Unlicensed Umbilical Cord Blood Units Provide a Safe and Effective Graft Source for a Diverse Population: A Study of 2456 Umbilical Cord Blood Recipients.

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation (UCBT) is a curative procedure for patients with hematologic malignancies and genetic disorders and expands access to transplantation for non-Caucasian patients unable to find a fully matched unrelated donor. In 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration required that unrelated UCBT be performed using either licensed UCB or unlicensed UCB under the Investigational New Drug (IND) program. The National Marrow Donor Program manages an IND under which 2456 patients (1499 adults and 957 children, 564 with malignant diseases and 393 with nonmalignant diseases) underwent single or double UCBT between October 2011 and December 2016. The median patient age was 31 years (range, <1 to 81 years), and 50% of children and 36% of adults were non-Caucasian. The median time to neutrophil engraftment (ie, absolute neutrophil count ≥500/mm3) was 22 days for adults, 20 days for pediatric patients with malignant diseases, and 19 days for pediatric patients with nonmalignant diseases, with corresponding rates of engraftment at 42 days of 89%, 88%, and 90%. In these 3 groups of patients, the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV was 35%, 32%, and 24%; the incidence of chronic GVHD was 24%, 26%, and 24%; and 1-year overall survival (OS) was 57%, 71%, and 79%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, younger age, lower Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index, early-stage chemotherapy-sensitive disease, and higher performance score were predictive of improved OS for adults. In a subset analysis of children with malignancies undergoing single UCBT, the use of either licensed UCB (n = 48) or unlicensed UCB (n = 382) was associated with similar engraftment and survival. The use of unlicensed UCB units is safe and effective and provides an important graft source for a diverse population.

Top 10 Facts You Need to Know About Synthetic Cannabinoids: Not So Nice Spice.

In April and May 2015, the state of Mississippi experienced an unprecedented outbreak of severe reactions to the drug commonly referred to as "Spice." After numerous calls to the Poison Control Center, it became clear that health care providers were largely unfamiliar with the category of synthetic cannabinoids. This review article briefly highlights cannabinoid effects, chemical characteristics, and treatment for this often-dangerous category of drugs of abuse.

Recognition, treatment, and prevention of anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis is an acute and potentially lethal multisystem allergic reaction that occurs in a variety of clinical scenarios and is almost unavoidable. Immunologic reactions to medications, foods, and insect stings cause most episodes, but virtually any substance capable of inducing systemic degranulation of mast cells and basophils can produce anaphylaxis. All health care professionals must be able to recognize anaphylaxis promptly, be prepared to treat it appropriately, and be able to provide preventive recommendations. Similarly, at-risk individuals must be prepared to self-treat anaphylaxis promptly if prevention fails.

Pharmacotherapy in refractory anaphylaxis: when intramuscular epinephrine fails.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to provide an evidence-based overview of several pharmacotherapeutic options available for refractory anaphylaxis when intramuscular epinephrine, the drug of choice, fails to provide resolution of signs and symptoms. RECENT FINDINGS: The evidence base for the therapy of anaphylaxis is comparatively weak and is largely based on consensus expert recommendations and case reports. There is an increasing recognition that this is problematic. The level of evidence for epinephrine use in anaphylaxis is higher than for other agents. Recent systematic reviews have confirmed the lack of high-grade evidence to support use of antihistamines and corticosteroids in anaphylaxis, both of which statistically continue to be used more frequently than epinephrine. Newer pharmacotherapeutic agents have been proffered, but none has been evaluated with scientific rigor. SUMMARY: Some anaphylactic reactions are so severe that treatment is unsuccessful despite rapid recognition and treatment. Improving the evidence base for the various treatment modalities may further help minimize fatalities once anaphylaxis is recognized. Consensus expert recommendations and case reports suggest a number of pharmacotherapeutic agents that are worthy of high-quality scrutiny through randomized controlled studies in which both treatment and placebo arms receive intramuscular epinephrine injections.