Using mobile health applications for the rapid recruitment of perinatal women.

This article describes how two research teams recruited participants using a mobile application for pregnant women. In both studies, a study description appeared on the home screen of a pregnancy application. Interested women were directed to a secure research website to enroll. Enrollment goals were rapidly exceeded. Both studies enrolled participants from across the USA. Demographic diversity was achieved by one study. Mobile health applications are innovative venues for recruiting research participants.

Time to conception and the menstrual cycle: an observational study of fertility app users who conceived.

The objective of this research was to evaluate the association between menstrual cycle characteristics (cycle length, cycle-length variability, and their interaction) and the amount of time it takes women to conceive using a robust multiple linear regression. Participants downloaded Ovia Fertility in 2015 indicated that they had just started trying to conceive, and reported conception within 12 months (n = 45,360, adjusted model n = 8835). The average time to conception among women in the adjusted model was 3.94 months (n = 8835). Women with normal cycle lengths (27-29 days) conceived more quickly than women with cycle lengths of 25-26 days (+0.41 months; p < 0.001), 30-31 days (+0.27 months; p < 0.01), 32-33 days (+0.44 months; p < 0.001), and 34+ days (+0.75 months; p < 0.001). Women with regular cycle-length variability (<9 days between cycles) conceived more quickly than women with irregular variability (+0.72 months; p < 0.001). Results of the interaction analysis indicated that, among women with regular cycle-length variability, those with normal cycle length had shorter time to conception than women with either short or long cycle length. The interaction between cycle length and cycle-length variability provided enhanced insights into the amount of time it takes to conceive, compared to either indicator alone.

Findings from a mobile application-based cohort are consistent with established knowledge of the menstrual cycle, fertile window, and conception.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of self-reported fertility data generated by a mobile application-based cohort in comparison with data collected by traditional clinical methodologies. DESIGN: Data were collected from July 2013 to July 2018 through a mobile application designed to track fertility. Bayesian hierarchical models were used to assess day-specific pregnancy probabilities. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate differences in day of ovulation and lengths of menstrual phases and to assess changes in the cervix and ovulation-related symptoms drawing closer to the day of ovulation. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Data consisted of 225,596 menstrual cycles from 98,903 women. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Day-specific probabilities of pregnancy, variability in lengths of the follicular and luteal phases, trends in prevalence of symptoms and cervix changes across the fertile window. RESULT(S): Analyses were consistent with established clinical knowledge. Probability of conception was highest during the 5 days before and day of ovulation, with the highest probability occurring the day before ovulation. The average cycle length was 29.6 days, and average lengths of the follicular and luteal phases were 15.8 and 13.7 days, respectively. Closer to day of ovulation, women were more likely to report changes in the cervix corresponding to fluid consistency, feel, position, and openness and symptoms associated with ovulation, including pelvic pain, tender breasts, increased sex drive, and cramps. CONCLUSION(S): Components of the menstrual cycle and fertile window, when re-evaluated with a mobile application-based cohort, were found to be consistent with established clinical knowledge, suggesting an agreement between traditional and modern data collection methodologies.