RESUMEN
A 9-point risk assessment identified persons with a history of injection drug use who were safe for discharge. "Low-risk" patients were discharged with outpatient antibiotics; others continued inpatient treatment. Use of the assessment reduced the mean length of stay by 20 days and total direct cost by 33%, creating capacity for an additional 333 patients.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Consumidores de Drogas , Control de Infecciones , Infecciones/epidemiología , Pacientes Internos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The evidence-based beta-blockers carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol succinate reduce mortality and hospitalizations among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Use of these medications is not well described in the general population of patients with HFrEF, especially among patients with potential contraindications. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to describe the patterns of prescription fills for carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol succinate among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HFrEF, as well as to estimate the associations between specific contraindications for beta-blocker therapy and those patterns. METHODS AND RESULTS: With the use of the cohort of 15,205 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HFrEF from 2007 to 2013 in the 5% Medicare random sample, we described prescription fills (30 days after discharge) and dosage patterns (1 year after discharge) for beta-blockers. By means of of Fine and Gray competing risk models, we estimated the associations between potential contraindications (hypotension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], asthma, and syncope) and prescription fill and dosing patterns while adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and health care utilization. For beneficiaries who did not die or readmitted to the hospital, 38% of hospitalizations were followed by a prescription fill for an evidence-based beta-blocker within 30 days, 12% were followed by prescription fills for at least 50% of the recommended dose of an evidence-based beta-blocker within 1 year, and 9% were followed by a prescription fill for an up-titrated dose of an evidence-based beta-blocker within 1 year. The prevalence of the contraindications were 21% for hypotension, 48% for COPD, 15% for asthma, and 12% for syncope. Among beneficiaries who did not fill a prescription for an evidence-based beta-blocker within 30 days, 67% had at least 1 of these contraindications. Hypotension, COPD, and syncope were each associated with a â¼10% lower risk of filling a prescription for an evidence-based beta-blocker. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription fill and up-titration rates for evidence-based beta-blockers are low among Medicare beneficiaries with HFrEF, but contraindications explain only a minor part of these low rates.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicare Part D , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Bisoprolol/uso terapéutico , Carvedilol/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Metoprolol/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Assess the validity of Medicare claims for identifying myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: We used data from 9951 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and above in the Reasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study. Between 2003 and 2012, 669 participants had an MI identified and adjudicated through study procedures (ie, the gold standard), and 552 had an overnight inpatient claim with a code for MI (ICD-9 code 410.x0 or 410.x1) in any discharge diagnosis position. RESULTS: Using Medicare claims with a discharge diagnosis code for MI in any position, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 84.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 80.9%-87.3%] and the sensitivity was 49.0% (95% CI, 44.9%-53.1%). Sensitivity was lower for men (45.8%) versus women (55.1%), microsize MIs (13.7%) versus other MIs (64.7%), type 2 (30.9%), and 4-5 MIs (11.1%) versus type 1 MIs (76.6%), and MIs occurring in-hospital (28.8%) versus out-of-hospital (66.7%). Using Medicare claims with a code for MI in the primary discharge diagnosis position, the PPV was 89.7% (95% CI, 86.3%-92.5%) and sensitivity was 40.1% (95% CI, 36.1%-44.2%). The sensitivity of claims with a code for MI in the primary discharge diagnosis position was lower for microsize versus other MIs, type 2 and 4-5 MIs versus type 1 MIs and MIs occurring in-hospital versus out-of-hospital. Hazard ratios for MI associated with participant characteristics were similar using adjudicated MIs identified through study procedures or claims for MI without further adjudication. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare claims have a high PPV but low sensitivity for identifying MI and can be used to investigate individual-level characteristics associated with MI.
Asunto(s)
Geografía , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/etnología , Grupos Raciales , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/clasificación , Alta del Paciente , Estados Unidos/etnologíaRESUMEN
AIM: To identify the costs of replacing an entire malfunctioning AUS device versus an individual component at the time of device malfunction. METHODS: Decision analysis was performed by analyzing the costs associated with revising a malfunctioning artificial urinary sphincter using one of two techniques: either individual or entire device replacement. Costs were determined by including actual institutional costs. Model assumptions were based on a summary of published literature and were created based on a time horizon of 0-5 years since the original, primary AUS was placed, and models were created for malfunction of each individual component. Sensitivity analysis was done adjusting for costs of the device and failure rates. RESULTS: Total costs to replace an individual component were $8330 for the pump, $7611 for the cuff, and $5599 for the balloon, while entire device replacement cost $15 069. Over a 5-year time horizon the cost per patient for replacement of a balloon, pump, or cuff were $14 407, $17 491, and $15 212, respectively, versus $18 001 if the entire device was replaced. To be less costly to replace the entire device, balloon, pump, and cuff failure rates would need to be >55%, >25%, or >37.5% during the first 2 years after placement. CONCLUSION: In the event of failure of the artificial urinary sphincter, cost analysis demonstrates that removal and replacement of the entire device is more expensive than replacement of a malfunctioning component at any point up to 5 years after initial AUS placement.
Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos/economía , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Esfínter Urinario Artificial/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/economía , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Falla de Equipo/economía , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Reoperación/economía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Compare medical expenditures among adults with statin-associated adverse effects (SAAE) and high statin adherence (HSA) following myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: We analyzed expenditures in 2016 US dollars among Medicare beneficiaries with SAAE (n = 1741) and HSA (n = 55,567) who were ≥ 66 years of age and initiated moderate/high-intensity statins following an MI in 2007-2013. SAAE were identified through a claims-based algorithm, which included down-titrating statins and initiating ezetimibe, switching to ezetimibe monotherapy, having a rhabdomyolysis or antihyperlipidemic adverse event followed by statin down-titration or discontinuation, or switching between ≥ 3 statin types within 365 days following MI. HSA was defined by having a statin available to take for ≥ 80% of the days in the 365 days following MI. RESULTS: Expenditures among beneficiaries with SAAE and HSA were $40,776 (95% CI $38,329-$43,223) and $26,728 ($26,482-$26,974), respectively, in the 365 days following MI, and $34,238 ($31,396-$37,080) and $29,053 ($28,605-$29,500), respectively, for every year after the first 365 days. Multivariable-adjusted ratios comparing expenditures among beneficiaries with SAAE versus HSA in the first 365 days and after the first 365 days following MI were 1.51 (95% CI 1.43-1.59) and 1.23 (1.12-1.34), respectively. Inpatient and outpatient expenditures were higher among beneficiaries with SAAE versus HSA during and after the first 365 days following MI. Compared to beneficiaries with HSA, medication expenditures among those with SAAE were similar in the 365 days following MI, but higher afterwards. Other medical expenditures were higher among beneficiaries with SAAE versus HSA. CONCLUSION: SAAE are associated with increased expenditures following MI compared with HSA.
Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos , Gastos en Salud , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/economía , Beneficios del Seguro/economía , Medicare/economía , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria , Sustitución de Medicamentos/economía , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cause of death is often not available in administrative claims data. OBJECTIVE: To develop claims-based algorithms to identify deaths due to fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD; ie, fatal coronary heart disease [CHD] or stroke), CHD, and stroke. METHODS: Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study data were linked with Medicare claims to develop the algorithms. Events adjudicated by REGARDS study investigators were used as the gold standard. Stepwise selection was used to choose predictors from Medicare data for inclusion in the algorithms. C-index, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were used to assess algorithm performance. Net reclassification index (NRI) was used to compare the algorithms with an approach of classifying all deaths within 28 days following hospitalization for myocardial infarction and stroke to be fatal CVD. RESULTS: Data from 2,685 REGARDS participants with linkage to Medicare, who died between 2003 and 2013, were analyzed. The C-index for discriminating fatal CVD from other causes of death was 0.87. Using a cut-point that provided the closest observed-to-predicted number of fatal CVD events, the sensitivity was 0.64, specificity 0.90, PPV 0.65, and NPV 0.90. The algorithms resulted in positive NRIs compared with using deaths within 28 days following hospitalization for myocardial infarction and stroke. Claims-based algorithms for discriminating fatal CHD and fatal stroke performed similarly to fatal CVD. CONCLUSION: The claims-based algorithms developed to discriminate fatal CVD events from other causes of death performed better than the method of using hospital discharge diagnosis codes.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Medicare , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We studied the frequency and intensity of care for aTRH among participants aged 65 years and older in the US-based REGARDS study linked with Medicare claims. METHODS: Blood pressure (BP) was measured twice and averaged. aTRH was defined by the use of ≥3 classes of antihypertensive medication and uncontrolled BP (UaTRH, systolic/diastolic BP ≥140/90 mmHg), or ≥4 classes with controlled BP (CaTRH). Participants were categorized as not having aTRH (no aTRH), CaTRH or UaTRH. RESULTS: Among 4650 participants with hypertension, 468 (10.1%) had UaTRH, 247 (5.3%) had CaTRH, and 3935 (84.6%) had hypertension but did not have aTRH. For hypertension-related visits, those with UaTRH saw primary care physicians and cardiologists more frequently than those without aTRH (mean primary care visits per year: 2.77 vs 2.27, P<.001; cardiologists: 0.50 vs 0.35, P=.014). Among those with UaTRH, CaTRH, and no aTRH, respectively 73.5%, 68.0%, and 67.5% had >1 hypertension-related visit per year. Among those with UaTRH, males vs females (prevalence ratio=0.78; 95% CI 0.69-0.89), whites vs blacks (0.88; 95% CI 0.78-0.99), and current smokers vs non-smokers (0.66; 95% CI 0.48-0.89) were less likely to receive >1 hypertension-related visit per year. Diagnostic intensity, measured by testing for end organ damage and secondary hypertension, was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Many people with UaTRH are not seen more than once per year for hypertension and may benefit from increased care.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/etiología , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Masculino , Medicare , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We had previously developed an algorithm for Medicare claims data to detect bone metastases associated with breast, prostate, or lung cancer. This study was conducted to examine whether this algorithm accurately documents bone metastases on the basis of diagnosis codes in Medicare claims data. METHODS: We obtained data from Medicare claims and electronic medical records of patients 65 years or older with a breast, prostate, or lung cancer diagnosis at a teaching hospital and/or affiliated clinics during 2005 or 2006. We calculated the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of our algorithm using medical records as the "gold standard." The κ statistic was used to measure agreement between claims and medical record data. RESULTS: The agreement between claims and medical record data for bone metastases among breast, prostate, and lung cancer patients was 0.93, 0.90, and 0.69, respectively. The sensitivities of our algorithm for bone metastasis in patients with breast, prostate, and lung were 96.8% [95% confidence interval (CI)=83.8% to 99.4%], 91.7% (95% CI=78.2% to 97.1%), and 74.1% (95% CI=55.3% to 86.8%), respectively; and the PPVs were 90.9% (95% CI=76.4% to 96.9%), 91.7% (95% CI=78.2% to 97.1%), and 71.4% (95% CI=52.9% to 84.8%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm for detecting bone metastases in claims data had high sensitivity and PPV for breast and prostate cancer patients. Sensitivity and PPV were lower but still moderate for lung cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Medicare/organización & administración , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To measure transarterial chemoembolization utilization and survival benefit among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study identified 37,832 patients with HCC diagnosed between 1991 and 2011. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Propensity-score matching was used to address an imbalance of covariates. RESULTS: More than 75% of patients with HCC did not receive any HCC-directed treatment. Transarterial chemoembolization was the most common initial therapy (15.9%). Factors associated with the use of chemoembolization included younger age, more HCC risk factors, more comorbidities, higher socioeconomic status, intrahepatic tumor, unifocal tumor, vascular invasion, and smaller tumor size (all P < .001). Median survival was improved in patients treated with chemoembolization compared with those not treated with chemoembolization (20.1 vs 4.3 mo; P < .0001). Similar findings were demonstrated in propensity-scoring analysis (14.5 vs 4.2 mo; P < .0001) and immortal time bias sensitivity analysis (9.5 vs 3.6 mo; P < .0001). There was a significantly improved survival hazard ratio (HR) in patients treated with chemoembolization (HR, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCC treated with transarterial chemoembolization experienced a significant survival advantage compared with those not treated with transarterial chemoembolization. More than 75% of SEER/Medicare patients diagnosed with HCC received no identifiable oncologic treatment. There is a significant public health need to increase awareness of efficacious HCC treatments such as transarterial chemoembolization.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/tendencias , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare , Selección de Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Programa de VERF , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For women who have had a previous low transverse cesarean delivery, the decision to undergo a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) or an elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) has important clinical and economic ramifications. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the alternative choices of a TOLAC and an ERCD for women with low-risk, singleton gestation pregnancies. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EconLit, and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry with no language, publication, or date restrictions up until October 2015. Studies were included if they were primary research, compared a TOLAC with an ERCD, and provided information on the relative cost of the alternatives. Abstracts and partial economic evaluations were excluded. RESULTS: Of 310 studies initially reviewed, 7 studies were included in the systematic review. In the base-case analyses, 4 studies concluded that TOLAC was dominant over ERCD, 1 study found ERCD to be dominant, and 2 studies found that although TOLAC was more costly, it offered more benefits and was thus cost-effective from a population perspective when considering societal willingness to pay for better outcomes. In sensitivity analyses, cost-effectiveness was found to be dependent on a high likelihood of TOLAC success, low risk of uterine rupture, and low relative cost of TOLAC compared with ERCD. CONCLUSIONS: For women who are likely to have a successful vaginal delivery, routine ERCD may result in excess morbidity and cost from a population perspective.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea Repetida/economía , Esfuerzo de Parto , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Econométricos , Embarazo , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Less intensive treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) may be appropriate for patients in long-term care settings because of limited life expectancy, frailty, comorbidities, and emphasis on quality of life. METHODS: We compared treatment patterns between REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study participants discharged to long-term care versus home following HFrEF hospitalizations. We examined medical records and Medicare pharmacy claims for 147 HFrEF hospitalizations among 80 participants to obtain information about discharge disposition and medication prescriptions and fills. RESULTS: Discharge to long-term care followed 22 of 147 HFrEF hospitalizations (15%). Participants discharged to long-term care were more likely to be prescribed beta-blockers and less likely to be prescribed aldosterone receptor antagonists and hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate (96%, 14%, and 5%, respectively) compared to participants discharged home (81%, 22%, and 23%, respectively). The percentages of participants discharged to long-term care and home who had claims for filled prescriptions were similar for beta-blockers (68% versus 66%) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARBs) (45% versus 47%) after 1 year. Smaller percentages of participants discharged to long-term care had claims for filled prescriptions of other medications compared to participants discharged home (diuretics: long-term care-50%, home-72%; hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate: long-term care-5%, home-23%; aldosterone receptor antagonists: long-term care-5%, home-23%). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in medication prescriptions and fills among individuals with HFrEF discharged to long-term care versus home may reflect prioritization of some medical therapies over others for patients in long-term care.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización/tendencias , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Grupos Raciales , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etnología , Humanos , Masculino , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Morbilidad/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Treat to target guidelines recommend achieving remission or low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the reduction in adverse events and costs associated with lower disease activity is unclear. METHODS: We used Corrona linked to Medicare data to identify RA patients. Time varying disease activity was measured using Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI); outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, a composite of hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visits, mortality, and medical costs. Outcome-specific Cox proportional models evaluated the adjusted hazard ratios between disease activity and outcomes, controlling for potential confounders including comorbidities grouped into four patient phenotypes. Costs were analyzed with mixed models using a Gaussian distribution with log transformation. RESULTS: Depending on outcome, 4593 RA patients contributed up to 12 001 person years. Median age was 71 years, 75% women. At baseline, approximately 50-60% of patients were in remission or low disease activity. There was a dose-response relationship between RA disease activity (remission, low, moderate, and high) and the incidence of hospitalizations (13.1, 17.8, 21.2, 27.5 per 100 py, respectively); all adjusted hazard ratios were significant: 0.68 (remission), 0.87 (low), and 1.24 (high) compared with moderate disease activity. Similar trends were observed for ED visits and mortality. The crude difference in annual medical costs between remission ($11 145) and moderate disease activity ($17 646) was $-6 500; the adjusted difference (95%CI) was $-3133 (-4737.72, -1528.43). CONCLUSION: Leveraging the benefits of linking registry and administrative data together, lower disease activity in RA was associated with incrementally reduced risks of all-cause hospitalization, ED visits, mortality, and medical costs in a dose-dependent fashion. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/economía , Artritis Reumatoide/economía , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Studies of prognosis following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) conventionally examine the first recurrent coronary heart disease (CHD) event which may not adequately characterize the full burden of CHD hospitalizations. We therefore examined the cumulative number of CHD rehospitalizations following AMI among older adults in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 78,085 Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥66 years without recent CHD history who were hospitalized for AMI in 2000-2010. Counts of CHD rehospitalizations over a maximum of 10 years of follow-up were calculated. Characteristics were assessed through claims and enrollment information and associations with CHD rehospitalizations were evaluated using Poisson models. RESULTS: Over 25 % of beneficiaries were aged ≥85 years, 55 % were women, and 89 % were white. Comorbidities were common, including diabetes (22.9 %), hypertension (46.7 %), heart failure (10.3 %), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (19.2 %). Following AMI, 16,078 beneficiaries (20.6 %) were hospitalized for CHD a total of 23,132 times. Among those who experienced at least one CHD rehospitalization, 35.9 % had ≥2 CHD rehospitalizations (n = 5773, 7.4 % of all beneficiaries with AMI) in the ensuing decade. Associations of demographics, comorbidities, and index hospitalization characteristics with rates of first and total CHD rehospitalizations were largely similar. Age ≥85 years versus 66-69 years was more strongly associated with first (rate ratio [RR] 1.43) than total (RR 1.35) CHD rehospitalization (p < 0.05), as was male versus female sex (RR 1.13 and 1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Emphasizing the first recurrent CHD rehospitalization underestimates the burden of disease experienced among older adults with AMI.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare characteristics of patients with possible statin intolerance identified using different claims-based algorithms versus patients with high adherence to statins. METHODS: We analyzed 134,863 Medicare beneficiaries initiating statins between 2007 and 2011. Statin intolerance and discontinuation, and high adherence to statins, defined by proportion of days covered ≥80 %, were assessed during the 365 days following statin initiation. Definition 1 of statin intolerance included statin down-titration or discontinuation with ezetimibe initiation, having a claim for a rhabdomyolysis or antihyperlipidemic event followed by statin down-titration or discontinuation, or switching between ≥3 types of statins. Definition 2 included beneficiaries who met Definition 1 and those who down-titrated statin intensity. We also analyzed beneficiaries who met Definition 2 of statin intolerance or discontinued statins. RESULTS: The prevalence of statin intolerance was 1.0 % (n = 1320) and 5.2 % (n = 6985) using Definitions 1 and 2, respectively. Overall, 45,266 (33.6 %) beneficiaries had statin intolerance by Definition 2 or discontinued statins and 55,990 (41.5 %) beneficiaries had high adherence to statins. Compared with beneficiaries with high adherence to statins, those with statin intolerance and who had statin intolerance or discontinued statins were more likely to be female versus male, and black, Hispanic or Asian versus white. The multivariable adjusted odds ratio for statin intolerance by Definitions 1 and 2 comparing patients initiating high versus low/moderate intensity statins were 2.82 (95%CI: 2.42-3.29), and 8.58 (8.07-9.12), respectively, and for statin intolerance or statin discontinuation was 2.35 (2.25-2.45). CONCLUSIONS: Definitions of statin intolerance presented herein can be applied to analyses using administrative claims data.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ezetimiba/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rabdomiólisis/inducido químicamente , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medicare claims have been used to study lipid-lowering medication (LLM) use among US adults. METHODS: We analyzed the agreement between Medicare claims for LLM and LLM use indicated by self-report during a telephone interview and, separately, by a medication inventory performed during an in-home study visit upon enrollment into the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. We included REGARDS participants ≥65 years enrolled in 2006-2007 with Medicare pharmacy benefits (Part D) from 120 days before their telephone interview through their medication inventory (n = 899). RESULTS: Overall, 39.2% and 39.5% of participants had a Medicare claim for an LLM within 120 days prior to their interview and medication inventory, respectively. Also, 42.7% of participants self-reported using LLMs, and 41.8% had an LLM in their medication inventory. The Kappa statistic (95% confidence interval [CI]) for agreement of Medicare claims with self-report and medication inventory was 0.68 (0.63-0.73) and 0.72 (0.68-0.77), respectively. No Medicare claims for LLMs were present for 22.1% (95%CI: 18.1-26.6%) of participants who self-reported taking LLMs and 18.9% (15.1-23.3%) with LLMs in their medication inventory. Agreement between Medicare claims and self-report was lower among Black male individuals (Kappa = 0.34 [95%CI: 0.14-0.54]) compared with Black female individuals (0.70 [0.61-0.79]), White male individuals (0.65 [0.56-0.75]), and White female individuals (0.79 [0.72-0.86]). Agreement between Medicare claims and the medication inventory was also low among Black male individuals (Kappa = 0.48 [95%CI: 0.29-0.66]). CONCLUSIONS: Although substantial agreement exists, many Medicare beneficiaries who self-report LLM use or have LLMs in a medication inventory have no claims for these medications. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipolipemiantes/administración & dosificación , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacoepidemiología/métodos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Autoinforme , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
We examined claims-based approaches for identifying a study population free of coronary heart disease (CHD) using data from 8,937 US blacks and whites enrolled during 2003-2007 in a prospective cohort study linked to Medicare claims. Our goal was to minimize the percentage of persons at study entry with self-reported CHD (previous myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization). We assembled 6 cohorts without CHD claims by requiring 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years of continuous Medicare fee-for-service insurance coverage prior to study entry and using either a fixed-window or all-available look-back period. We examined adding CHD-related claims to our "base algorithm," which included claims for myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization. Using a 6-month fixed-window look-back period, 17.8% of participants without claims in the base algorithm reported having CHD. This was reduced to 3.6% using an all-available look-back period and adding other CHD claims to the base algorithm. Among cohorts using all-available look-back periods, increasing the length of continuous coverage from 6 months to 1 or 2 years reduced the sample size available without lowering the percentage of persons with self-reported CHD. This analysis demonstrates approaches for developing a CHD-free cohort using Medicare claims.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Medicare , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Sesgo , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Estudios Prospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several screening tests are available to detect colorectal cancer (CRC) and reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. The purpose of this review was to determine how current CRC screening strategies for CRC compare with no screening and whether agreement exists with regard to the cost effectiveness of different strategies. METHODS: Databases were searched for cost-effectiveness analyses focused on CRC screening strategies in the United States and published between May 2007 and February 2014. We analyzed the uses of fecal occult blood, fecal immunochemistry, and stool DNA tests, as well as sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and virtual colonoscopy. A paired comparison of each screening strategy with no screening across each of the studies reviewed was conducted. A series of paired comparisons of the results reported in each of the studies is also included. RESULTS: When compared with no screening, all CRC screening strategies evaluated in this review were cost effective. There was disagreement as to which screening strategy was the most cost effective. However, sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal blood testing always dominated either strategy alone. Studies comparing colonoscopy with fecal blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, or both had mixed results. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with no screening, all CRC screening strategies are more cost effective. Study results disagree as to which screening strategy should be the preferred method.
Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Sangre Oculta , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Sigmoidoscopía/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of different drugs for osteoporosis (OP). We aimed to determine if fracture and mortality rates vary among patients initiating different OP medications. METHODS: We used the Medicare 5% sample to identify new users of intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid (n=1.674), oral bisphosphonates (n=32.626), IV ibandronate (n=492), calcitonin (n=2.606), raloxifene (n=1.950), or parathyroid hormone (n=549). We included beneficiaries who were ≥65 years of age, were continuously enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare and initiated therapy during 2007-2009. Outcomes were hip fracture, clinical vertebral fracture, and all-cause mortality, identified using inpatient and physician diagnosis codes for fracture, procedure codes for fracture repair, and vital status information. Cox regression models compared users of each medication to users of IV zoledronic acid, adjusting for multiple confounders. RESULTS: During follow-up (median, 0.8-1.5 years depending on the drug), 787 subjects had hip fractures, 986 had clinical vertebral fractures, and 2.999 died. Positive associations included IV ibandronate with hip fracture (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-4.51), calcitonin with vertebral fracture (HR=1.59, 95%CI 1.04-2.43), and calcitonin with mortality (HR=1.31; 95%CI 1.02-1.68). Adjusted HRs for other drug-outcome comparisons were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: IV ibandronate and calcitonin were associated with higher rates of some types of fracture when compared to IV zolendronic acid. The relatively high mortality associated with use of calcitonin may reflect the poorer health of users of this agent.
Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de Cadera/mortalidad , Fracturas de Cadera/prevención & control , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/mortalidad , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/mortalidad , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Causas de Muerte , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A well-functioning primary care system has the capacity to provide effective care for patients to avoid nonurgent emergency department (ED) use and related costs. OBJECTIVE: This study examined how patients' perceived deficiency in ambulatory care is associated with nonurgent ED care costs nationwide. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the 2010-2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. This study chose usual source of care, convenience of needed medical care, and patient evaluation of care quality as the main independent variables. The marginal effect following a multivariate logit model was employed to analyze the urgent vs. nonurgent ED care costs in 2011, after controlling for covariates in 2010. The endogeneity was accounted for by the time lag effect and controlling for education levels. Sample weights and variance were adjusted with the survey procedures to make results nationally representative. RESULTS: Patient-perceived poor and intermediate levels of primary care quality had higher odds of nonurgent ED care costs (odds ratio [OR] = 2.22, p = 0.035, and OR = 2.05, p = 0.011, respectively) compared to high-quality care, with a marginal effect (at means) of 13.0% and 11.5% higher predicted probability of nonurgent ED care costs. Costs related to these ambulatory care quality deficiencies amounted to $229 million for private plans (95% confidence interval [CI] $100 million-$358 million), $58.5 million for public plans (95% CI $33.9 million-$83.1 million), and an overall of $379 million (95% CI $229 million-$529 million) nationally. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the improvement in ambulatory care quality as the potential target area to effectively reduce nonurgent ED care costs.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Control de Costos , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Prioridad del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Routine electrocardiograms (ECGs) are not recommended for asymptomatic patients because the potential harms are thought to outweigh any benefits. Assessment tools to identify high risk individuals may improve the harm versus benefit profile of screening ECGs. In particular, people with unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) have elevated risk for cardiovascular events and death. METHODS: Using logistic regression, we developed a basic assessment tool among 16,653 participants in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study using demographics, self-reported medical history, blood pressure, and body mass index and an expanded assessment tool using information on 51 potential variables. UMI was defined as electrocardiogram evidence of myocardial infarction without a self-reported history (n = 740). RESULTS: The basic assessment tool had a c-statistic of 0.638 (95% confidence interval 0.617-0.659) and included age, race, smoking status, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and self-reported history of transient ischemic attack, deep vein thrombosis, falls, diabetes, and hypertension. A predicted probability of UMI > 3% provided a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 30%. The expanded assessment tool had a c-statistic of 0.654 (95% confidence interval 0.634-0.674). Because of the poor performance of these assessment tools, external validation was not pursued. CONCLUSIONS: Despite examining a large number of potential correlates of UMI, the assessment tools did not provide a high level of discrimination. These data suggest defining groups with high prevalence of UMI for targeted screening will be difficult.