Inter-physician Communication in Pediatric Orthopaedics: What do Pediatricians Want to Hear From us?

BACKGROUND: Pediatric orthopaedic surgeons often communicate with general pediatric providers to facilitate patient care, but little data exist on communication preferences. This study investigates pediatric provider preferences regarding when they would like to receive patient updates from pediatric orthopedists, which communication modalities they prefer, and what information they like to receive. METHODS: We developed a 19-question e-mail survey to evaluate provider preferences on communication modality, timing, frequency, and what data they deem important as it relates to musculoskeletal patient care. RESULTS: A total of 111 general pediatric providers in our geographical region completed the survey. Among the providers, 55.9% preferred fax, 40.5% electronic health record inbox message, 19.8% e-mail, 12.6% mail, and 7.2% call/voicemail. The majority (67.9%) preferred information in a traditional note format, whereas 24.8% preferred a summary in paragraph format. Patient diagnosis and treatment plan for shared patients were the most important pieces of information for general pediatric providers to receive from pediatric orthopedists. Of various patient-specific scenarios included in the survey, referrals for osteomyelitis concern, fractures requiring surgery, scoliosis concern, and developmental dysplasia of the hip requiring treatment were considered most important for pediatric orthopedists to send updates. In terms of frequency of communication, over half of the pediatric providers (59.5%) desired updates after the first visit and after care plan changes (50.5%). CONCLUSION: Only 43.5% of pediatric providers feel like current communication with pediatric orthopaedic surgeons is "always" or "often" adequate. Most of our surveyed providers preferred occasional SOAP notes through fax as communication from pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. The communication deemed most important to providers related to referrals where the provider makes the initial diagnosis and then refers the patient to orthopaedics for a condition with potential long-term patient impacts. Finally, providers felt communication was most important after the first pediatric orthopaedic office visit. EVIDENCE: Level III, survey based.

Risk of Infection Following Gunshot Wound Fractures to the Foot and Ankle: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

The purpose of this multicenter retrospective chart review was to describe demographics, fracture and wound characteristics, and treatments for foot and/or ankle fractures caused by gunshot wounds (GSWs) and identify factors that increase risk of infection in adults treated at 5 urban level 1 trauma centers in South and Midwest regions of the United States. A total of 244 patients sustained GSW-related fractures of the foot/ankle during 2007-2017, of whom 179 had ≥30 days of follow-up data after the initial injury. Most patients were male (95.1%; 232/244) with an average age of 31.2 years. On average, patients sustained 1.3 GSWs (range 1-5) to the foot/ankle. Most GSWs were categorized as low energy (85.1%; 171/201) and the majority (58.2%; 142/244) had retained bullet fragments. Antibiotics were administered at initial presentation to 78.7% (192/244) of patients and 41.8% (102/244) were managed operatively at the time of initial injury. Nerve injury, vascular injury, and infection were documented in, respectively, 8.6% (21/243), 6.6% (16/243), and 17.2% (42/244) of all cases. Multivariable analysis revealed that high-energy injuries and retained bullet fragments increased the risk of infection by 3-fold (odds ratio 3.09, 95% confidence interval 1.16-8.27, p = .025) and 3.5-fold (OR 3.48, 95% CI1.40-8.67; p = .008), respectively. Side of injury, primary injury region, and vascular injury were not significant predictors of infection risk. Further research should examine whether retained bullet fragments are directly associated with infection risk and support the development of guidelines regarding the management of patients with GSW-related fractures to the ankle/foot.

Geographic determinants of colorectal cancer in Louisiana.

PURPOSE: Currently, rural residents in the United States (US) experience a greater cancer burden for tobacco-related cancers and cancers that can be prevented by screening. We aim to characterize geographic determinants of colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in Louisiana due to rural residence and other known geographic risk factors, area socioeconomic status (SES), and cultural region (Acadian or French-speaking). METHODS: Primary colorectal cancer diagnosed among adults 30 years and older in 2008-2017 were obtained from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. Population and social and economic data were obtained from US Census American Community Survey. Rural areas were defined using US Department of Agriculture 2010 rural-urban commuting area codes. Estimates of relative risk (RR) were obtained from multilevel binomial regression models of incidence. RESULTS: The study population was 16.1% rural, 18.4% low SES, and 17.9% Acadian. Risk of CRC was greater among rural white residents (RR Women: 1.09(1.02-1.16), RR Men: 1.11(1.04-1.18)). Low SES was associated with increased CRC for all demographic groups, with excess risk ranging from 8% in Black men (RR: 1.08(1.01-1.16)) to 16% in white men (RR: 1.16(1.08-1.24)). Increased risk in the Acadian region was greatest for Black men (RR: 1.21(1.10-1.33)) and women (RR: 1.21(1.09-1.33)). Rural-urban disparities in CRC were no longer significant after controlling for SES and Acadian region. CONCLUSION: SES remains a significant determinant of CRC disparities in Louisiana and may contribute to observed rural-urban disparities in the state. While the intersectionality of CRC risk factors is complex, we have confirmed a robust regional disparity for the Acadian region of Louisiana.

Disparities in Pediatric Scoliosis: The Impact of Race and Insurance Type on Access to Nonoperative Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has evidence-based, nonoperative treatments proven to be effective with early diagnosis and prompt treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify potential disparities in access to nonoperative treatment for AIS. Specifically, we sought to determine the interaction of socioeconomic factors on a major curve magnitude and recommend treatment at the initial presentation. METHODS: A retrospective review of AIS patients who underwent surgery at a single tertiary pediatric hospital between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018 was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups for comparison: patients with public insurance (PUB) and those with private insurance (PRV). Primary variables analyzed were patient race, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), major curve magnitude, and treatment recommendation at the initial presentation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of the major curve magnitude at presentation. RESULTS: A total of 341 patients met the inclusion criteria; PUB and PRV groups consisted of 182 (53.4%) and 159 (46.6%) children, respectively. Overall, the major curve magnitude at presentation was significantly higher in PUB compared with PRV patients (50.0° vs. 45.1°; P =0.004) and higher in Black patients compared to White patients (51.8 vs. 47.0, P =0.042). Surgery was recommended for 49.7% of the PUB group and 43.7% of the PRV group. A lesser number of PUB patients had curve magnitudes within the range of brace indications (≤40°) compared to PRV patients (22.5% vs. 35.2%, respectively; P =0.010). The odds of having an initial major curve magnitude <40 degrees were 67% lower among Black patients with public insurance compared to Black patients with private insurance (OR=0.33; 95% CI: 0.13-0.83; P =0.019). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated disparity in access to nonoperative treatment for pediatric scoliosis. Black patients with public insurance were the most at-risk to present with curve magnitudes exceeding brace indications. Future work focused on understanding the reasons for this significant disparity may help to promote more equitable access to effective nonoperative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Feasibility of Utilizing Malunion Criteria to Limit Radiographs After Spica Casting for Pediatric Femur Fractures.

BACKGROUND: There are no existing guidelines regarding the timing or frequency of postoperative radiographs following spica casting for pediatric femur fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate established femoral malunion criteria as a potential screening tool to limit postoperative radiographs by identifying patients at risk for unacceptable alignment in the early treatment period. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for pediatric femoral shaft fractures presenting to a tertiary pediatric referral hospital from 2012 to 2017. Pediatric femur malunion criteria were applied to radiographs at initial presentation, first follow-up visit, and final follow-up visit. The primary outcome was a change in management based on radiographic findings in the early postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included radiographic measures, number of follow-up visits, and complications. RESULTS: Of 449 consecutive pediatric femur fractures treated at our center, 149 patients aged 1 to 4 years (mean age: 2.5±1.6 y) met inclusion criteria. At initial presentation, 36.9% (55/149) of patients met malunion criteria. Only 4.0% (6/149) of patients had a change in management following initial closed reduction and spica cast application due to radiographic findings at subsequent follow-up. Of these patients, 67% (4/6) were identified on preoperative imaging, and 83.3% (5/6) were identified by their first clinic appointment. Four of the 149 patients were converted to definitive surgical fixation, and 2 patients required cast wedging due to either unacceptable fracture shortening or coronal/sagittal angulation. CONCLUSIONS: Routine early postoperative radiographs may not be necessary for all pediatric femur fractures managed with closed reduction and spica casting. The value of this study is that it is the first to demonstrate the feasibility of limiting postoperative radiographs using a preoperative screening tool. However, the established femoral malunion criteria utilized in this study were limited in their predictive value, and further work is necessary to improve the sensitivity and specificity before widespread clinical application. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The Effect of Surgeon Experience on Outcomes Following Growth Friendly Instrumentation for Early Onset Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to utilize a multicenter, multisurgeon cohort to assess the effect of surgeon experience on outcomes of growth friendly instrumentation (GFI) in early onset scoliosis (EOS). We hypothesized that unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR), estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time would be greater amongst early career surgeons (ECSs) when compared with advanced career surgeons (ACSs). METHODS: An international pediatric spine database was queried for patients ages 2 to 10 years treated by posterior distraction-based GFI with at least of 2-year follow up. Two groups were created for analysis based on surgeon experience: ECSs (with ≤10 y of experience) and ACSs (with >10 y of experience). The primary outcome was UPROR. Additional outcomes included: operating room time, EBL, neurological deficits, infection rate, hardware failure, and the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24). Subgroup analysis was performed for further assessment based on procedure type, superior anchor type, etiology, and curve severity. RESULTS: A total of 960 patients met inclusion criteria including 243 (25.3%) treated by ECS. Etiology, sex, superior anchor, and EOSQ-24 scores were similar between groups (P>0.05). There were no clinically significant differences in patient age or preoperative major coronal curve. UPROR (35.8% vs. 32.7%, P=0.532), infection (17.0% vs. 15.6%, P=0.698), operating room time (235 vs. 231 min, P=0.755), and EBL (151 vs. 155 mL, P=0.833) were comparable between ECS and ACS groups. The frequency of having at least 1 complication was relatively high but comparable among groups (60.7% vs. 62.6%, P=0.709). EOSQ-24 subdomain scores were similar between groups at 2-year follow-up (P>0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that ECS had increased surgical time compared with ACS in severe curves >90 degrees (270 vs. 229 min, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first multicenter assessment of surgeon experience on outcomes in EOS. Overall, surgeon experience did not significantly influence UPROR, complication rates, EBL, or surgical time associated with GFI in this cohort of EOS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Patient Characteristics Independently Associated With Knee Osteoarthritis Symptom Severity at Initial Orthopedic Consultation.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify patient and disease characteristics associated with the symptomatic severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA) at the time of initial knee OA diagnosis by an orthopedist. METHODS: This medical records review included patients initially diagnosed with knee OA during 2016 to 2017 by a single orthopedic surgeon in a university-based tertiary care setting. All variables were assessed at first OA diagnosis. Main outcomes were subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Pain, other Symptoms, knee-related quality of life, and function in daily living. Multivariable regression analyses examined the following predictors of main outcomes: sex, race, age, insurance type, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, and radiographic OA severity (Kellgren-Lawrence grade). RESULTS: Of the 559 patients included in the study, most were African American (52.1%), female (71.7%), and had severe radiographic OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade, 4; 68.7%). Female sex, African American racial/ethnic group, Medicaid insurance, younger age, and severe radiographic OA were independently statistically significantly associated with worse symptoms, pain, and function (p < 0.05 for all). Body mass index and Charlson comorbidity index were not statistically significant predictors of any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified disparities in the perception of knee OA problems at initial orthopedist diagnosis based on sex, age, race, insurance, and radiographic OA severity. Because most of these variables are also associated with more rapid progression of OA, identifying their biopsychosocial underpinnings may help determine which interventions are most likely to redress these disparities and delay progression to end-stage knee OA.

Global vascular surgeons' experience, stressors, and coping during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to unprecedented challenges for health care systems globally. We designed and administered a global survey to examine the effects of COVID-19 on vascular surgeons and explore the COVID-19-related stressors faced, coping strategies used, and support structures available. METHODS: The Pandemic Practice, Anxiety, Coping, and Support Survey for Vascular Surgeons was an anonymous cross-sectional survey sponsored by the Society for Vascular Surgery Wellness Task Force. The survey analysis evaluated the effects of COVID-19-related stressors on vascular surgeons measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. The 28-item Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced inventory was used to assess the active and avoidant coping strategies. Survey data were collected using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) from April 14, 2020 to April 24, 2020 inclusive. Additional qualitative data were collected using open-ended questions. Univariable and multivariable analyses of the factors associated with the anxiety levels and qualitative analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1609 survey responses (70.5% male; 82.5% vascular surgeons in practice) from 58 countries (43.4% from United States; 43.4% from Brazil) were eligible for analysis. Some degree of anxiety was reported by 54.5% of the respondents, and 23.3% reported moderate or severe anxiety. Most respondents (∼60%) reported using active coping strategies and the avoidant coping strategy of "self-distraction," and 20% used other avoidant coping strategies. Multivariable analysis identified the following factors as significantly associated with increased self-reported anxiety levels: staying in a separate room at home or staying at the hospital or a hotel after work (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.79), donning and doffing personal protective equipment (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.41-2.33), worry about potential adverse patient outcomes due to care delay (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87), and financial concerns (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.49-2.42). The factors significantly associated with decreased self-reported anxiety levels were hospital support (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91) and the use of positive reframing as an active coping strategy (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons globally have been experiencing multiple COVID-19-related stressors during this devastating crisis. These findings have highlighted the continued need for hospital systems to support their vascular surgeons and the importance of national societies to continue to invest in peer-support programs as paramount to promoting the well-being of vascular surgeons during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Urgent Inpatient Colectomy Carries a Higher Morbidity and Mortality Than Elective Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Emergency colorectal surgery confers a higher risk of adverse outcomes compared to elective surgery. Few studies have examined the outcomes after urgent colectomies, typically defined as those performed at the index admission, but not performed at admission in an emergency fashion. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk of adverse outcomes following urgent inpatient colorectal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All adult patients undergoing colectomy between 2013 and 2017 in the ACS NSQIP were included in the analysis. Patients were grouped into Elective, Urgent and Emergency groups. The Urgent group was further stratified by time from admission to surgery. Baseline characteristics and 30 day outcomes were compared between the Elective, Urgent and Emergency groups using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: 104,486 patients underwent elective colorectal resection. 23,179 underwent urgent while 22,241 had emergency resections. Patients undergoing urgent colectomy presented with increased comorbidities, and experienced higher mortality (2.5-4.1%, AOR 2.3 (1.9 - 2.8)) compared to elective surgery (0.4%). Urgent colectomy was an independent risk factor for the majority of short term complications documented in NSQIP. Moreover, patients undergoing urgent colectomy more than a week following admission had an increased risk of bleeding, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, and prolonged hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Urgent colectomies are associated with a greater risk of adverse outcomes compared to elective surgery. Urgent status is an independent risk factor for post operative mortality and morbidity. Further characterization of this patient population and their specific challenges may help ameliorate these adverse events.

Comparison of Short-leg and Long-leg Casts for the Treatment of Distal Third Tibial Shaft Fractures in Children.

BACKGROUND: Long-leg casts (LLCs) are an established treatment for pediatric tibial shaft fractures including fractures involving the distal third. There is a paucity of literature assessing the use of short-leg cast (SLC) for tibial shaft fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine if SLC were as effective as LLC for the treatment of pediatric distal third tibial shaft fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive distal third tibial shaft fractures treated at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2013 to 2018. Exclusion criteria included midshaft and proximal fractures of the tibia, distal fractures that violated the tibial physis or plafond, and pathologic fractures. We compared primary outcomes of time to weight-bearing, time to union, and final angulation between LLC and SLC groups. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients aged 5 to 17 years (mean age: 9.2±3.2 y) met inclusion criteria, including 50 LLC and 35 SLC patients. Time to weight-bearing for SLC (3.3±0.6 wk) was shorter compared with LLC (6.4±0.7 wk, P<0.0001). Overall, fractures treated with SLC had a shorter time to the union (7.4±0.9 wk) compared with LLC (9.0±0.9 wk, P=0.026) without statistical differences in final angulation at the time of union. There was a higher percentage of cast complications in the LLC treatment group (12%) compared with SLC (6%). CONCLUSIONS: SLC demonstrated earlier time to weight-bearing and shorter time to fracture union when compared with LLC. Surgeons should consider SLC and early weight-bearing for the treatment of distal third tibial shaft fractures in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Assessing the Impact of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) Visiting Scholar Program.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA)-Children's Orthopaedics in Underserved Regions (COUR) Visiting Scholar Program is to engage emerging leaders from low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) in POSNA educational offerings. This study aims to outline the educational and leadership activities pursued by the alumni of the POSNA-COUR Visiting Scholars Program. We hypothesized that there may be a discrepancy between visiting scholar interest level and actual participation in key follow-up educational and leadership activities. METHODS: A 32-question online survey developed by the POSNA-COUR committee was electronically delivered to the POSNA-COUR visiting scholarship recipients from 2007 to 2019. The survey inquired about scholars' educational background, clinical practice, and academic interests. Respondents also reported educational, research, and leadership activities that occurred following program participation. RESULTS: Fifty-seven percent (44/77) of the previous scholars participated in the survey. Sixty-eight percent reported that >75% of their practice was comprised of pediatric patients. The COUR scholarship afforded 15 scholars the opportunity to attend their first educational conference in North America. The majority (86%) of respondents consulted POSNA members on care-related issues, 52% organized a POSNA member's visit to their country, and 13% have become members of POSNA. Scholars shared their knowledge with colleagues through lectures (73%), demonstration of surgical skills (63%), mentorship (59%), hosting local courses (43%), and research (14%). There was a significant discrepancy between interest and actual participation in research (98% vs. 16%, P<0.0001), hosting a regional course (98% vs. 43%, P<0.0001), and becoming a member of POSNA (96% vs. 13%, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The POSNA-COUR Visiting Scholar Program is effective at providing beneficial educational opportunities to orthopaedic surgeons from LMICs. There is, however, a significant discrepancy between reported scholar interest and actual engagement in leadership endeavors including: research, organization of regional courses, and POSNA membership. The impact of the POSNA-COUR visiting scholar program can be enhanced through collaboration with scholarship alumni in these key areas. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

The Impact of Cast Immobilization on Return to Daycare.

BACKGROUND: Children who are prohibited from returning to daycare (RTD) after treatment with cast immobilization place an increased burden on parents and caregivers. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of cast immobilization on RTD. Specifically, we sought to determine the prevalence of RTD after orthopaedic immobilization based on daycare facility policy. METHODS: This was a survey study of randomly selected daycare facilities servicing a total of 6662 children within 10 miles of a major metropolitan city center. The 40-question survey included information on daycare policies and experience caring for children treated with orthopaedic immobilization. The survey also included questions about daycare type, enrollment, and geographic location. Photographs of the types of immobilization were embedded in the survey to facilitate understanding. Daycare facilities were randomly selected based on a power analysis to estimate a 50% prevalence of RTD after spica casting within 10% margin of error. RESULTS: Seventy-three daycare facilities completed the survey study. The average child-staff ratio was 5:1 and most daycare facilities (78%) did not have a nurse on staff. Predetermined policies regarding RTD after injury were available at 81% of daycares. Twenty-eight (38.5%) facilities had encountered a child with a cast in the previous year. The rate of RTD for children with upper limb injuries was 90.5% compared with 79% for lower limb injuries (P=0.003). Spica casts showed the lowest RTD rate: single leg (22.5%), 1 and a half leg (18%), and 2 leg (16%) (P<0.0001). Experienced daycare facilities (>5 y) had a higher RTD rate compared with less experienced facilities (P=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: The ability to RTD is dependent on immobilization type. Children with long leg and spica casts are disproportionately restricted when compared with other cast types. At minimum, surgeons should consider the socioeconomic implications of orthopaedic immobilization. There is also a need for orthopaedic involvement in policy formation at the local level to provide standardized guidelines for re-entry into childcare facilities following orthopaedic immobilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Intraoperative Burden of Flexible Intramedullary Nailing and Spica Casting for Femur Fractures in Young Children.

BACKGROUND: Spica casting (Spica) remains the widely accepted treatment of closed femoral shaft fractures in young children aged 6 months to 5 years. In some centers, there has been a recent trend towards surgical fixation of these fractures with flexible intramedullary nails (FINs). Despite numerous studies evaluating both Spica and FIN treatment of femoral shaft fractures, there remains a paucity of data regarding patient burden during the intraoperative period. The purpose of this study was to compare the intraoperative burden, defined as anesthetic exposure, fluoroscopic duration, and radiation load, between Spica and FIN treatment of femoral shaft fractures in young children. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for pediatric femoral shaft fractures presenting to a tertiary pediatric referral hospital from 2012 to 2017. Comparison groups included pediatric femur fractures treated with Spica and those treated with FIN. Outcomes included anesthetic exposure, fluoroscopy duration, and radiation exposure. In addition, length of stay, clinic visits, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Of 449 consecutive pediatric femur fractures treated at our center, 143 patients ages 2 to 6 years (mean age 3.8±1.4 y) met inclusion criteria. The Spica group contained 91 patients; FIN contained 52 patients. Mean anesthetic exposure was less for Spica compared with FIN [45.1 min, 95% confidence interval (CI): 38.0-52.3 vs. 90.7 min, 95% CI: 80.5-100.8 min; P<0.001]. On average, Spica procedures required less fluoroscopy time compared with FIN (15.4 s, 95% CI: 4.8-26.0 vs. 131.6 s, 95% CI: 117.6-145.6 s; P<0.001). Mean radiation load was less for Spica compared with FIN (1.6 mGy, 95% CI: 0.6-2.6 vs. 6.9 mGy, 95% CI: 5.7-8.1 mGy; P<0.001). There was no difference in length of hospital stay (P=0.831), follow-up visits (P=0.248), or complication rate (P=0.645) between Spica and FIN groups. The most common complication was skin irritation for Spica (18.7%) and symptomatic hardware for FIN (17.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that pediatric patients with femoral shaft fractures experience an increased intraoperative burden when treated with FIN compared with Spica. Treatment with FIN was associated with increased exposure to anesthesia, fluoroscopic duration, and radiation load despite similar complication rates when compared with Spica. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Predictors of Open Reduction in Pediatric Femur Fractures Treated With Flexible Nails.

BACKGROUND: Closed reduction (CR) is sufficient to reduce the majority of femur fractures treated with flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN). No previous study has examined factors associated with failed CR of pediatric femoral shaft fractures treated with FIN. We sought to determine preoperative factors associated with failed CR. We hypothesized that fracture, patient, and surgeon characteristics would impact the need for open reduction (OR). METHODS: A retrospective review of children treated for femur fracture between 2012 and 2017 at a tertiary pediatric hospital was performed. Comparisons were made between 2 groups: FIN with CR group and FIN that required OR group. Demographic and baseline characteristics were compared between treatment groups using either χ tests or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and general linear models for continuous variables. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using univariate logistic regression tests. RESULTS: Of 449 consecutive pediatric femur fractures treated at our center, 85 children were treated with FIN and constituted the study cohort. CR failed in 14 patients (16.5%) necessitating OR of the fracture site. Significant differences between study groups were found in fracture location (P=0.018), the mechanism (P=0.003), and displacement on the anteroposterior radiograph (P=0.027). Surgical time was found to be longer in the OR group (P=0.010). We identified 3 preoperative predictors of OR for FIN including fractures caused by high energy mechanisms (odds ratio=7.5), distal third fractures (odds ratio=15.3), and fracture displacement on the anteroposterior view (odds ratio=1.06). Surgeon years in practice, patient weight, age, and time from injury to surgery were not associated with OR. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents 3 preoperative risk factors that predict the need for OR of femur fractures treated with FIN. Surgical time was longer in cases that required OR. Our findings suggest that surgeons should avoid lengthy attempts at CR and consider a lower threshold for OR of at-risk fractures or use another technique other than flexible nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic.

Academic-Community Partnership Development to Enhance Program Outcomes in Underserved Communities: A Case Study.

