A Qualitative Study of Midlevel Nurse Managers' Perspectives of Scholarly Inquiry.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the key characteristics and needs of midlevel nurse managers (MLNMs) who support and engage clinical nurses (CNs) in scholarly inquiry. BACKGROUND: Healthcare organizations expect CNs to participate in scholarly inquiry, incorporating evidence-based interventions to improve outcomes and safety. How the MLNM supports and engages CNs in scholarly inquiry remains unclear. METHODS: Twelve semistructured interviews of MLNMs occurred at several facilities in the mid-Atlantic region utilizing the institutional review board-acknowledged protocol. Theme interpretation utilized inductive analysis. RESULTS: Four recurrent themes emerged from the interviews related to the value of scholarly inquiry: 1) securing organizational resources to promote scholarly inquiry; 2) knowledge and experience in scholarly inquiry; 3) actions supporting scholarly inquiry; and 4) the value of scholarly inquiry within the organization. CONCLUSIONS: Senior nursing leadership and healthcare organizations must recognize the value and provide the infrastructure to support scholarly inquiry. Infrastructure includes education, dedicated time, access to expertise, and resources.

Effect of a Nurse-Led, Patient-Centered, Gratitude Intervention on Patient Hospitalization Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Objectives were to evaluate patient perceptions of a nurse-led, patient-centered gratitude intervention and if nurses identified actionable items to improve patient's hospitalization experience. BACKGROUND: Research demonstrates positive effects of gratitude and caring interventions on patient health and well-being. Evidence is sparse regarding nurse-led gratitude interventions improving hospitalized patient's experiences. METHODS: In this pilot study, 91 adult medical patients completed gratitude forms twice daily for up to 6 shifts and a study discharge form documenting intervention perceptions. In response to the patients' gratitude-related feedback, RNs recorded patient experience-related actions they and interprofessional teams could implement. RESULTS: On average, patients perceived the nurse-led gratitude intervention as helpful (4.2) (1 = very unhelpful, 5 = very helpful) and improved hospitalization experiences (4.3) (1 = seldom, 5 = never). Most of the time actions were required or to be taken, based on patient gratitude intervention responses. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perceptions of nurse-led gratitude intervention demonstrated helpfulness and improved hospitalization experience.

Quality Improvement in the Emergency Department: A Project to Reduce Door-to-Electrocardiography Times for Patients Presenting With Chest Pain.

INTRODUCTION: The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend obtaining electrocardiography for patients who present to the emergency department with chest pain in less than 10 minutes of arrival. Reducing door-to-electrocardiography time is an important step in adhering to the recommended door-to-balloon times (≤ 90 minutes) for patients who present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: Based on lean sigma principles, a protocol was implemented in an adult emergency department that included deferring nurse triage for patients with complaints of chest pain, chest tightness, and chest pressure and providing them with a red heart symbol as an indicator for clinical technicians to prioritize their electrocardiography order. Pre- and postintervention data were collected over a 12-month period. RESULTS: Before the intervention, the mean door-to-electrocardiography time was 17 minutes for patients with chest pain (n = 893). After the intervention, the mean door-to-electrocardiography time for patients with chest pain significantly decreased to 7 minutes (n = 1,057) (t = 10.47, P ≤ 0.001). Initially, the percentage of compliance with door-to-electrocardiography standard of 10 minutes was 31% and improved to 83% after implementation of the new protocol. DISCUSSION: Implementation of the optimized door-to-electrocardiography protocol decreased the time for obtaining diagnostics and improved compliance with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines, potentially decreasing door-to-balloon times for patients who presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Exploring the Best Practices of Nursing Research Councils in Magnet® Organizations: Findings From a Qualitative Research Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this descriptive qualitative study was to identify best practices of nursing research councils (NRCs) at Magnet®-designated hospitals. BACKGROUND: Nursing research (NR) is essential, adding to the body of nursing knowledge. Applying NR to the bedside improves care, enhances patient safety, and is an imperative for nursing leaders. METHODS: We interviewed NR designees at 26 Magnet-recognized hospitals about the structure and function of their NRCs and used structural coding to identify best practices. RESULTS: Most organizations link NR and evidence-based practice. Council membership includes leadership and clinical nurses. Councils conduct scientific reviews for nursing studies, supporting nurse principal investigators. Tracking and reporting of NR vary widely and are challenging. Councils provide education, sponsor research days, and collaborate interprofessionally, including with academic partners. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study demonstrate the need to create formal processes to track and report NR and to develop outcome-focused NR education.

Revitalizing a vital sign: improving detection of tachypnea at primary triage.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the accuracy of emergency department (ED) triage respiratory rate measurement using the usual care method and a new electronic respiratory rate sensor (BioHarness, Zephyr Technology Corp.), both compared to a criterion standard measurement. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study with convenience sampling conducted in an urban academic adult ED, including 3 separate respiratory rate measurements performed at ED triage: usual care measurement, electronic BioHarness measurement, and criterion standard measurement. The criterion standard measurement used was defined by the World Health Organization as manual observation or auscultation of respirations for 60 seconds. The resultant usual care and BioHarness measurements were compared with the criterion standard, evaluating accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for detecting tachypnea, as well as potential systematic biases of usual care and BioHarness measurements using a Bland Altman analysis. RESULTS: Of 191 analyzed patients, 44 presented with tachypnea (>20 breaths/min). Relative to criterion standard measurement, usual care measurement had a sensitivity of 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12% to 37%) and specificity of 99% (95% CI 97% to 100%) for tachypnea, whereas BioHarness had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 80% to 97%) and specificity of 97% (95% CI 93% to 99%) for tachypnea. Usual care measurements clustered around respiratory rates of 16 and 18 breaths/min (n=144), with poor agreement with criterion standard measurement. Conversely, BioHarness measurement closely tracked criterion standard values over the range of respiratory rates. CONCLUSION: Current methods of respiratory rate measurement at ED triage are inaccurate. A new electronic respiratory rate sensor, BioHarness, has significantly greater sensitivity for detecting tachypnea versus usual care method of measurement.

Workplace violence: prevalence and risk factors in the safe at work study.

OBJECTIVE: Nurses face one of the highest rates of reported workplace violence (WPV). This research examined the prevalence of WPV and demographic, work-related, and adult and childhood abuse histories as risk factors for WPV among 2166 nurses/nursing personnel across four health care institutions in one US metropolitan area. METHODS: Using data from an online cross-sectional survey, multivariate logistic regression was utilized to determine risk factors for physical and psychological WPV. RESULTS: Almost one-third (30%) of nurses/nursing personnel experienced WPV (19.4% physical, 19.9% psychological). Risk factors included being a nurse, white, male, working in the emergency department, older age, longer employment, childhood abuse, and intimate partner violence. CONCLUSIONS: Adult and childhood abuse histories have not been considered in previous large-scale investigations, but were significant risk factors along with other previously identified risk factors for WPV.