A phase II study of sequential treatment with anthracycline and taxane followed by eribulin in patients with HER2-negative, locally advanced breast cancer (JBCRG-17).

PURPOSE: The sequence of taxanes (T) followed by anthracyclines (A) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for almost 20 years for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Sequential administration of eribulin (E) following A/T could provide a greater response rate for women with LABC. METHODS: In this single-arm, multicenter, Phase II prospective study, the patients received 4 cycles of the FEC regimen and 4 cycles of taxane. After the A/T-regimen, 4 cycles of E were administered followed by surgical resection. The primary endpoint was the clinical response rate. Eligible patients were women aged 20 years or older, with histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer, clinical Stage IIIA (T2-3 and N2 only), Stage IIIB, and Stage IIIC, HER2-negative. RESULTS: A preplanned interim analysis aimed to validate the trial assumptions was conducted after treatment of 20 patients and demonstrated that clinical progressive disease rates in the E phase were significantly higher (30%) than assumed. Therefore, the Independent Data Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the study. Finally, 53 patients were enrolled, and 26 patients received the A/T/E-regimen. The overall observed clinical response rate (RR) was 73% (19/26); RRs were 77% (20/26) in the AT phase and 23% (6/26) in the E phase. Thirty percent (8/26) of patients had PD in the E phase, 6 of whom had achieved cCR/PR in the AT phase. Reported grade ≥ 3 AEs related to E were neutropenia (42%), white blood cell count decrease (27%), febrile neutropenia (7.6%), weight gain (3.8%), and weight loss (3.8%). CONCLUSION: Sequential administration of eribulin after the A/T-regimen provided no additional effect for LABC patients. Future research should continue to focus on identifying specific molecular biomarkers that can improve response rates.

Adjuvant Capecitabine for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have residual invasive carcinoma after the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer have poor prognoses. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients remains unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned 910 patients with HER2-negative residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (containing anthracycline, taxane, or both) to receive standard postsurgical treatment either with capecitabine or without (control). The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival. RESULTS: The result of the prespecified interim analysis met the primary end point, so this trial was terminated early. The final analysis showed that disease-free survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (74.1% vs. 67.6% of the patients were alive and free from recurrence or second cancer at 5 years; hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.92; P=0.01). Overall survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (89.2% vs. 83.6% of the patients were alive at 5 years; hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.90; P=0.01). Among patients with triple-negative disease, the rate of disease-free survival was 69.8% in the capecitabine group versus 56.1% in the control group (hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87), and the overall survival rate was 78.8% versus 70.3% (hazard ratio for death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.90). The hand-foot syndrome, the most common adverse reaction to capecitabine, occurred in 73.4% of the patients in the capecitabine group. CONCLUSIONS: After standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracycline, taxane, or both, the addition of adjuvant capecitabine therapy was safe and effective in prolonging disease-free survival and overall survival among patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who had residual invasive disease on pathological testing. (Funded by the Advanced Clinical Research Organization and the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group; CREATE-X UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000000843 .).

A randomized, 3-arm, neoadjuvant, phase 2 study comparing docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (TCbHP), TCbHP followed by trastuzumab emtansine and pertuzumab (T-DM1+P), and T-DM1+P in HER2-positive primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The standard of care in the neoadjuvant setting for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is dual HER2-targeted therapy. However, a need to minimize treatment-related toxicity and improve pathological complete response (pCR) rates, particularly in luminal HER2-positive disease, exists. METHODS: Neopeaks, a randomized, phase 2 study, compared docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (TCbHP; 6 cycles; group A), TCbHP (4 cycles) followed by trastuzumab emtansine + pertuzumab (T-DM1+P; 4 cycles; group B), and T-DM1+P (4 cycles; group C) regimens in HER2-positive primary breast cancer patients; concurrent hormone therapy with T-DM1+P was administered in case of estrogen receptor positivity (ER+). Based on tumor shrinkage, nonresponders in group C were switched to 5-fluorouracil + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (FEC; 4 cycles). Primary endpoint was pCR (comprehensive pCR ypN0 [ypT0-TisypN0]). RESULTS: Of 236 patients enrolled, 204 were randomized to groups A (n = 51), B (n = 52), and C (n = 101). In group C, 80 (79%) patients continued T-DM1+P following favorable response, whereas 21 (21%) nonresponders switched to FEC. pCR rate was numerically higher with the TCbHP → T-DM1+P regimen (71%) versus the standard TCbHP (57%) and T-DM1+P (57%) regimens. The rate in group C was higher among responders continuing T-DM1+P (63%) versus nonresponders who switched to FEC (38%). pCR rates after initial 4 cycles of T-DM1+P (group C; 57%) and standard TCbHP regimen (57%) were equivalent. pCR rate in patients with ER+ was significantly higher in group B (69%) than groups A (43%) and C (51%), but was comparable in patients with ER- (67-76%). Compared with the T-DM1-based arm, the incidence of adverse events was higher in the taxane-based arms. CONCLUSION: In the neoadjuvant setting, the pCR rate with the standard TCbHP → T-DM1+P regimen was numerically better than the TCbHP regimen alone and significantly better in patients with ER+. Personalization of the T-DM1+P regimen could serve as a reasonable approach to minimize toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Trial registration ID: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000014649.

Predictive factors of an axillary pathological complete response of node-positive breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to identify the predictive factors of an axillary pathological complete response (Ax-pCR) in patients with node-positive breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: The present study included 219 patients who underwent NAC followed by curative surgery, including axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), for 221 breast cancers between January 2010 and April 2018. All patients were clinically and/or pathologically confirmed to be node-positive at the initial diagnosis. The predictive factors of Ax-pCR were analyzed using a chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (43%) achieved Ax-pCR after NAC. The odds of achieving Ax-pCR were significantly improved when tumors were high grade (odds ratio [OR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-4.84), estrogen receptor (ER) negative (OR 2.65 95% CI 1.23-5.70), ycN0 on ultrasound (US) imaging (OR 3.89, 95% CI 1.90-7.97), and showed a clinical complete response (CR) at the primary site after NAC (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.59-11.27). CONCLUSIONS: Ax-pCR was more likely to be achieved in patients who were diagnosed with ER-negative and high-grade breast cancer and those with ycN0 and clinical CR at the primary site after NAC than among others. Among these patients, those with initially cN1/N2 might be good candidates for a deescalated treatment strategy after NAC.

A multi-national, randomised, open-label, parallel, phase III non-inferiority study comparing NK105 and paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: NK105 is a novel nanoparticle drug delivery formulation that encapsulates paclitaxel (PTX) in polymeric micelles. We conducted an open-label phase III non-inferiority trial to compare the efficacy and safety of NK105 and PTX in metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either NK105 (65 mg/m2) or PTX (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with a non-inferiority margin of 1.215. RESULTS: A total of 436 patients were randomised and 211 patients in each group were included in the efficacy analysis. The median PFS was 8.4 and 8.5 months for NK105 and PTX, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.255; 95% confidence interval: 0.989-1.592). The median overall survival and overall response rates were 31.2 vs. 36.2 months and 31.6% vs. 39.0%, respectively. The two groups exhibited similar safety profiles. The incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) was 1.4% vs. 7.5% (≥Grade 3) for NK105 and PTX, respectively. The patient-reported outcomes of PSN were significantly favourable for NK105 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint was not met, but NK105 had a better PSN toxicity profile than PTX. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01644890.

[Toxicity of Palbociclib in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older with Metastatic Breast Cancer].

We aimed to examine palbociclib toxicity in patients aged 70 years and older with metastatic breast cancer(MBC). From December 2017 to August 2018, 32 patients with estrogen receptor(ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-negative MBC were included in this study. The most common adverse event(AE)observed was neutropenia, and comparative rates of grade 3 or 4 AE were identified in the groups of patients aged ≥70 years(n=11)and <70 years(n=21) (91% vs 81%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in one patient. Although dose interruption rate was higher in the older group (≥70 years of age)than in the younger group(<70 years of age)(100% vs 86%, respectively), reduction rates were similar between the two groups(64% vs 62%, respectively). Palbociclib was well-tolerated in Japanese older(≥70 years of age) MBC patients.

