Using Smartphones to Enhance Vision Screening in Rural Areas: Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: While it is treatable, uncorrected refractive error is the number one cause of visual impairment worldwide. This eye condition alone, or together with ocular misalignment, can also cause amblyopia, which is also treatable if detected early but still occurs in about 4% of the population. Mass vision screening is the first and most critical step to address these issues, but due to limited resources, vision screening in many rural areas remains a major challenge. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to pilot-test the feasibility of using smartphone apps to enhance vision screening in areas where access to eye care is limited. METHODS: A vision screening program was piggybacked on a charity summer camp program in a rural county in Sichuan, China. A total of 73 fourth and fifth graders were tested for visual acuity using a standard eye chart and were then tested for refractive error and heterophoria using 2 smartphone apps (a refraction app and a strabismus app, respectively) by nonprofessional personnel. RESULTS: A total of 5 of 73 (6.8%, 95% CI 2.3%-15.3%) students were found to have visual acuity worse than 20/20 (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] 0) in at least one eye. Among the 5 students, 3 primarily had refractive error according to the refraction app. The other 2 students had manifest strabismus (one with 72-prism diopter [PD] esotropia and one with 33-PD exotropia) according to the strabismus app. Students without manifest strabismus were also measured for phoria using the strabismus app in cover/uncover mode. The median phoria was 0.0-PD (IQR 2.9-PD esophoria to 2.2-PD exophoria). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this vision screening study are consistent with findings from other population-based vision screening studies in which conventional tools were used by ophthalmic professionals. The smartphone apps are promising and have the potential to be used in mass vision screenings for identifying risk factors for amblyopia and for myopia control. The smartphone apps may have significant implications for the future of low-cost vision care, particularly in resource-constrained and geographically remote areas.

Infectious eye disease in the 21st century-an overview.

Infectious diseases affecting the eye often cause unilateral or asymmetric visual loss in children and people of working age. This group of conditions includes viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic diseases, both common and rare presentations which, in aggregate, may account for a significant portion of the global visual burden. Diagnosis is frequently challenging even in specialist centres, and many disease presentations are highly regional. In an age of globalisation, an understanding of the various modes of transmission and the geographic distribution of infections can be instructive to clinicians. The impact of eye infections on global disability is currently not sufficiently captured in global prevalence studies on visual impairment and blindness, which focus on bilateral disease in the over-50s. Moreover, in many cases it is hard to differentiate between infectious and immune-mediated diseases. Since infectious eye diseases can be preventable and frequently affect younger people, we argue that in future prevalence studies they should be considered as a separate category, including estimates of disability-adjusted life years (DALY) as a measure of overall disease burden. Numbers of ocular infections are uniquely affected by outbreaks as well as endemic transmission, and their control frequently relies on collaborative partnerships that go well beyond the remit of ophthalmology, encompassing domains as various as vaccination, antibiotic development, individual healthcare, vector control, mass drug administration, food supplementation, environmental and food hygiene, epidemiological mapping, and many more. Moreover, the anticipated impacts of global warming, conflict, food poverty, urbanisation and environmental degradation are likely to magnify their importance. While remote telemedicine can be a useful aide in the diagnosis of these conditions in resource-poor areas, enhanced global reporting networks and artificial intelligence systems may ultimately be required for disease surveillance and monitoring.

Management of Acute Non-Infectious Anterior Uveitis in Adults - Practice Patterns Among Uveitis Specialists in North America.

PURPOSE: This study aims to understand the practice patterns among ophthalmologists in North America who manage patients with acute, non-infectious anterior uveitis. METHODS: An eight-question survey was designed to elucidate the practice patterns of ophthalmologists across various geographic locations and practice settings regarding the management of anterior uveitis. This survey was distributed via the American Uveitis Society and Young Uveitis Specialists email listserv to ophthalmologists who self-identify as uveitis specialists and have a patient population that is at least 30% uveitis. RESULTS: A total of 102 responses were received and analyzed (37% response rate). Respondents practiced predominantly in North America, and 40% had received subspecialty training in uveitis. All respondents chose topical corticosteroid therapy as first-line treatment for acute, unilateral, or bilateral non-infectious idiopathic anterior uveitis. The most common initial frequency for prednisolone acetate administration was six times/day while the patient was awake (29.7%) and patients are typically seen in follow-up within a week (75% of respondents). If there is a lack of treatment response within 2-3 weeks with the initial topical treatment, 42 respondents (41.2%) chose to switch to difluprednate eye drops and 29 (28.4%) recommended switching to oral prednisone. CONCLUSION: Our results show that topical corticosteroid, most frequently prednisolone acetate 1%, is the treatment of choice for patients with acute noninfectious anterior uveitis. Reported initial medication dosing and follow-up care approaches are highly variable, which suggests heterogeneity in practice patterns. Further research on the optimal initial dosing is needed.

The FLuorometholone as Adjunctive MEdical Therapy for Trachomatous Trichiasis Surgery (FLAME) Trial: Study Design.

Purpose: To report the design of FL uorometholone as A djunctive ME dical Therapy for TT Surgery (FLAME) Trial. Design: Parallel design, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial with 1:1 randomization to fluorometholone 0.1% eyedrops twice daily or placebo twice daily for four weeks in eyes undergoing trachomatous trichiasis (TT) surgery; assessing the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of fluorometholone 0.1% in preventing recurrent postoperative trichiasis. Methods: Up to 2500 eligible persons with trachomatous trichiasis (TT) undergoing lid rotation surgery will be enrolled in Jimma zone, Ethiopia. Participants, surgeons, study field staff, and study supervisors leading operational aspects of the trial are masked to treatment assignment. Randomization is stratified by surgeon, which simultaneously stratifies by the district. The study visits are at baseline/enrollment, at four-week post-enrollment, six months, and one year (study exit). The primary outcome is cumulative one-year postoperative TT (PTT) incidence, defined as: ≥1 lashes touching the globe, evidence of epilation, and/or repeat TT surgery. Secondary postoperative outcomes include number of trichiatic lashes, location thereof (touching the cornea or not), evidence of post-operative epilation, entropion, changes in corneal opacity, IOP elevation, need for cataract surgery, visual acuity change from baseline, eyelid contour abnormality, granuloma, eyelid closure defect, and occurrence of adverse events. Health economic analyses center on calculating the incremental cost per case of PTT avoided by fluorometholone treatment. Conclusion: The FLAME Trial is designed to provide evidence of the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of adjunctive topical peri-/postoperative fluorometholone 0.1% therapy with trichiasis surgery, which is hypothesized to reduce the risk of recurrent trichiasis while being acceptably safe. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT04149210.

Antiviral treatment for acute retinal necrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acute retinal necrosis is a progressive intraocular inflammatory syndrome characterized by diffuse necrotizing retinitis that can lead to a poor visual outcome, mainly from retinal detachment. The antiviral treatment approach for acute retinal necrosis varies as there are no established guidelines. We summarize the outcomes of acute retinal necrosis with available antiviral treatments. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar for interventional and observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled proportion of the predefined selected outcomes. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022320987). Thirty-four studies with a total of 963 participants and 1,090 eyes were included in the final analysis. The estimated varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex virus polymerase chain reaction-positive cases were 63% (95% CI: 55-71%) and 35% (95% CI: 28-42%), respectively. The 3 main antiviral treatment approaches identified were oral antivirals alone, intravenous antivirals alone, and a combination of systemic (oral or intravenous) and intravitreal antivirals. The overall pooled estimated proportions of visual acuity improvement, recurrence, and retinal detachment were 37% (95% CI: 27-47%), 14% (95% CI: 8-21%), and 43% (95% CI: 38-50%), respectively. Patients treated with systemic and intravitreal antivirals showed a trend towards better visual outcomes than those treated with systemic antivirals (oral or intravenous) alone, even though this analysis was not statistically significant (test for subgroup differences P = 0.83).

Managing a patient with uveitis in the era of artificial intelligence: Current approaches, emerging trends, and future perspectives.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with healthcare has opened new avenues for diagnosing, treating, and managing medical conditions with remarkable precision. Uveitis, a diverse group of rare eye conditions characterized by inflammation of the uveal tract, exemplifies the complexities in ophthalmology due to its varied causes, clinical presentations, and responses to treatments. Uveitis, if not managed promptly and effectively, can lead to significant visual impairment. However, its management requires specialized knowledge, which is often lacking, particularly in regions with limited access to health services. AI's capabilities in pattern recognition, data analysis, and predictive modelling offer significant potential to revolutionize uveitis management. AI can classify disease etiologies, analyze multimodal imaging data, predict outcomes, and identify new therapeutic targets. However, transforming these AI models into clinical applications and meeting patient expectations involves overcoming challenges like acquiring extensive, annotated datasets, ensuring algorithmic transparency, and validating these models in real-world settings. This review delves into the complexities of uveitis and the current AI landscape, discussing the development, opportunities, and challenges of AI from theoretical models to bedside application. It also examines the epidemiology of uveitis, the global shortage of uveitis specialists, and the disease's socioeconomic impacts, underlining the critical need for AI-driven approaches. Furthermore, it explores the integration of AI in diagnostic imaging and future directions in ophthalmology, aiming to highlight emerging trends that could transform management of a patient with uveitis and suggesting collaborative efforts to enhance AI applications in clinical practice.

Posterior capsular opacification and YAG laser capsulotomy in uveitis patients following cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of visually significant posterior capsule opacification (PCO with visual acuity ≤20/50) and the incidence of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in the year following cataract surgery for uveitic eyes. METHOD: Patients were identified from the Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy for Eye Diseases (SITE) Cohort Study using a standardized chart review process. RESULTS: Among 1,855 uveitic eyes of 1,370 patients who had undergone cataract surgery, visually significant PCO occurred in 297 eyes (16%), and YAG laser capsulotomy was done in 407 eyes (22%) within the first year following surgery. Higher odds of developing 20/50 visual acuity attributed to PCO were noted in children and young adults compared with adults older than 65 years of age (overall p = 0.03). Poorer preoperative visual acuity (overall p = 0.0069) and postoperative inflammation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.37-2.45; p < 0.0001) were associated with PCO incidence. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for YAG laser capsulotomy were younger age groups compared with those older than 65 years of age at the time of surgery (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.90-2.24; 95% CI, 1.90-2.24; overall p = 0.0007), female sex (aOR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.82; p = 0.03), postoperative active inflammation (aOR = 165; 95% CI, 1.27-2.16; overall p < 0.0001), extracapsular cataract extraction compared with phacoemulsification (aOR = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.17-2.47; overall p < 0.0001), and insertion of an intraocular lens (aOR = 4.60; 95% CI, -2.29-9.25; p < 0.0001). Black race was associated with lower YAG laser capsulotomy incidence than Whites (aOR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.52; overall p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Vision-reducing (≤20/50) PCO is common, occurring in about one sixth of uveitic eyes within 1 year of cataract surgery; a higher number (22%) of eyes underwent YAG laser capsulotomy within the first year. Age and postoperative inflammation following cataract surgery are the variables most associated with the incidence of visually significant PCO and YAG laser capsulotomy.

Incidence and Remission of Post-Surgical Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery in Eyes With Intraocular Inflammation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, remission, and relapse of post-surgical cystoid macular edema (PCME) following cataract surgery in inflammatory eye disease. METHODS: A total of 1859 eyes that had no visually significant macular edema prior to cataract surgery while under tertiary uveitis management were included. Standardized retrospective chart review was used to gather clinical data. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for inter-eye correlations were performed. RESULTS: PCME causing VA 20/50 or worse was reported in 286 eyes (15%) within 6 months of surgery. Adults age 18-64 years as compared to children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.42, for ages 18 to 44 years and aOR = 1.93 for ages 45 to 64 years, overall P = .02); concurrent use of systemic immunosuppression (conventional aOR 1.53 and biologics aOR = 2.68, overall P = .0095); preoperative VA 20/50 or worse (overall P < .0001); cataract surgery performed before 2000 (overall P = .03) and PMCE in fellow eye (aOR = 3.04, P = .0004) were associated with development of PCME within 6 months of cataract surgery. PCME resolution was seen in 81% of eyes at 12 months and 91% of eyes at 24 months. CME relapse was seen in 12% eyes at 12 months and 19% eyes at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: PCME occurs frequently in uveitic eyes undergoing cataract surgery; however, most resolve within a year. CME recurrences likely are due to the underlying disease process and not relapses of PCME.