Screening strategy for de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies beyond the first year after kidney transplantation: Personalized or "one size fits all"?

Screening for de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) after kidney transplantation is widely recommended. The aim of this single-center, cross-sectional study was to investigate the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening. We included 464 patients screened for de novo DSA at annual visits after a median of 5 years post-transplant (range 1 to 19 years). Overall, de novo DSAs were detected in 55/464 patients (11.9%) with a stepwise increase of the prevalence from 4.9% at 1 year post-transplant to 18.9% at >10 years post-transplant. Subsequent allograft biopsies were performed in 24/55 patients (44%). The main reasons to omit biopsies were good/stable allograft function and anticipated lack of clinical consequences (eg, relevant comorbidities). Rejection processes were detected in 16/24 biopsies (67%). Therapeutic interventions were made in 18/464 screened patients (3.9%) with a significantly higher rate in the youngest quartile of patients (≤48 years; 7.9%) compared to the middle 50% (49-67 years; 3%) and the oldest quartile (≥68 years; 1.7%) (P = .03). Our study suggests that the frequency of therapeutic interventions triggered by de novo DSA screening after kidney transplantation is overall low, but significantly higher in younger patients, arguing for a personalized, age-adapted de novo DSA screening strategy.

HLA antibody affinity determination: From HLA-specific monoclonal antibodies to donor HLA specific antibodies (DSA) in patient serum.

Organs transplanted across donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) are associated with a variety of clinical outcomes, including a high risk of acute kidney graft rejection. Unfortunately, the currently available assays to determine DSA characteristics are insufficient to clearly discriminate between potentially harmless and harmful DSA. To further explore the hazard potential of DSA, their concentration and binding strength to their natural target, using soluble HLA, may be informative. There are currently a number of biophysical technologies available that allow the assessment of antibody binding strength. However, these methods require prior knowledge of antibody concentrations. Our objective within this study was to develop a novel approach that combines the determination of DSA-affinity as well as DSA-concentration for patient sample evaluation within one assay. We initially tested the reproducibility of previously reported affinities of human HLA-specific monoclonal antibodies and assessed the technology-specific precision of the obtained results on multiple platforms, including surface plasmon resonance (SPR), bio-layer interferometry (BLI), Luminex (single antigen beads; SAB), and flow-induced dispersion analysis (FIDA). While the first three (solid-phase) technologies revealed comparable high binding-strengths, suggesting measurement of avidity, the latter (in-solution) approach revealed slightly lower binding-strengths, presumably indicating measurement of affinity. We believe that our newly developed in-solution FIDA-assay is particularly suitable to provide useful clinical information by not just measuring DSA-affinities in patient serum samples but simultaneously delivering a particular DSA-concentration. Here, we investigated DSA from 20 pre-transplant patients, all of whom showed negative CDC-crossmatch results with donor cells and SAB signals ranging between 571 and 14899 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). DSA-concentrations were found in the range between 11.2 and 1223 nM (median 81.1 nM), and their measured affinities fall between 0.055 and 24.7 nM (median 5.34 nM; 449-fold difference). In 13 of 20 sera (65%), DSA accounted for more than 0.1% of total serum antibodies, and 4/20 sera (20%) revealed a proportion of DSA even higher than 1%. To conclude, this study strengthens the presumption that pre-transplant patient DSA consists of various concentrations and different net affinities. Validation of these results in a larger patient cohort with clinical outcomes will be essential in a further step to assess the clinical relevance of DSA-concentration and DSA-affinity.

Multicenter Validation of a Urine CXCL10 Assay for Noninvasive Monitoring of Renal Transplants.

BACKGROUND: Urine CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10, interferon gamma-induced protein 10 [IP10]) outperforms standard-of-care monitoring for detecting subclinical and early clinical T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and may advance TCMR therapy development through biomarker-enriched trials. The goal was to perform an international multicenter validation of a CXCL10 bead-based immunoassay (Luminex) for transplant surveillance and compare with an electrochemiluminescence-based (Meso Scale Discovery [MSD]) assay used in transplant trials. METHODS: Four laboratories participated in the Luminex assay development and evaluation. Urine CXCL10 was measured by Luminex and MSD in 2 independent adult kidney transplant trial cohorts (Basel and TMCT04). In an independent test and validation set, a linear mixed-effects model to predict (log 10 -transformed) MSD CXCL10 from Luminex CXCL10 was developed to determine the conversion between assays. Net reclassification was determined after mathematical conversion. RESULTS: The Luminex assay was precise, with an intra- and interassay coefficient of variation 8.1% and 9.3%; showed modest agreement between 4 laboratories (R 0.96 to 0.99, P < 0.001); and correlated with known CXCL10 in a single- (n = 100 urines, R 0.94 to 0.98, P < 0.001) and multicenter cohort (n = 468 urines, R 0.92, P < 0.001) but the 2 assays were not equivalent by Passing-Bablok regression. Linear mixed-effects modeling demonstrated an intercept of -0.490 and coefficient of 1.028, showing Luminex CXCL10 are slightly higher than MSD CXCL10, but the agreement is close to 1.0. After conversion of the biopsy thresholds, the decision to biopsy would be changed for only 6% (5/85) patients showing acceptable reclassification. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate this urine CXCL10 Luminex immunoassay is robust, reproducible, and accurate, indicating it can be readily translated into clinical HLA laboratories for serial posttransplant surveillance.

Development of an immunogenicity score for HLA-DQ eplets: A conceptual study.

Eplets are defined as distinct amino acid configurations on the surface of HLA molecules. The aim of this study was to estimate the immunogenicity of HLA-DQ eplets in a cohort of 221 pregnancies with HLA-DQ mismatches. We defined the immunogenicity of an eplet by the frequency of antibody responses against it. Around 90% of all listed DQB1 or DQA1 eplets were at least five times mismatched and thus included for the calculation of their immunogenicity. The DQB1 eplets with the five highest immunogenicity scores were 55PP, 52PR, 52PQ, 85VG and 45EV; 25% of all DQB1 eplets were not reacting. The DQA1 eplets with the five highest immunogenicity scores were 25YS, 47QL, 55RR, 187T and 18S; 17% of all DQA1 eplets were not reacting. The immunogenicity score had a slightly higher area under the curve to predict development of child-specific antibodies than various molecular mismatch scores (eg, eplet mismatch load, amino acid mismatch load). Overlapping eplets were identified as a barrier to unambiguously assign the immunogenicity score based on HLA antibody reaction patterns. In this conceptual study, we explored the immunogenicity of HLA-DQ eplets and created a map of potentially immunogenic regions on HLA-DQ molecules, which requires validation in clinical transplant cohorts.