Extended adjuvant intermittent letrozole versus continuous letrozole in postmenopausal women with breast cancer (SOLE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In animal models of breast cancer, resistance to continuous use of letrozole can be reversed by withdrawal and reintroduction of letrozole. We therefore hypothesised that extended intermittent use of adjuvant letrozole would improve breast cancer outcome compared with continuous use of letrozole in postmenopausal women. METHODS: We did the multicentre, open-label, randomised, parallel, phase 3 SOLE trial in 240 centres (academic, primary, secondary, and tertiary care centres) in 22 countries. We enrolled postmenopausal women of any age with hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-positive, and operable breast cancer for which they had undergone local treatment (surgery with or without radiotherapy) and had completed 4-6 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. They had to be clinically free of breast cancer at enrolment and without evidence of recurrent disease at any time before randomisation. We randomly assigned women (1:1) to treatment groups of either continuous use of letrozole (2·5 mg/day orally for 5 years) or intermittent use of letrozole (2·5 mg/day orally for 9 months followed by a 3-month break in years 1-4 and then 2·5 mg/day during all 12 months of year 5). Randomisation was done by principal investigators or designee at respective centres through the internet-based system of the International Breast Cancer Study Group, was stratified by type of previous endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitors only vs selective oestrogen receptor modulators only vs both therapies), and used permuted block sizes of four and institutional balancing. No one was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, analysed by the intention-to-treat principle using a stratified log-rank test. All patients in the intention-to-treat population who initiated protocol treatment during their period of trial participation were included in the safety analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00553410, and EudraCT, number 2007-001370-88; and long-term follow-up of patients is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Dec 5, 2007, and Oct 8, 2012, 4884 women were enrolled and randomised after exclusion of patients at a non-adherent centre, found to have inadequate documentation of informed consent, immediately withdrew consent, or randomly assigned to intervention groups in error. 4851 women comprised the intention-to-treat population that compared extended intermittent letrozole use (n=2425) with continuous letrozole use (n=2426). After a median follow-up of 60 months (IQR 53-72), disease-free survival was 85·8% (95% CI 84·2-87·2) in the intermittent letrozole group compared with 87·5% (86·0-88·8) in the continuous letrozole group (hazard ratio 1·08, 95% CI 0·93-1·26; p=0·31). Adverse events were reported as expected and were similar between the two groups. The most common grade 3-5 adverse events were hypertension (584 [24%] of 2417 in the intermittent letrozole group vs 517 [21%] of 2411 in the continuous letrozole group) and arthralgia (136 [6%] vs 151 [6%]). 54 patients (24 [1%] in the intermittent letrozole group and 30 [1%] in the continuous letrozole group) had grade 3-5 CNS cerebrovascular ischaemia, 16 (nine [<1%] vs seven [<1%]) had grade 3-5 CNS haemorrhage, and 40 (19 [1%] vs 21 [1%]) had grade 3-5 cardiac ischaemia. In total, 23 (<1%) of 4851 patients died while on trial treatment (13 [<1%] of 2417 patients in the intermittent letrozole group vs ten [<1%] of 2411 in the continuous letrozole group). INTERPRETATION: In postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, extended use of intermittent letrozole did not improve disease-free survival compared with continuous use of letrozole. An alternative schedule of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole, including intermittent administration, might be feasible and the results of the SOLE trial support the safety of temporary treatment breaks in selected patients who might require them. FUNDING: Novartis and the International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Prediction of postoperative disease-free survival and brain metastasis for HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab using a machine learning algorithm.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop mathematical tools to predict the likelihood of recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) plus trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. METHODS: Data of 776 patients from a multicenter retrospective cohort study were collected. All patients had HER2-positive breast cancer and received NAC plus trastuzumab between 2001 and 2010. Two mathematical tools using a machine learning method were developed to predict the likelihood of disease-free survival (DFS) (DFS model) and brain metastasis (BM) (BM model) within 5 years after surgery. For validation, bootstrap analyses were conducted. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was calculated to examine the discrimination. RESULTS: The AUC values were 0.785 (95% CI 0.740-0.831, P < 0.001) for the DFS model and 0.871 (95% CI 0.830-0.912, P < 0.001) for the BM model. Patients with low-risk DFS or BM events, as predicted by the models, showed better 5-year DFS and BM rates than those with high-risk DFS or BM events (89% vs. 61% for the DFS model, P < 0.001; 99% vs. 87% for the BM model, P < 0.001). These models maintained discrimination abilities in both luminal and non-luminal subtypes, providing prognostic information independent of pathological response. Bootstrap validation confirmed the high generalization abilities of the models. CONCLUSIONS: The DFS and BM models have a high accuracy to predict prognosis among HER2-positive patients treated with NAC plus trastuzumab. Our models can help optimize adjuvant therapy and postoperative surveillance.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose capecitabine plus docetaxel versus single-agent docetaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III JO21095 trial.

PURPOSE: The randomized phase III JO21095 trial compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy (XT) versus single-agent administration of docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Patients were randomized to either low-dose XT (capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-14; docetaxel 60 mg/m2, day 1 every 3 weeks) or docetaxel (70 mg/m2, day 1 every 3 weeks). The primary objective was to demonstrate superior progression-free survival (PFS) with low-dose XT versus single-agent docetaxel. Overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: In total, 162 patients were treated. Median PFS was 10.5 months with low-dose XT and 9.8 months with single-agent docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.97]; p = 0.03). The OS HR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.52-1.53; p = 0.68). Grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities occurred in 74% of XT-treated patients and 76% of docetaxel-treated patients. The main differences in grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities were hand-foot syndrome (7.3% of XT-treated patients vs 0% receiving docetaxel), fatigue/malaise (2.4 vs 10.0%), and peripheral edema (1.2 vs 7.5%). Dose modifications were required in 100% of low-dose XT and 49% of docetaxel patients. Toxicity-related treatment discontinuations occurred in 18 and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The improved PFS with low-dose XT versus docetaxel alone is consistent with higher-dose XT phase III experience, but the safety profile was more favorable and manageable.

Circulating tumor cells as a prognostic marker for efficacy in the randomized phase III JO21095 trial in Japanese patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Prognostic effects of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been reported in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, few phase III trials have investigated the potential role of CTCs in treatment selection. We explored potential relationships between CTCs, efficacy, and differential treatment effects. METHODS: Patients with HER2-negative MBC were randomized to receive either concurrent capecitabine plus docetaxel (XT) or sequential single-agent docetaxel followed by single-agent capecitabine at progression (T â†’ X). Blood samples were collected at baseline, on day 1 of cycles 2 and 3, and at progression. CTCs were counted using the CellSearch® System. The relationship between baseline CTC count and outcomes was investigated using a pre-defined threshold of 2 CTCs/7.5 mL. RESULTS: At screening, 44% of the 148 enrolled patients had positive CTC score. In multivariate analyses of pooled treatment arms, positive baseline CTC and triple-negative disease were strongly associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with positive CTC score at the baseline had worse OS, irrespective of change in CTC (decreased versus remaining positive) at cycle 2. The prognostic effect of baseline CTC count on OS appeared slightly less pronounced in XT-treated pts. compared with T â†’ X. CONCLUSIONS: A baseline CTC count ≥2 CTCs/7.5 mL was associated with worse prognosis. However, some improvement in PFS and OS was shown with concurrent XT, thus baseline CTC could be a predictive marker. As the current trial was not designed to evaluate a change in chemotherapy according to on-treatment CTC changes, prospective investigation is required.

Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of the ICG Fluorescence Method Compared with the Radioisotope Method for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: This study compared the clinical utility of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence and radioisotope (RI) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in breast cancer. METHODS: Women with node-negative breast cancer underwent SLN biopsy using ICG fluorescence and RI. The primary end point was the sensitivity of ICG fluorescence compared with RI in the patients with tumor-positive SLNs. Secondary end points included detection rates for SLN, the additive effect of ICG fluorescence to RI, signature of positive SLNs according to tier, and adverse events related to ICG administration. RESULTS: A total of 847 women with clinical node-negative breast cancer underwent SLN biopsy, and 821 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. SLN mapping was performed using ICG fluorescence and RI. The overall detection of SLNs using ICG fluorescence was identical to RI (97.2 vs. 97.0 %, P = 0.88), and the combination of both methods achieved a significant improvement compared with RI alone (99.8 vs. 97.0 %, P < 0.001). The detection rate for tumor-positive SLN was 93.3 % for ICG fluorescence and 90.0 % for RI, and the sensitivity of the ICG fluorescence method was 95.7 % (95 % CI 91.3-98.3, P = 0.11). The additional use of ICG significantly improved positive SLN detection for RI (97.2 vs. 90.0 %, P < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events related to hypersensitivity to ICG. CONCLUSIONS: The ICG fluorescence method may be an acceptable alternative to SLN detection using RI in breast cancer.

