Efficacy and safety of N-acetyl-GED-0507-34-LEVO gel in patients with moderate-to severe facial acne vulgaris: a phase IIb randomized double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary in vitro and in vivo studies have supported the efficacy of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) modulator N-acetyl-GED-0507-34-LEVO (NAC-GED) for the treatment of acne-inducing sebocyte differentiation, improving sebum composition and controlling the inflammatory process. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NAC-GED (5% and 2%) in patients with moderate-to-severe facial acne vulgaris. METHODS: This double-blind phase II randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at 36 sites in Germany, Italy and Poland. Patients aged 12-30 years with facial acne, an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3-4, and an inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion count of 20-100 were randomized to topical application of the study drug (2% or 5%) or placebo (vehicle), once daily for 12 weeks. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were percentage change from baseline in total lesion count (TLC) and IGA success at week 12; the safety endpoints were adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. This study was registered with EudraCT (2018-003307-19). RESULTS: Between Q1 in 2019 and Q1 in 2020 450 patients [n = 418 (92·9%) IGA 3; n = 32 (7·1%) IGA 4] were randomly assigned to NAC-GED 5% (n = 150), NAC-GED 2% (n = 150) or vehicle (n = 150). The percentage change in TLC reduction was statistically significantly higher in both the NAC-GED 5% [-57·1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -60·8 to -53·4; P < 0·001] and NAC-GED 2% (-44·7%, 95% CI -49·1 to -40·1; P < 0·001) groups compared with vehicle (-33·9%, 95% CI -37·6 to -30·2). A higher proportion of patients treated with NAC-GED 5% experienced IGA success (45%, 95% CI 38-53) vs. the vehicle group (24%, 95% CI 18-31; P < 0·001). The IGA success rate was 33% in the NAC-GED 2% group (P = not significant vs. vehicle). The percentage of patients who had one or more AEs was 19%, 16% and 19% in the NAC-GED 5%, NAC-GED 2% and vehicle groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The topical application of NAC-GED 5% reduced TLC, increased the IGA success rate and was safe for use in patients with acne vulgaris. Thus, NAC-GED, a new PPARγ modulator, showed an effective clinical response. What is already known about this topic? Acne vulgaris, one of the most common dermatological diseases, affects more than 85% of adolescents. There is a medical need for innovative and safe treatment of acne vulgaris. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) is involved in lipid metabolism and specifically in cell differentiation, sebum production and the inflammatory reaction. What does this study add? N-acetyl-GED-0507-34-LEVO (NAC-GED 5%), a PPARγ modulator, significantly improves acne manifestations in patients with moderate-to-severe acne and is safe and well tolerated. The results suggest that the PPARγ receptor is a novel therapeutic target for acne. The results provide a basis for a large phase III trial to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of NAC-GED in combating a disease that afflicts 80-90% of adolescents.

Contact dermatitis due to masks and respirators during COVID-19 pandemic: What we should know and what we should do.

Given the current lack of a therapeutic vaccine for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), preventive measures including mask wearing are crucial in slowing the transmission of cases. However, prolonged wearing of protective respirators, medical and fabric masks can easily generate excessive sweating, moisture and friction. Closed and warm environments heighten the skin's permeability and sensitivity to physical or chemical irritants, leading to chronic cumulative irritant contact dermatitis or, rarely, even allergic contact dermatitis. Although not representing a life-threatening condition, contact dermatitis can have a significant impact on emergency management, as it is potentially able to reduce work performance and create emotional discomfort due to the involvement of evident body areas. To minimize the skin breakdown, adherence to standards on wearing protective and safe equipments and avoidance of overprotection should be performed. At the same time, some measures of skin care are recommended. Here, we offer some tips on how to prevent and manage contact dermatitis due to masks not only in health care workers, but also in the general population during this COVID-19 outbreak.

Serious Cutaneous Toxicities with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

Cutaneous toxicities frequently occurred with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), although clinical and pharmacological features are incompletely characterized. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System was queried to describe ICI-related cutaneous toxicities, focusing on severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs): Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. As compared with other anticancer drugs, a higher proportion of death (11.3% vs. 8.7%) and serious reports (42.7% vs. 34.6%) emerged for ICIs (p < .05). A higher frequency of coreported allopurinol and antiepileptics was recorded among 2,525 total SCARs (17% vs. 10%, ICIs and anticancer agents, respectively; p < .05). Mean times to onset were 47, 48, and 40 days (SJS, TEN, and DRESS, respectively), with comparable mean latency between monotherapy and combination regimens (41 days). This immune-related pattern advocates for long-lasting monitoring by oncologists and dermatologists.

Virologic and genetic evaluation of vemurafenib-induced skin cancers.

We describe the occurrence of a giant squamous cell carcinoma in a patient receiving vemurafenib for the treatment of late melanoma mestastases. Although the development of keratoacanthomas and squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) has been described during vemurafenib therapy, most of the reported cases are treated with surgical excision. In the present case, SCC regressed after drug withdrawal.

Topical applications of heterologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) for refractory gingival lesions in autoimmune blistering diseases.

BACKGROUND: Recalcitrant gingival erosions, blisters and desquamative gingivitis are common features in oral autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD). First line treatments include high-dosage corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive drugs, with several side effects and elevated number of recurrences. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been recently introduced as an alternative treatment and its use seems to be promising and safe. METHODS: In this study we describe the use of topical application of heterologous PRP in nine patients affected by mucous membrane pemphigoid, with gingival lesions refractory to previous treatments. Topical applications of PRP were performed once a week for 2 months and the endpoint for clinical evaluation was set 3 months after the last session. Oral disease severity score (ODSS) and VAS scores for pain measurement were recorded before and after treatment. RESULTS: The procedure was painless, well accepted, and free from adverse reactions. All patients (100%) reported a reduction in VAS whereas reduction in ODSS was observed in 89% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the study, topical heterologous PRP is a safe and promising procedure to be studied in future controlled randomized trials as adjuvant treatment for refractory gingival lesions in patients with AIBDs.

Subcutaneous sarcoidosis: a case series from a single center.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic granulomatous disease which not only affect the skin but can also involve the lymph nodes, eyes, and lungs. Subcutaneous sarcoidosis (SCS), is a rare form of sarcoidosis which is generally more prevalent in women in their 40s and 50s, characterized by subcutaneous, flesh-colored nodules, mostly localized on the limbs. A retrospective study to investigate clinical features and response to treatment in patients affected by SCS. METHODS: All patients with systemic and/or cutaneous sarcoidosis visited in our clinic hospital between 2012 and 2022. Out of this group, clinical features, and management of SCS patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 102 patients with specific lesions of cutaneous sarcoidosis, with or without systemic involvement, 13 (13%) were diagnosed with SCS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that systemic involvement in SCS is the prevalent finding as expected. Moreover, SCS patients have a relatively good prognosis, and systemic treatment does not differ from first-line therapies for cutaneous sarcoidosis.