Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Care Med ; 48(10): e916-e926, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32931197

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the Children's Hospital Association's Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes sepsis definitions and the identified patients; evaluate the definition using a published framework for evaluating sepsis definitions. DESIGN: Observational cohort. SETTING: Multicenter quality improvement collaborative of 46 hospitals from January 2017 to December 2018, excluding neonatal ICUs. PATIENTS: Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis was defined by electronic health record evidence of suspected infection and sepsis treatment or organ dysfunction. A more severely ill subgroup, Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Critical Sepsis, was defined, approximating septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Participating hospitals identified patients, extracted data, and transferred de-identified data to a central data warehouse. The definitions were evaluated across domains of reliability, content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, measurement burden, and timeliness. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty hospitals met data quality criteria across four electronic health record platforms. There were 23,976 cases of Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis, including 8,565 with Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Critical Sepsis. The median age was 5.9 years. There were 10,316 (43.0%) immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients, 4,135 (20.3%) with central lines, and 2,352 (11.6%) chronically ventilated. Among Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis patients, 60.8% were admitted to intensive care, 26.4% had new positive-pressure ventilation, and 19.7% received vasopressors. Median hospital length of stay was 6.0 days (3.0-13.0 d). All-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality was 958 (4.0%) in Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis; 541 (6.3%) in Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Critical Sepsis. The Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis definitions demonstrated strengths in content validity, convergent construct validity, and criterion validity; weakness in reliability. Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis definitions had significant initial measurement burden (median time from case completion to submission: 15 mo [interquartile range, 13-18 mo]); timeliness improved once data capture was established (median, 26 d; interquartile range, 23-56 d). CONCLUSIONS: The Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Sepsis definitions demonstrated feasibility for large-scale data abstraction. The patients identified provide important information about children treated for sepsis. When operationalized, these definitions enabled multicenter identification and data aggregation, indicating practical utility for quality improvement.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Sepsis/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/fisiología , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sepsis/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/terapia
2.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 35(7): 455-460, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28067685

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines emphasize early recognition of pediatric septic shock using clinical examination findings. Elevated serum lactate has been associated with increased mortality in adult patients with septic shock. Our objective was to determine the association between the initial serum lactate obtained in the pediatric emergency department (PED) from patients treated for septic shock and the use of vasoactive medication within 24 hours. METHODS: This was a retrospective study from 2008 through 2012 of PED patients at a tertiary care children's hospital. Patients younger than 18 years treated for septic shock were included if they had a serum lactate obtained in the PED. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty-four PED encounters met inclusion criteria. Median initial PED lactate was 2.1 mmol/L (interquartile range, 1.4-3.2 mmol/L). Overall, 121 patients (14%) received vasoactive medication within 24 hours of the initial PED lactate. A multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated associations between initial lactate levels of 3.1 to 5 mmol/L (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.26) and 5.1 mmol/L or greater (odds ratio, 5.00; 95% confidence interval, 2.56-9.76) and the use of vasoactive medication within 24 hours. Other factors associated with use of vasoactive medication within 24 hours included hypotension, abnormal pulses, and mental status changes. CONCLUSIONS: Increased initial lactate is associated with use of vasoactive medication within 24 hours in PED patients with septic shock.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Láctico/sangre , Choque Séptico/sangre , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Admisión del Paciente , Valores de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/terapia , Signos Vitales
3.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 18(11): e536-e545, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28914722

