Development and Validation of a Risk Score to Differentiate Viral and Autoimmune Encephalitis in Adults.

BACKGROUND: Encephalitis represents a challenging condition to diagnose and treat. To assist physicians in considering autoimmune encephalitis (AE) sooner, we developed and validated a risk score. METHODS: The study was conducted as a retrospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of definite viral encephalitis (VE) and AE from​​ February 2005 to December 2019. Clinically relevant and statistically significant features between cases of AE and VE were explored in a bivariate logistic regression model and results were used to identify variables for inclusion in the risk score. A multivariable logistic model was used to generate risk score values and predict risk for AE. Results were externally validated. RESULTS: A total of 1310 patients were screened. Of the 279 enrolled, 36 patients met criteria for definite AE and 88 criteria for definite VE. Patients with AE compared with VE were more likely to have a subacute to chronic presentation (odds ratio [OR] = 22.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05-243.7), Charlson comorbidity index <2 (OR = 6.62; 95% CI, 1.05-41.4), psychiatric and/or memory complaints (OR = 203.0; 95% CI, 7.57-5445), and absence of robust inflammation in the cerebrospinal fluid defined as <50 white blood cells/µL and protein <50 mg/dL (OR = 0.06; 95% CI, .005-0.50). Using these 4 variables, patients were classified into 3 risk categories for AE: low (0-1), intermediate (2-3), and high (4). Results were externally validated and the performance of the score achieved an area under the curve of 0.918 (95% CI, .871-.966). DISCUSSION: This risk score allows clinicians to estimate the probability of AE in patients presenting with encephalitis and may assist with earlier diagnosis and treatment.

24/7 workflow for bloodstream infection diagnostics in microbiology laboratories: the first step to improve clinical management.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the impact of an uninterrupted workflow regarding blood cultures on turnaround time and antibiotic prescription. METHODS: Monomicrobial episodes of bacteremia were retrospectively evaluated before and after a continuous 24/7 workflow was implemented in our clinical microbiology laboratory (pre- and post-intervention periods; PREIP and POSTIP). Primary outcome was the time from specimen collection to the first change in antibiotic therapy. Secondary outcomes included the time from specimen collection to effective antibiotic therapy and to antibiotic susceptibility testing results (or turnaround time), as well as hospital length of stay and all-cause mortality at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 548 episodes of bacteremia were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in PREIP and POSTIP regarding patient characteristics and causative bacteria. In POSTIP, the mean time to the first change in antibiotic therapy was reduced by 10.4 h (p<0.001). The time to effective antibiotic therapy and the turnaround time were respectively reduced by 4.8 h (p<0.001) and 5.1 h (p=0.006) in POSTIP. There was no difference in mean hospital length of stay or mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Around the clock processing of blood cultures allows for a reduction in turnaround time, which in turn reduces the delay until effective antibiotic therapy prescription.

Dalbavancin in clinical practice: a particular place for the elderly?

We investigate dalbavancin efficiency and tolerance among elderly in Grenoble-Alpes 32 university hospital. Among the 65 patients who received dalbavancin, 51% (33) were considered as old. Patients presented mainly bones and joint infections (52%), surgical site infection 34 (31%), and infective endocarditis (IE) (8%). Clinical cure was confirmed for 79% of old 35 patients at 1, 3, and 6 months. Six adverse events (9%) were reported after 36 dalbavancin's administration, but each time in combination with other antibiotics. 37 Dalbavancin had a significant effectiveness and safety profile and represents a real 38 therapeutic option in the management of deep and complex infections of elderly patients.

Epidemiology and outcome of occult bacteremia in patients discharged from emergency departments or ambulatory units: one-year study.

Microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) is made several hours after blood culture sampling. This delay could be critical in ambulatory clinics, emergency departments, and hospital day care units, as the patient may be discharged prior to blood culture positivity. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical outcome (including the number of readmissions) of patients diagnosed with BSI after discharge. We prospectively included all adult patients with positive blood culture for BSI that was confirmed after discharge from our center (Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital) in 2016. Patients were contacted about their blood culture results, and their clinical status was controlled via an external consultation or their family physician, with hospital readmission if necessary. Clinical outcome, accuracy of initial diagnosis, microbiological epidemiology, and antibiotic prescription were assessed. In 2016, 1433 episodes of positive blood culture were detected in our hospital, with 50 (3.5%) occurring after patient discharge. Clinically relevant bacteria were determined in 32/50 cases (64%), while other positive blood culture results were considered to be contaminants. Clinical reevaluation was performed in 45 patients (90%). The diagnosis was changed during the clinical reassessment of 24/49 patients (49%). Antibiotics were prescribed prior to discharge for 24/50 patients (48%), modified during follow-up for 15/45 (33%), and initiated for 13/45 (29%) at the reevaluation. Overall, 24/45 (53%) patients were readmitted to hospital units after reevaluation. The clinical follow-up of patients with positive blood culture after discharge led to diagnostic changes and hospital readmission in around half of patients.

