Exposed Intramedullary Fixation Produces Similar Outcomes to Buried Fixation for Acute Pediatric Monteggia Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures requires ulnar length stability to maintain reduction of the radiocapitellar joint. When operative care is indicated, intramedullary ulna fixation can be buried or left temporarily exposed through the skin while under a cast. The authors hypothesized that treatment with exposed fixation yields equivalent results to buried fixation for Monteggia fractures while avoiding secondary surgery for hardware removal. METHODS: A retrospective review of children with acute Monteggia fractures at our Level 1 pediatric trauma center was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were evaluated for age, fracture type, fracture location, Bado classification, type of treatment, complications, cast duration, time to fracture union, time to hardware removal, and range of motion. RESULTS: Out of 59 acute Monteggia fractures surgically treated (average age 6 y, range 2 to 14), 15 (25%) patients were fixed with buried intramedullary fixation and 44 (75%) with exposed intramedullary fixation under a cast. There were no significant differences between buried and exposed intramedullary fixation in cast time after surgery (39 vs. 37 d; P =0.55), time to fracture union (37 vs. 35 d; P =0.67), pronation/supination (137 vs. 134 degrees; P =0.68) or flexion/extension (115 vs. 114 degrees; P =0.81) range of motion. The exposed fixation had a return to OR of 4.5% (2 out of 44), and the buried fixation returned to the OR for removal on all patients. CONCLUSION: Exposed intramedullary fixation yielded equivalent clinical outcomes to buried devices in the treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures while eliminating the need for a second surgery to remove hardware, reducing the associated risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia, but had a higher complication rate. Open Monteggia fractures or patterns with a known risk of delayed union may benefit from buried instead of exposed intramedullary fixation for earlier mobilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Prospective Evaluation of a Treatment Protocol Based on Fracture Displacement for Pediatric Lateral Condyle Humerus Fractures: A Preliminary Study.

BACKGROUND: To prospectively evaluate a displacement-based classification system and an outcome-derived algorithm in the treatment of children with lateral condyle fractures. METHODS: All children with a lateral condyle fracture were prospectively enrolled at our institution between 2013 and 2016. Fractures were classified and treated on the basis of the following classification system: type 1: <2 mm; treated with long arm casting, type II: 2 to 4 mm; treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP), and type III: >4 mm; open reduction and percutaneous pinning (ORPP). Functional outcomes were assessed at 6 to 12 weeks and at 1-year follow-ups using the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI). RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (mean age, 6 y; range 2 to 12 y) were prospectively enrolled. There were 17 (31%) type I fractures treated with a long arm cast, 8 (15%) type II treated with CRPP, and 30 (54%) type III treated with ORPP. Postoperative complications included delayed union (N=5) and pin site infection (N=3). Delayed unions on the basis of fracture type was type I (1/17, 6%), type II (1/8, 13%), and type III (3/30, 10%) (P=0.85). The rate of delayed unions in type II and III fractures fixed with k-wires was 11% (4/38). Four patients required a second operation with screw fixation. No significant differences were found across PODCI domains at 1-year follow-up when comparing our study population with normative data. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study of a treatment protocol for pediatric lateral condyle fractures and validates the use of displacement as a guide for best evidence-based treatment. Children with a lateral condyle fracture can achieve excellent functional outcomes in all classification types with comparable complication rates when radiographic fracture displacement is used to guide surgical and clinical decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Variability of the Anterior Humeral Line in Normal Pediatric Elbows.

BACKGROUND: The anterior humeral line (AHL) is considered a valuable radiographic tool in the assessment of pediatric elbow sagittal plane alignment following injury. However, few studies exist that examine the validity of the AHL. The purpose of this study is to report the variability of the AHL in skeletally immature children with normal elbows. METHODS: A total of 124 true lateral elbow radiographs of normal pediatric elbows were retrospectively identified and examined for the relationship of the AHL to the capitellum. The percentage of AHLs falling outside the middle third of the capitellum was compared among different age and sex groups using Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: In 100% of patients, the AHL touched the ossific nucleus of the capitellum. In 100% (52/52) of patients ≥5 years the AHL goes through the middle third of the capitellum, but this is significantly different from patients less than 5 years of age in whom 25% (18/72) of patients the AHL fell outside of the middle third of the capitellum (P<0.001). In children less than 2 years of age, the AHL was in the anterior third in 30% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional teaching that the AHL touches the capitellum on a lateral radiograph of a normal elbow in a child is correct, so if the AHL does not touch the capitellum it is appropriate to look for pathology. Similarly, in children 5 years and older the AHL goes through the middle third of the capitellum in all patients, so if it does not, it is appropriate to look for pathology. However, with decreasing age variability increases, with the AHL touching the anterior third of the capitellum in almost 1/3 of children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Iatrogenic nerve injuries in the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures: are we really just missing nerve injuries on preoperative examination?

BACKGROUND: Recent studies report the rate of iatrogenic nerve injury in operatively treated supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures is 3% to 4%. A reliable neurological examination can be difficult to obtain in a young child in pain. We hypothesized that nerve injuries may be missed preoperatively, later noted postoperatively in a more compliant patient, and then falsely considered an iatrogenic injury. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on patients who presented between April 2011 and April 2013 with an extension-type SCH fracture that was managed surgically. A neurological examination was performed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at follow-up visits by a fellowship-trained attending pediatric orthopaedic surgeon. Only patients in whom the attending surgeon felt a reliable neurovascular examination was obtained were included in this study. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 16% had a nerve injury recognized on preoperative examination and 3% had a new nerve injury on postoperative examination (1 anterior interosseous, 1 median sensory, and 1 radial motor). The Gartland type (P=0.421), type of reduction (open vs. closed; P=0.720), and number of lateral-entry (P=0.898) or medial-entry (P=0.938) pins used were not associated with patients who had a new nerve injury found postoperatively. A trend was seen between fracture severity and rate of a preoperative nerve injury: type II 7% (2/28), type III 19% (9/58), and type IV 36% (5/14) (P=0.058). Preoperatively, nerve injuries were noted at the following rates: median 12% (12/100) (including 8 anterior interosseous nerve injuries), radial 8% (8/100), ulnar 3% (3/100). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, in patients who were able to comply with a preoperative neurological examination done by an attending pediatric orthopaedic surgeon, the rate of iatrogenic nerve injury after operative treatment of SCH fractures is 3%. We conclude that this finding is true, and not a result of inadequate preoperative neurological examinations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I prognostic study.

Development of a Group Curriculum for Children With Congenital Upper Limb Difference (CULD) and Their Caregivers.

Caring for patients with congenital upper limb differences (CULD) requires an understanding of unique psychosocial challenges. The study purpose was to describe the needs of children with CULD and their caregivers to develop a group curriculum. This mixed-method study included 13 mothers and one father of children with CULD (age 3 months to 14 years; mean 7.2 ± 4.3 years) using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Parent Proxy Reports and caregiver interviews. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Peer Relationships (M = 48.1 ± 10.9) and Pain Interference (M = 44.5 ± 7.5) T-scores were average with below average scores for Physical Function: Upper Extremity (M = 31.9 ± 12.1). Caregivers expressed high interest in groups to create community and mutual support covering themes of responding to questions from strangers, social and coping skills, building self-confidence, accessing resources, advocacy skills, and advice from adults with CULD. Access to a support group with a curriculum addressing CULD-related patient and family needs may improve care.