Flecainide Is Associated With a Lower Incidence of Arrhythmic Events in a Large Cohort of Patients With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: In severely affected patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, beta-blockers are often insufficiently protective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether flecainide is associated with a lower incidence of arrhythmic events (AEs) when added to beta-blockers in a large cohort of patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. METHODS: From 2 international registries, this multicenter case cross-over study included patients with a clinical or genetic diagnosis of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in whom flecainide was added to beta-blocker therapy. The study period was defined as the period in which background therapy (ie, beta-blocker type [beta1-selective or nonselective]), left cardiac sympathetic denervation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment status, remained unchanged within individual patients and was divided into pre-flecainide and on-flecainide periods. The primary end point was AEs, defined as sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock, and arrhythmic syncope. The association of flecainide with AE rates was assessed using a generalized linear mixed model assuming negative binomial distribution and random effects for patients. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients (123 [50%] females; median age at start of flecainide, 18 years [interquartile range, 14-29]; median flecainide dose, 2.2 mg/kg per day [interquartile range, 1.7-3.1]) were included. At baseline, all patients used a beta-blocker, 70 (28%) had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and 21 (9%) had a left cardiac sympathetic denervation. During a median pre-flecainide follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 0.4-7.2), 41 patients (17%) experienced 58 AEs (annual event rate, 5.6%). During a median on-flecainide follow-up of 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.0-6.0), 23 patients (9%) experienced 38 AEs (annual event rate, 4.0%). There were significantly fewer AEs after initiation of flecainide (incidence rate ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.38-0.83]; P=0.007). Among patients who were symptomatic before diagnosis or during the pre-flecainide period (n=167), flecainide was associated with significantly fewer AEs (incidence rate ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.31-0.77]; P=0.002). Among patients with ≥1 AE on beta-blocker therapy (n=41), adding flecainide was also associated with significantly fewer AEs (incidence rate ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.14-0.45]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, adding flecainide to beta-blocker therapy was associated with a lower incidence of AEs in the overall cohort, in symptomatic patients, and particularly in patients with breakthrough AEs while on beta-blocker therapy.

Limited Relationship Between Echocardiographic Measures and Electrocardiographic Markers of Left Ventricular Size in Healthy Children.

Pediatric ECG standards have been defined without echocardiographic confirmation of normal anatomy. The Pediatric Heart Network Normal Echocardiogram Z-score Project provides a racially diverse group of healthy children with normal echocardiograms. We hypothesized that ECG and echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) dimensions are sufficiently correlated in healthy children to imply a clinically meaningful relationship. This was a secondary analysis of a previously described cohort including 2170 digital ECGs. The relationship between 6 ECG measures associated with LV size were analyzed with LV Mass (LVMass-z) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV-z) along with 11 additional parameters. Pearson or Spearman correlations were calculated for the 78 ECG-echocardiographic pairs with regression analyses assessing the variance in ECG measures explained by variation in LV dimensions and demographic variables. ECG/echocardiographic measurement correlations were significant and concordant in 41/78 (53%), though many were significant and discordant (13/78). Of the 6 ECG parameters, 5 correlated in the clinically predicted direction for LV Mass-z and LVEDV-z. Even when statistically significant, correlations were weak (0.05-0.24). R2 was higher for demographic variables than for echocardiographic measures or body surface area in all pairs, but remained weak (R2 ≤ 0.17). In a large cohort of healthy children, there was a positive association between echocardiographic measures of LV size and ECG measures of LVH. These correlations were weak and dependent on factors other than echocardiographic or patient derived variables. Thus, our data support deemphasizing the use of solitary, traditional measurement-based ECG markers traditionally thought to be characteristic of LVH as standalone indications for further cardiac evaluation of LVH in children and adolescents.

An International Multicenter Cohort Study on ß-Blockers for the Treatment of Symptomatic Children With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for recurrent arrhythmic events. ß-Blockers decrease this risk, but studies comparing individual ß-blockers in sizeable cohorts are lacking. We aimed to assess the association between risk for arrhythmic events and type of ß-blocker in a large cohort of symptomatic children with CPVT. METHODS: From 2 international registries of patients with CPVT, RYR2 variant-carrying symptomatic children (defined as syncope or sudden cardiac arrest before ß-blocker initiation and age at start of ß-blocker therapy <18 years), treated with a ß-blocker were included. Cox regression analyses with time-dependent covariates for ß-blockers and potential confounders were used to assess the hazard ratio (HR). The primary outcome was the first occurrence of sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or syncope. The secondary outcome was the first occurrence of any of the primary outcomes except syncope. RESULTS: We included 329 patients (median age at diagnosis, 12 [interquartile range, 7-15] years, 35% females). Ninety-nine (30.1%) patients experienced the primary outcome and 74 (22.5%) experienced the secondary outcome during a median follow-up of 6.7 (interquartile range, 2.8-12.5) years. Two-hundred sixteen patients (66.0%) used a nonselective ß-blocker (predominantly nadolol [n=140] or propranolol [n=70]) and 111 (33.7%) used a ß1-selective ß-blocker (predominantly atenolol [n=51], metoprolol [n=33], or bisoprolol [n=19]) as initial ß-blocker. Baseline characteristics did not differ. The HRs for both the primary and secondary outcomes were higher for ß1-selective compared with nonselective ß-blockers (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.31-3.17]; and HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.20-3.30], respectively). When assessed separately, the HR for the primary outcome was higher for atenolol (HR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.44-4.99]), bisoprolol (HR, 3.24 [95% CI, 1.47-7.18]), and metoprolol (HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.08-4.40]) compared with nadolol, but did not differ from propranolol. The HR of the secondary outcome was only higher in atenolol compared with nadolol (HR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.30-5.55]). CONCLUSIONS: ß1-selective ß-blockers were associated with a significantly higher risk for arrhythmic events in symptomatic children with CPVT compared with nonselective ß-blockers, specifically nadolol. Nadolol, or propranolol if nadolol is unavailable, should be the preferred ß-blocker for treating symptomatic children with CPVT.

When Do Smartwatch Heart Rate Concerns in Children Indicate Arrhythmia?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and predictors of true arrhythmia in pediatric patients presenting with concerns about smartwatch cardiac data. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of children aged 10-18 years who had presented to a pediatric cardiology clinic between January 2018 and December 2021 with concerns related to smartwatch cardiac data. The primary study outcome was diagnosis of arrhythmia based on clinical evaluation or documentation of arrhythmia by clinical testing. RESULTS: There were 126 patients (mean age 15.6 ± 2.4 years) who presented with a smartwatch-based rhythm concern, with tachycardia in 89%. In all, 19 of 126 (15%) patients were diagnosed with true arrhythmia. The odds of a true arrhythmia diagnosis with symptoms vs no symptoms were 3.2 (95% CI 0.7-14.5), and with heart rate (HR) ≥190 beats/min vs HR <190 beats/min, it was 14.3 (95% CI 3.8-52.8). The positive predictive value of HR ≥190 beats/min and symptoms together to predict arrhythmia was only 39% (95% CI 28-52). The negative predictive value for arrhythmia having neither symptoms nor HR >190 was 95% (95% CI 75-99). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of a true arrhythmia in pediatric patients presenting with a smartwatch-based HR concern was low. Rarely, smartwatch electrograms or trend data were sufficient for arrhythmia diagnosis.

Outcomes of Infant Supraventricular Tachycardia Management Without Medication.

Most infants presenting with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are treated with an antiarrhythmic, primarily to prevent unrecognized future episodes that could lead to tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. A common practice at our institution is to not treat after the first presentation of infant SVT and instead educate parents on heart rate monitoring and reasons to present to care. The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of non-pharmacologic treatment of infant SVT at first presentation and compare to outcomes of infants treated with an antiarrhythmic. This was a retrospective single center study of all infants presenting with a first episode of SVT from 2014 to 2021. Excluded were patients with a non-reentry type tachyarrhythmia, atrial flutter, long-RP tachycardia, congenital heart disease, or abnormal ventricular function. Sixty-four infants were included in the study. Thirty-six were managed without an antiarrhythmic. SVT recurred in 28% of the non-treatment group vs 50% in those treated with antiarrhythmics, p = 0.12. Of the patients admitted to the hospital, those in the non-treatment group had a shorter length of stay, 1(IQR 1-1) vs 3(IQR 2-4) days, p < 0.01. Non-treated patients were less likely to present to the emergency department for recurrent SVT, 6% vs 32%, p < 0.01. Neither group had a patient develop tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. For infants with structurally and functionally normal hearts, non-treatment combined with parental education after the first episode of SVT does not lead to worse outcomes. This approach avoids the burden of medication administration in an infant and may have the added benefit of empowering parents to feel comfortable managing clinically insignificant tachycardia at home.

Detection of Tachyarrhythmias in a Large Cohort of Infants Using Direct-to-Consumer Heart Rate Monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Current estimates of the incidence of tachyarrhythmias in infants rely on clinical documentation and may not reflect the true rate in the general population. Our aim was to describe the epidemiology of tachyarrhythmia detected in a large cohort of infants using direct-to-consumer heart rate (HR) monitoring. STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected from Owlet Smart Sock devices used in infants in the US with birthdates between February 2017 and February 2019. We queried the HR data for episodes of tachyarrhythmia (HR of ≥240 bpm for >60 seconds). RESULTS: The study included 100 949 infants (50.8% male) monitored for more than 200 million total hours. We identified 5070 episodes of tachyarrhythmia in 2508 infants. The cumulative incidence of tachyarrhythmia in our cohort was 2.5% over the first year of life. The median age at the time of the first episode of tachyarrhythmia was 36 days (range, 1-358 days). Tachyarrhythmia was more common in infants with congenital heart disease (4.0% vs 2.4%; P = .015) and in females (2.7% vs 2.0%; P < .001). The median length of an episode was 7.3 minutes (range, 60 seconds to 5.4 hours) and the probability of an episode lasting longer than 45 minutes was 16.8% (95% CI, 15.4%-18.3%). CONCLUSIONS: We found the cumulative incidence of tachyarrhythmia among infants using direct-to-consumer HR monitors to be higher than previously reported in studies relying on clinical diagnosis. This finding may represent previously undetected subclinical disease in young infants, the significance of which remains uncertain. Clinicians should be prepared to discuss these events with parents.

The impact of CIEDs with automatic "wireless" remote monitoring on efficiency.

BACKGROUND: A benefit of automatically transmitting or "wireless" CIEDs (W-CIED) is the prompt detection of device malfunction and arrhythmias. We hypothesized that the use of W-CIEDs would improve the efficiency of remote monitoring by decreasing unnecessary CIED remote transmissions because of the automatic detection of abnormalities. OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of patient-initiated transmissions in patients with W-CIEDs versus non-wireless CIEDs (NW-CIED) at a single pediatric and congenital heart center. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with W-CIEDs followed over a 2-year period compared to a similar cohort of patients with NW-CIED. All CIED remote transmissions during were reviewed for indication and outcome. RESULTS: The W-CIED cohort had 87 patients; mean age 20 ± 13 years; NW-CIED cohort had 220 patients; mean age 22 ± (13) years. The mean number of symptomatic patient-initiated transmissions per patient was 0.93 ± 2.65 in the W-CIED cohort versus 0.39 ± 0.64 in the NW-CIED cohort (p ≤ .001). The mean number of asymptomatic patient-initiated transmission sent per patient in the W-CIED cohort was 1.86 ± 2.59 versus 0.81 ± 1.41 in the NW-CIED cohort (p ≤ .0001). Type of device, age, and presence of congenital heart disease were not significantly associated with the incidence of patient-initiated remote monitoring transmissions. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of patient-initiated transmission was higher in the W-CIED cohort, contradictory to the study hypothesis. This may reflect a lack of patient understanding of the benefit or functionality of W-CIEDs and may be mitigated by education to both providers and patients.

Acute outcomes of three-dimensional mapping for fluoroscopy reduction in paediatric catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia in children. Current improvements in technology have allowed progressive reduction in radiation exposure associated with the procedure. To assess the impact of three-dimensional mapping, we compared acute procedural results collected from the Catheter Ablation with Reduction or Elimination of Fluoroscopy registry to published results from the Prospective Assessment after Pediatric Cardiac Ablation study. METHODS: Inclusion and exclusion criteria from the Prospective Assessment after Pediatric Cardiac Ablation study were used as guidelines to select patient data from the Catheter Ablation with Reduction or Elimination of Fluoroscopy registry to compare acute procedural outcomes between cohorts. Outcomes assessed include procedural and fluoroscopy exposure times, success rates of procedure, and complications. RESULTS: In 786 ablation procedures, targeting 498 accessory pathways and 288 atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia substrates, average procedural time (156.5 versus 206.7 minutes, p < 0.01), and fluoroscopy time (1.2 versus 38.3 minutes, p < 0.01) were significantly shorter in the study group. Success rates for the various substrates were similar except for manifest accessory pathways which had a significantly higher success rate in the study group (96.4% versus 93.0%, p < 0.01). Major complication rates were significantly lower in the study group (0.3% versus 1.6%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In a large, multicentre study, three-dimensional systems show favourable improvements in clinical outcomes in children undergoing catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia compared to the traditional fluoroscopic approach. Further improvements are anticipated as technology advances.

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients.

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients: Executive summary.

Guidelines for the implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have evolved since publication of the initial ACC/AHA pacemaker guidelines in 1984 [1]. CIEDs have evolved to include novel forms of cardiac pacing, the development of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and the introduction of devices for long term monitoring of heart rhythm and other physiologic parameters. In view of the increasing complexity of both devices and patients, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. In 2018, the ACC/AHA/HRS published Guidelines on the Evaluation and Management of Patients with Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay [2], which were specific recommendations for patients >18 years of age. This age-specific threshold was established in view of the differing indications for CIEDs in young patients as well as size-specific technology factors. Therefore, the following document was developed to update and further delineate indications for the use and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, with recognition that there is often overlap in the care of patents between 18 and 21 years of age. This document is an abbreviated expert consensus statement (ECS) intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease/diagnostic categories. This document will also provide guidance regarding the management of lead systems and follow-up evaluation for pediatric patients with CIEDs. The recommendations are presented in an abbreviated modular format, with each section including the complete table of recommendations along with a brief synopsis of supportive text and select references to provide some context for the recommendations. This document is not intended to provide an exhaustive discussion of the basis for each of the recommendations, which are further addressed in the comprehensive PACES-CIED document [3], with further data easily accessible in electronic searches or textbooks.

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients.

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

"A Song of Ice and Fire"-another verse from the world of ablation.

The debate between the use of radiofrequency (RF) or cryoenergy for ablation near the atrioventricular (AV) conducting system or small coronaries has been fueled by the relative efficacies and risks of the two technologies, particularly in smaller hearts. The manuscript by Schneider et al adds another chapter to that ongoing debate.

Riata lead failure in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead failures occur at higher rates in pediatric and congenital heart disease (CHD) patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and timing of Riata lead failure in pediatric and CHD patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of pediatric patients and adults with CHD with implantation of a Riata or Riata ST lead between 2002 and 2009. The prevalence and timing of electrical failure and conductor coil externalization (CCE) were determined. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients and 63 leads from seven centers were included. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at implant was 14.4 (11.5-18.7) years and median follow-up was 8.7 (7.3-11.1) years. The underlying diagnosis was a primary arrhythmia disorder in 45%, cardiomyopathy in 31%, and CHD in 28% of patients. Electrical failure occurred in 43% and CCE in 16% of leads at median lead ages of 4.7 (3.4-7.5) and 4.3 (3.9-7.0) years, respectively. Median lead survival free from electrical failure or CCE was 7.9 (95% confidence interval, 5.8-10.0) years. Forty-one percent of leads were functional at the end of the follow-up period, and 33% were extracted with a complication rate of 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of Riata lead electrical failure was high in children and patients with CHD, while the rate of CCE was comparable with published data. Counseling on lead management should factor in the high rate of electrical failure with considerations for elective replacement.

Frequency of CIED remote monitoring: A quality improvement follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Based on the findings of a prior study of CIED (Cardiac Implantable Electrical Device) remote monitoring (RM) frequency at the same center, the University of Michigan Congenital Heart Center (UMCHC) instituted a quality improvement (QI) change to reduce the frequency of routine CIED RM from every 2 months to every 3 months. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of this QI initiative to reduce workload without compromising patient care. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all UMCHC patients with CIEDs followed via Medtronic CareLink CIED remote monitoring system from July 2015 to June 2017, after the QI change in 2014. The primary outcome was success of transition to new monitoring schedule. Secondary outcomes included complications, incidence of actionable events (AES), patient compliance, and change in workload. Outcomes were compared to the prior study. RESULTS: There were 325 patients (mean age was 24  ±  14 years) included, of who 293 (90%) completely transitioned to the new RM schedule. During the study period, 96 transmissions included AES (4% of total), of which 50 (52%) were asymptomatic and discovered on routine monitoring. No patient experienced a complication attributable to decreased RM frequency. The mean number of interrogations decreased by 1.6 per patient over the 2-year period compared to prior study. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated successful implementation of a QI initiative to reduce CIED monitoring frequency at a single center with no patient adverse events. The intervention reduced workload and potentially improved patient compliance with routine RM.

Comparison of the Medtronic SelectSecure and conventional pacing leads: Long-term follow-up in a multicenter pediatric and congenital cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The Medtronic SelectSecure™ (Minneapolis, MN, USA) pacing lead (SS) has theoretical advantages compared to conventional (C) transvenous pacing leads (PLs). The study purpose was to determine whether differences in electrical function and lead survival exist between these PLs in a large data set of pediatric and congenital patients. METHODS: A multicenter historical longitudinal cohort study was performed comparing SS and CPL performance over a 72-month follow-up (FU). Ten centers provided data for both SS and CPL, matched for age, implanted pacing chamber, time period of implantation, and presence of heart disease. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 141 subjects in each group. No statistical differences were observed in age, gender, presence of heart disease, or pacing indication. Atrial and ventricular capture thresholds were stable throughout FU and higher in the SS group (atrial: 0.75 ± 0.02 vs 0.5 ± 0.04 V, ventricular: 1.0 ± 0.04 vs 0.75 ± 0.04 V), P < 0.001. Group PL sensing thresholds did not differ. The SS group required greater energy to pace (atrial: 0.57 ± 0.05 vs 0.32 ± 0.02 mJ, ventricular: 0.83 ± 0.05 vs 0.56 ± 0.06 mJ), P = 0.001. Early lead dislodgement and phrenic nerve stimulation were greater in the SS group (P = 0.03). Long-term lead survival was high and similar between the two groups, P = 0.35. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival of both PL was high with a low fracture rate. The SS had excellent electrical function but did show higher capture thresholds and increased energy to pace; these differences are offset by other advantages of the SS PL.

Cosmetic outcomes and quality of life in children with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

BACKGROUND: Axillary implant location is an alternative implant location in patients for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for the purposes of improved cosmetic outcome. The impact from the patient's perspective is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare scar perception scores and quality of life (QOL) in pediatric patients with axillary CIED implant location versus the standard infraclavicular approach. METHODS: This is a multicenter prospective study conducted at eight pediatric centers and it includes patients aged from 8 to 18 years with a CIED. Patients with prior sternotomy were excluded. Scar perception and QOL outcomes were compared between the infraclavicular and axillary implant locations. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients (83 implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD]/58 pacemakers) were included, 55 with an axillary device and 86 with an infraclavicular device. Patients with an ICD in the axillary position had better perception of scar appearance and consciousness. Patients in the axillary group reported, on average, a total Pediatric QOL Inventory score that was 6 (1, 11) units higher than the infraclavicular group, after adjusting for sex and race (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: QOL is significantly improved in axillary in comparison to the infraclavicular CIED position, regardless of device type. Scar perception is improved in patients with ICD in the axillary position.

The clinical and genetic spectrum of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: findings from an international multicentre registry.

Aims: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is an ion channelopathy characterized by ventricular arrhythmia during exertion or stress. Mutations in RYR2-coded Ryanodine Receptor-2 (RyR2) and CASQ2-coded Calsequestrin-2 (CASQ2) genes underlie CPVT1 and CPVT2, respectively. However, prognostic markers are scarce. We sought to better characterize the phenotypic and genotypic spectrum of CPVT, and utilize molecular modelling to help account for clinical phenotypes. Methods and results: This is a Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society multicentre, retrospective cohort study of CPVT patients diagnosed at <19 years of age and their first-degree relatives. Genetic testing was undertaken in 194 of 236 subjects (82%) during 3.5 (1.4-5.3) years of follow-up. The majority (60%) had RyR2-associated CPVT1. Variant locations were predicted based on a 3D structural model of RyR2. Specific residues appear to have key structural importance, supported by an association between cardiac arrest and mutations in the intersubunit interface of the N-terminus, and the S4-S5 linker and helices S5 and S6 of the RyR2 C-terminus. In approximately one quarter of symptomatic patients, cardiac events were precipitated by only normal wakeful activities. Conclusion: This large, multicentre study identifies contemporary challenges related to the diagnosis and prognostication of CPVT patients. Structural modelling of RyR2 can improve our understanding severe CPVT phenotypes. Wakeful rest, rather than exertion, often precipitated life-threatening cardiac events.

Variation in Pediatric Post-Ablation Care: A Survey of the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES).

Although catheter ablation is a standard treatment for pediatric arrhythmias, there are no consensus guidelines for follow-up care. This study describes the variation in post-ablation practices identified through a survey of the pediatric and congenital electrophysiology society (PACES). Pediatric and congenital electrophysiology society members were invited to participate in an online survey of post-ablation practices in September 2014. Survey questions targeted routine post-ablation practices for three common arrhythmia substrates: atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia, concealed accessory pathways (AP), and manifest APs. Significant practice variation was defined as <90% concordance among respondents. There were 70 respondents from 67 centers, 29 (41%) in practice for <10 years. Uniform practices included aspirin after left side ablation by 65 (93%), immediate post-procedure ECG by 63 (90%), and performance of outpatient follow-up in 69 (99%) including ECG in 97-100% depending on substrate. The majority, 57 (81%), have standardized follow-up independent of substrate. Post-procedural observation is highly variable, with 25 (36%) discharging patients on the day of ablation, 22 (33%) observing patients in hospital overnight, and 21 (30%) basing hospitalization on pre-defined criteria. Immediate post-procedure echo is performed after all ablations in only 16 (23%). Discharge from outpatient care occurs at a median time of 12 months for each arrhythmia substrate. Common post-ablation practices are evident among pediatric electrophysiologists. However, they report significant variation in post-procedure monitoring practices and testing. The rationale for these variances, and their impact on costs and outcomes, should be defined.

Nadolol for Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia in Infants and Young Children.

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is a common infant arrhythmia, for which beta-blockers are frequently chosen as therapy. Propranolol is a common choice though it is dosed every 6-8 h. We reviewed the clinical results of treating infant SVT with an extemporaneous preparation of nadolol. Retrospective cohort study of patients under 2 years old receiving nadolol for SVT at a single center. Patients were ascertained by patient and pharmacy databases. Twenty-eight infants received nadolol, of whom 25 had regular narrow complex tachycardia, 2 atrial flutter, and 1 focal atrial tachycardia. Patient age at initiation was a median 54 days (range 10-720). The final dose was 1 mg/kg/day in 22/28 patients (range 0.5-2). Once-daily dosing was used in 20 patients (71.4%); dosing was BID in 7, TID in 1. Among regular narrow complex tachycardia patients, 18/25 received nadolol monotherapy and 7 required additional agents; flecainide in 6, digoxin in 1. The median age of tachyarrhythmia onset was 18 days (range 1-180) with a median age of nadolol initiation of 30 days (range 11-390). Of the 20 regular narrow complex tachycardia patients initiated on nadolol monotherapy, 85% had no recurrences as of 1-year follow-up. Side effects were suspected in 3 of 28 (10.7%), including wheezing (n = 1, 3.5%), irritability and diarrhea (n = 1, 3.5%), and bradycardia (n = 1, 3.5%). Oral nadolol suspension was a successful treatment for SVT in 85% of patients with minimal adverse effects. Single daily dosing was used in the majority of patients.

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Outcomes in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease: Time to System Revision.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are intended to prevent sudden cardiac death yet also impose a risk of morbidity. This study describes the outcomes of ICDs in a pediatric and congenital heart disease (CHD) population from a single center. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all patients with an ICD followed at the University of Michigan Congenital Heart Center from 2005-2013. The primary outcome was ICD system revision for any reason excluding routine generator change for battery depletion. RESULTS: There were 191 ICD systems in 131 patients, including 57 with CHD, 24 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 45 with structurally normal hearts. Median age was 16 years at initial implant. Total follow-up was 850 patient-years; median 4.9 years/patient. There were 43 (33%) patients who required 60 ICD revisions; 70 revisions/1,000 patient-years of follow-up. Revisions included 25 lead extractions with replacement, 21 lead additions, five lead repositions, and four full system revisions. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) median time to appropriate shock was similar to the median time to system revision. K-M time to system revision was significantly affected by recalled lead performance. CONCLUSIONS: The need for ICD system revision is high in this pediatric and CHD population and occurs at a rate similar to the rate of receiving appropriate therapy. These results highlight the need for judicious implant criteria and improved device longevity.