A Prospective Cohort Study to Identify Clinical, Biological, and Imaging Features That Predict the Etiology of Acute Encephalitis.

BACKGROUND: New diagnostic tools have been developed to improve the diagnosis of infectious encephalitis. Using a prospective cohort of encephalitis patients, our objective was to identify possible clusters of patients with similar patterns among encephalitis of unknown cause (EUC) and to describe to what extent a patient's initial presentation may be predictive of encephalitis etiology, particularly herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV). METHODS: The National Cohort of Infectious Encephalitis in France is an ongoing prospective cohort study implemented in France in 2016. Patients who present with documented or suspected acute infectious encephalitis were included. Focusing on the variables that describe the initial presentation, we performed a factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD) to investigate a pattern of association between the initial presentation of a patient and the etiologic pathogen. RESULTS: As of 1 August 2018, data from 349 patients were analyzed. The most frequent pathogens were HSV (25%), VZV (11%), tick-borne encephalitis virus (6%), Listeria (5%), influenza virus (3%), and EUC (34%). Using the FAMD, it was not possible to identify a specific pattern related to the group of EUC. Age, temporal or hemorrhagic lesions, and cerebral spinal fluid lymphocytosis were significantly associated with HSV/VZV encephalitis. CONCLUSIONS: No initial clinical/imaging/biology pattern was identified at admission among EUC, despite the improvement in diagnostic tools. In this context, the recommendation for a universal, early, probabilistic, initial treatment against HSV and VZV is still relevant, regardless of the initial clinical presentation of the encephalitis.

SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Immunocompromised Patient Given Antibody Monotherapy.

A 72-year-old immunocompromised man infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 received bamlanivimab monotherapy. Viral evolution was monitored in nasopharyngeal and blood samples by melting curve analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and whole-genome sequencing. Rapid emergence of spike receptor binding domain mutations was found, associated with a compartmentalization of viral populations.

Management of prosthetic joint infections in France: a national audit to identify key situations requiring innovation and homogenization.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are one of the most serious complication of arthroplasty. The management of PJI needs a multidisciplinary collaboration between orthopaedic surgeon, infectious disease specialist and microbiologist. In France, the management of PJI is organized around reference centres (CRIOACs). Our main objective was to perform an audit through a questionnaire survey based on clinical cases, to evaluate how French physicians manage PJI. Eligible participants were all physicians involved in care of patients presenting a PJI. Physicians could answer individually, or collectively during a multidisciplinary team meeting dedicated to PJI. The survey consisted as three questionnaires organized in a total of six clinical cases. RESULTS: Answers from the CRIOACs to the three questionnaires were 92, 77, and 53%. Between 32 and 39% of respondents did not administer antibiotic prophylaxis despite positive S. aureus pre-operative documentation. One-stage exchange strategy was widely preferred in all clinical cases, with no difference between CRIOACs and other centres. Rifampicin was prescribed for S. aureus PJI, in a situation with (90-92%) or without any prosthesis (70%). There was no consensus for the total antibiotic regimen duration, with prescriptions from six to 12 weeks for a majority of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical strategy for the management of PJI was homogenous with a preference for a one-stage exchange strategy. Medical management was more heterogenous, which reflects the heterogeneity of those infections and difficulties to perform studies with strong conclusions.

A nationwide survey on involvement of clinical microbiologists in antibiotic stewardship programmes in large French hospitals.

