[Male stress urinary incontinence by InVance bone anchored sub-urethral sling: Predictive factors of treatment failure: Multicentric study by the CTMH-AFU]. / Facteurs prédictifs d'échec de cure d'incontinence urinaire d'effort masculine par bandelette sous-urétrale à ancrage osseux type InVance : étude multicentrique du comité des troubles mictionnels de l'homme de l'Association française d'urologie.

AIM: To define predictive factors of treatment failure in a multicentric study for the treatment of stress male urinary incontinence by InVance (American Medical System, USA) bone anchored sub-urethral sling. METHOD: Cases treated by InVance between January 2005 and December 2007 in four French academic centers were collected. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were evaluated. Mean age was 68 years old. With a mean follow-up of 20 months, 38 patients (45%) were dry, 22 (26%) were improved, and 24 (29%) suffered treatment failure. In univariate analysis, three parameters were significantly associated with treatment failure, including severe urinary incontinence (P=0.005), urodynamic instability (P=0.043), and incontinence due to a bitherapy including external radiotherapy (P=0.031). If zero or one versus two or three risk factors were present, treatment failure rate was 25 and 67%, respectively (P=0.013). In multivariate analysis, bitherapy including radiotherapy was the sole independent treatment failure risk factor (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: Two patient groups were defined, allowing to determine preoperatively good candidates and bad candidates for stress urinary incontinence treatment by InVance sling.

[Preoperative factors of misdiagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma]. / Facteurs associés à l'échec du diagnostic préopératoire des angiomyolipomes rénaux.

OBJECTIVES: To explain the high incidence of misdiagnosis of angiomyolipoma (AML) prior to surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 2007, 2,657 patients were operated for a renal tumor at Dupuytren hospital in Limoges and at Cochin hospital in Paris. In 85 cases (3.2%), tumors were AMLs on pathology. The group of patients in which the diagnosis was done preoperatively was compared to the one in which the diagnosis was missed. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 57-years-old and the sex-ratio was five women for one man. The mean size of AMLs was 5.4 cm. The patients were symptomatic in 46% of cases (39/85). The diagnosis of AML was ignored preoperatively in 62 patients (73%). In multivariate analysis, the small size of the AML, low proportion of fat and male sex were significantly associated with misdiagnosis of AML (p<0.001, p<0.018 and p<0.008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of misdiagnosis of AML preoperatively is high. The diagnosis seems particularly difficult when the tumor is small or contains a small proportion of fat. In addition, this study highlights that the diagnosis of AML is frequently ignored in men. The increased resolution of CTscan and the use of preoperative biopsies for tumors less than 4 cm could be helpful to decrease the incidence of useless surgery of AMLs.