Long-term Results and Efficacy of Intermediate Rhinoplasty in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip: A Single Surgeon's Experience.

Intermediate rhinoplasty, the correction of cleft lip nose deformities, is performed between the time of primary and secondary rhinoplasties, which is at ~6 years of age. Although intermediate rhinoplasty reduces psychological stress in school-aged children through improvements in appearance, studies on intermediate rhinoplasty are scarce. Hence, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of intermediate rhinoplasty in patients with unilateral cleft lip. Twenty-three patients with unilateral cleft lip who underwent intermediate rhinoplasty without primary rhinoplasty from 1997 to 2004 were enrolled in this retrospective study. They were categorized into total, male, and female groups. Photogrammetric analysis of 9 proportional, 5 angular, and 6 nostril-related parameters was performed using photographs that were taken after skeletal maturity had been reached; these parameters were compared with those of normal controls. The cleft group had significantly lower dome-to-columellar ratio, nasal sill ratio, labial-columellar angle, nostril width ratio, nostril height (base) ratio, nostril one-fourth medial part ratio, and nostril area ratio measurement and significantly higher alar width/mouth width ratio, columella height/alar width ratio, nasal tip protrusion/alar base width ratio, nasal dorsum angle, and nostril dimension in the cleft side values than the control group. After intermediate rhinoplasty, significant nasal improvement was achieved, including sufficient nasal tip projection, nasal height, nasal protrusion, and a relatively symmetric nasal tip without tip deviation. Intermediate rhinoplasty may contribute to reducing the psychosocial stress of school-aged children with unilateral cleft lip.

Lymphaticovenular anastomosis for Morbihan disease: a case report.

Morbihan disease (MD) is a very rare condition characterized by rosaceous or erythematous lymphedema on the upper twothirds of the face. A definitive management strategy for MD is lacking, and treatment is challenging. Herein, we present a case of persistent bilateral eyelid edema treated by lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) and lymph node-vein bypass surgery. The patient experienced persistent bilateral eyelid edema. Indocyanine green lymphography was performed, and the diagnosis of bilateral facial lymphedema was confirmed. On the right side, a preauricular lymphatic vessel was anastomosed to a vein. On the left side, lymphostomy on the preauricular lymph node was done, with anastomosis to the transected proximal end of the concomitant vein of the transverse facial artery. Furthermore, a preauricular lymphatic vessel was anastomosed to a vein. Eyelid edema decreased and progressively improved on both sides. The outcome of this case suggests that LVA and lymph node-vein bypass surgery are appropriate for treating persistent eyelid edema related to MD.

Reconstruction of large facial defects using a combination of forehead flap and other procedures.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of large facial defects is challenging as both functional and cosmetic results must be considered. Reconstruction with forehead flaps on the face is advantageous; nonetheless, reconstruction of large defects with forehead flaps alone results in extensive scarring on the donor site. In our study, the results of reconstruction using a combination of forehead flaps and other techniques for large facial defects were evaluated. METHODS: A total of 63 patients underwent reconstructive surgery using forehead flaps between February 2005 and June 2020 at our institution. Reconstruction of a large defect with forehead flaps alone has limitations; because of this, 22 patients underwent a combination of procedures and were selected as the subjects of this study. This study was retrospectively conducted by reviewing the patients' medical records. Additional procedures included orbicularis oculi musculocutaneous (OOMC) V-Y advancement flap, cheek advancement flap, nasolabial V-Y advancement flap, grafting, and simultaneous application of two different techniques. Flap survival, complications, and recurrence of skin cancer were analyzed. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using questionnaires. RESULTS: Along with reconstructive surgery using forehead flaps, nasolabial V-Y advancement flap was performed in nine patients, local advancement flap in three, OOMC V-Y advancement flap in two, grafting in five, and two different techniques in three patients. No patient developed flap loss; however, cancer recurred in two patients. The overall patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction with a combination of forehead flaps and other techniques for large facial defects can be considered as both functionally and cosmetically reliable.

Long-Term Evaluation of the Lip and Nose in Bilateral Complete Cleft Lip Patients following Lip Adhesion and Secondary Nose Correction.

Background Surgical correction of bilateral cleft lip deformities remains one of the most challenging areas in facial plastic surgery. Many surgical techniques and conservative devices have been offered for the early management of bilateral cleft lip in infants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of lip adhesion on the lip and nose of patients with bilateral cleft lip. Methods A retrospective review of 13 patients with bilateral cleft lip was performed and compared with age-matched noncleft children. Patients underwent lip adhesion at a mean age of 2.8 months, and cheiloplasty at 6.6 months of age using a modification the Mulliken method. Secondary rhinoplasty was performed at the age of 6 in 13 patients. The surgical results were analyzed using photographic records obtained at the age of 1 and 7 years. Twelve length measurements and one angle measurement were obtained. Results All measurements were not statistically different from those of the noncleft age-matched control group at the age of 1. At 7 years of age, upper lip height and vermilion mucosal height were shorter ( p < 0.05) than in the control group. Nasal tip protrusion and the nasolabial angle were greater ( p < 0.05) than in the control group. Conclusion Lip adhesion followed by secondary rhinoplasty resulted in an acceptable lip and nasal appearance. Although nasoalveolar molding is now widely used, lip adhesion can be an appropriate alternative if an orthodontist is not available due to geographical or economic constraints.

Outcomes of lipectomy in patients with advanced unilateral upper extremity lymphedema with regard to the difference in time required for indocyanine green to reach the axilla: A retrospective cohort study in a single center.

This study aimed to compare and analyze the prognosis after lipectomy with respect to the difference in time required for indocyanine green (ICG) to reach the axilla in patients with advanced unilateral upper extremity lymphedema. The study population was divided into 2 groups, according to the time required by ICG to reach the axilla after injection, that is, <1 hour (<1 hour; n = 9) and over 1 hour (>1 hour; n = 8). The patient's arm volume was examined before surgery and up to 12 months after surgery. The volume difference between the 2 groups was compared using the excess volume ratio. Statistically significant differences were not observed before surgery (P = .847) and 1 month (P = .336), 3 months (P = .630), and 6 months after surgery (P = .124) between the excess volume ratio values of the < 1 hour and > 1 hour groups. A statistically significant difference was confirmed 12 months after surgery (P = .034). The difference in the time when ICG reached the axilla in patients with lymphedema was associated with prognosis after lipectomy. The difference in time could possibly be used as a variable to classify the progress of lymphedema in the future.