Antibiotic stewardship programmes (ASP) are essential to tackle antibiotic resistance. Clinical microbiologists (CMs) play a key role in these programmes; however, few studies describe their actual involvement. Our objective was to explore CMs' involvement in French hospital ASP. In 2018, we conducted a survey among CMs working in large public French hospitals (600 acute care beds or more). The questionnaire focused on the following topics: microbiology department's characteristics, hospital ASP, and CMs' involvement in this programme, including their use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDT). Fifty/74 CMs answered (response rate 68%), with 68% working in a teaching hospital. CMs were leading the ASP in 6% of cases, and 57% of hospitals had a multidisciplinary antibiotic stewardship team. Most microbiology departments (92%) were using specific PCR, processed 24/7 in 74% of hospitals. More than half (58%) were using syndromic panel-based testing, 94% mass spectrometry, and 96% immunochromatographic/colorimetric RDT. Blood cultures were processed 24/7 in 44% of hospitals. CMs were involved in this. Finally, 42% of CMs wished to be more involved in their hospital's ASP, the most frequently reported barrier being lack of time (36%). CMs should be more involved in ASP. RDT are widely used, but not implemented in an optimal way.

Antibiotic therapy for Enterococcus bacteraemia: warning for the antimicrobial stewardship team.

Enterococci are a significant cause of bacteraemia in healthcare-associated infections (HCAI), being resistant to cephalosporins and aminoglycosides often used in this setting. Our aim was to measure the rate of inefficient antimicrobial therapy and its impact on the outcome. We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study in 6 French institutions. Patients were identified through the laboratory's database, which extracted all positive blood cultures for Enterococcus spp. in 2016. Patients' data were gathered by reviewing hospital records. Efficient antimicrobial therapy was defined as any therapy containing at least one antibiotic compound with in vitro efficacy against Enterococcus spp.: amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolide, tigecycline. A short-term unfavourable outcome was defined as intensive care requirement and/or in-hospital death at least 48 h after positive blood culture. One hundred thirty-one patients were included; the main diagnosis was a urinary tract infection (46%) and a HCAI was observed in 54% of the cases. Four patients did not receive any antibiotic. Forty-three per cent of empirical antibiotic therapies and 17% of documented ones were inefficient for enterococcal bacteraemia. Sixty patients (46%) received amoxicillin as a documented therapy. Twenty-three per cent of the patients presented a short-term unfavourable outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that not receiving amoxicillin as a documented antibiotic therapy was associated with an unfavourable short-term outcome (p = 0.001). In conclusion, Enterococcal bacteraemia was associated with a high proportion of inefficient antimicrobial therapy. In multivariate analysis, amoxicillin use was associated with a better outcome.

Factors associated with unfavorable outcome in a multicenter audit of 100 infective endocarditis.

We aimed to identify factors associated with unfavorable outcome in patients treated for infective endocarditis (IE), with a focus on departure from European guidelines. We conducted a retrospective audit of all adult patients treated for endocarditis during a 1-year period across a regional network of nine care centers in the south-east of France. Medical records were reviewed regarding patient and infection characteristics, antibiotic therapy, outcome, and compliance to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Antibiotic treatment appropriateness was evaluated regarding molecule, dosage, and duration, according to guidelines. Primary endpoint was the assessment of factors associated with unfavorable outcome, defined as in-hospital mortality or IE relapse at 1-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints were intensive care admission, iatrogenic events, and nosocomial infections that occurred during hospital stay. One hundred patients were included. Median age was 71 years old. Twenty-two patients died and IE relapse occurred in two patients, representing 24 patients with unfavorable outcome. Overall, antibiotic treatment was deemed appropriate in 28 cases. Thirty-three patients required intensive care, 34 iatrogenic events were found, including 19 acute kidney injuries, and 13 nosocomial infections occurred during care. Using a logistic regression, factors associated with unfavorable outcome were admission in the intensive care unit (adjusted odd ratio 7.26 [1.8-29.28]; p = 0.005), new-onset nosocomial infection (adjusted odd ratio 8.83 [1.42-54.6]; p = 0.019), and age > 71 years old (adjusted odd ratio 11.2 [2.76-46.17]; p < 0.001). Departure from guidelines was frequent but not related to unfavorable outcome in our study. Only intensive care, age, and nosocomial infections were associated with mortality and relapse. Iatrogenic events were numerous, with no impact on outcome.

Quality indicators assessing antibiotic use in the outpatient setting: a systematic review followed by an international multidisciplinary consensus procedure.

Objectives: Quality indicators (QIs) assessing the appropriateness of antibiotic use are essential to identify targets for improvement and guide antibiotic stewardship interventions. The aim of this study was to develop a set of QIs for the outpatient setting from a global perspective. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed by searching MEDLINE and relevant web sites in order to retrieve a list of QIs. These indicators were extracted from published trials, guidelines, literature reviews or consensus procedures. This evidence-based set of QIs was evaluated by a multidisciplinary, international group of stakeholders using a RAND-modified Delphi procedure, using two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting between them. Stakeholders appraised the QIs' relevance using a nine-point Likert scale. This work is part of the DRIVE-AB project. Results: The systematic literature review identified 43 unique QIs, from 54 studies and seven web sites. Twenty-five stakeholders from 14 countries participated in the consensus procedure. Ultimately, 32 QIs were retained, with a high level of agreement. The set of QIs included structure, process and outcome indicators, targeting both high- and middle- to low-income settings. Most indicators focused on general practice, addressing the common indications for antibiotic use in the community (particularly urinary and respiratory tract infections), and the organization of healthcare facilities. Twelve indicators specifically addressed outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Conclusions: We identified a set of 32 outpatient QIs to measure the appropriateness of antibiotic use. These QIs can be used to identify targets for improvement and to evaluate the effects of antibiotic stewardship interventions.

Metrics to assess the quantity of antibiotic use in the outpatient setting: a systematic review followed by an international multidisciplinary consensus procedure.

Background: The international Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) project DRIVE-AB (Driving Reinvestment in Research and Development and Responsible Antibiotic Use) aims to develop a global definition of 'responsible' antibiotic use. Objectives: To identify consensually validated quantity metrics for antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. Methods: First, outpatient quantity metrics (OQMs) were identified by a systematic search of literature and web sites published until 12 December 2014. Identified OQMs were evaluated by a multidisciplinary, international stakeholder panel using a RAND-modified Delphi procedure. Two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting between them were conducted to assess OQM relevance for measuring the quantity of antibiotic use on a nine-point Likert scale, to add comments or to propose new metrics. Results: A total of 597 articles were screened, 177 studies met criteria for full-text screening and 138 were finally included. Twenty different OQMs were identified and appraised by 23 stakeholders. During the first survey, 14 OQMs were excluded and 6 qualified for discussion. During the face-to-face meeting, 10 stakeholders retained five OQMs and suggestions were made considering context and combination of metrics. The final set of metrics included defined daily doses, treatments/courses and prescriptions per defined population, treatments/courses and prescriptions per defined number of physician contacts and seasonal variation of total antibiotic use. Conclusions: A small set of consensually validated metrics to assess the quantity of antibiotic use in the outpatient setting was obtained, enabling (inter)national comparisons. The OQMs will help build a global conceptual framework for responsible antibiotic use.

Quality indicators for responsible antibiotic use in the inpatient setting: a systematic review followed by an international multidisciplinary consensus procedure.

Background: This study was conducted as part of the Driving Reinvestment in Research and Development and Responsible Antibiotic Use (DRIVE-AB) project and aimed to develop generic quality indicators (QIs) for responsible antibiotic use in the inpatient setting. Methods: A RAND-modified Delphi method was applied. First, QIs were identified by a systematic review. A complementary search was performed on web sites of relevant organizations. Duplicates were removed and disease and patient-specific QIs were combined into generic indicators. The relevance of these QIs was appraised by a multidisciplinary international stakeholder panel through two questionnaires and an in-between consensus meeting. Results: The systematic review retrieved 70 potential generic QIs. The QIs were appraised by 25 international stakeholders with diverse backgrounds (medical community, public health, patients, antibiotic research and development, regulators, governments). Ultimately, 51 QIs were selected in consensus. QIs with the highest relevance score included: (i) an antibiotic plan should be documented in the medical record at the start of the antibiotic treatment; (ii) the results of bacteriological susceptibility testing should be documented in the medical record; (iii) the local guidelines should correspond to the national guidelines but should be adapted based on local resistance patterns; (iv) an antibiotic stewardship programme should be in place at the healthcare facility; and (v) allergy status should be taken into account when antibiotics are prescribed. Conclusions: This systematic and stepwise method combining evidence from literature and stakeholder opinion led to multidisciplinary international consensus on generic inpatient QIs that can be used globally to assess the quality of antibiotic use.

Variation in antibiotic use among and within different settings: a systematic review.

