The added value of clinical radiopharmacists in nuclear medicine: The example of glomerular filtration rate assessment in kidney donors.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: In Europe, the pharmaceutical supply of chromium-51 has been stopped. However, this isotope is necessary for the evaluation of glomerular filtration rates. It is possible to replace it with technetium-99m, but the validation of this change in the measurement method must be carried out. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of chromium-51 data from January 2018 to January 2019 was performed, followed by a study from January 2019 to January 2020 using the technetium tracer. The patients were different in the both study groups, and none had an eGFR below 50 mL min-1 . A cost analysis was performed. Patient exposure to ionizing radiation was studied for both methods. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Seventy-eight patients were included in the study. In total, 42 EDTA-51 Cr and 36 DTPA-99m Tc examinations were conducted and compared. There were no significant differences between the methods used to assess renal function (P = .351). The results of cost analysis and patient radiation exposure were in favour of DTPA-99m Tc examinations. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of a retrospective study of two patient cohorts, there was no significant difference between the results obtained with chromium-51 and technetium-99m tracers. In addition, with the use of DTPA-99m Tc, operating costs and patient exposure to ionizing radiation were reduced, and clinical activity was maintained for the patients' benefit. Radiopharmacists are able to react quickly to supply contingencies, reduce operating costs and maintain the quality of medical examinations.

Diffusion-weighted MRI is not superior to FDG-PET/CT for the detection of neck recurrence in well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma (WDTC) and positive thyroglobulin (Tg)/negative iodine-131 whole body scintigraphy (WBS) remains challenging. Here, we investigate the specific role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the neck (DW-MRI) as compared to rhTSH stimulated FDG-PET/CT in such patients. METHODS: Patients with WDTC, positive Tg/negative WBS were prospectively enrolled in the study. FDG-PET/CT and neck DW-MRI were performed on the same day after rhTSH stimulation. Neck-US was performed 24 hours after FDG-PET/CT and MRI to guide fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Patients with positive FNA underwent surgery. Patient with negative workup underwent new explorations at 6 and 18 months. RESULTS: A total of 86 FDG-PET/CT and 83 DW-MRI tests were performed in 40 patients (23 females; 17 males; 52±16 years). For detection of neck recurrences, sensitivity was equivalent for FDG-PET/CT and to DW-MRI at baseline (46% vs. 43%), at 6 months (30% vs. 20%) and at 18 months (11 vs. 10%). The comparison with a non-weighted Kappa test shows significant concordance between FDG-PET/CT and DW-MRI (K=0.741±0.062; P<0.0001). A relationship was observed between Tg and results of FDG-PET/CT, but not for DW-MRI. FDG-PET/CT permitted to detect iodine-refractory distant metastasis in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In Tg-positive/WBS-negative DTC patients, low tumour burden, neck DW-MRI does not provide additional information compared to rhTSH-stimulated FDG-PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT has the best sensitivity, is acceptable for patients, allows whole body exploration and distant metastasis detections, and is correlated with Tg levels.

Detection of neuroendocrine tumors: 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy compared with 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a new somatostatin analog, 99mTc-P829, compared with that of 111In-pentetreotide. METHODS: Forty-three patients (32 men, 11 women; age range, 24-78 y; mean age, 56 y) with biologically or histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors were prospectively included: 11 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, 16 patients with carcinoid tumors, and 16 patients with other types of functioning (n = 6) or nonfunctioning (n = 10) endocrine tumors. 111In-Pentetreotide planar images (head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were obtained 4 and 24 h after injection of 10 microg somatostatin analog labeled with 148 +/- 17 MBq 111In, and SPECT was performed 24 h after injection. Similar (99m)Tc-P829 planar images were obtained at 1, 4-6, and 24 h after injection of 50 microg peptide labeled with 991.6 +/- 187.59 MBq 99mTc. Abdominal SPECT was performed 4-6 h after injection. RESULTS: 111In-Pentetreotide detected 203 tumoral sites in 39 (91%) of 43 patients, whereas 99mTc-P829 detected 77 sites in 28 (65%) of 43 patients (P < 0.005). In the liver, 129 sites (in 24 patients) were detected by 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy and 34 sites (in 10 patients) were detected by 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy. CONCLUSION: In patients with endocrine tumors, the detection rate of 99mTc-P829 scintigraphy was lower than that of 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy, which appeared to be more sensitive, especially for liver metastases.

Clinical impact of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in the management of paragangliomas of the head and neck.

UNLABELLED: Paragangliomas are neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatinergic receptors and, thus, may be imaged by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). The purpose of the study was to assess the contribution of SRS in the management of paraganglioma of the head and neck. METHODS: (111)In-Pentetreotide (148 MBq) was intravenously administered to 3 groups of patients. Group A consisted of 9 patients with tumors of the head and neck that did not exhibit typical radiologic features of paragangliomas and required further diagnostic evaluation. Group B consisted of 28 patients with known paragangliomas or paraganglioma metastatic lymph node who required staging and assessment of multicentricity. Group C consisted of 5 asymptomatic relatives of affected individuals who required screening. All patients underwent clinical, laboratory, radiologic, and audiovestibular evaluation. RESULTS: In group A (n = 9), SRS was positive in 6 cases, 4 paragangliomas and 2 meningiomas, and negative in 3 patients in whom the initial diagnosis of paraganglioma was excluded. In group B (n = 28), SRS was strongly positive in all of the 34 head and neck masses diagnosed on conventional imaging to be paragangliomas; it localized 1 primary malignant paraganglioma and revealed 9 unexpected foci. In group C (n = 5), SRS was positive in 3 of the 5 relatives, CT or MR scan confirming the diagnosis of paraganglioma in all cases. CONCLUSION: Because of very high sensitivity in detecting paraganglioma, SRS should be included in a multiple-step strategy for patients' management. It could be useful in ruling out the diagnosis of schwannoma, but its major advantage may involve patients' staging. Once biologic genetic testing of affected patients' relatives evidenced the predisposing mutation, SRS could be proposed to identify individuals who express the disease.