Prognostic value of pre-treatment risk stratification and post-treatment neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio change for pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab is effective in a limited number of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Therefore, we evaluated the prognostic value of clinical biomarkers following pembrolizumab treatment in patients with advanced UC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 121 patients with platinum-refractory advanced UC who received pembrolizumab. Inflammation-based prognostic scores before and 6 weeks after the treatment were recorded. The categorical variables influencing overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) were analyzed. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed that pretreatment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (PS), presence of only lymph node metastasis (only LN mets), C-reactive protein (CRP), and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were independent prognostic factors for OS (P = 0.0077; RR = 2.42, P = 0.0049; RR = 0.36, P = 0.0047; RR = 2.53, and P = 0.0079; RR = 2.33, respectively). The pretreatment risk stratification using ECOG PS, only LN mets, CRP, and NLR was used for estimating the OS (P < 0.0001) and ORR (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, changes in NLR in response to pembrolizumab were significantly associated with the OS (P = 0.0002) and ORR (P = 0.0023). This change was also significantly correlated with OS even in the high-risk group stratified by this pretreatment risk stratification (P = 0.0069). CONCLUSIONS: This pretreatment risk stratification may be used for estimating the OS and ORR of patients with advanced UC treated with pembrolizumab. If changes in NLR in response to pembrolizumab treatment improve, pembrolizumab should be continued.

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytoma: Comparative outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate operative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy through a transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneal approach for large (>5 cm in diameter) pheochromocytomas. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the results of a transperitoneal approach with those of a retroperitoneal approach in 22 patients (mean age 57.5 years, range 38-76 years) with unilateral large pheochromocytomas (12 right, 10 left). The mean body mass index, operation time, pneumoperitoneum time, estimated blood loss, fluctuation in blood pressure and complication rate were compared between the two approaches. RESULTS: The mean tumor diameter (range) was 7.0 cm (range 5.2-15.5 cm), and no significant differences were observed between the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneal approach in any baseline clinical parameter. For right-sided procedures, significant differences were found for operation time (113 vs 85 min), pneumoperitoneum time (93 vs 64 min) and estimated blood loss (96 vs 23 mL; P < 0.05, transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneal approach, respectively). No open conversion or recurrence was reported, but one right transperitoneal approach case required blood transfusion. No difference in these parameters was noted on the left side. CONCLUSIONS: For right side procedures, the retroperitoneal approach is feasible, safer and faster than the transperitoneal approach for large pheochromocytomas. Early transection of the feeding artery is beneficial for managing the tumor and reducing the risk of bleeding.

Identification of curable high-risk prostate cancer using radical prostatectomy alone: who are the good candidates for undergoing radical prostatectomy among patients with high-risk prostate cancer?

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus regarding which patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) would benefit the most by radical prostatectomy (RP). We aimed to identify patients with high-risk PCa who are treatable by RP alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on 315 patients with D'Amico high-risk PCa who were treated using RP without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy at the institutions of the Yamaguchi Uro-Oncology Group between 2009 and 2013. The primary endpoint was biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) after RP. Risk factors for biochemical progression were extracted using the Cox proportional hazard model. We stratified the patients with high-risk PCa into 3 subgroups based on bPFS after RP using the risk factors. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 49.9 months, biochemical progression was observed in 20.5% of the patients. The 2- and 5-year bPFS after RP were 89.4 and 70.0%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, Gleason score (GS) at biopsy (≥ 8, HR 1.92, p < 0.05) and % positive core (≥ 30%, HR 2.85, p < 0.005) were independent predictors of biochemical progression. Patients were stratified into favorable- (0 risk factor; 117 patients), intermediate- (1 risk factor; 127 patients), and poor- (2 risk factors; 57 patients) risk groups, based on the number of predictive factors. On the Cox proportional hazard model, this risk classification model could significantly predict biochemical progression after RP (favorable-risk, HR 1.0; intermediate-risk, HR 2.26; high-risk, HR 5.03; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The risk of biochemical progression of high-risk PCa after RP could be stratified by GS at biopsy (≥ 8) and % positive core (≥ 30%).

Rac1-mediated Bcl-2 induction is critical in antigen-induced CD4 single-positive differentiation of a CD4+CD8+ immature thymocyte line.

Rac1, one of the Rho family small guanosine triphosphatases, has been shown to work as a "molecular switch" in various signal transduction pathways. To assess the function of Rac1 in the differentiation process of CD4 single-positive (CD4-SP) T cells from CD4CD8 double-positive (DP) cells, we used a DP cell line DPK, which can differentiate into CD4-SP cells upon TCR stimulation in vitro. DPK expressing dominant-negative (dn)Rac1 underwent massive apoptosis upon TCR stimulation and resulted in defective differentiation of CD4-SP cells. Conversely, overexpression of dnRac2 did not affect differentiation. TCR-dependent actin polymerization was inhibited, whereas early ERK activation was unaltered in dnRac1-expressing DPK. We found that TCR-dependent induction of Bcl-2 was suppressed greatly in dnRac1-expressing DPK, and this suppression was independent of actin rearrangement. Furthermore, introduction of exogenous Bcl-2 inhibited TCR-dependent induction of apoptosis and restored CD4-SP generation in dnRac1-expressing DPK without restoring TCR-induced actin polymerization. Collectively, these data indicate that Rac1 is critical in differentiation of CD4-SP from the DP cell line by preventing TCR-induced apoptosis via Bcl-2 up-regulation.

Centrosome amplification as a putative prognostic biomarker for the classification of urothelial carcinomas.

Recent studies have reported that centrosome amplification is closely related to chromosomal instability and patient prognosis in human malignancies. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the relationship between centrosome amplification and genomic alterations in urothelial carcinomas. Centrosomes were evaluated by immunohistochemistry using anti-γ-tubulin antibody. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization technology using DNA chips spotted with 4030 bacterial artificial chromosome clones was applied to 70 urothelial carcinomas to examine DNA copy number aberrations. Studying aberrations in the number of chromosomes 7, 9, and 17 using fluorescence in situ hybridization allowed the estimation of the degree of chromosomal instability. DNA copy number gains at 20p12.2, 5p15.2, 5p15.31, and 17q25.3 and losses at 17p12, 8p22, 2q37.3, 5q31.1, and 2q37.3 were more frequent in tumors with centrosome amplification than in those without it. The total numbers of DNA copy number aberrations and frequency of chromosomal instability were also larger in tumors with centrosome amplification than in those without it (P = .0263 and P < .0001, respectively). These parameters were more closely associated with centrosome amplification than with the subjectively assigned tumor grade (P = .0405 and P = .0020, respectively). Thus, these data suggest that centrosome amplification may have great potential as a biomarker for improved objective classification of urothelial carcinoma and estimation of prognosis.