Bridging the Communication Gaps: A Prospective Single-Arm Pilot Study Testing the Feasibility of Interdisciplinary Radiotherapy Planning in Locally Advanced Lung Cancer.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The treatment of locally advanced lung cancer (LALC) with radiotherapy (RT) can be challenging. Multidisciplinary collaboration between radiologists and radiation oncologists (ROs) may optimize RT planning, reduce uncertainty in follow-up imaging interpretation, and improve outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective clinical treatment trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04844736), 37 patients receiving definitive RT for LALC, six attending ROs, and three thoracic radiologists were consented and enrolled across four treatment centers. Prior to RT plan finalization, representative computed tomography (CT) slices with overlaid outlines of preliminary irradiation targets were shared with the team of radiologists. The primary endpoint was to assess feasibility of receiving feedback no later than 4 business days of RT simulation on at least 50% of plans. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with lung cancer were enrolled, and 35 of 37 RT plans were reviewed. Of the 35 patients reviewed, mean age was 69 years. For 27 of 37 plans (73%), feedback was received within 4 or fewer days (interquartile range 3-4 days). Thirteen of 35 cases (37%) received feedback that the delineated target potentially did not include all sites suspicious for tumor involvement. In total, changes to the RT plan were recommended for over- or undercoverage in 16 of 35 cases (46%) and implemented in all cases. Radiology review resulted in no treatment delays and substantial changes to irradiated volumes: gross tumor volume, -1.9 to +96.1%; planning target volume, -37.5 to +116.5%. CONCLUSION: Interdisciplinary collaborative RT planning using a simplified workflow was feasible, produced no treatment delays, and prompted substantial changes in RT targets.

Risk Factors for Malignant Transformation of Low-Grade Glioma.

PURPOSE: The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of low-grade glioma patients who undergo malignant transformation (MT) in the era of temozolomide are not well known. This study evaluates these factors in a large group of World Health Organization grade 2 glioma patients treated at a tertiary-care institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were analyzed using an institutional review board-approved low-grade glioma database. Characteristics were compared using χ2 and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Time to event was summarized using proportional hazards models. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of a total of 599 patients, 124 underwent MT; 76 (61.3%) had biopsy-proven MT. The MT incidence was 21%, and the median time to MT was 56.4 months. The 5- and 10-year progression-free survival rates were 30.6% ± 4.2% and 4.8% ± 1.9%, respectively, for MT patients and 60% ± 2.4% and 38% ± 2.7%, respectively, for non-MT patients. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 75% ± 4.0% and 46% ± 5.0%, respectively, for MT patients and 87% ± 1.7% and 78% ± 2.3%, respectively, for non-MT patients. On multivariate analysis, older age (P = .001), male sex (P = .004), multiple tumor locations (P = .004), chemotherapy alone (P = .012), and extent of resection (P = .045) remained significant predictors of MT. CONCLUSIONS: MT affects survival. Risk factors include older age, male sex, multiple tumor locations, use of chemotherapy alone, and presence of residual disease. Our finding that initial interventions could affect the rate of MT is provocative, but these data should be validated using data from prospective trials. In addition to improving survival, future therapeutic efforts should focus on preventing MT.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for non-metastatic pancreatic cancer increases margin-negative and node-negative rates at resection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare neoadjuvant to adjuvant chemoradiation in non-metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS: Single-institution data were obtained for patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation from 2011 to 2014. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate clinical and pathological outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-two well-matched patients were enrolled (21 underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 11 with adjuvant chemoradiation and 20 in the definitive group). Median tumor size was 2.6 cm pretreatment and 2.5 cm after neoadjuvant chemoradiation but 3.2 cm on pathology, with a treatment effect in 95.2% of specimens. Clinical node positivity at diagnosis for neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemoradiation groups was similar (28.6% vs 27.3%, P = 0.12). Of the 36 neoadjuvant patients, 21 (58.3%) underwent complete resection. In the neoadjuvant vs adjuvant chemoradiation groups, positive margins were decreased (4.8% vs 63.6%, P < 0.001), as was pathological nodal positivity (23.8% vs 90.9%, P < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 13.3 months, locoregional control for neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemoradiation was 7.7 and 7.2 months, respectively (P = 0.12) and the definitive group was 1.2 months (P = 0.014 compared with the surgical cohort). One-year overall survival was better with neoadjuvant than with adjuvant chemoradiation but this was not significant (94% vs 82%, P = 0.20); 1-year survival for the definitive group was 59% (P = 0.03 compared with the surgical cohort). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation remains a promising approach for non-metastatic pancreatic cancer for improving resectability and pathological and clinical findings. Computed tomography may not fully demonstrate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatment.