Cross-reactivity between Anisakis spp. and wasp venom allergens.

BACKGROUND: Anisakiasis is caused by the consumption of raw or undercooked fish or cephalopods parasitized by live L3 larvae of nematode Anisakis spp. Larvae anchor to stomach mucosa releasing excretion/secretion products which contain the main allergens. It has been described that nematode larvae release venom allergen-like proteins among their excretion/secretion products. We investigated potential cross-reactivity between Anisakis and wasp venom allergens. METHODS: Two groups of 25 patients each were studied: wasp venom- and Anisakis-allergic patients. Sera from patients were tested by ImmunoCAP, dot-blotting with recombinant Anisakis allergens and ADVIA-Centaur system with Hymenoptera allergens. Cross-reactivity was assessed by IgE immunoblotting inhibition assays. Role of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) was studied by inhibition with bromelain and periodate treatment. RESULTS: A total of 40% of wasp venom-allergic patients had specific IgE to Anisakis simplex and 20% detected at least one of the Anisakis recombinant allergens tested. Likewise, 44% of Anisakis-allergic patients had specific IgE to Vespula spp. venom and 16% detected at least one of the Hymenoptera allergens tested. Wasp venom-allergic patients detected CCDs in Anisakis extract and peptide epitopes on Anisakis allergens rAni s 1 and rAni s 9, whereas Anisakis-allergic patients only detected CCDs on nVes v 1 allergen from Vespula spp. venom. The only Anisakis allergen inhibited by Vespula venom was rAni s 9. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time that cross-sensitization between wasp venom and Anisakis is described. CCDs are involved in both cases; however, peptide epitopes are only recognized by wasp venom-allergic patients.

Component-resolved in vitro diagnosis of hazelnut allergy in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy to hazelnut occurs both with and without concomitant pollen allergy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate a panel of hazelnut allergens for diagnosis of hazelnut allergy in Spain, Switzerland, and Denmark. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with a positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge result with hazelnuts; 5 patients with a history of anaphylaxis; 62 patients with pollen allergy but hazelnut tolerance; and 63 nonatopic control subjects were included. Serum IgE levels to hazelnut extract, recombinant hazelnut allergens (rCor a 1.04, rCor a 2, rCor a 8, rCor a 11), and native allergens (nCor a 9, nCor a Bd8K, nCor a Bd11K) were analyzed by means of ImmunoCAP. RESULTS: Among patients with hazelnut allergy, 91% (Switzerland/Spain, 100%; Denmark, 75%) had IgE to hazelnut extract, 75% to rCor a 1.04, 42% to rCor a 2, 28% to rCor a 8, and 2% to rCor a 11. The highest rate of sensitization to Cor a 1.04 was found in the northern regions (Switzerland/Denmark, 100%; Spain, 18%), whereas IgE to the lipid transfer protein rCor a 8 prevailed in Spain (Spain, 71%; Switzerland, 15%; Denmark, 5%). IgE to profilin rCor a 2 was equally distributed (40% to 45%). Among control subjects with pollen allergy, 61% had IgE to hazelnut extract, 69% to rCor a 1.04, 34% to rCor a 2, 10% to rCor a 8, and 6% to rCor a 11. CONCLUSION: Component-resolved in vitro analyses revealed substantial differences in IgE profiles of hazelnut allergic and hazelnut tolerant patients across Europe.

[Delayed allergic reaction to amlodipine with a positive lymphocyte transformation test]. / Reacción alérgica tardía a amlodipino con positividad de la prueba de transformación de linfocitos.

BACKGROUND: Amlodipine is one of the third generation dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers used for hypertension. Mild, moderate and severe reactions have been reported with calcium channel blockers. Cross-reactivity among these drugs has not been established. CLINICAL REPORT: We have presented the case of a patient who developed a delayed pruritic, and erythematous maculopapular skin exanthema after the intake of amlodipine. A positive lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) confirmed the implication of amlodipine in the reaction and showed positivity to another calcium channel blocker, nifedipine, demonstrating cross reactivity. CONCLUSION: This is the first reported case of hypersensitivity to amlodipine in which the involvement of the drug is confirmed by a positive TTL. TTL could become a good diagnostic alternative for patients who experience late reactions to amlodipine and possibly cross-reactivity with nifedipine.

Antecedentes: el amlodipino es uno de los bloqueadores de los canales de calcio de dihidropiridinas de tercera generación utilizado para la hipertensión. Se han notificado reacciones leves, moderadas y graves con bloqueadores de los canales de calcio. No se ha establecido la reactividad cruzada entre estos fármacos. Caso clínico: se presenta el caso de una paciente con exantema cutáneo maculopapular, eritematoso y pruriginoso tardío tras la ingestión de amlodipino. La prueba de transformación de linfocitos mostró positividad al amlodipino, lo que confirmó la implicación de este fármaco en la reacción; también mostró positividad al nifedipino, lo que demostró la presencia de reactividad cruzada. Conclusión: este es el primer caso reportado de hipersensibilidad a amlodipino en el que se confirma la implicación del fármaco por medio de una prueba positiva de transformación de linfocitos, la cual podría convertirse en una buena opción diagnóstica en aquellos pacientes que experimentan reacciones tardías al amlodipino, así como posible reactividad cruzada con nifedipino.

Conjunctival provocation tests in the diagnosis of Anisakis simplex hypersensitivity.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of positive skin tests to Anisakis simplex is high compared with the low incidence of true gastroallergic Anisakiasis. There is little information about the prevalence of positive conjunctival tests in A. simplex-sensitized individuals. This study assesses the predictive value of conjunctival provocation test in two groups of A. simplex-sensitized subjects and negative controls. METHODS: Group A consisted of 28 individuals with a clinical history strongly suggestive of gastroallergic anisakiasis and group B, of 32 individuals without such history. The 60 individuals had positive skin tests and in vitro specific IgE determinations to A. simplex. Skin and conjunctival provocation tests were performed with an extract of A. simplex at a concentration of 1 mg of lyophilized material per ml. RESULTS: Conjunctival provocation tests were positive in 21/28 (75%) of group A patients and in 10/32 (31%) of group B patients. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.015); the odds ratio was 6.6 (2.11-20.5; p < 0.05). The diagnostic value of the conjunctival provocation test was expressed by the following statistical indicators: sensitivity 75% (55.8%-88.6%), false positive 25% (11.4%-45.2%), specificity 68.7% (49.9%-83.2%), false negative 31.2% (16.7%-50%), positive predictive value 67.7% (48.5%-82.7%), negative predictive value 75.9% (56.1%-89%), Yuden index 1.43. There were no statistical differences related to age, sex, or atopic status in patients with a positive or negative conjunctival challenge. Total and specific IgE levels to A. simplex were significantly greater (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) in the group of patients with a positive challenge. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that positive conjunctival provocation tests and high specific and total IgE levels are more prevalent in patients with a clinical history strongly suggestive of gastroallergic anisakiasis. Despite the significant differences obtained in both groups, this test has a limited diagnostic value to clinically discriminate patients with a history consistent with gastroallergic anisakiasis.

Aeroallergen sensitization influences quality of life and comorbidities in patients with nasal polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Nasal polyposis (NP) is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology that impairs quality of life (QoL). The role of atopy in NP is not established. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and QoL in a broad sample of patients with NP and to evaluate the influence of allergy on this disease. METHODS: A multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in 67 allergy units in Spain. NP and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity were diagnosed following EP(3)OS guidelines. Rhinitis and asthma were classified following Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma and the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines, respectively. Skin tests with a battery of aeroallergens were performed on all patients. A visual analog scale (VAS) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) and 31-item Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measure (RSOM 31) questionnaires were completed by all the patients. RESULTS: Of the 671 patients included, 611 were evaluable. Mean age was 46 years and 50% of patients were men. Also, 50% were atopic. Asthma was present in 66% of patients and NSAID hypersensitivity was present in 26%. The most frequent symptoms were nasal congestion and rhinorrhea. Mean value of VAS was 58.6. Global health and bodily pain were the items most frequently identified in the SF-12 questionnaire and nasal and ocular symptoms in the RSOM-31 questionnaire. There was a good correlation between VAS score and QoL (p < 0.0001). Rhinitis was more severe in nonallergic patients. Asthma was more frequent in atopic patients, whereas ASA triad was more frequent in nonatopic patients. Atopic patients showed higher VAS scores and worse QoL. CONCLUSION: Atopic NP patients showed worse QoL, higher incidence of asthma and a less severe form of rhinitis than non-atopic patients.

Clinical characteristics of melon (Cucumis melo) allergy.

BACKGROUND: Although melon is a frequent allergy-eliciting fruit, allergic reactions to melon have rarely been reported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and describe the clinical characteristics of melon allergy in melon-allergic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated patients allergic to melon and a control group of patients allergic to pollen. The diagnosis of melon allergy was based on a convincing clinical history, positive skin test results (prick-by-prick test), and positive results on oral challenge tests to melon. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were included in the study: 66 in the melon allergy group and 95 in the pollen control group. The melon allergy group included 35 female and 31 male patients with a mean age of 26.6 +/- 2.7 years (range, 5-61 years). Although all patients had oral symptoms, 13 (19.7%) of the patients had extraoral symptoms and none experienced generalized urticaria or anaphylaxis. Excluding other Cucurbitaceae fruits, peach, fig, and kiwi most frequently elicited positive skin test results and symptoms. Up to 23% of melon-allergic patients had a concomitant latex sensitization. Melon allergy was especially linked to pollen allergy, since all the melon-allergic patients were also allergic to pollen. Some differential features with respect to the pollen allergy control group were a higher prevalence of asthma (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; P < 0.05) and a statistical increase in the frequency of sensitization to several tree and weed pollens, including Ulmus (OR, 42.8) and Ambrosia (OR, 22.4). CONCLUSION: The most important conditions linked to melon allergy are pollen allergy (100%), allergy to other nonrelated fruits, mainly peach (up to 62%), and latex sensitivity (up to 23%). Some differential features of the pollinosis in melon allergy were a higher prevalence of asthma and a higher frequency of sensitization to several weed and tree pollens.