Clinical significance of the expression of autophagy-associated marker, beclin 1, in breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAE) has been employed to improve surgical outcomes for hormone receptor-positive breast cancers in postmenopausal women. Endocrine responsiveness is estimated by expressions of hormone receptors, but its heterogeneity has been recognized. Autophagy is an evolutionally conserved process associated with cell survival and cell death and has been implicated in cancer treatment. METHODS: In order to examine the possible association between autophagy and response to endocrine therapy, we evaluated the status of autophagy-associated markers, beclin 1 and LC3, and apoptosis-associated markers, TUNEL and M30, in pre- and post-treatment specimens from 71 patients in a multicenter prospective study of neoadjuvant exemestane (JFMC34-0601). RESULTS: Immunoreactivity of the autophagy-associated markers, beclin 1 and LC3, in carcinoma cells increased in 14% and 52% of the patients, respectively, following the exemestane treatment. These increases were statistically significant (beclin 1, p = 0.016, N = 49; LC3, p < 0.0001, N = 33). The status of M30 immunoreactivity decreased (p = 0.008, N = 47) and TUNEL remained unchanged (N = 53). In addition, tumors with pre-treatment stromal beclin 1 immunoreactivity revealed poor clinical and pathological responses compared with those without stromal beclin 1 immunoreactivity (25% vs 67% for clinical response, p = 0.011, N = 51; 0% vs 41% for pathological response, p = 0.0081, N = 49). Tumors with positive pre-treatment stromal beclin 1 had a higher baseline Ki-67 labeling index (both hot spot and overall average) than those without (p = 0.042 and 0.0075, respectively, N = 53). Results of logistic regression analyses revealed that stromal beclin 1 was a predictor for clinical and pathological responses while ER, PR, Ki-67, and stromal LC3 expressions were not. CONCLUSIONS: Results of our present study demonstrated that beclin 1 and LC3 immunoreactivity increased in carcinoma cells following exemestane treatment and that the status of pre-treatment stromal beclin 1 is associated with higher carcinoma cell proliferation and poor clinical and pathological responses to NAE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN C000000345 (2006/03/06).

Phase I study of weekly nab-paclitaxel combined with S-1 in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

We conducted a phase I study of a weekly nab-paclitaxel and S-1 combination therapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated and recommended doses. Each treatment was repeated every 21 days. Levels 1, 2a, 2b, and 3 were set depending on the S-1 dose (65 or 80 mg/m(2) ) and nab-paclitaxel infusion schedule (days 1 and 8 or days 1, 8, and 15). Fifteen patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in one patient at Level 3 (100 mg/m(2) nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 with 80 mg/m(2) S-1 daily for 14 days, followed by 7 days of rest). Although the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, the recommended dose was determined to be Level 3. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event. For patients with measurable lesions, the response rate was 50.0% and the median time to treatment failure and median progression-free survival was 13.2 and 21.0 months, respectively. The present results show the feasibility and potential for long-term administration of this combination therapy.

Prolonged survival after diagnosis of brain metastasis from breast cancer: contributing factors and treatment implications.

OBJECTIVE: The prognosis of breast cancer-derived brain metastasis is poor, but new drugs and recent therapeutic strategies have helped extend survival in patients. Prediction of therapeutic responses and outcomes is not yet possible, however. In a retrospective study, we examined prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer-derived brain metastasis, and we tested the prognostic utility of a breast cancer-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment in these patients. METHODS: Sixty-three patients diagnosed with brain metastasis from breast cancer treated surgically and adjuvantly were included. We examined clinical variables per primary tumor subtype: ER+/HER2- (luminal), HER2+ (human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-enriched) or ER-/PR-/HER2- (triple negative). We also categorized patients' breast cancer-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment scores and analyzed post-brain metastasis survival time in relation to these categories. RESULTS: The breast cancers comprised the following subtypes: luminal, n = 18; human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-enriched, n = 27 and triple-negative, n = 18; median survival per subtype was 11, 37 and 3 months, respectively. Survival of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-enriched patients was longer, though not significantly (P = 0.188), than that of luminal patients. Survival of triple-negative patients was significantly short (vs. human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-enriched patients, P < 0.001). Karnofsky performance status, HER2 status and the disease-free interval (from initial treatment to first recurrence) were shown to be significant prognostic factors (Karnofsky performance status < 70: relative risk 2.08, P = 0.028; HER2+: relative risk 2.911, P = 0.004; disease-free interval < 24 months: relative risk 1.933, P = 0.011). Breast cancer-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment scores reflected disease-free intervals and survival times. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that breast cancer-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment-based prediction will be helpful in determining appropriate therapeutic strategies for patients with brain metastasis from breast cancer.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy findings in an open-label, single-arm study of weekly paclitaxel plus lapatinib as first-line therapy for Japanese women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lapatinib is the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeting agent approved globally for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of lapatinib combined with paclitaxel (L+P) were investigated in this study, to establish clear evidence regarding the combination in Japanese patients. METHODS: In this two-part, single-arm, open-label study, the tolerability of L+P as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with HER2-positive MBC was evaluated in six patients in the first part, and the safety, efficacy and PK were evaluated in a further six patients (making a total of twelve patients) in the second part. Eligible women were enrolled and received lapatinib 1500 mg once daily and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) weekly for at least 6 cycles. RESULTS: The only dose-limiting toxicity reported was Grade 3 diarrhea in one patient. The systemic exposure to maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) for lapatinib, as well as the AUC of paclitaxel, were increased when combined. The most common adverse events (AEs) related to the study treatment were alopecia, diarrhea and decreased hemoglobin. The majority of drug-related AEs were Grade 1 or 2. The median overall survival was 35.6 months (95 % confidence interval 23.9, not reached). The response rate and clinical benefit rate were both 83 % (95 % confidence interval 51.6, 97.9). CONCLUSIONS: The L+P treatment was well tolerated in Japanese patients with HER2-positive MBC. Although the PK profiles of lapatinib and paclitaxel influenced each other, the magnitudes were not greatly different from those in non-Japanese patients.

Outcomes of trastuzumab therapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Previous large trials with trastuzumab (TZM) showed improved outcome in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of TZM in Japanese patients have not been fully evaluated. We have therefore conducted an observational study in Japan. METHODS: This was a retrospective and a prospective observational study in which data on women with histologically confirmed HER2-positive invasive breast cancer who received TZM for stage I-IIIC disease were collected from 56 institutions that participated in the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group and the efficacy of each treatment regimen analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2,024 patients treated between July 2009 and June 2011 were initially enrolled in this study; in August 2013, the patient cohort comprised 2,009 patients. Of these, 142 (7.5 %) were aged ≥70 years, 1,097 (58.1 %) had clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer, and 883 (47.4 %) were estrogen receptor-positive. Treatment options were neoadjuvant therapy (662 patients) and adjuvant therapy with TZM (1,228 patients). Three-year overall survival (OS) rates in the entire cohort and in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant cohorts, respectively, were 98.9 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 98.2-99.3], 98.3 (95 % CI 96.8-99.1 %), and 99.2 % (95 % CI 98.4-99.6), respectively. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates in the entire cohort and in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant cohorts, respectively were 94.2 (95 % CI 93.0-95.2), 94.8 (95 % CI 93.0-95.9), and 93.1 (95 % CI 90.7-94.9 %), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age and nodal status negatively correlated with DFS. Age was the only factor which correlated with OS rate. Adverse events (AEs) associated with TZM and grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 356 (18.8 %) and 14 (0.6 %) patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 cardiac toxicities were reported in 11 patients. CONCLUSION: Based on data from our patient cohort of Japanese women with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer, the efficacy and safety of systemic therapy with TZM are comparable to data from previously conducted large trials. Progress in anti-HER2 therapy for patients aged ≥70 years who have a poorer prognosis is needed.

[Everolimus plus exemestane in postmenopausal patients with estrogen-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer - Japanese subgroup analysis of BOLERO -2].

In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, international study (the BOLERO-2), the addition of mTOR inhibitor everolimus to exemestane was evaluated in postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER⁺) advanced/recurrent breast cancer that was refractory to any nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). This report presents the safety and updated (18- month) efficacy results from the Japanese subset (n=106) of BOLERO-2. After a median follow-up of 18 months, the median progression-free survival time was 8.5 months with everolimus plus exemestane compared to 4.2 months with placebo plus exemestane. The most common adverse events (AEs) with everolimus plus exemestane were stomatitis, rash, dysgeusia, and non-infectious lung disease. The AEs reported with the combination therapy were mostly of grade 1 or 2 and manageable with appropriate intervention. In conclusion, this combination could be a useful addition to the armamentarium of treatments for Japanese postmenopausal women with ER⁺ advanced/recurrent breast cancer progressing on NSAIs.

Randomized phase II study of weekly paclitaxel with and without carboplatin followed by cyclophosphamide/epirubicin/5-fluorouracil as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/IIIA breast cancer without HER2 overexpression.

Addition of carboplatin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer may improve pathological complete response (pCR) rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel (wPTX) followed by cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-negative breast cancer. Patients with stage II/IIIA HER2-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to preoperatively receive CP-CEF (four 3-week cycles of carboplatin [area under the curve 5 mg/mL/min, day 1] and wPTX [80 mg/m(2), day 1, 8, 15] followed by four 3-week cycles of CEF [500/100/500 mg/m(2)] or P-CEF (four cycles of wPTX followed by four cycles of CEF). The primary objective was pCR rate. Of 181 eligible patients, 89 were randomly assigned to the CP-CEF and 92 to the P-CEF. Two patients in each arm refused to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall 88 patients in the CP-CEF and 91 patients in the P-CEF were assessable for efficacy and safety. The pCR rate in the CP-CEF was significantly higher than that in the P-CEF (31.8 vs. 17.6 %, one-sided P = 0.01). Among patients with triple-negative breast cancer, the pCR rate in the CP-CEF was significantly higher than that in the P-CEF [61.2 (23/37) vs. 26.3 % (10/38), P = 0.003]. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in the CP-CEF more frequently than in the P-CEF (65.9 vs. 38.5 %). Adding carboplatin to neoadjuvant wPTX followed by CEF for HER2-negative breast cancer improved the pCR rate and exacerbated hematotoxicity.

Evaluating the 21-gene assay Recurrence Score® as a predictor of clinical response to 24 weeks of neoadjuvant exemestane in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the results of the Recurrence Score (RS) assay and the clinical response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. METHODS: Core biopsy samples at baseline and post-treatment surgical samples were obtained from 80 and 77 of 116 patients, respectively, enrolled in the multicenter prospective study of neoadjuvant exemestane therapy (JFMC34-0601). The 21-gene assay was performed after appropriate manual microdissection. The estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, HER2 and Ki-67 were assayed by immunohistochemistry at a central laboratory. Clinical response was assessed based on the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) guideline. RESULTS: Sixty-four core biopsy samples and 52 resection samples met the RS quality requirements. The clinical response rate in those patients with a low RS result (low RS group; 19/32, 59.4 %) was significantly higher than that in those patients with a high RS result (high RS group; 3/15, 20.0 %) (P = 0.015) and similar to that in patients with an intermediate RS result (intermediate RS group; 10/17, 58.8 %). The rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were 90.6 % (29/32) in the low RS group, 76.5 % (13/17) in the intermediate RS group and 46.7 % (7/15) in the high RS group. The odds ratio for BCS adjusted for continuous baseline Ki-67 was 0.114 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.014-0.721; P = 0.028] between the high and low RS groups. RS values in pre-treatment samples were highly correlated with those in post-treatment samples (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.745, 95 % CI 0.592-0.846). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the predictive value of the RS for clinical response to neoadjuvant exemestane therapy in postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer.

A multicenter, phase II study of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and concurrent trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy for HER-2 positive advanced breast cancer (the HER2NAT study).

BACKGROUND: The outcome in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-positive locally advanced breast cancer may be improved by integrating trastuzumab with primary systemic therapy (PST). METHODS: The efficacy and safety of PST comprising EC (epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), four cycles every 3 weeks) followed by docetaxel (75 mg/m(2), four cycles every 3 weeks) and concurrent trastuzumab (loading dose 4 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/kg, 12 cycles every week) was investigated in a multicenter, prospective, phase II study in patients with HER-2-positive stage IIIB/IIIC/IV breast cancer. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) including the tumor intraductal component confirmed by central pathologic review. RESULTS: In total, 38 patients were enrolled (stage IIIB, 63.2 %; IIIC, 23.7 %; IV, 13.2 %; estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive, 47.4 %). The pCR rate was 16.2 % in the primary tumor (six of 37 patients in the Full Analysis Set) and 56.8 % (21/37) in the ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes. Treatment was given according to protocol in 28 of 37 patients; six of 28 in the Per-Protocol Set achieved pCR (21.4 %). The clinical response rate was 67.6 % (25/37 patients; complete response, 13.5 %; partial response, 54.1 %). No patients developed congestive heart failure; however, three patients had a non-symptomatic decrease of >10 % of left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: PST including concurrent use of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel is effective and well-tolerated in HER-2-positive advanced breast cancer patients, including those patients requiring mastectomy for local control.