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: A newly proposed surveillance definition for ventilator-associated conditions among neonatal and pediatric patients has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality among ventilated patients in cardiac ICU, neonatal ICU, and PICU. This study aimed to identify potential risk factors associated with pediatric ventilator-associated conditions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Six U.S. hospitals PATIENTS:: Children less than or equal to 18 years old ventilated for greater than or equal to 1 day. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified children with pediatric ventilator-associated conditions and matched them to children without ventilator-associated conditions. Medical records were reviewed for comorbidities and acute care factors. We used bivariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression models to identify factors associated with ventilator-associated conditions. We studied 192 pairs of ventilator-associated conditions cases and matched controls (113 in the PICU and cardiac ICU combined; 79 in the neonatal ICU). In the PICU/cardiac ICU, potential risk factors for ventilator-associated conditions included neuromuscular blockade (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.08-4.87), positive fluid balance (highest quartile compared with the lowest, odds ratio, 7.76; 95% CI, 2.10-28.6), and blood product use (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.70-3.28). Weaning from sedation (i.e., decreasing sedation) or interruption of sedation may be protective (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.18-1.11). In the neonatal ICU, potential risk factors included blood product use (odds ratio, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.02-8.78), neuromuscular blockade use (odds ratio, 3.96; 95% CI, 0.93-16.9), and recent surgical procedures (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% CI, 0.77-6.28). Weaning or interrupting sedation was protective (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: In mechanically ventilated neonates and children, we identified several possible risk factors associated with ventilator-associated conditions. Next steps include studying propensity-matched cohorts and prospectively testing whether changes in sedation management, transfusion thresholds, and fluid management can decrease pediatric ventilator-associated conditions rates and improve patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
4.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 17(10): e451-e458, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27500722

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends rapid recognition and treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. Few reports have evaluated the impact of these recommendations in pediatrics. We sought to determine if outcomes in patients who received initial care compliant with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign time goals differed from those treated more slowly. DESIGN: Single center retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Emergency department and PICU at an academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-one patients treated for septic shock in the emergency department and admitted directly to the PICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The exposure was receipt of emergency department care compliant with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations (delivery of IV fluids, IV antibiotics, and vasoactive infusions within 1 hr of shock recognition). The primary outcome was development of new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Secondary outcomes included mortality, need for mechanical ventilation or vasoactive medications, and hospital and PICU length of stay. Of the 321 children studied, 117 received Surviving Sepsis Campaign compliant care in the emergency department and 204 did not. New or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome developed in nine of the patients (7.7%) who received Surviving Sepsis Campaign compliant care and 25 (12.3%) who did not (p = 0.26). There were 17 deaths; overall mortality rate was 5%. There were no significant differences between groups in any of the secondary outcomes. Although only 36% of patients met the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline recommendation of bundled care within 1 hour of shock recognition, 75% of patients received the recommended interventions in less than 3 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for pediatric septic shock in compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations was not associated with better outcomes compared with children whose initial therapies in the emergency department were administered more slowly. However, all patients were treated rapidly and we report low morbidity and mortality. This underscores the importance of rapid recognition and treatment of septic shock.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Choque Séptico/terapia , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/etiología , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/complicaciones , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Neurocrit Care ; 24(3): 353-60, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26627225

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important worldwide cause of death and disability for children. The Approaches and Decisions for Acute Pediatric TBI (ADAPT) Trial is an observational, cohort study to compare the effectiveness of six aspects of TBI care. Understanding the differences between clinical sites-including their structure, clinical processes, and culture differences-will be necessary to assess differences in outcome from the study and can inform the overall community regarding differences across academic centers. METHODS: We developed a survey and queried ADAPT site principal investigators with a focus on six domains: (i) hospital, (ii) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), (iii) medical staff characteristics, (iv) quality of care, (v) medication safety, and (vi) safety culture. Summary statistics were used to describe differences between centers. RESULTS: ADAPT clinical sites that enrolled a subject within the first year (32 US-based, 11 international) were studied. A wide variation in site characteristics was observed in hospital and ICU characteristics, including an almost sevenfold range in ICU size (8-55 beds) and more than fivefold range of overall ICU admissions (537-2623). Nursing staffing (predominantly 1:1 or 1:2) and the presence of pharmacists within the ICU (79 %) were less variable, and most sites "strongly agreed" or "agreed" that Neurosurgery and Critical Care teams worked well together (81.4 %). However, a minority of sites (46 %) used an explicit protocol for treatment of children with severe TBI care. CONCLUSIONS: We found a variety of inter-center structure, process, and culture differences. These intrinsic differences between sites may begin to explain why interventional studies have failed to prove efficacy of experimental therapies. Understanding these differences may be an important factor in analyzing future ADAPT trial results and in determining best practices for pediatric severe TBI.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Cultura Organizacional , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos
6.
Crit Care Med ; 42(3): 512-9, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24164955

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, an accepted rescue therapy for refractory cardiopulmonary failure, requires a complex multidisciplinary approach and advanced technology. Little is known about the relationship between a center's case volume and patient mortality. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between hospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation annual volume and in-hospital mortality and assess if a minimum hospital volume could be recommended. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A retrospective cohort admitted to children's hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System database from 2004 to 2011 supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was identified. Indications were assigned based on patient age (neonatal vs pediatric), diagnosis, and procedure codes. Average hospital annual volume was defined as 0-19, 20-49, or greater than or equal to 50 cases per year. Maximum likelihood estimates were used to assess minimum annual case volume. PATIENTS: A total of 7,322 pediatric patients aged 0-18 were supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and had an indication assigned. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Average hospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation volume ranged from 1 to 58 cases per year. Overall mortality was 43% but differed significantly by indication. After adjustment for case-mix, complexity of cardiac surgery, and year of treatment, patients treated at medium-volume centers (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98) and high-volume centers (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.89) had significantly lower odds of death compared with those treated at low-volume centers. The minimum annual case load most significantly associated with lower mortality was 22 (95% CI, 22-28). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric centers with low extracorporeal membrane oxygenation average annual case volume had significantly higher mortality and a minimum volume of 22 cases per year was associated with improved mortality. We suggest that this threshold should be evaluated by additional study.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Femenino , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia
9.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 7(3): e569, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35720872

RESUMEN

Introduction: The success of quality improvement (QI) projects depends on many factors, with communication and knowledge of project-specific practice change being fundamental. This project aimed to improve the knowledge of active safety and QI projects. Methods: Two interventions were trialed to improve knowledge: paired email and meeting announcements followed by a daily huddle to review ongoing projects. Knowledge, measured as the ability to recall a project and its practice change, was the primary outcome. The frequency and duration of the Huddle were process and balancing measures, respectively. Results: Seven days after a meeting/email announcement, 3 of 13 (23%) faculty and fellows recalled the announced practice change. Investigators then tested the effects of the Huddle by assessing practitioners' knowledge of safety and QI project-related practice changes on the first and last day of a service week. The average percentage of items recalled increased from the beginning to end of a service week by 33% [46% to 79%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12-53] for faculty and 27% (51% to 77%, 95% CI 13-40) for fellows. The Huddle occurred in four of seven (interquartile range 2-5) days/wk with a mean duration of 4.5 (SD 2) minutes. Follow-up assessment 2 years after Huddle implementation demonstrate sustained increase in item recall [faculty +36% (95% CI +13% to 40%); fellows +35% (95% CI +23% to 47%)]. Conclusions: A daily huddle to discuss safety and QI project-related practice change is an effective and time-efficient communication method to increase knowledge of active projects.

10.
Paediatr Drugs ; 24(3): 193-205, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35307800

RESUMEN

Sepsis is a life-threatening response to infection that contributes significantly to neonatal and pediatric morbidity and mortality worldwide. The key tenets of care include early recognition of potential sepsis, rapid intervention with appropriate fluids to restore adequate tissue perfusion, and empiric antibiotics to cover likely pathogens. Vasoactive/inotropic agents are recommended if tissue perfusion and hemodynamics are inadequate following initial fluid resuscitation. Several adjunctive therapies have been suggested with theoretical benefit, though definitive recommendations are not yet supported by research reports. This review focuses on the recommendations for medication and fluid management of pediatric sepsis and septic shock, highlighting issues related to antibiotic choices and antimicrobial stewardship, selection of intravenous fluids for resuscitation, and selection and use of vasoactive/inotropic medications. Controversy remains regarding resuscitation fluid volume and type, antibiotic choices depending upon infectious risks in the patient's community, and adjunctive therapies such as vitamin C, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and methylene blue. We include best practice recommendations based on international guidelines, a review of primary literature, and a discussion of ongoing clinical trials and the nuances of therapeutic choices.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Fluidoterapia , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Resucitación , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico
11.
JAMA Pediatr ; 176(7): 690-698, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35499841

RESUMEN

Importance: Blood culture overuse in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) can lead to unnecessary antibiotic use and contribute to antibiotic resistance. Optimizing blood culture practices through diagnostic stewardship may reduce unnecessary blood cultures and antibiotics. Objective: To evaluate the association of a 14-site multidisciplinary PICU blood culture collaborative with culture rates, antibiotic use, and patient outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective quality improvement (QI) collaborative involved 14 PICUs across the United States from 2017 to 2020 for the Bright STAR (Testing Stewardship for Antibiotic Reduction) collaborative. Data were collected from each participating PICU and from the Children's Hospital Association Pediatric Health Information System for prespecified primary and secondary outcomes. Exposures: A local QI program focusing on blood culture practices in the PICU (facilitated by a larger QI collaborative). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was blood culture rates (per 1000 patient-days/mo). Secondary outcomes included broad-spectrum antibiotic use (total days of therapy and new initiations of broad-spectrum antibiotics ≥3 days after PICU admission) and PICU rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), Clostridioides difficile infection, mortality, readmission, length of stay, sepsis, and severe sepsis/septic shock. Results: Across the 14 PICUs, the blood culture rate was 149.4 per 1000 patient-days/mo preimplementation and 100.5 per 1000 patient-days/mo postimplementation, for a 33% relative reduction (95% CI, 26%-39%). Comparing the periods before and after implementation, the rate of broad-spectrum antibiotic use decreased from 506 days to 440 days per 1000 patient-days/mo, respectively, a 13% relative reduction (95% CI, 7%-19%). The broad-spectrum antibiotic initiation rate decreased from 58.1 to 53.6 initiations/1000 patient-days/mo, an 8% relative reduction (95% CI, 4%-11%). Rates of CLABSI decreased from 1.8 to 1.1 per 1000 central venous line days/mo, a 36% relative reduction (95% CI, 20%-49%). Mortality, length of stay, readmission, sepsis, and severe sepsis/septic shock were similar before and after implementation. Conclusions and Relevance: Multidisciplinary diagnostic stewardship interventions can reduce blood culture and antibiotic use in the PICU. Future work will determine optimal strategies for wider-scale dissemination of diagnostic stewardship in this setting while monitoring patient safety and balancing measures.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cultivo de Sangre , Niño , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
12.
J Trauma ; 71(4): 1016-22, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21336186

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Utah state trauma audit filters assess expeditious care at referring emergency departments for severely injured patients to avoid delays in transfer. We evaluated two state performance measures related to pediatric trauma care before arrival at the Level I trauma center. METHODS: Analysis of the Primary Children's Medical Center (PCMC) trauma database for children with Injury Severity Scores (ISS)>15 from 2006 to 2009 was performed. Patient care was evaluated for referring hospital emergency department triage time of <2 hours and total transfer time of ≤6 hours for rural and ≤4 hours for urban place of injury. RESULTS: Four hundred twelve patients with ISS>15 were admitted via interhospital transfer from within Utah. Approximately 50% of patients were triaged<2 hours, which increased to almost two thirds when restricted to those initially evaluated within 100 miles (helicopter range) of PCMC. Factors associated with delayed triaged included lower ISS, less severe head injury, greater distance from the trauma center, and primary chest/abdominal injuries. Death and poor outcome did not differ significantly by triage in <2 hours or ≥2 hours. Adherence with the total transfer time goal was 94% for rural and 76% for urban place of injury. CONCLUSIONS: There was substantial nonadherence with trauma performance measures for triage in <2 hours among pediatric trauma patients with ISS >15. Because of low rates of poor outcome, we are unable to determine whether adherence with state triage goals lessens morbidity or mortality.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Objetivos , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos/normas , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Triaje/normas , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Utah
13.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 49(sup1): 413-421, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34404310

RESUMEN

Pediatric sepsis is a common problem worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Best practice recommendations have been published by both the American College of Critical Care Medicine and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign to guide the recognition and treatment of pediatric sepsis. However, implementation of these recommendations can be challenging due to the complexity of the care required and intensity of resources needed to successfully implement programs. This paper outlines the experience with implementation of a pediatric sepsis quality improvement program at Primary Children's Hospital, a free-standing, quaternary care children's hospital in Salt Lake City. The hospital has implemented sepsis projects across multiple care settings. Challenges, lessons learned, and suggestions for implementation are described.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYSepsis is a life-threatening condition that results from an inappropriate response to an infection by the body's immune system. All children are potentially susceptible to sepsis, with nearly 8,000 children dying from the disease in the US each year. Sepsis is a complicated disease, and several international groups have published guidelines to help hospital teams treat children with sepsis appropriately. However, because recognizing and treating sepsis in children is challenging and takes a coordinated effort from many different types of healthcare team members, following the international sepsis guidelines effectively can be difficult and resource intensive. This paper describes how one children's hospital (Primary Children's Hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah) approached the challenge of implementing pediatric sepsis guidelines, some lessons learned from their experience, and suggestions for others interested in implementing sepsis guidelines for children.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Niño , Cuidados Críticos , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sepsis/terapia , Choque Séptico/terapia
14.
Pediatrics ; 147(1)2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33328337

RESUMEN

Pediatric sepsis is a major public health problem. Published treatment guidelines and several initiatives have increased adherence with guideline recommendations and have improved patient outcomes, but the gains are modest, and persistent gaps remain. The Children's Hospital Association Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) collaborative seeks to improve sepsis outcomes in pediatric emergency departments, ICUs, general care units, and hematology/oncology units. We developed a multicenter quality improvement learning collaborative of US children's hospitals. We reviewed treatment guidelines and literature through 2 in-person meetings and multiple conference calls. We defined and analyzed baseline sepsis-attributable mortality and hospital-onset sepsis and developed a key driver diagram (KDD) on the basis of treatment guidelines, available evidence, and expert opinion. Fifty-six hospital-based teams are participating in IPSO; 100% of teams are engaged in educational and information-sharing activities. A baseline, sepsis-attributable mortality of 3.1% was determined, and the incidence of hospital-onset sepsis was 1.3 cases per 1000 hospital admissions. A KDD was developed with the aim of reducing both the sepsis-attributable mortality and the incidence of hospital-onset sepsis in children by 25% from baseline by December 2020. To accomplish these aims, the KDD primary drivers focus on improving the following: treatment of infection; recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of sepsis; de-escalation of unnecessary care; engagement of patients and families; and methods to optimize performance. IPSO aims to improve sepsis outcomes through collaborative learning and reliable implementation of evidence-based interventions.


Asunto(s)
Educación Continua , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sepsis/terapia , Niño , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos
15.
Hosp Pediatr ; 10(4): 311-317, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32122986

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: National guidelines advocate for the administration of antibiotics within 1 hour to children with septic shock, although there is variance in the pediatric evidence-based literature supporting this benchmark. Our objective for this study was to describe the association of target time to antibiotic administration (TTAA) with outcomes of children treated for suspected septic shock in a pediatric emergency department. Septic shock is suspected when signs of perfusion and/or hypotension are present. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included PICU admission, hospital and PICU length of stay, and organ dysfunction resolution by hospital day 2. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of children <18 years of age admitted from the pediatric emergency department and treated for suspected septic shock between February 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015. Associations between TTAA and outcomes were evaluated by using multivariable linear and logistic regression models obtained from stepwise selection. RESULTS: Of 1377 patients, 47% were boys with a median age of 4.0 (interquartile range 1.4-11.6) years, 1.5% (20) died, 90% were compliant with TTAA goals, 40% required PICU admission, 38% had ≥2 unique complex chronic conditions, 71% received antibiotics in ≤2 hours, and 30% had a culture-positive bacterial etiology. There were no significant associations between TTAA and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found no association with TTAA and any clinical outcomes, adding to the growing body of literature questioning the timing benchmark of antibiotic administration. Although the importance of antibiotics is not in question, elucidating the target TTAA may improve resource use and decrease inappropriate or unnecessary antibiotic exposure.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Benchmarking , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Pediatr Intensive Care ; 8(3): 122-129, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31404226

RESUMEN

Severe sepsis (SS) in pediatric oncology patients is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. We investigated the incidence of and risk factors for morbidity and mortality among children diagnosed with cancer from 2008 to 2012, and admitted with SS during the 3 years following cancer diagnosis. A total of 1,002 children with cancer were included, 8% of whom required pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission with SS. Death and/or multiple organ dysfunction syndrome occurred in 34 out of 99 PICU encounters (34%). Lactate level and history of stem-cell transplantation were significantly associated with the development of death and/or organ dysfunction ( p < 0.05).

17.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 40(1): 32-39, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30409233

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess variability in antimicrobial use and associations with infection testing in pediatric ventilator-associated events (VAEs). DESIGN: Descriptive retrospective cohort with nested case-control study. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), cardiac intensive care units (CICUs), and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in 6 US hospitals.PatientsChildren≤18 years ventilated for≥1 calendar day. METHODS: We identified patients with pediatric ventilator-associated conditions (VACs), pediatric VACs with antimicrobial use for≥4 days (AVACs), and possible ventilator-associated pneumonia (PVAP, defined as pediatric AVAC with a positive respiratory diagnostic test) according to previously proposed criteria. RESULTS: Among 9,025 ventilated children, we identified 192 VAC cases, 43 in CICUs, 70 in PICUs, and 79 in NICUs. AVAC criteria were met in 79 VAC cases (41%) (58% CICU; 51% PICU; and 23% NICU), and varied by hospital (CICU, 20-67%; PICU, 0-70%; and NICU, 0-43%). Type and duration of AVAC antimicrobials varied by ICU type. AVAC cases in CICUs and PICUs received broad-spectrum antimicrobials more often than those in NICUs. Among AVAC cases, 39% had respiratory infection diagnostic testing performed; PVAP was identified in 15 VAC cases. Also, among AVAC cases, 73% had no associated positive respiratory or nonrespiratory diagnostic test. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial use is common in pediatric VAC, with variability in spectrum and duration of antimicrobials within hospitals and across ICU types, while PVAP is uncommon. Prolonged antimicrobial use despite low rates of PVAP or positive laboratory testing for infection suggests that AVAC may provide a lever for antimicrobial stewardship programs to improve utilization.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/clasificación , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/organización & administración , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Hosp Pediatr ; 8(6): 361-367, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29794122

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe asthma management, investigate practice variation, and describe asthma-associated charges and resource use during asthma management in the PICU. METHODS: Children ages 2 to 18 years treated for status asthmaticus in the PICU from 2008 to 2011 are included in this study. This is a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. Data were collected by using the Intermountain Healthcare Enterprise Data Warehouse. RESULTS: There were 262 patients included and grouped by maximal respiratory support intervention. Seventy percent of the patients did not receive escalation of respiratory support beyond nasal cannula or nonrebreather mask, and the majority of these patients received only first-tier recommended therapy. For all patients, medical imaging and laboratory charge fractions accounted for <3% and <5% of the total charges, respectively. Among nonintubated patients, the majority of these diagnostic test results were normal. Fifteen patients were intubated during our study period; 4 were intubated at our facility. Compared with outside hospital intubations, these 4 patients had longer time to intubation (>3 days versus <24 hours) and significantly longer median PICU length of stay (12.7 days versus 2.6 days). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the vast majority of patients with severe asthma were treated with minimal interventions alone (nasal cannula or nonrebreather mask and first-tier medications). Minimizing PICU length of stay is likely the most successful way to decrease expense during asthma care.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Asma/economía , Asma/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/economía , Intubación Intratraqueal/economía , Masculino , Respiración Artificial/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 8(4): 331-6, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17417126

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop a trigger tool for identifying adverse events occurring in critically ill pediatric patients; to identify and characterize adverse events and preventable adverse events experienced by critically ill pediatric patients; and to characterize the patients who experience preventable adverse events. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review using a trigger tool. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary, university-affiliated pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: A systematic sample of 259 pediatric intensive care unit patients from a 1-yr period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured frequency of occurrence (0.19 preventable adverse events per patient-day), severity of harm (78% minor, 19% moderate, 3% serious, no deaths), and type of event (sedation, 22%; skin, 16%; medical device complication, 14%; pulmonary, 13%; and cardiovascular, 11%). Patients who experienced preventable adverse events were younger, had longer lengths of stay, and had higher illness burdens. Preventable adverse events occurred more frequently among surgical patients than medical patients. CONCLUSIONS: Preventable adverse events occurred fairly frequently in the pediatric intensive care unit, but serious harm was rare. Conditions that increased the likelihood of a preventable adverse event were a) need for sedation or pain control; b) relative immobility; and c) need for vascular devices, feeding tubes, or ventilators. Adverse event prevention strategies that focus on improving patient monitoring under increased-risk conditions and improving early detection and treatment of potential harm will likely be more effective than strategies aimed at general error prevention.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/organización & administración , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Preescolar , Protocolos Clínicos , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Equipos y Suministros/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA