RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The care of children and adolescents in need of care at home is exacerbated by the shortage of skilled workers in the care sector, which leads to bottlenecks in care and presents caring families with major challenges. The implementation of new care approaches in existing structures in the healthcare system is proving to be a key development task in order to provide targeted support for affected families in the future. METHODS: Qualitative explorative interview study to record the perspective of families with (seriously) ill children and adolescents on the current care situation and possible helpful support services. The sampling was criteria-driven and the analysis and evaluation was content-analytical. Respondents were given a short questionnaire to record socio-demographic characteristics. RESULTS: In particular, the transmission of the diagnosis, the everyday challenges and the impact on quality of life were named as stress factors by n=10 participating parents. Improved access to information, voluntary structures and central contact points as well as digital services were named as key development needs. CONCLUSION: The interviews from real life and needs-oriented perspective show that there is a need to expand low-threshold care coordination services, strengthen voluntary structures and use telemedical services. Meeting these needs should enable access to specialized treatment and helpful services, especially in rural areas.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of long term cancer survivors during childhood or adolescence is increasing steadily. Survivors often suffer from physical or psychosocial long term effects. There is currently little data on the arrangement of long term aftercare in the field of psychosocial care. METHODS: In November 2017 a questionnaire was sent to 1900 cancer survivors aged between 18 and 35 years whose diagnosis dated at least five years prior. The obtained data serve as a condition and needs assessment, how the (psychosocial) long-term aftercare is perceived by the survivors and what else is desired. The analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics as well as the calculation of bivariate correlations. RESULTS: The response rate was 54.9% (n=1.043). The median interval from the first diagnosis was 20 years. In total 666 survivors (63.9%) stated that they suffered from at least one long term effect. Within this, especially neurocognitive themes played a role. 87.2% of the respondents had the feeling that they had overcome the illness/therapy well. CONCLUSION: Through a stronger patient-focussed orientation concerning the current care and advisory services, the situation of long term survivors could be improved. This especially includes access to relevant information that focuses on the available psychosocial and welfare services, as well as to advisory and care services. Additionally, the development and expansion of care structures in the areas of neurocognition and psychotherapy is important to ensure long term participation attendance. HINTERGRUND: Die Zahl der Langzeitüberlebenden nach einer Krebserkrankung im Kindes- oder Jugendalter (Survivor) steigt stetig. Survivor leiden nicht selten unter körperlichen oder psychosozialen Spätfolgen. Für die Gestaltung der Langzeitnachsorge im Bereich der psychosozialen Versorgung liegen bislang kaum Daten vor. METHODE: 11/2017 wurde deutschlandweit ein Fragebogen an 1.900 Survivor im Alter von 18 bis 35 Jahren versandt, deren Erstdiagnose zum Befragungszeitpunkt mindestens fünf Jahre zurücklag. Die erhobenen Daten dienen als Zustands- und Bedarfserhebung, wie die (psychosozialen) Langzeitnachsorge von den Survivorn wahrgenommen und was darüber hinaus gewünscht wird. Die Auswertung erfolgte mittels deskriptiver Statistik sowie der Berechnung bivariater Korrelationen. ERGEBNISSE: Der Rücklauf betrug 54,9% (n=1.043). Der mediane Abstand zur Erst-Diagnose betrug 20 Jahre. Insgesamt gaben 666 Survivor (63,9%) an, mindestens eines der abgefragten Items/Symptome bei sich zu beobachten. Hierbei spielen besonders neurokognitive Themen eine Rolle. Viele Angebote der Langzeitnachsorge sind den Survivorn nicht bekannt. 87,2% der Befragten haben das Gefühl, die Erkrankung/Therapie gut gemeistert zu haben. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG: Eine stärkere patientenorientierte Ausrichtung der derzeitigen Versorgungs- und Beratungsangebote könnte die Situation von Langzeitüberlebenden noch verbessern. Zentral sind hierbei der Zugang zu gezielten Informationen, eine psychosoziale und sozialrechtliche Betreuung sowie der Zugang zu Beratungs- und Versorgungsangeboten. Auch der Auf- und Ausbau von Versorgungsstrukturen im Bereich der Neurokognition und Psychotherapie ist für die langfristige Sicherstellung von Partizipation wünschenswert.