Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(12): 3244-3247, 2020 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32478813

RESUMEN

Nursing home (NH) patients often acquire colonization with antibiotic-resistant organisms (AROs). We show that patients exposed to broad-spectrum antibiotics during previous hospitalizations have elevated enterococcal relative abundances on NH admission and higher risk of subsequent ARO acquisition. Our findings suggest that interventions preventing ARO spread should extend beyond NH doors.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Humanos , Casas de Salud , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(6): 837-844, 2018 08 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635360

RESUMEN

Background: The spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is a global concern, and much about transmission in healthcare systems remains unknown. To reduce hospital stays, nursing facilities (NFs) have increasingly assumed care of post-acute populations. We estimate the prevalence of MDRO colonization in NF patients on enrollment and discharge to community settings, risk factors for colonization, and rates of acquiring MDROs during the stay. Methods: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal cohort study of newly admitted patients in 6 NFs in southeast Michigan using active microbial surveillance of multiple anatomic sites sampled at enrollment, days 14 and 30, and monthly thereafter for up to 6 months. Results: We enrolled 651 patients and collected 7526 samples over 1629 visits, with an average of 29 days of follow-up per participant. Nearly all participants were admitted for post-acute care (95%). More than half (56.8%) were colonized with MDROs at enrollment: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 16.1%; vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), 33.2%; and resistant gram-negative bacilli (R-GNB), 32.0%. Risk factors for colonization at enrollment included prolonged hospitalization (>14 days), functional disability, antibiotic use, or device use. Rates per 1000 patient-days of acquiring a new MDRO were MRSA, 3.4; VRE, 8.2; and R-GNB, 13.6. MDRO colonization at discharge was similar to that at enrollment (56.4%): MRSA, 18.4%; VRE, 30.3%; and R-GNB, 33.6%. Conclusions: Short-stay NF patients exhibit a high prevalence of MDROs near the time of admission, as well as at discharge, and may serve as a reservoir for spread in other healthcare settings. Future interventions to reduce MDROs should specifically target this population.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/transmisión , Docentes de Enfermería , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/transmisión , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Michigan , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(6): 861-868, 2018 08 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29726892

RESUMEN

Background: Most nursing facilities (NFs) lack methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) surveillance programs due to limited resources and high costs. We investigated the utility of environmental screening of high-touch surfaces in patient rooms as a way to circumvent these challenges. Methods: We compared MRSA and VRE culture data from high-touch surfaces in patients' rooms (14450 samples from 6 NFs) and ranked each site's performance in predicting patient colonization (7413 samples). The best-performing sites were included in a MRSA- and a VRE-specific panel that functioned as a proxy for patient colonization. Molecular typing was performed to confirm available concordant patient-environment pairs. Results: We identified and validated a MRSA panel that consisted of the bed controls, nurse call button, bed rail, and TV remote control. The VRE panel included the toilet seat, bed controls, bed rail, TV remote control, and top of the side table. Panel colonization data tracked patient colonization. Negative predictive values were 89%-92% for MRSA and 82%-84% for VRE. Molecular typing confirmed a strong clonal type relationship in available concordant patient-environment pairs (98% for MRSA, 91% for VRE), pointing to common epidemiological patterns for environmental and patient isolates. Conclusions: Environmental panels used as a proxy for patient colonization and incorporated into facility surveillance protocols can guide decolonization strategies, improve awareness of MRSA and VRE burden, and inform efforts to reduce transmission. Targeted environmental screening may be a viable surveillance strategy for MRSA and VRE detection in NFs.


Asunto(s)
Fómites/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación , Aparatos Sanitarios/microbiología , Lechos/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Contaminación de Equipos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/transmisión , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Diseño Interior y Mobiliario , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Tipificación Molecular , Casas de Salud , Habitaciones de Pacientes , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/genética
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(5): 1698-703, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22378900

RESUMEN

The epidemiology of new acquisition of antibiotic-resistant organisms (AROs) in community-based skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) is not well studied. To define the incidence, persistence of, and time to new colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and ceftazidime-resistant (CAZ(r)) and ciprofloxacin-resistant (CIP(r)) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in SNFs, SNF residents were enrolled and specimens from the nares, oropharynx, groin, perianal area, and wounds were prospectively cultured monthly. Standard microbiological tests were used to identify MRSA, VRE, and CAZ(r) and CIP(r) GNB. Residents with at least 3 months of follow-up were included in the analysis. Colonized residents were categorized as having either preexisting or new acquisition. The time to colonization for new acquisition of AROs was calculated. Eighty-two residents met the eligibility criteria. New acquisition of AROs was common. For example, of the 59 residents colonized with CIP(r) GNB, 28 (47%) were colonized with CIP(r) GNB at the start of the study (96% persistent and 4% intermittent), and 31 (53%) acquired CIP(r) GNB at the facility (61% persistent). The time to new acquisition was shortest for CIP(r) GNB, at a mean of 75.5 days; the time to new acquisition for MRSA was 126.6 days (P = 0.007 versus CIP(r) GNB), that for CAZ(r) was 176.0 days (P = 0.0001 versus CIP(r) GNB), and that for VRE was 186.0 days (P = 0.0004 versus CIP(r) GNB). Functional status was significantly associated with new acquisition of AROs (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; P = 0.01). New acquisition of AROs, in particular CIP(r) GNB and MRSA, is common in SNFs. CIP(r) GNB are acquired rapidly. Additional longitudinal studies to investigate risk factors for ARO acquisition are required.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Ingle/microbiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Nariz/microbiología , Orofaringe/microbiología , Perineo/microbiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Heridas y Lesiones/microbiología
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(8): 1063-1066, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34016196

RESUMEN

Perianal screening can be intrusive. The sensitivities of multianatomical, nonperianal surveillance were 92.3% for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 58.7% for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and 54.9% for resistant Gram-negative bacilli (R-GNB). Sensitivities improved upon adding environmental surveillance (95.5%, 82.9%, and 67.9%, respectively). Multianatomical, nonperianal screening and room environment surveillance may replace perianal screening and reduce healthy participant bias in nursing homes.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Control de Infecciones , Tamizaje Masivo , Casas de Salud , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Monitoreo Biológico/métodos , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(2): e2144959, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103795

RESUMEN

Importance: Little is known about the contribution of hospital antibiotic prescribing to multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) burden in nursing homes (NHs). Objectives: To characterize antibiotic exposures across the NH patient's health care continuum (preceding health care exposure and NH stay) and to investigate whether recent antibiotic exposure is associated with MDRO colonization and room environment contamination at NH study enrollment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study (conducted from 2013-2016) that enrolled NH patients and followed them up for as long as 6 months. The study was conducted in 6 NHs in Michigan among NH patients who were enrolled within 14 days of admission. Clinical metadata abstraction, multi-anatomical site screening, and room environment surveillance for MDROs were conducted at each study visit. Data were analyzed between May 2019 and November 2021. Exposures: Antibiotic data were abstracted from NH electronic medical records by trained research staff and characterized by class, route, indication, location of therapy initiation, risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (C diffogenic agents), and 2019 World Health Organization Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWARE) antibiotic stewardship framework categories. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were MDRO colonization and MDRO room environment contamination at NH study enrollment, measured using standard microbiology methods. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify whether antibiotic exposure within 60 days was associated with MDRO burden at NH study enrollment. Additionally, antibiotic exposure data were characterized using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 642 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 74.7 [12.2] years; 369 [57.5%] women; 402 [62.6%] White; median [IQR] NH days to enrollment, 6.0 [3.0-7.0]). Of these, 422 (65.7%) received 1191 antibiotic exposures: 368 (57.3%) received 971 hospital-associated prescriptions, and 119 (18.5%) received 198 NH-associated prescriptions. Overall, 283 patients (44.1%) received at least 1 C diffogenic agent, and 322 (50.2%) received at least 1 high-risk WHO AWARE antibiotic (watch or reserve agent). More than half of NH patients (364 [56.7%]) and room environments (437 [68.1%]) had MDRO-positive results at enrollment. In multivariable analysis, recent antibiotic exposure was positively associated with baseline MDRO colonization (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.22-2.38) and MDRO environmental contamination (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.17-2.39). Exploratory stratification by C diffogenic agent exposure increased the effect size (MDRO colonization: OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.33-2.96; MDRO environmental contamination: OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.24-2.79). Likewise, exploratory stratification by exposure to high-risk WHO AWARE antibiotics increased the effect size (MDRO colonization: OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.61-3.36; MDRO environmental contamination: OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.26-2.75). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that high-risk, hospital-based antibiotics are a potentially high-value target to reduce MDROs in postacute care NHs. This study underscores the potential utility of integrated hospital and NH stewardship programming on regional MDRO epidemiology.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Michigan , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control
7.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 10(1): 104, 2021 07 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34225783

RESUMEN

Multiple room occupancy is common in Nursing Homes (NHs), and its role in transmission of antibiotic-resistant pathogens is unclear. We investigated prevalence of patient colonization and environmental contamination with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in NH roommates, compared it with expected prevalence, and determined specific body and environmental sites that may act as sources of roommate colonization. Roommate contamination was associated with index patient's colonization (relative risk (RR): 2.57 (95% CI 1.04-6.37)) for MRSA, and index patient's immediate environment contamination for VRE (RR: 3.60 (95% CI 1.59-8.12)). When specific index patient sites associated with roommate colonization were investigated, the side table (Fisher's p = 0.029 and 0.047 for VRE and MRSA, respectively) and the nurse call button (p = 0.001 and 0.052) stood out, together with patient hands in the case of VRE (p = 0.026). Future studies should be carried out to establish whether these sites should be a specific target of infection prevention campaigns in NHs with multiple occupancy rooms.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Casas de Salud , Habitaciones de Pacientes , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Fómites , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Humanos , Prevalencia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(7): e2116555, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34269807

RESUMEN

Importance: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Preventing MDROs can reduce the risk of subsequent transmission and infection. Objective: To determine whether a multicomponent infection prevention intervention can reduce MDRO prevalence in nursing homes (NHs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial of a multicomponent intervention was conducted in 6 NHs in Michigan from September 2016 to August 2018. Three NHs adopted a multicomponent intervention, while 3 control NHs continued without investigator intervention. Study visits were conducted at baseline; days 7, 14, 21, and 30; and monthly thereafter for up to 6 months or discharge. Visits included clinical data collection and MDRO surveillance culturing of multiple body sites and high-touch surfaces in patient rooms. Any patients who provided informed consent within 14 days of admission to the NH were enrolled in this study. Non-English speakers and patients receiving hospice care were ineligible. Analysis was performed from November 2018 to February 2020. Interventions: Intervention NHs adopted a multicomponent intervention that included enhanced barrier precautions, chlorhexidine bathing, MDRO surveillance, environmental cleaning education and feedback, hand hygiene promotion, and health care worker education and feedback. Control nursing homes continued standard care practices. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome, presence of MDROs, was measured longitudinally in the patient and room environment and was evaluated using generalized mixed effect models. The secondary outcome, time to new MDRO acquisition, was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: A total of 6 NHs were included, with 245 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.5 [13.6] years; 134 [54.7%] women) enrolled; 3 NHs with 113 patients (46.1%) were randomized to the intervention group and 3 NHs with 132 patients (53.9%) were randomized to the control group. A total of 132 patients (53.9%) were White, and 235 patients (95.9%) were receiving postacute care. Over 808 study visits, 3654 patient cultures and 5606 environmental cultures were obtained. The intervention reduced the odds of MDRO prevalence in patients' environment by 43% (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94), but there was no statistically significant difference on the patient level before or after adjustment (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.29-1.14). There were no significant reductions in time to new acquisition for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-1.09), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.46-1.53), or resistant gram-negative bacilli (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.73-1.78). Conclusions and Relevance: This cluster randomized clinical trial found that the multicomponent intervention reduced the prevalence of MDROs in the environment of NH patients. Our findings highlight the potential for multicomponent interventions to directly and indirectly reduce MDRO prevalence in NHs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02909946.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Casas de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Baños/métodos , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Análisis por Conglomerados , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Higiene de las Manos , Promoción de la Salud , Hogares para Ancianos , Humanos , Higiene/educación , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Michigan , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control
9.
Front Public Health ; 9: 671428, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34322470

RESUMEN

Background: Colonization is the main precursor to infection, which may lead to adverse clinical outcomes among older adults in nursing homes (NHs). Understanding seasonal changes in the local burden of common bacterial pathogens is key to implementing appropriate and cost-effective infection prevention measures in this resource-constrained healthcare environment. It is thus surprising that seasonal trends in patient and environmental colonization with major bacterial pathogens are presently unknown in the expanding NH setting. Methods: We examined the seasonal incidence of four major pathogens among 640 nursing home patients and high-touch surfaces within their rooms over 2 years. In cases where a significant number of antimicrobial-resistant strains was found, incidence in antimicrobial-susceptible and antimicrobial-resistant isolates was compared, along with antibiotic use trends. Results: We observed spring peaks in the incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (1.70 peak to trough ratio for both patient and environmental isolates) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (1.95 peak to trough ratio for patient isolates, 1.50 for environmental isolates). We also observed summer peaks in Klebsiella pneumoniae (1.83 and 1.82 peak to trough ratio for patient and environmental isolates, respectively), and ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli. Susceptible S. aureus and E. coli did not follow seasonal patterns. Conclusions: A meaningful seasonal pattern may be present in the NH setting for several significant pathogens, and especially antimicrobial-resistant ones. Whether such patterns are consistent across geographic areas and over longer periods of time should be a key focus of investigation, in order to better inform timing of surveillance and infection prevention efforts in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Anciano , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Escherichia coli , Humanos , Incidencia , Casas de Salud , Estaciones del Año , Staphylococcus aureus
10.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(10): 1222-1224, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32493534

RESUMEN

The role of demographic characteristics, such as sex and race, as risk factors for colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms, has not been established in the nursing home setting. We demonstrate significantly higher prevalence overall in male patients, and sex differences are dependent on organism of interest and body site.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Casas de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería
11.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(3): 478-485, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851386

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) burden of high-touch common area and rehabilitation gym surfaces, and to assess microorganism transfer potential during rehabilitation sessions. DESIGN: Prospective study of environmental contamination. SETTING: Nursing home (NH). PARTICIPANTS: Six Michigan NHs. MEASUREMENTS: Monthly samples from common area surfaces (eg, living room), rehabilitation equipment, and rehabilitation personnel hands were screened for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and resistant gram-negative bacilli (R-GNB). To assess microorganism transfer potential, we conducted an in-depth assessment of microorganism transfer during 10 rehabilitation sessions. Microorganism transfer was defined as the identification of a microorganism on a destination surface that was uncontaminated before the rehabilitation session. Patient frequency of common area usage was also assessed qualitatively. RESULTS: We obtained 1338 common area specimens from 180 monthly facility visits, of which 13.4% (179/1338) were MDRO positive: MRSA, 3.8%; VRE, 5.8%; and R-GNB, 5.1%. A total of 64% (116/180) of sampling visits had at least one MDRO-positive common area specimen. Within rehabilitation gyms, we obtained 521 equipment and 190 personnel hand specimens during 60 monthly visits. Of the equipment specimens collected, 7.7% (40/521) were MDRO positive: MRSA, 2.5%; VRE, 4.0%; and R-GNB, 1.9%. Of the 190 rehabilitation personnel hand specimens collected, 3.7% (7/190) were MDRO positive. Overall, 55% (33/60) of rehabilitation gym visits had at least one MDRO-positive specimen. Microorganism transfer assessment during 10 rehabilitation sessions revealed 35 opportunities for transfer during which microorganism transfer occurred in 17.1% (6/35) of opportunities. CONCLUSION: NH common areas and rehabilitation gyms are MDRO reservoirs that may contribute to the transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens. Because NHs accommodate the increasing short-stay patient population, developing effective interventions that reduce MDRO transmission in the common area and rehabilitation gym environment should be considered an infection prevention priority. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:478-485, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Contaminación de Equipos/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Aparatos Sanitarios/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Michigan , Casas de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación
12.
J Patient Exp ; 7(6): 1044-1053, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33457544

RESUMEN

We conducted a cross-sectional, survey study of 764 volunteers to gain insight into patients' perceptions of physician qualities of compassion and competence. Among 651 (85% response rate) survey participants, mean age was 52.4 (SD 21.4) years, 70.8% (n = 458) were female, and 84% (n = 539) identified as white. Predictors of compassion over competence included female gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.04-1.89) and whether the respondent had a personal connection to the vignette (aOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.0-1.53). Thematic analysis demonstrated that preferences were influenced by: (a) explicit beliefs regarding the value of physician compassion and physician competence; (b) impact of emotional and mental health on medical experiences; (c) the type and frequency of health care exposure; and (d) perceived role of the physician in various clinical vignettes. Patients had wide-ranging, complex opinions on the qualities they valued in their physicians. These findings suggest that patients are engaged and can provide critical thoughtful feedback on the practice and delivery of health care.

13.
mSphere ; 4(4)2019 08 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31462413

RESUMEN

Nursing home residents are at a greater risk of developing pressure injuries that develop into an open wound, which can become colonized with bacteria. Understanding the factors that influence microbial colonization of open wounds can lead to the prevention of infections. The relationship between bacteria found in urine and those in open wounds is currently unknown. To determine if bacterial species colonizing open wounds are also found in the urine, we conducted a pilot study with nursing home residents, comparing bacterial species present in the urine with those present in wounds between the umbilicus and mid-thigh. To identify microbial species that were present in both urine and open wound at one time point in one patient, standard clinical bacteriologic culture techniques followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) were used, as well as 16S rRNA-encoding gene amplicon sequencing. We found some bacterial species detected in urine were also detected in open wounds in one individual at one time point, using both culture-dependent and -independent techniques. Bacterial species that were more often detected, using culture-dependent and -independent methods, at both sites included Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus mirabilis, Escherichia coli, and Providencia stuartii This pilot study provides evidence that bacterial species identified within the urine can also be identified in open wounds in the same patient at one point in time. Further studies are needed to investigate if these species are of the same lineage and if the urinary microbiota are able to seed colonization of open wounds below the umbilicus.IMPORTANCE Older adults, specifically those in nursing facilities, are more susceptible to developing chronic open nonhealing wounds. Chronic open nonhealing wounds severely impact an individual's quality of life and can lead to other comorbidities, such as infection. Recent evidence suggests that the open wound bacterial community can influence wound healing and repair. It is important to understand all sources of open wound contamination to improve preventative infection measures and treatment protocols. In this pilot study, we investigated if bacterial species isolated from urine can also be isolated from open wounds located between the levels of the umbilicus and mid-thigh in the same patient at the same point in time. A growing body of evidence suggests that urine can harbor a microbial community, even in asymptomatic individuals, and older adults are more prone to urinary incontinence. This is the first study to investigate bacterial species concordance between these two anatomical sites. We found, using both culture-dependent and -independent methods, that the same bacterial species can colonize both the urine and wound in one patient at one point in time. Further studies are needed to investigate if these species are of the same lineage and if the urinary microbiota are able to seed colonization of these types of open wounds.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/orina , Microbiota , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/microbiología , Anciano , Bacterias/clasificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Calidad de Vida , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Células Madre
14.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 40(12): 1394-1399, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31647042

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-resistant organism (ARO) colonization rates in skilled nursing facilities (NFs) are high; hand hygiene is crucial to interrupt transmission. We aimed to determine factors associated with hand hygiene adherence in NFs and to assess rates of ARO acquisition among healthcare personnel (HCP). METHODS: HCP were observed during routine care at 6 NFs. We recorded hand hygiene adherence, glove use, activities, and time in room. HCP hands were cultured before and after patient care; patients and high-touch surfaces were cultured. HCP activities were categorized as high-versus low-risk for self-contamination. Multivariable regression was performed to identify predictors of hand hygiene adherence. RESULTS: We recorded 385 HCP observations and paired them with cultures performed before and after patient care. Hand hygiene adherence occurred in 96 of 352 observations (27.3%) before patient care and 165 of 358 observations (46.1%) after patient care. Gloves were worn in 169 of 376 observations (44.9%). Higher adherence was associated with glove use before patient care (odds ratio [OR], 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-4.54) and after patient care (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.77-5.48). Compared with nurses, certified nurse assistants had lower hand hygiene adherence (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.67) before patient care and physical/occupational therapists (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11-0.44) after patient care. Hand hygiene varied by activity performed and time in the room. HCP hands were contaminated with AROs in 35 of 385 cultures of hands before patient care (0.9%) and 22 of 350 cultures of hands after patient care (6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene adherence in NFs remain low; it is influenced by job title, type of care activity, and glove use. Hand hygiene programs should incorporate these unique care and staffing factors to reduce ARO transmission.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Higiene de las Manos/normas , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas Antimicrobianas de Difusión por Disco , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Guantes Protectores , Personal de Salud/clasificación , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos
16.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(11): 1241-1246, 2016 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27553671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess effectiveness of an interactive educational program in increasing knowledge of key infection prevention and control (IPC) principles with emphasis on indwelling device care, hand hygiene, and multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among nursing home (NH) health care personnel (HCP). METHODS: We conducted a multimodal randomized controlled study involving HCP at 12 NHs. Ten comprehensive and interactive modules covered common IPC topics. We compared intervention and control scores to assess differences in pretest scores as a result of field interventions, pre- and post-test scores to assess knowledge gain, and magnitude of knowledge gain based on job categories. RESULTS: We conducted over 200 in-services across 10 topics at six intervention sites over 36 months. There were 4,962 tests returned over the course of the study, ranging from 389-633 per module. Participants were mostly female certified nursing assistants (CNAs). Score improvement was highest for modules emphasizing hand hygiene, urinary catheter care, and MDROs (15.6%, 15.9%, and 22.0%, respectively). After adjusting for cluster study design, knowledge scores were significantly higher after each educational module, suggesting the education delivery method was effective. When compared with CNAs, nursing and rehabilitation personnel scored significantly higher in their knowledge tests. CONCLUSIONS: Our intervention significantly improved IPC knowledge in HCP, especially for those involved in direct patient care. This increase in knowledge along with preemptive barrier precautions and active surveillance has enhanced resident safety by reducing MDROs and infections in high-risk NH residents.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Educación Médica/métodos , Personal de Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Competencia Profesional , Estudios Controlados Antes y Después , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Casas de Salud , Distribución Aleatoria
17.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(4): 440-7, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26782632

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Rates of multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms are surpassing those of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in nursing homes (NHs). OBJECTIVE To characterize the incidence and duration of carriage of ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli (CipREc) in NHs and identify those in the O25b-ST131 lineage. METHODS We collected 227 CipREc isolates obtained by routine and regular surveillance of high-risk NH residents with indwelling devices. Repetitive element palindromic (REP)-polymerase chain reaction assay and multiplex polymerase chain reaction amplification for O25b-ST131 E. coli detection were performed using (GTG)5-primers and O25pabBspe and trpA2 primer pairs, respectively. RESULTS We found a high period prevalence of CipREc colonization (21.5%), high rates of recolonization with the same strain following clearing (0.46 recolonizations/ person/ year), and an acquisition incidence of 1.05 cases/1,000 person-days. Almost three-quarters of colonized residents carried strains in the O25b-ST131 E. coli lineage. Compared with isolates not in the lineage, O25b-ST131 isolates were carried significantly longer (10 vs 3 months). We identified 18 different REP-types; 2 occurred in 55% of the residents colonized with CipREc, and in more than 1 NH. Duration of CipREc carriage varied by REP-type and averaged 6 months. CONCLUSION CipREc occurred frequently in NH residents and is carried for long durations, and reacquisition following clearance is common Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01062841.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Casas de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Escherichia coli/clasificación , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Método Simple Ciego
18.
JAMA Intern Med ; 175(5): 714-23, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25775048

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Indwelling devices (eg, urinary catheters and feeding tubes) are often used in nursing homes (NHs). Inadequate care of residents with these devices contributes to high rates of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and device-related infections in NHs. OBJECTIVE: To test whether a multimodal targeted infection program (TIP) reduces the prevalence of MDROs and incident device-related infections. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial at 12 community-based NHs from May 2010 to April 2013. Participants were high-risk NH residents with urinary catheters, feeding tubes, or both. INTERVENTIONS: Multimodal, including preemptive barrier precautions, active surveillance for MDROs and infections, and NH staff education. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the prevalence density rate of MDROs, defined as the total number of MDROs isolated per visit averaged over the duration of a resident's participation. Secondary outcomes included new MDRO acquisitions and new clinically defined device-associated infections. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects multilevel Poisson regression model (primary outcome) and a Cox proportional hazards model (secondary outcome), adjusting for facility-level clustering and resident-level variables. RESULTS: In total, 418 NH residents with indwelling devices were enrolled, with 34,174 device-days and 6557 anatomic sites sampled. Intervention NHs had a decrease in the overall MDRO prevalence density (rate ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94). The rate of new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisitions was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (rate ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96). Hazard ratios for the first and all (including recurrent) clinically defined catheter-associated urinary tract infections were 0.54 (95% CI, 0.30-0.97) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.49-0.99), respectively, in the intervention group and the control group. There were no reductions in new vancomycin-resistant enterococci or resistant gram-negative bacilli acquisitions or in new feeding tube-associated pneumonias or skin and soft-tissue infections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our multimodal TIP intervention reduced the overall MDRO prevalence density, new methicillin-resistant S aureus acquisitions, and clinically defined catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates in high-risk NH residents with indwelling devices. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this approach as well as its effects on the reduction of MDRO transmission to other residents, on the environment, and on referring hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01062841.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Hogares para Ancianos , Intubación Gastrointestinal/efectos adversos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Casas de Salud , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Desarrollo de Personal/métodos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Precauciones Universales/métodos , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación Gastrointestinal/métodos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/etiología , Cateterismo Urinario/métodos , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología
19.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(10): 1112-4, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25278405

RESUMEN

Twenty-four-hour reports are filled out by nurses daily to monitor nursing home residents and document any changes in resident status. Semistructured interviews conducted with ICPs from 12 southeast Michigan nursing homes showed that although 24-hour reports were used, they were not standardized for infection prevention activities. Our results indicate 24-hour reports can be an effective communication tool and potentially aid in early recognition of infections and outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Notificación de Enfermedades/métodos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Casas de Salud , Notificación de Enfermedades/normas , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Michigan , Estudios Prospectivos
20.
Am J Infect Control ; 41(6): e55-7, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23726551

RESUMEN

Utilizing a self-administered questionnaire in 440 health care workers (81% response rate), we evaluated the impact of health care workers policy awareness on hand hygiene and urinary catheter care in nursing homes. We show that health care workers aware of their nursing home policies are more likely to report wearing gloves and practicing hand hygiene as per evidence-based recommendations during urinary catheter care compared with those who are unaware of their facility policies.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/enfermería , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Higiene de las Manos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Casas de Salud , Cateterismo Urinario/enfermería , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Guantes Protectores , Política de Salud , Hogares para Ancianos , Humanos , Michigan , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Asistentes de Enfermería , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA