Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Appetite ; 197: 107271, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382764

RESUMEN

Improving understanding of the intention to choose plant-based food is an important element of climate change mitigation. A cross-sectional survey of 454 North American adults was used to predict their dietary-change intentions from the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the more-recently proposed theory of behavioral choice (TBC). The TPB accounted for 65 percent of the variance in intentions and the TBC accounted for a significantly greater (80 percent) proportion of variance. The strongest predictors of intention were the TBC's sense of obligation, attitude-values-affect (AVA), and habit, and the TBP's social norms. Five interactions also contributed in small but significant ways toward the accounting of the participants' food-choice intentions. Policy implications are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Actitud , Intención , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Dieta , Conducta de Elección , Teoría Psicológica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 21(6): 572-578, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32362472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anxiety is common in hospitalized patients and can worsen pain or lead to unsuccessful pain relief. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of measuring anxiety with a visual analog scale (VAS) in the hospitalized patient experiencing pain. DESIGN: We conducted a multiple-center cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Adult inpatients experiencing moderate to severe pain defined by a pain VAS score ≥40 of 100 were included. METHODS: Pain and anxiety data were collected using the following instruments: pain VAS, anxiety VAS, State Anxiety Scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-YA) and Anxiety Subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD-A). RESULTS: Data were collected from 394 patients. Of those patients, 43.6% (171 of 392) and 36.6% (143 of 391) had significant anxiety according to STAI-Ya and HAD-A, respectively. Correlation was good between anxiety-VAS and STAI-YA (ρ = 0.67 [95% confidence interval 0.61-0.72]) and moderate between anxiety VAS and HAD-D (ρ = 0.48 [0.39-0.56]). The main factor predictive of situational anxiety was history of anxiety-depression symptoms (odds ratio = 2.95 [1.93-4.56]). For anxiety VAS score ≥ 40 of 100, the sensitivity for detecting anxiety was 81% with 70% specificity. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the high prevalence of anxiety among inpatients experiencing pain, demonstrated the capacity of a VAS to assess this anxiety, determined an anxiety VAS cutoff level to screen for significant anxiety, and identified risk factors of anxiety in this population. Anxiety VAS has been found to be an easy-to-use method familiar to caregivers, with all the advantages needed for an effective screening instrument. An anxiety VAS score ≥40 of 100 would thus warrant particular attention to adapt care to the patient's anxiety-related pain and initiate specific therapeutic interventions.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/clasificación , Dimensión del Dolor/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos
3.
Appetite ; 138: 233-241, 2019 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30965045

RESUMEN

Consumption of animal products is an important greenhouse gas emitting behavior. However, perceived hindrances to incorporating more plant-based diets present challenges for the successful design of behavior-change interventions. Latent profile analysis of survey responses revealed three distinct groups. Meat-reducers perceive the fewest inhibitors and are the most willing to incorporate more meat-free days in their diets. Moderate-hindrance meat eaters perceive many more inhibitors, and are hindered by a lack of social support, attachment to meat, not wanting to change their routine, and less awareness of the health benefits of eating less meat. They are willing to incorporate new healthy foods in their diet and are somewhat willing to avoid meat on some days. Strong-hindrance meat eaters report weak self-efficacy and the most inhibitors but are somewhat willing to incorporate healthier foods in their diets. Implications for tailored meat-reduction interventions are discussed. For example, when targeting meat-attached individuals, it might be beneficial to focus on replacing red meats with less carbon-intensive protein sources.


Asunto(s)
Dieta/métodos , Preferencias Alimentarias/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Carne/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoeficacia , Apoyo Social , Adulto , Canadá , Dieta/psicología , Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA