Impact of using the International Risk Scoring Tool on the cost-utility of palivizumab for preventing severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in Canadian moderate-to-late preterm infants.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-utility of palivizumab versus no prophylaxis in preventing severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in Canadian moderate-to-late preterm (32-35 weeks' gestational age) infants using an (i) International Risk Scoring Tool (IRST) and (ii) Canadian RST (CRST). METHODS: A decision tree was developed to assess cost-utility. Infants assessed at moderate- and high-risk of RSV-related hospitalization (RSVH) by the IRST or CRST received palivizumab or no prophylaxis and then progressed to either (i) RSVH; (ii) emergency room/outpatient medically attended RSV-infection (MARI) or (iii) were uninfected/non-medically attended. Infants admitted to intensive care could incur mortality (0.43%). Respiratory morbidity was accounted in all uninfected surviving infants for 6 years or 18 years (RSVH/MARI). Palivizumab efficacy (72.2% RSVH reduction) and hospital outcomes were from the Canadian CARESS, PICNIC and RSV-Quebec studies. Palivizumab costs (50 mg: CAN$752; 100 mg: $1,505) were calculated from Canadian birth statistics combined with a growth algorithm. Healthcare/payer and societal costs (May 2022; 1.5% discounting) were included. RESULTS: Cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was $29,789 with the IRST (0.79 probability of being <$50,000) and $15,833 with the CRST (0.96 probability). The model was most sensitive to utility scores, long-term sequelae and palivizumab cost. Vial sharing improved the incremental cost-utility ratio (IRST: $22,319; CRST: $9,231). CONCLUSIONS: Palivizumab was highly cost-effective (vs no prophylaxis) in Canadian moderate-to-late preterm infants using either the IRST or CRST. The IRST has fewer risk factors than the CRST (3 vs 7, respectively), captures more potential RSVHs (85% vs 54%) and provides another option to guide cost-effective RSV prophylaxis in Canada.

A new cost-utility analysis assessing risk factor-guided prophylaxis with palivizumab for the prevention of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in Italian infants born at 29-35 weeks' gestational age.

Since the last Italian cost-utility assessment of palivizumab in 2009, new data on the burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and an International Risk Scoring Tool (IRST) have become available. The objective of this study was to provide an up-to-date cost-utility assessment of palivizumab versus no prophylaxis for the prevention of severe RSV infection in otherwise healthy Italian infants born at 29-31 weeks' gestational age (wGA) infants and those 32-35wGA infants categorized as either moderate- or high-risk of RSV-hospitalization (RSVH) by the IRST. A decision tree was constructed in which infants received palivizumab or no prophylaxis and then could experience: i) RSVH; ii) emergency room medically-attended RSV-infection (MARI); or, iii) remain uninfected/non-medically attended. RSVH cases that required intensive care unit admission could die (0.43%). Respiratory morbidity was considered in all surviving infants up to 18 years of age. Hospitalization rates were derived from Italian data combined with efficacy from the IMpact-RSV trial. Palivizumab costs were calculated from vial prices (50mg: €490.37 100mg: €814.34) and Italian birth statistics combined with a growth algorithm. A lifetime horizon and healthcare and societal costs were included. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was €14814 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained in the whole population (mean: €15430; probability of ICUR being <€40000: 0.90). The equivalent ICURs were €15139 per QALY gained (€15915; 0.89) for 29-31wGA infants and €14719 per QALY gained (€15230; 0.89) for 32-35wGA infants. The model was most sensitive to rates of long-term sequelae, utility scores, palivizumab cost, and palivizumab efficacy. Palivizumab remained cost-effective in all scenario analyses, including a scenario wherein RSVH infants received palivizumab without a reduction in long-term sequelae and experienced a 6-year duration of respiratory morbidity (ICUR: €27948 per QALY gained). In conclusion, palivizumab remains cost-effective versus no prophylaxis in otherwise healthy Italian preterm infants born 29-35wGA. The IRST can help guide cost-effective use of palivizumab in 32-35wGA infants.

Identifying the research, advocacy, policy and implementation needs for the prevention and management of respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection in low- and middle-income countries.

Introduction: The high burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in young children disproportionately occurs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The PROUD (Preventing RespiratOry syncytial virUs in unDerdeveloped countries) Taskforce of 24 RSV worldwide experts assessed key needs for RSV prevention in LMICs, including vaccine and newer preventive measures. Methods: A global, survey-based study was undertaken in 2021. An online questionnaire was developed following three meetings of the Taskforce panellists wherein factors related to RSV infection, its prevention and management were identified using iterative questioning. Each factor was scored, by non-panellists interested in RSV, on a scale of zero (very-low-relevance) to 100 (very-high-relevance) within two scenarios: (1) Current and (2) Future expectations for RSV management. Results: Ninety questionnaires were completed: 70 by respondents (71.4% physicians; 27.1% researchers/scientists) from 16 LMICs and 20 from nine high-income (HI) countries (90.0% physicians; 5.0% researchers/scientists), as a reference group. Within LMICs, RSV awareness was perceived to be low, and management was not prioritised. Of the 100 factors scored, those related to improved diagnosis particularly access to affordable point-of-care diagnostics, disease burden data generation, clinical and general education, prompt access to new interventions, and engagement with policymakers/payers were identified of paramount importance. There was a strong need for clinical education and local data generation in the lowest economies, whereas upper-middle income countries were more closely aligned with HI countries in terms of current RSV service provision. Conclusion: Seven key actions for improving RSV prevention and management in LMICs are proposed.