Objectives: Variation in antibiotic use may reflect inappropriate use. We aimed to systematically describe the variation in measures for antibiotic use among settings or providers. This study was conducted as part of the innovative medicines initiative (IMI)-funded international project DRIVE-AB. Methods: We searched for studies published in MEDLINE from January 2004 to January 2015 reporting variation in measures for systemic antibiotic use (e.g. DDDs) in inpatient and outpatient settings. The ratio between a study's reported maximum and minimum values of a given measure [maximum:minimum ratio (MMR)] was calculated as a measure of variation. Similar measures were grouped into categories and when possible the overall median ratio and IQR were calculated. Results: One hundred and forty-three studies were included, of which 85 (59.4%) were conducted in Europe and 12 (8.4%) in low- to middle-income countries. Most studies described the variation in the quantity of antibiotic use in the inpatient setting (81/143, 56.6%), especially among hospitals (41/81, 50.6%). The most frequent measure was DDDs with different denominators, reported in 23/81 (28.4%) inpatient studies and in 28/62 (45.2%) outpatient studies. For this measure, we found a median MMR of 3.7 (IQR 2.6-5.0) in 4 studies reporting antibiotic use in ICUs in DDDs/1000 patient-days and a median MMR of 2.3 (IQR 1.5-3.2) in 18 studies reporting outpatient antibiotic use in DDDs/1000 inhabitant-days. Substantial variation was also identified in other measures. Conclusions: Our review confirms the large variation in antibiotic use even across similar settings and providers. Data from low- and middle-income countries are under-represented. Further studies should try to better elucidate reasons for the observed variation to facilitate interventions that reduce unwarranted practice variation. In addition, the heterogeneity of reported measures clearly shows that there is need for standardization.

Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure.

Background: Quantifying antibiotic use is an essential element of antibiotic stewardship since it allows comparison between different settings and time windows, and measurement of the impact of interventions. However, quantity metrics (QMs) and methods have not been standardized. Objectives: To propose a set of QMs for antibiotic use in inpatients (IQMs) that are accepted globally by professionals in a range of disciplines. The study was conducted within the Driving Reinvestment in Research and Development and Responsible Antibiotic Use (DRIVE-AB) project. Methods: A systematic literature review using MEDLINE identified articles on measuring inpatient antibiotic use, published up to 29 January 2015. A consensually selected list of national and international web sites was screened for additional IQMs. IQMs were classified according to the type of numerator used and presented to a multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders. A RAND-modified Delphi consensus procedure, which consisted of two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting, was performed. Results: The systematic literature review and web site search identified 168 eligible articles from which an initial list of 20 IQMs, composed of 20 different numerators and associated denominators was developed. The consensus procedure resulted in a final set of 12 IQMs. Among this final set, DDDs per 100(0) patient-days and days of therapy per patient-days were most frequently found in the review. The panel recommended that antibiotic use should be expressed in at least two metrics simultaneously. Conclusions: Our consensus procedure identified a set of IQMs that we propose as an evidence-based global standard.

Putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a matched cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at risk for developing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. A clinical algorithm has been validated to discriminate colonization from putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (PIPA) in Aspergillus-positive respiratory tract cultures of critically ill patients. We focused on critically ill patients with COPD who met the criteria for PIPA. METHODS: This matched cohort study included critically ill patients with COPD from two university hospital intensive care units (ICUs). We studied the risk factors for PIPA as well as the impact of PIPA on short- and long-term outcomes. Whether PIPA was associated with a pattern of bacterial colonization and/or infection 6 months before and/or during ICU stay was assessed. In addition, antifungal strategies were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty cases of PIPA in critically ill patients with COPD in the ICU were matched with one hundred control patients with COPD. The ICU short- and the long-term (at 1 year) mortality were significantly increased in the PIPA group (p < 0.001 for all variables). PIPA was a strong independent risk factor for mortality in the ICU (odds ratio 7.44, 95 % confidence interval 2.93-18.93, p < 0.001) before vasopressor therapy, renal replacement therapy, and duration of mechanical ventilation. Before ICU admission, the use of corticosteroids and antibiotics significantly increased the risk of PIPA (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference in bacterial etiologic agents responsible for colonization and/or infection was found between the groups. Antifungal treatment was started in 64 % of PIPA cases, with a poor impact on the overall outcome. CONCLUSIONS: PIPA was a strong death predictor in critically ill patients with COPD. The use of corticosteroids and antibiotics before ICU admission was a risk factor for PIPA. PIPA was not associated with a specific bacterial pattern of colonization or infection. Prompting antifungal treatment in critically ill patients with COPD who have PIPA may not be the only factor involved in prognosis reversal.

Early picc-line infections in non-neutropenic patients are mainly due to E. coli suggesting that third-generation cephalosporin may be used as a first-line antibiotic therapy.

PURPOSE: To describe the rate of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) -associated bloodstream infections, and the pathogens involved. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data collected from all adult patients with a PICC insertion in a hematology unit in a tertiary care center between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 370 PICCs were inserted in 275 patients with hematological malignancies: 54 (15 %) confirmed cases of central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) were identified. Enterobacteria were the most frequent bacteria identified, involved in 35 % of CLABSIs. Group 1 enterobacteria bacteremia occurred a much shorter time after insertion (median time to CLABSI 16 days) than group 2 or group 3 enterobacteria (median time to CLABSI 64 days, p-value = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Among Gram-negative bacilli CLABSI among non-neutropenic patients, E. coli identification was the most frequent and occurred earlier after insertion, suggesting that third-generation cephalosporin may be used as a first-line antibiotic therapy for enterobacteria bacteremia among non-neutropenic patients.

Quantitative brain 18F-FDG PET/CT analysis in seronegative autoimmune encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: Brain 18F-FDG PET/CT is a useful diagnostic in evaluating patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Specific patterns of brain dysmetabolism have been reported in anti-NMDAR and anti-LGI1 AE, and the degree of dysmetabolism may correlate with clinical functional status.18FDG-PET/CT abnormalities have not yet been described in seronegative AE. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of brain18FDG-PET/CT data in people with seronegative AE treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Utilizing NeuroQ™ software, the Z-scores of 47 brain regions were calculated relative to healthy controls, then visually and statistically compared for probable and possible AE per clinical consensus diagnostic criteria to previous data from anti-NMDAR and anti-LGI1 cohorts. RESULTS: Eight probable seronegative AE and nine possible seronegative AE were identified. The group only differed in frequency of abnormal brain MRI, which was seen in all of the probable seronegative AE patients. Both seronegative groups had similar overall patterns of brain dysmetabolism. A common pattern of frontal lobe hypometabolism and medial temporal lobe hypermetabolism was observed in patients with probable and possible seronegative AE, as well as anti-NMDAR and anti-LGI1 AE as part of their respective characteristic patterns of dysmetabolism. Four patients had multiple brain18FDG-PET/CT scans, with changes in number and severity of abnormal brain regions mirroring clinical status. CONCLUSIONS: A18FDG-PET/CT pattern of frontal lobe hypometabolism and medial temporal lobe hypermetabolism could represent a common potential biomarker of AE, which along with additional clinical data may facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment.

Cytomegalovirus detection is associated with ICU admission in non-AIDS and AIDS patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is frequently detected in lung and/or blood samples of patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), although this co-detection is not precisely understood. We aimed to determine whether PJP was more severe in case of CMV detection. METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients with a diagnosis of PJP between 2009 and 2020 in our centre and with a measure of CMV viral load in blood and/or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). PJP severity was assessed by the requirement for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: The median age of the 249 patients was 63 [IQR: 53-73] years. The main conditions were haematological malignancies (44.2%), solid organ transplantations (16.5%), and solid organ cancers (8.8%). Overall, 36.5% patients were admitted to ICU. CMV was detected in BAL in 57/227 patients; the 37 patients with viral load ≥3 log copies/mL were more frequently admitted to ICU (78.4% vs 28.4%, p<0.001). CMV was also detected in blood in 57/194 patients; the 48 patients with viral load ≥3 log copies/mL were more frequently admitted to ICU (68.7% vs 29.4%, p<0.001). ICU admission rate was found to increase with each log of BAL CMV viral load and each log of blood CMV viral load. CONCLUSIONS: PJP is more severe in the case of concomitant CMV detection. This may reflect either the deleterious role of CMV itself, which may require antiviral therapy, or the fact that patients with CMV reactivation are even more immunocompromised.

Diagnostic performances and therapeutic impact of the Unyvero Implant and Tissue Infection multiplex PCR in periprosthetic joint infections.

Aim: We evaluated the diagnostic performances of Unyvero Implant and Tissue Infection multiplex PCR (mPCR) (Curetis) and the clinical impact of this PCR on therapeutic decisions. Materials & methods: A mPCR was performed on 33 joint fluids in addition to standard culture. A group of experts analyzed a posteriori the impact of the mPCR in the patient management. Results: The rate of concordance with culture was 74% (20/27). The sensitivity of the PCR was 59% and the specificity 90%. Clinicians would have started an appropriate treatment sooner for six patients (from 2 to 22 days earlier). Conclusion: The PCR would improve the management of 22% of the patients. For other patients, mPCR results have to be completed with the culture.