Purpose: A community-academic partnership was developed to assess community needs and restructure a variety of community-based programs that provide services to underserved communities in New Orleans, Louisiana. Methods: The community and academic partners utilized five phases to assess community needs and restructure programs: 1) meetings; 2) narrowing the scope of community programs; 3) data collection and analysis; 4) emphasizing target programs; and 5) improving sustainability through grant submissions and grant development training. Results: Survey data were collected and analyzed pre- and post-community-academic partnership between November 2014-November 2016 in New Orleans, Louisiana. The data supported the need for community-based programs run by a community organization known as the Dillard University Office of Community and Church Relations (OCCR). The survey results showed that community members expressed interest in: screenings for chronic diseases, such as diabetes; attending exercise classes at local churches; attending financial management workshops; and health fairs run by the community organization. In the future, screenings, workshops, health fairs, as well as exercise and diet programs, will take place at all churches participating in the community-based, umbrella program, Churches in Unity program. Conclusion: A formal community-academic partnership, involving the assignment of an academic liaison, restructured programs for a community partner to better serve the needs of a community that is at-risk for a multitude of obesity-related health problems faced by underserved communities.

Does Marital Status Impact Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of research on the relationship between marital status and patient outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent TKA by a single surgeon at a university-based orthopedic practice. Data abstracted included age, gender, marital status, body mass index, length of hospital stay, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The WOMAC and OKS were administered at the preoperative visit and at approximately 10, 30, 90, and 180 days after TKA. Multivariate analyses with patient-reported outcomes as repeated measures, marital status, day of assessment; and the interaction of marital status and day of assessment as fixed effects; and age, gender, body mass index, and length of hospital stay as covariates were conducted as well as analyses in which preoperative patient-reported outcomes were treated as fixed effects. RESULTS: Of 422 patients who underwent TKA during the study period, complete data were available for 249, of whom 124 were married and 125 unmarried. Married patients had significantly higher WOMAC scores than unmarried patients at all postoperative assessments, even after controlling for preoperative scores. Although married patients also had significantly higher postoperative OKS scores than their unmarried peers, differences between groups were attenuated after adjusting for preoperative OKS scores. CONCLUSION: This study found that married patients have better overall outcomes after TKA but yielded conflicting results as to whether the positive effects of marriage are specific to the postoperative period.

Medicaid and Indigent Patients Experience Delayed Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures, Resulting in Worse Consequential Radiographic Outcomes.

Distal radius fractures are the most common upper extremity injury. Patients referred to safety-net tertiary facilities following a fracture experience significant delays in treatment because of financial and language barriers as well as poor access to care at outlying community hospitals. This delay in treatment can affect postoperative functional outcomes and complication rates because of failure to restore anatomic alignment. The purpose of this multicenter study was to assess for risk factors associated with delayed fixation of distal radius fractures and evaluate the impact of delayed treatment on radiographic alignment. Patients with a distal radius fracture treated surgically during a 2-year period were identified. Measures included time from injury to surgery, demographic information, fracture classification, and radiographic parameters. The effect of surgery delay on radiographic outcomes was assessed with delayed surgery defined as 11 or more days out from injury. A total of 183 patients met study inclusion criteria. Medicaid and indigent patients were more likely to experience a delay in surgical treatment. Specifically, 70% of these patients were treated in a delayed fashion. Delayed treatment of 11 days or more was associated with worse radial height and inclination on postoperative radiographic imaging. Medicaid and indigent patients are more likely to experience delayed fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures. This delayed surgery negatively affects postoperative radiographic outcomes. These findings suggest a need to improve access to care for Medicaid and indigent patients and to proceed with operative intervention within 10 days for distal radius fractures. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):e93-e97.].

Preoperative Computed Tomography Scan in Distal Radius Fractures and the Effect on Preoperative Planning.

Purpose: It is unclear whether computed tomography (CT) scans alter the surgical plan when ordered before surgery for fixation of intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether a preoperative CT scan alters the planned approach (PA) or planned fixation strategy (PFS) for open reduction internal fixation of intra-articular DRFs. Methods: Radiology records were retrospectively reviewed by one trauma surgeon and two hand surgeons for 33 intra-articular DRFs that met the inclusion criteria and previously underwent open reduction internal fixation. Surgeons were initially provided only preoperative radiographs; they were asked for their PA and PFS. Three months later, each surgeon was provided with the same preoperative radiographs as well as a CT scan. They were asked for their PA and PFS and to grade the usefulness of CT for each fracture. Results: The overall probability of having the same PA and PFS between the two presentations was 70.6% and 70.9%, respectively. There was a significant difference in opinion on the usefulness of the CT scan among the surgeons (P < .001). Conclusions: This study suggests that ordering a CT scan for preoperative planning of open reduction internal fixation for an intra-articular DRF does not affect the approach or fixation strategy in the majority of cases, regardless of how useful a CT scan was determined to be by the surgeon. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Back pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: frequency and risk factors.

PURPOSE: Although back pain is commonly reported in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), factors that influence the presence and severity of back pain in AIS, including curve-specific variables, have not been well studied. This study aims to describe the prevalence and severity of back pain in AIS patients and determine the extent to which patient characteristics, including curve-specific factors, are associated with a higher risk of back pain in AIS. METHODS: The study was a retrospective medical records review of adolescents (aged 10-17 years) diagnosed with AIS between 01/01/2018 and 12/31/2021 at an academic tertiary children's hospital. Patients with previous spine surgery were excluded. Variables collected included demographics (age, sex, race, insurance), Lenke classification, major coronal curve, back pain-related information, Risser stage, vitamin D levels, post-diagnosis brace utilization, physical therapy or chiropractic treatment, and surgery. RESULTS: A total of 891 AIS patients were included in the analysis. The sample was predominantly female (73.3%) and insured by Medicaid (57.8) with a mean age of 12.8 years. The mean major coronal curve was 26.3 degrees. Most patients had Lenke type 1 (47%) and type 5 (41%) curves. Nearly half of patients reported back pain (48.5%) with average pain severity in the low-to-moderate range (4.7) on FACES pain scale (0-10). Among those who reported back pain, 63.2% specified a location with the majority reporting pain in the lumbar region (56%) and, less commonly, in the thoracic (39%) and scapular (8%) regions. Lumbar pain was associated with significantly higher pain intensity (p = 0.033). Additionally, the location of pain reported was associated with location of major coronal curve (p < 0.0001). No association was observed between pain presence and vitamin D deficiency (p = 0.571, n = 175), major coronal curve magnitude (p = 0.999), Lenke curve type (p = 0.577), and sex (p = 0.069). Older patients, those insured by Medicaid, and those with higher Risser scores were more likely to report pain scores (p = 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: Nearly half (48%) of newly diagnosed AIS patients experience back pain which is higher than the prevalence of 33% seen in the general adolescent population. Pain was more prevalent among patients over the age of 13, with heavier body weight, and those insured by Medicaid. Pain was most commonly reported in the lumbar region, especially among patients with lumbar curves. This information can be helpful in counseling AIS patients, though further investigations are needed, especially to determine the underlying causes of back pain in AIS and to elucidate the discrepancy in pain between patients with Medicaid and commercial insurance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Study Level II.

Optimal Duration of Physical Therapy Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Aims & Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify patient characteristics associated with engagement and completion of physical therapy (PT) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and examine the relationship between number of PT sessions attended and outcomes during the first 12 weeks after surgery. Methods: Patients underwent unilateral primary TKA by a single surgeon and were advised to complete 17 PT sessions over 6 weeks at a hospital-affiliated facility. Analyses examined predictors of PT engagement (attendance of ≥2 sessions) and completion (attendance of 17 ± 1 sessions) within 6 weeks and associations between number of PT sessions attended and changes in range of motion (ROM) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) values. Results: Patients living <40 km were more likely to be engaged in PT than those living ≥40 km from the clinic (P < .0001). Among patients who completed PT within 6 weeks, 95.0%, 85.1%, and 56.4% achieved flexion of, respectively, ≥90°, ≥100°, and ≥110°. Among engaged patients, the active flexion thresholds of ≥90°, ≥100°, and ≥110° were achieved by, respectively, 94.4%, 82.5%, and 58.1% by 6 weeks and by 96.7%, 92.1%, and 84.2% by 12 weeks. Improvement in KOOS Symptoms (P = .029), Function in daily living (P = .030) and quality of life (P = .031) linearly decreased as number of PT sessions increased. Conclusions: These results raise the question of whether patients who meet satisfactory outcomes before completing 6 weeks of prescribed PT and those who attend more PT sessions than prescribed may be over-utilizing healthcare resources without additional benefit.