Impact of Metastatic Lymph Nodes on Survival of Patients with pN1-Category Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Long-Term Survival Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality rates of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are high in China. The overall survival (OS) of patients with ESCC is related to lymph node (LN) metastasis (LNM). This study aimed to discuss the impact of metastasis in LN stations on the OS of patients with pathologic N1 (pN1) ESCC. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Esophageal Cancer Case Management database of Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute (SCCH-ECCM). Additionally, data of patients with pN1-category ESCC collected between January 2010 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Data from 807 patients were analyzed. The median OS of the patients with one metastatic LN (group 1) was 49.8 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 30.8-68.9 months), whereas the OS of those with two metastatic LNs (group 2) was only 33.3 months (P = 0.0001). Moreover, group 1 did not show a significantly longer OS than group 2.1 (patients with 2 metastatic LNs in 1 LNM station; P = 0.5736), but did show a significantly longer OS than group 2.2 (patients with 2 metastatic LNs in 2 LNM stations; P < 0.0001). After propensity score-matching, the 5-year survival rate for group 1 was 28 %, whereas that for group 2 was 14 % (P = 0.0027). CONCLUSIONS: The OS for the patients with one metastatic LN in one LNM was not significantly longer than for the patients with two metastatic LNs in one LNM station. Patients with one LNM station had a significantly longer OS than those with two LNM stations. Thus, the number of LNM stations is a significant determinant of OS in pN1 ESCC.

Mapping of Lymph Node Metastasis and Efficacy Index in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Large-Scale Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has a high mortality rate in China. The metastatic pattern in the lymph nodes and the value of their dissection on the overall survival of these patients remain controversial. The primary aim of this study was to provide a basis for accurate staging of esophageal cancer and to identify the relationship between esophageal cancer surgery, lymph node dissection, and overall survival rates. METHODS: We utilized our hospital database to retrospectively review the data of 1727 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent R0 esophagectomy from January 2010 to December 2017. The lymph nodes were defined according to Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th Edition. The Efficacy Index (EI) was calculated by multiplying the frequency (%) of metastases to a zone and the 5-year survival rate (%) of patients with metastases to that zone, and then dividing by 100. RESULTS: The EI was high in the supraclavicular and mediastinal zones in patients with upper esophageal tumors, and the EI of 101R was 17.39, which was the highest among the lymph node stations. In patients with middle esophageal tumors, the EI was highest in the mediastinal zone, followed by the celiac and supraclavicular zones. Furthermore, the EI was highest in the celiac zone, followed by the mediastinal zones in patients with lower esophageal tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The EI of resected lymph nodes was found to vary between stations and was related to the primary location of the tumor.

Effect of cervical paraesophageal lymph node metastasis versus supraclavicular lymph node metastasis on the overall survival of patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an observational study.

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a major global health burden, with a particularly high incidence in East Asia. The authors aimed to investigate the effect of metastasis in cervical paraesophageal lymph nodes (station 101) and supraclavicular lymph nodes (station 104) on the survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from the database of the authors' hospital. The authors retrospectively analyzed the patients with EC who underwent esophagectomy from January 2010 to December 2017. These patients were allocated into two groups based on the presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in the cervical paraesophageal or supraclavicular regions. Clinical outcomes and survival data were compared using the TNM staging system of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Results: After a median follow-up of 62.1 months, 122 patients with LNM in the supraclavicular region were included in the study. Among these patients, 53 showed cervical paraesophageal LNM and an overall survival (OS) of 19.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.3-23.5]. In contrast, 69 patients showed supraclavicular LNM with an OS of 34.9 months (95% CI 25.7-44.1). The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 77%, 29%, and 21%, respectively, for patients with cervical paraesophageal LNM. Moreover, patients with supraclavicular LNM demonstrated OS rates of 88%, 48%, and 34%, respectively [Hazard ratio (HR): 0.634, 95% CI: 0.402-1.000, P=0.042]. Conclusions: Patients with ESCC with cervical paraesophageal LNM had significantly worse OS than those with supraclavicular LNM. This study underscores the importance of accurately identifying and managing ESCC with cervical paraesophageal LNM, as it may require more tailored and aggressive treatment strategies to prolong patient survival.

Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients older than 70 years: a propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: With the rising life expectancy and an aging population, it has become increasingly important to investigate treatments suitable for older adult patients with esophageal cancer. This study investigated whether older adult patients who underwent esophagectomy had better clinical outcomes than those who were nonsurgically treated. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who were 70 years or older and underwent esophagectomy, radiotherapy (RT), and/or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between January 2018 and December 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the surgery group (S group) and the nonsurgery group (NS group). We then compared the clinical outcomes of the 2 groups. RESULTS: After a median follow-up duration of 36.6 months, the S group showed better overall survival (OS). The 3-year OS was 59% in the S group and 27% in the NS group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.397; 95% CI, 0.278-0.549; P < .0001). In the S group, the median progression-free survival was 38.3 months (95% CI, 30.6-46.1) compared with 12.3 months in the NS group (HR, 0.511; 95% CI, 0.376-0.695; P < .0001). In addition, the number of adverse events in the NS group was higher than that in the S group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Overall, patients with ESCC at the age of ≥70 years who underwent esophagectomy had significantly better clinical outcomes than those who underwent nonsurgical treatment with RT and/or CRT.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Background: Several studies have reported the outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with ESCC. However, phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with long-term outcomes and the comparison of different therapeutic strategies are lacking. Methods: Studies involving patients with advanced ESCC treated with preoperative neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were searched through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to July 1, 2022. The outcomes were presented as proportions and pooled respectively by fixed or random effect model depending on the heterogeneity between studies. All analyses were performed using the R packages meta 5.5-0 and meta-for 3.4-0. Results: Thirty trials involving 1406 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rate for neoadjuvant immunotherapy was 0.30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.33). The pCR rate of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) was significantly higher than that of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (nICT) (nICRT: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.31-0.65; nICT: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.26-0.33; p=0.03). No significant difference in efficacy was observed between the different chemotherapy agents and treatment cycles. The incidences of grade 1-2 and 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56-0.84) and 0.16 (95% CI: 0.09-0.25), respectively. Patients treated with nICRT and carboplatin had a higher incidence of grade 3-4 TRAEs compared with those treated with nICT (nICRT: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.17-0.77; nICT: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.07-0.22; p=0.03) and cisplatin (carboplatin: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.53; cisplatin: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01-0.09; p<0.01). Conclusion: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has good efficacy and safety profiles in patients with locally advanced ESCC. Additional RCTs with long-term survival data are warranted.

Impact of two­field or three­field lymphadenectomy on overall survival in middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single­center retrospective analysis.

Squamous cell carcinoma is the main subtype of esophageal cancer in East Asia. The effect of the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed to treat middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China remains controversial. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the impact of the number of LNs removed during lymphadenectomy on the survival of patients with middle and lower thoracic ESCC. Data were obtained from the Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute Esophageal Cancer Case Management Database from January 2010 to April 2020. Either three-field systematic lymphadenectomy (3F group) or two-field systematic lymphadenectomy (2F group) was performed for ESCC cases with or without suspicious tumor-positive cervical LNs, respectively. Subgroups were designed for further analysis based on the quartile number of resected LNs. After 50.7 months of median follow-up, 1,659 patients who underwent esophagectomy were enrolled. The median overall survival (OS) of the 2F and 3F groups was 50.0 months and 58.5 months, respectively. The OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 86, 57 and 47%, respectively, in the 2F group, and 83, 52 and 47%, respectively, in the 3F group (P=0.732). The average OS of the 3F B and D groups was 57.7 months and 30.2 months, respectively (P=0.006). In the 2F group, the OS between subgroups was not significantly different. In conclusion, resection of >15 LNs during two-field dissection in patients with ESCC undergoing esophagectomy did not affect their survival outcomes. In three-field lymphadenectomy, the extent of LNs removed could lead to different survival outcomes.

Resected lymph nodes and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer are high. Therefore, the authors aimed to investigate how the number of dissected lymph nodes (LNs) during esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma impacts overall survival (OS), particularly that of patients with positive LNs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 2010 to 2017 were obtained from the Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute Esophageal Cancer Case Management Database. Participants were divided into two groups: patients with negative lymph nodes (N0) and patients with positive lymph nodes (N+). The median number of resected LNs during surgery was 24; therefore, patients with 15-23 and those with 24 or more resected LNs were assigned to subgroups A and B, respectively. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 60.33 months, 1624 patients who underwent esophagectomy were evaluated; 60.53 and 39.47% had a pathological diagnosis of N+ or N0, respectively. The median OS was 33.9 months for the N+ group; however, the N0 group did not achieve the median OS. The mean OS was 84.9 months. In the N+ group, the median OS times of subgroups A and B were 31.2 and 37.1 months, respectively. The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 82, 43, and 34%, respectively, for subgroup A of the N+ group; they were 86, 51, and 38%, respectively, for subgroup B of the N+ group. Subgroups A and B of the N0 group exhibited no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: Increasing the number of LNs harvested during surgery to 24 or more could improve the OS of patients with positive LNs but not that of patients with negative LNs.

Peripheral T lymphocyte and immunocyte subset dynamics: markers of neoadjuvant therapy outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Purpose: In patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), neoadjuvant therapy increased the curative resection rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival for patients with resectable ESCC. However, the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy varies among different patients. We aim to compare the differences in the characteristics of peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets before and after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with different curative efficacy. Method: This study enrolled 266 ESCC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy from August 2018 to August 2022. The postoperative pathological results divided patients into the major pathological response (MPR) and non-MPR groups. Compare the differences in peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets and analyze the trend of changes in T lymphocyte subsets at different phases of treatment. Propensity score matching was used to reduce the influence of potential confounding factors. Results: Prior to the neoadjuvant therapy, particularly before the second cycle, the MPR group exhibited significantly higher ratios of CD4/CD8 (P=0.009) and helper T cells (TH ratio, P=0.030) compared to the non-MPR group. In contrast, the suppressor T cell ratio (TS ratio) was lower (P=0.016) in the MPR group. The difference in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets between the two groups of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is significant. Conclusion: In peripheral blood, T lymphocyte subsets varied significantly based on the effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatment. Prior to the second cycle of neoadjuvant therapy, a higher CD4/CD8 and TH ratio, coupled with a decreased TS ratio, might suggest enhanced treatment outcomes.