Deployed military general internal physician's toolkit: the recent past and near future.

INTRODUCTION: The role of the military physician in Deployed Hospital Care involves the diagnosis and management of a wide variety of disease states. Broad clinical skills need to be complemented by judicious use of a limited array of investigations. No study has specifically quantified what investigations physicians use on operations. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed to ascertain what investigations were undertaken on all patients managed by the General Internal Medicine teams over a 14 month period during a recent enduring operation in Afghanistan. A record was also made of investigations that were unavailable but considered desirable by the treating physician in order to inform clinical or occupational decisions. RESULTS: 676 patients were admitted during the study period. Blood tests were performed in 96% of patients, plain radiographs in 50%, CT in 12% and ultrasound in 12%. An ECG was performed in over half (57%) and a peak flow in 11%. The most desirable, but unavailable, investigations were cardiac monitoring and echocardiography (24% and 12% of patients, respectively). DISCUSSION: The data produced by this study both identified and quantified the investigations used by physicians during a mature operational deployment. This can be used in addition to accurate medical intelligence to inform and rationalise the diagnostic requirements for future operations as well as the provision of training. Technological advancements, particularly in weight and portability, are likely to enable more complex investigational modalities to be performed further forward on military deployments.

A 2-year review of the general internal medicine admissions to the British Role 3 Hospital in Camp Bastion, Afghanistan.

BACKGROUND: Detailed knowledge of the likely volume and nature of the diseases presenting to deployed secondary care facilities aids operational planning. Now the British operation in Afghanistan has ended and a record of the experience is useful to preserve the lessons learned. METHODS: Over a 2-year period from April 2011, prospective demographic and clinical data were collected on consecutive general internal medicine admissions to the Role 3 Hospital in Camp Bastion, Afghanistan. Up to four different symptoms and diagnoses were coded using the WHO International Classification of Disease, V.10 for each patient. RESULTS: A total of 1368 medical patients were admitted. Of 1131 military admissions, 612 were from the UK (54.1%) and the remainder from 13 allied countries; 237 civilians came from 23 countries. Civilians were older than the military patients (p<0.001) but included five children. The 20 most frequent presenting symptoms were identified and there were 1626 diagnoses made. The 10 most frequent diagnoses were infectious gastroenteritis (12.6%), heat illness (4.3%), pneumonia (3.6%), epilepsy (2.6%), cellulitis (2.7%), migraine (1.8%), peptic ulcer disease (1.2%), myocardial infarction (1.2%), venous thromboembolism (1.2%) and pericarditis (0.7%). In 252 cases (18.4%) a firm diagnosis was not reached and a symptom was recorded. The five most frequent of these were undifferentiated febrile illnesses (4.6%), syncope (3.7%), chest pain (2.8%), headache (0.8%) and palpitations (0.7%). The mean hospital length of stay was 1.59 days and 72.2% of UK military patients were 'returned to unit'. Three civilian patients died in hospital or following aeromedical evacuation and there were no deaths of any military patients. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the wide variety of presentations seen by physicians at an established military field hospital. This information informs the core syllabus of military physician training and will help facilitate planning for future medical support to similar military operations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RCDM/Res/Audit/1036/12/0305.

A review of the documentation in the British Armed Forces electronic patient record following discharge from the Role 3 Hospital in Camp Bastion.

INTRODUCTION: The British Role 3 Hospital in Camp Bastion, Afghanistan, uses a different electronic patient record (EPR) to Defence Primary Health Care and the two cannot directly communicate. Consequently, hospital discharge information is transferred by printed letter to primary care, introducing a step where information can be lost. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the primary care EPR contained an accurate summary of the secondary care admission. METHODS: Cross-sectional information on consecutive General Internal Medicine patients at the hospital was collected and compared with the primary care EPR. RESULTS: From April 2011 the hospital records of 270 patients were reviewed. 239 primary care records were available for comparison. Of 185 patients discharged back to their unit the EPR of 43.8% contained a comprehensive summary, 23.2% contained the scanned discharge letter and 50.8% contained an account of their hospital admission but not necessarily a comprehensive summary. Of the 54 patients evacuated to the UK, the EPRs of 48.1% contained a summary, 68.1% contained the scanned discharge letter and 75.9% contained some account of their hospital admission. More of the evacuated group had their admission documented in the primary care EPR (p=0.001). Only 56.5% of all primary care records contained some account of the hospital admission. DISCUSSION: The primary care record is not a reliable record of operational hospital admission and presents an unrecognised potential patient safety issue. The systems responsible for the transfer of discharge summary data need to be appraised to prevent it continuing. Retrospective action should be considered to rectify this problem in former hospital patients.

Clinical activity at the UK military level 2 hospital in Bentiu, South Sudan during Op TRENTON from June to September 2017.

INTRODUCTION: Diseases and non-battle injuries (DNBIs) are common on UK military deployments, but the collection and analysis of clinically useful data on these remain a challenge. Standard medical returns do not provide adequate clinical information, and clinician-led approaches have been laudable, but not integrated nor standardised nor used long-term. Op TRENTON is a novel UK military humanitarian operation in support of the United Nations Mission in South Sudan, which included the deployment of UK military level 1 and level 2 medical treatment facilities at Bentiu to provide healthcare for UK and United Nations (UN) personnel. METHODS: A service evaluation of patient consultations and admissions at the UK military level 2 hospital was performed using two data sets collected by the emergency department (ED) and medicine (MED) teams. RESULTS: Over a three-month (13-week) period, 286 cases were seen, of which 51% were UK troops, 29% were UN civilians and 20% were UN troops. The ED team saw 175 cases (61%) and provided definitive care for 113 (40%), whereas the MED team saw and provided definitive care for 128 cases (45%). Overall, there were 75% with diseases and 25% with non-battle injuries. The most common diagnoses seen by the ED team were musculoskeletal injuries (17%), unidentified non-malarial undifferentiated febrile illness (UNMUFI) (17%), malaria (13%), chemical pneumonitis (13%) and wounds (8%). The most common diagnoses seen by the MED team were acute gastroenteritis (AGE) (56%), UNMUFI (12%) and malaria (9%). AGE was due to viruses (31%), diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (32%), other bacteria (6%) and protozoa (12%). CONCLUSION: Data collection on DNBIs during the initial phase of this deployment was clinically useful and integrated between different departments. However, a standardised, long-term solution that is embedded into deployed healthcare is required. The clinical activity recorded here should be used for planning, training, service development and targeted research.

Undifferentiated febrile illnesses in South Sudan: a case series from Operation TRENTON from June to August 2017.

Undifferentiated febrile illnesses present diagnostic and treatment challenges in the Firm Base, let alone in the deployed austere environment. We report a series of 14 cases from Operation TRENTON in South Sudan in 2017 that coincided with the rainy season, increased insect numbers and a Relief in Place. The majority of patients had headaches, myalgia, arthralgia and back pain, as well as leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. No diagnoses could be made in theatre, despite a sophisticated deployed laboratory being available, and further testing in the UK, including next-generation sequencing, was unable to establish an aetiology. Such illnesses are very likely to present in tropical environments, where increasing numbers of military personnel are being deployed, and clinicians must be aware of the non-specific presentation and treatment, as well as the availability of Military Infection Reachback services to assist in the management of these cases.