RESUMEN
Allergies play a pivotal role in the daily practice of ENT specialists. Allergic symptoms induced by inhalant allergens are widespread in the population and can manifest through a wide range of symptoms, including rhinorrhea, sneezing, conjunctival redness, cough and dyspnea. Inconsistent diagnosis and treatment of allergic conditions can lead to reduced quality of life, decreased work performance, and socioeconomically significant secondary diseases. In addition to the medical history, the skin prick test and serological IgE diagnostics are the most important diagnostic procedure for detecting type-I allergies. To clarify clinical relevance, molecular diagnostics and nasal provocation testing may be employed. The key to effective treatment lies in a comprehensive allergological diagnosis coupled with a detailed patient history. General treatment recommendations such as allergen avoidance and nasal irrigation should complement pharmacological therapy. In the treatment of allergic rhinitis topical steroids are first line treatment options. The primary goal of treatment is symptom control, and if control is insufficient, causal therapy through specific allergen immunotherapy is recommended. Challenges in the ENT clinic involve selecting the necessary diagnostics and appropriate, effective treatments. Hence, using diagnostic and treatment algorithms, as well as standardized patient history questionnaires, can serve as invaluable tools in daily patient interactions, especially considering limited time availability.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoglobulina E , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Pruebas Cutáneas , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Derivación y Consulta , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Hipersensibilidad/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification, economic pressure, and a flat learning curve make the realization and development of proper microsurgical skills and competences a challenging task in the daily clinical practice. In previous studies, we were able to show that microsurgical procedures, e.g., free flaps and replantations, are safe training procedures and teachable in daily clinical practice in view of certain issues of risk stratification. The present study aims to evaluate further improvements in terms of safety and complication rates for free flaps as a training procedure after introduction and continuous implementation of a structured in-house training curriculum for microsurgical skills and competences and a 24-hour free accessible microsurgical training facility for the plastic surgery resident. METHODS: This retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted to review whether microsurgical skills for free flaps to the lower extremity can further be improved after implementation of the curriculum and a 24-hour accessible training facility. Therefore, we compared cohort A before (2009-2012) and B after (2014-2017) implementation. Patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcome parameters for free tissue transfer of the lower extremity were evaluated. RESULTS: The comparison of both cohorts showed a significantly reduced postoperative complication rate for cohort B (p <0.05). Furthermore, operation time was shorter, and the hospital stay could be significantly decreased (p <0.01). Workhorse flaps for plastic surgical training were the anterior lateral thigh (ALT) flap or the musculus latissimus dorsi (LD) flap. However, even more complex procedures with arteriovenous loops could be safely performed by plastic surgery residents under the supervision of the senior surgeon in exceptional cases. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a regularly held, microsurgical in-house training curriculum with 24-hour accessible training facility improves procedural and outcome parameters for free flaps to the lower extremity for surgical residents and is an elementary part of skills and competency training. However, risk stratification, repeated surgical exposure, expertise, and institutional infrastructures are essential and must be taken into consideration.