Substituting Doxorubicin with nonpegylated liposomal Doxorubicin for the treatment of early breast cancer: results of a retrospective study.

Introduction. Evidence from the metastatic setting suggests that replacing conventional doxorubicin with nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) for early breast cancer may maintain efficacy whilst reducing long-term cardiotoxicity, an important consideration with many patients going on to receive multiple lines of treatment. Methods. Consecutive patients with early breast cancer treated with NPLD were assessed for disease progression and changes in cardiac function according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results. Ninety-seven patients (median age at diagnosis 51 (32-76) years) were studied. The majority received NPLD (60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)) adjuvantly (79.4%) and in sequence with a taxane (79.4%; docetaxel 75 mg/m(2)). 80.4% had radiotherapy and 15.5% received trastuzumab. Mean time to disease recurrence was 87.0 months (80.7-93.2 [95% confidence interval]) and 5-year disease-free survival was 86.0%. Mean LVEF values remained within the normal range of ≥55% during treatment and throughout the cardiac follow-up period (median 7 months, range 1-21 months). Use of trastuzumab and age at diagnosis did not appear to influence LVEF. Conclusion. NPLD appeared to be a well-tolerated substitute for conventional doxorubicin in patients with early breast cancer.

Multicenter experience of nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin use in the management of metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the use of nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) in the management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) within routine UK clinical practice and to assess its efficacy and tolerability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients that received NPLD for MBC at 5 institutions were identified. Clinicopathologic details, echocardiographic data, and toxicities were documented. Response to treatment, outcome, cardiotoxicity, and safety were assessed. RESULTS: 63 patients (median age at NPLD therapy, 53.5 years) who had received NPLD were identified; 18 (29%) were anthracycline-naïve, and 42 (67%) were anthracycline-pretreated (median cumulative dose of epirubicin, 450 mg/m(2)). In 3 cases, prior treatment history was not available. NPLD was most frequently (16 [25%] of 63 patients) administered as first-line chemotherapy (median, third-line; range, 1-9), although it was given later in anthracycline-pretreated patients (median, fourth-line; range, 1-9). Overall, 14 (29%) of 49 evaluable patients achieved an objective response, which increased to 10 (71%) of 14 when NPLD was given first-line (anthracycline-naïve, 8 [100%] of 8; anthracycline-pretreated, 2 [50%] of 4; adjuvant treatment unknown, 2). Median progression-free survival was 7 months (first-line, 18 months, vs. ≥ second-line, 6 months; P = .0066), and median overall survival was 10 months (first-line, 18 months, vs. ≥ second-line, 10 months; P = .0971). Toxicities tended to be grade 1 or 2. Three patients had cardiotoxicity (left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% or a fall of ≥ 10% from baseline), which resolved during treatment. CONCLUSION: NPLD was used in both anthracycline-naïve patients and those with prior exposure. There is evidence of clinical activity in those with prior exposure to anthracyclines, with a low incidence of cardiotoxicity.

Cost-minimisation analysis of subcutaneous methotrexate versus biologic therapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an insufficient response or intolerance to oral methotrexate.

This study aims to model the economic impact of subcutaneous methotrexate (SC MTX) or a biologic over a 12-month period using a hypothetical population of rheumatoid arthritis patients who failed to tolerate or respond to oral MTX and were suitable candidates for biologic therapy. A decision-based model was developed using current National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance to determine the management of this hypothetical UK population. Published data on the continuation rates of SC MTX and biologics were used to compare the costs of the two treatment options. The economic model used a cost-minimisation methodology from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective, with the cost of all drugs and resources being estimated on this basis. Sensitivity analyses were also performed to determine the effects of changing key assumptions on the mean cost differences. The routine use of SC MTX following oral MTX failure has the potential to save an estimated £7,197 per patient in the first year of therapy and £9.3m per year nationally in new patients. Sensitivity analyses support the robustness of the results. The results of this study suggest that routine use of SC MTX following oral MTX failure has the potential to provide considerable savings to the NHS through optimised use of MTX first-line therapy. It is proposed, therefore, that patients should start on oral MTX with a subsequent switch to SC MTX in the case of an insufficient response or tolerability issues, before introducing a biologic agent.