Development of peptide aptamer microarrays for detection of HPV16 oncoproteins in cell extracts.

Protein microarrays represent an emerging technology that promises to facilitate high-throughput proteomics. The major goal of this technology is to employ peptides, full-length proteins, antibodies, and small molecules to simultaneously screen thousands of targets for potential protein-protein interactions or modifications of the proteome. This article describes the performance of a set of peptide aptamers specific for the human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 oncoproteins E6 and E7 in a microarray format. E6 and E7 peptide aptamer microarrays were probed with fluorescence-labeled lysates generated from HPV-infected cervical keratinocytes expressing both E6 and E7 oncoproteins. Peptide aptamer microarrays are shown to detect low levels of E6 and E7 proteins. Peptide aptamers specific for cellular proteins included on these microarrays suggested that expression of CDK2, CDK4, and BCL-6 may be affected by HPV infection and genome integration. We conclude that peptide aptamer microarrays represent a promising tool for proteomics and may be of value in biological and clinical investigations of cervical carcinogenesis.

A peptide aptamer to antagonize BCL-6 function.

BCL-6 is a transcription factor essential for germinal centre B-cell development. The BCL-6 gene is involved in diffuse large-cell lymphoma and overexpressed in other types of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and in high-grade breast cancer. BCL-6 is a transcriptional repressor whose N-terminal POZ domain mediates protein-protein interactions to exert its effects. Reasoning that disruption of POZ domain-mediated interactions may be an effective route to antagonizing the effects of BCL-6 in lymphoma, we screened a library for peptide aptamers that specifically bind to BCL-6 POZ and not the POZ domains of related proteins and describe here the first of these reagents, Apt48. Apt48 binds BCL-6 POZ in a manner distinct from the transcriptional corepressor SMRT, yet was found to prevent BCL-6-mediated repression of a luciferase reporter gene. Apt48 also reproduced several previously validated effects of BCL-6 inhibition. Notably, expression of the differentiation markers CD69, Blimp-1 and cyclin D2 was increased in B-cell lines when Apt48 was expressed. We also show that expression of Apt48 restores cytokine-mediated growth arrest to BCL-6 overexpressing cells. Thus, we have identified a peptide aptamer that affects a function of BCL-6 that is required to prevent differentiation of proliferating B cells.

The use of a neutral peptide aptamer scaffold to anchor BH3 peptides constitutes a viable approach to studying their function.

The B-cell CLL/lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) family of proteins are important regulators of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis, and their interactions, driven by Bcl-2 homology (BH) domains, are of great interest in cancer research. Particularly, the BH3 domain is of clinical relevance, as it promotes apoptosis through activation of Bcl-2-associated x protein (Bax) and Bcl-2 antagonist killer (Bak), as well as by antagonising the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members. Although investigated extensively in vitro, the study of the BH3 domain alone inside cells is more problematic because of diminished secondary structure of the unconstrained peptide and a lack of stability. In this study, we report the successful use of a novel peptide aptamer scaffold - Stefin A quadruple mutant - to anchor and present the BH3 domains from Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death (Bim), p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (Puma), Bcl-2-associated death promoter (Bad) and Noxa, and demonstrate its usefulness in the study of the BH3 domains in vivo. When expressed intracellularly, anchored BH3 peptides exhibit much the same binding specificities previously established in vitro, however, we find that, at endogenous expression levels, Bcl-2 does not bind to any of the anchored BH3 domains tested. Nonetheless, when expressed inside cells the anchored PUMA and Bim BH3 α-helices powerfully induce cell death in the absence of efficient targeting to the mitochondrial membrane, whereas the Noxa helix requires a membrane insertion domain in order to kill Mcl-1-dependent myeloma cells. Finally, the binding of the Bim BH3 peptide to Bax was the only interaction with a pro-apoptotic effector protein observed in this study.

Targeted modification and transportation of cellular proteins.

Peptide aptamers are proteins selected from combinatorial libraries that display conformationally constrained variable regions. Peptide aptamers can disrupt specific protein interactions and thus represent a useful method for manipulating protein function in vivo. Here, we describe aptamer derivatives that extend the range of functional manipulations. We isolated an aptamer with increased affinity for its Cdk2 target by mutagenizing an existing aptamer and identifying tighter binding mutants with calibrated two-hybrid reporter genes. We used this and other anti-Cdk2 aptamers as recognition domains in chimeric proteins that contained other functional moieties. Aptamers fused to the catalytic domain of a ubiquitin ligase specifically decorated LexA-Cdk2 with ubiquitin moieties in vivo. Aptamers against Cdk2 and another protein, Ste5, that carried a nuclear localization sequence transported their targets into the nucleus. These experiments indicate that fusion proteins containing aptameric recognition moieties will be useful for specific modification of protein function in vivo.

Localization of yeast telomeres to the nuclear periphery is separable from transcriptional repression and telomere stability functions.

The left telomere of Saccharomyces chromosome VII was often localized near the nuclear periphery, even in cells lacking the silencing proteins Sir3 or Hdf1. This association was lost in late mitotic cells and when transcription was induced through the telomeric tract. Although in silencing competent cells there was no correlation between the fraction of cells in which a telomeric gene was repressed and the fraction of cells in which it was localized to the periphery, no condition was found where the telomere was both silenced and away from the periphery. We conclude that localization of a telomere to the nuclear periphery is not sufficient for transcriptional repression nor does it affect the stability function of yeast telomeres.