The Predictive Value of the Hydrogen Breath Test in the Diagnosis of Fructose Malabsorption.

BACKGROUND: Fructose malabsorption is commonly diagnosed by the hydrogen fructose (H2) breath test. However, the mechanisms behind fructose malabsorption in humans are not well understood and the clinical relevance of this test is considered controversial. Hence, the main aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive value of the H2 breath test. METHODS: Regarding exclusion criteria, the study enrolled 562 consecutive patients, enlisted to a gastroenterology clinic between 2009 and 2011 for testing malabsorption. In the final data analysis, 246 patients were included. Ecotrophologists used 3 categories to rate dietary success: complete response, partial response and no response to the diet. They also rated the occurrence of abdominal pain, diarrhoea and bloating during the H2 breath test. Ordinal regression analysis using SPSS was performed to evaluate whether H2 breath test results - measured as the maximum H2 level, the maximum increase in H2, and the area under the curve (AUC) - predicted dietary success or failure. Correlation analyses were applied to test whether symptoms of fructose malabsorption correlated with the H2 breath test measures. Finally, we evaluated whether cut-off-values of 40 or 60 parts per million (ppm) serve better than the test measure of 20 ppm to diagnose fructose malabsorption. RESULTS: When a fructose-free diet was administered it was found that 103 patients (41.9%) were complete responders, 116 (47.2%) were partial responders and 27 (11%) were non-responders. The H2 breath test with the 20 ppm cut-off-value, that is, the maximum H2 level, the maximum increase in H2, and the AUC did not predict dietary response (all 95% CI ns). This was also the case when using 40 or 60 ppm as cut-off-values (all 95% CI ns). Abdominal pain during the test correlated significantly with the AUC. Diarrhoea and bloating correlated significantly with the AUC, the maximum H2 level and the maximum increase in H2 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The H2 breath test produced no predictive value for the fructose-free diet outcomes; its value as a predictive test is therefore questionable. However, the symptoms of fructose malabsorption correlated significantly with the H2 breath test measures, and this is an indication that there is at least a degree of validity of the H2 breath test beyond the simple detection or exclusion of fructose malabsorption.

Proposal for an anti-TNF-exit strategy based on trough serum level.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate, if the strategy to stop anti-TNF treatment after determination of low trough serum levels and exclusion of inflammation is associated with lower relapse rates. METHODS: Since 2013 we followed an exit strategy in patients treated with anti-TNF treatment for inflammatory bowel disease based on trough serum levels. The relapse rates were observed prospectively, data analysis was performed in a retrospective manner of the collected clinical data. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled, who stopped anti-TNF therapy. 13 Patients followed the clinical algorithm, 27 patients were used as control group (13 patients with ulcerative colitis and 14 patients with Crohn's disease). 19 patients received Infliximab, 21 Adalimumab. The median follow-up time after discontinuation was 19 months (IQR 18). Relapses were observed in 22/40 patients (55%). Among the 13 patients with a targeted discontinuation of therapy based on the algorithm, three relapses were observed (23%), compared to 19/27 (70%) from the non-algorithm group (OR: 7.9; 95%-CI: 1.7-36.5). Relapse-free-survival after anti-TNF discontinuation was significantly higher in patients treated by the algorithm compared to the non-algorithm group (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: An exit strategy based on trough serum levels significantly reduces the relapse rate.

CT-P13 (Inflectra™, Remsima™) monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

The approval of infliximab biosimilars Remsima™ and Inflectra™ (CT-P13) for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a promising step to reduce treatment costs. Since monitoring of Remicade™ serum trough levels and anti-Remicade™ immunogenicity hold an important significance in treatment modalities, no data about monitoring of drug serum trough levels or anti-drug antibody levels in IBD patients treated with Remsima™ or Inflectra™ are present to date. Therefore, in this study we applied a Remicade™-validated ELISA to determine drug serum levels of Remsima™ or Inflectra™. Serum concentrations were measured at identical levels compared to Remicade™ at multiple time points over 38 weeks, suggesting that the monitoring of serum trough levels is equally feasible for patients receiving Remsima™ or Inflectra™ and Remicade™. Additionally, anti-drug antibody levels were not significantly different in patients treated with Remsima™ or Inflectra™ compared to patients treated with Remicade™. To our knowledge this is the first real-life experience demonstrating the feasibility of drug monitoring in IBD patients treated with the infliximab biosimilars Remsima™ and Inflectra™.