Length of stay after reaching clinical stability drives hospital costs associated with adult community-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has a considerable clinical and economic impact. The aim of this study was to identify drivers of hospital costs associated with CAP in 2 Belgian hospitals. Specifically, the influence of patient characteristics, quality indicators, and other treatment aspects on hospital costs was explored. METHODS: The following were registered for patients admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of CAP in a large university hospital (Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, UZL) and a medium-sized secondary care hospital (Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, ZOL) in Belgium: the pneumonia severity index (PSI), time to clinical stability, length of stay, antibiotic therapy, outcomes, compliance with validated quality indicators, and the different costs (pharmacy, laboratory, and radiology, and total). Regression analysis was used to identify influential variables. RESULTS: Between October 2007 and June 2010, 803 patients were included, with a median total cost of €4794.57. The length of stay after clinical stability and time to clinical stability had the highest influence on the total cost (+6.3% and +4.9% per additional day, respectively; p < 0.0001). Other important drivers of higher costs were total therapy duration, PSI score, age, and admission to intensive care. Patients treated with moxifloxacin had significantly, but limited, lower costs. Quality indicator compliance, including guideline-compliant antibiotic treatment and therapy streamlining, had little influence. CONCLUSIONS: The most important driver of hospital costs associated with CAP was the time between clinical stability and actual hospital discharge. In order to substantially decrease the costs of CAP treatment, this period should be rigorously evaluated for possible intervention targets that would allow costs in CAP treatment to be decreased in a substantial manner.

Empirical management of community-acquired pneumonia: impact of concurrent A/H1N1 influenza pandemic on guideline implementation.

BACKGROUND: Guideline-concordant therapies have been proven to be associated with improved health and economic outcomes in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, actual use of CAP guidelines remains poor, but using tailored interventions looks promising. Based on local observations, we assessed the impact of low-intensity interventions to improve guideline use. METHODS: Pre-and post-intervention study with segmented regression analysis in a large tertiary care centre [University Hospitals Leuven (UZL)] and a smaller secondary care control hospital [Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL)] from October 2007 through to June 2010 in Belgium. RESULTS: A total of 477 patients were included in UZL, with 58.5% of the patients treated according to local guidelines. Guideline adherence remained stable, but a decrease (-28.6%; P = 0.021) was observed during guideline re-introduction in October 2009. Further analysis showed a high correlation with the concurrent A/H1N1 influenza pandemic (r(point-biserial) = 0.683; P = 0.045) and with suspected influenza infection (odds ratio = 2.70; P = 0.038). In ZOL, 326 patients were enrolled, with 69.3% being treated concordantly. A similar, non-significant decrease in guideline adherence was observed after October 2009. CONCLUSIONS: Our interventions did not lead to a higher proportion of CAP patients receiving guideline-compliant therapy. Instead, a compliance decrease was observed, coinciding with the peak in the A/H1N1 pandemic in the population. Similar observations could be made in ZOL. The widespread attention for this pandemic may have altered the perception of needed antibiotic therapy for pulmonary infections, bypassing our interventions and decreasing actual guideline compliance. Increased vigilance and follow-up is needed when epidemics with similar impact occur in the future.