from CXCR2(-/-) mice that were stimulated to express CXCR1 showed increased proliferation in response to ligand. Hepatocyte proliferation was decreased in CXCR1(-/-) mice in vivo. CONCLUSION: This is the first report to show that CXCR1 expression is induced in hepatocytes after injury. Furthermore, the data suggest that CXCR1 has divergent effects from CXCR2 and appears to facilitate repair and regenerative responses after I/R injury.
Asunto(s)
Hepatocitos/metabolismo , Hepatopatías/fisiopatología , Hígado/metabolismo , Receptores de Interleucina-8A/biosíntesis , Daño por Reperfusión/fisiopatología , Animales , Regeneración Hepática/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Receptores de Interleucina-8A/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Interleucina-8A/deficiencia , Receptores de Interleucina-8B/antagonistas & inhibidores , SulfonamidasRESUMEN
Sepsis is a highly lethal disorder characterized by widespread apoptosis-induced depletion of immune cells and the development of a profound immunosuppressive state. IL-7 is a potent antiapoptotic cytokine that enhances immune effector cell function and is essential for lymphocyte survival. In this study, recombinant human IL-7 (rhIL-7) efficacy and potential mechanisms of action were tested in a murine peritonitis model. Studies at two independent laboratories showed that rhIL-7 markedly improved host survival, blocked apoptosis of CD4 and CD8 T cells, restored IFN-gamma production, and improved immune effector cell recruitment to the infected site. Importantly, rhIL-7 also prevented a hallmark of sepsis (i.e., the loss of delayed-type hypersensitivity), which is an IFN-gamma- and T cell-dependent response. Mechanistically, rhIL-7 significantly increased the expression of the leukocyte adhesion markers LFA-1 and VLA-4, consistent with its ability to improve leukocyte function and trafficking to the infectious focus. rhIL-7 also increased the expression of CD8. The potent antiapoptotic effect of rhIL-7 was due to increased Bcl-2, as well as to a dramatic decrease in sepsis-induced PUMA, a heretofore unreported effect of IL-7. If additional animal studies support its efficacy in sepsis and if current clinical trials continue to confirm its safety in diverse settings, rhIL-7 should be strongly considered for clinical trials in sepsis.