Investigation of the interactions between methadone and elvitegravir-cobicistat in subjects receiving chronic methadone maintenance.

Interactions between HIV and opioid dependence therapies are known to occur. We sought to determine if such interactions occurred between methadone and elvitegravir boosted with cobicistat (EVG/COBI). We performed a within-subject open-label pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of 11 HIV-seronegative subjects stabilized on at least 2 weeks of methadone. Subjects underwent baseline and steady-state evaluation of the effect of elvitegravir 150 mg once a day (QD) boosted with 150 mg QD of cobicistat (EVG/COBI) on methadone pharmacokinetic parameters. Safety and pharmacodynamics were monitored throughout the study. Compared to baseline values, the R-methadone mean area under the concentration-time curve to the end of the dosing period (AUCtau) (5,550 versus 6,210 h · ng/ml) and mean maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) (316 versus 337 ng/ml) did not significantly increase in the presence of EVG/COBI. Compared to baseline values, the S-methadone mean AUCtau (7,040 versus 7,540 h · ng/ml) and mean Cmax (446 versus 452 ng/ml) did not significantly increase in the presence of EVG/COBI. The AUCtau, Cmax, and Ctau of elvitegravir and cobicistat did not significantly differ from those of historical controls. Opioid withdrawal or overdose was not observed among subjects in this study. The addition of EVG/COBI to stabilized patients receiving methadone did not affect methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. These two agents can be safely coadministered.

The penetration of anti-infectives into the central nervous system.

The blood-brain barrier, blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier, and meninges are a complex and difficult-to-study system charged with protecting the central nervous system (CNS) from toxins, including drugs. Current estimates of CNS drug exposure are limited to CSF to blood ratios, of which area-under-the curve (AUC) estimates provide the most robust measure of drug exposure. Different classes of drugs and individual drugs within classes have different CNS penetration potential that is dependent upon a variety of biologic and pharmacologic factors. Clinical data (AUC and point ratios) regarding the penetration of several anti-infective agents used for the treatment of CNS infections are provided in this article.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GS-9350: a novel pharmacokinetic enhancer without anti-HIV activity.

GS-9350 is a new chemical entity under development as a potent, mechanism-based inhibitor of human cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) isoforms. Its intended use is to increase the systemic exposure of coadministered agents that are metabolized by CYP3A enzymes. Unlike ritonavir, which is in current clinical use for this purpose, GS-9350 is devoid of anti-HIV activity. The pharmacokinetics of GS-9350 and its efficacy in increasing systemic exposure of the probe CYP3A substrate midazolam were examined in a study involving single- and multiple-dose escalations of GS-9350 from 50 to 400 mg. Single-dose escalation from 50 to 400 mg resulted in a 164-fold increase in GS-9350 exposure, whereas multiple-dose escalation in the dosage range of 50-300 mg resulted in a 47-fold increase in exposure. GS-9350 potently inhibited midazolam apparent clearance (95% reduction), similar in effect to ritonavir 100 mg. GS-9350 was generally well tolerated at all doses, and there was no evidence of dose-limiting toxicity. Establishing proof-of-concept, GS-9350 is currently under phase II development as a potential alternative to ritonavir for use with antiretroviral agents (including the HIV integrase inhibitor elvitegravir) that are often prescribed along with a "booster" drug.

Dose-response of ritonavir on hepatic CYP3A activity and elvitegravir oral exposure.

Ritonavir, a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 isoform 3A (CYP3A) activity, is frequently used to boost the effects of protease inhibitors at doses of 100-400 mg per day; however, human data regarding the optimal dose required for boosting are limited. This study systematically evaluated the ritonavir dose-response relationship on presystemic and systemic CYP3A metabolism using the human immunodeficiency virus integrase inhibitor elvitegravir and midazolam as probe substrates. Ritonavir administered once daily with elvitegravir exhibited nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with a 119-fold increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval over a 20- to 200-mg dose range. The 20-mg dose of ritonavir substantially reduced CYP3A-mediated clearance (CL), as evidenced by a 66% reduction in midazolam CL that plateaued to 17% of baseline activity at a 100-mg dose. Maximum inhibition of elvitegravir apparent oral CL was achieved with ritonavir doses of 50-100 mg. Elvitegravir and ritonavir were generally well tolerated in this study. These data provide a critical understanding of ritonavir's dose-response relationship for inhibition of CYP3A activity in humans.

Pharmacokinetic study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate combined with rifampin in healthy volunteers.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF) was studied in combination with rifampin in 24 healthy subjects in a multiple-dose, open-label, single-group, two-period study. All subjects were given tenofovir DF at 300 mg once a day (QD) from days 1 to 10 (period 1). From days 11 to 20 the subjects received tenofovir DF at 300 mg combined with rifampin at 600 mg QD (period 2). The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of tenofovir (day 10 and 20) and rifampin (day 20) were assessed. The drug-related adverse events (AEs) experienced during this study were mostly mild. Only one grade 3 AE possibly or probably related to the treatment (raised liver enzyme levels) occurred during period 2; the subject was withdrawn from the study. Pharmacokinetic data for 23 subjects were thus evaluable. Point estimates for the mean ratios of tenofovir with rifampin versus tenofovir alone for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC(0-24)), the maximum concentration of drug in plasma (C(max)), and the minimum concentration of drug in plasma (C(min)) were 0.88, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively. The 90% classical confidence intervals for AUC(0-24), C(max), and C(min) were 0.84 to 0.92, 0.78 to 0.90, and 0.80 to 0.91, respectively, thus suggesting pharmacokinetic equivalence. Similarly, coadministration of rifampin and tenofovir DF did not result in changes in the values of the tenofovir pharmacokinetic parameters. For rifampin, the values of the pharmacokinetic parameters found in this study were comparable to those found in the literature, indicating that tenofovir DF has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of rifampin. In conclusion, adaptation of either the rifampin or the tenofovir DF dose for the simultaneous treatment of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in HIV-infected patients is probably not required.

Phase i/ii trial of the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antiretroviral activity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults.

Tenofovir DF is an antiviral nucleotide with activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The pharmacokinetics, safety, and activity of oral tenofovir DF in HIV-1-infected adults were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, escalating-dose study of four doses (75, 150, 300, and 600 mg given once daily). Subjects received a single dose of tenofovir DF or a placebo, followed by a 7-day washout period. Thereafter, subjects received their assigned study drug once daily for 28 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were dose proportional and demonstrated no change with repeated dosing. Reductions in plasma HIV-1 RNA were dose related at tenofovir DF doses of 75 to 300 mg, but there was no increase in virus suppression between the 300- and 600-mg dose cohorts, despite dose-proportional increases in drug exposure. Grade III or IV adverse events were limited to laboratory abnormalities, including elevated creatine phosphokinase and liver function tests, which resolved with or without drug discontinuation and without sequelae. No patients developed detectable sequence changes in the reverse transcriptase gene.