Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e216-e226, 2023 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35762834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early antiviral therapy was effective in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We assessed the efficacy and safety of combined interferon beta-1b and remdesivir treatment in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, prospective open-label, randomized-controlled trial involving high-risk adults hospitalized for COVID-19. Patients were randomly assigned to a 5-day interferon beta-1b 16 million units daily and remdesivir 200 mg loading on day 1 followed by 100 mg daily on day 2 to 5 (combination group), or to remdesivir only of similar regimen (control group) (1:1). The primary endpoint was the time to complete alleviation of symptoms (NEWS2 = 0). RESULTS: Two-hundred and twelve patients were enrolled. The median days of starting treatment from symptom onset was 3 days. The median age was 65 years, and 159 patients (75%) had chronic disease. The baseline demographics were similar. There was no mortality. For the primary endpoint, the combination group was significantly quicker to NEWS2 = 0 (4 vs 6.5 days; hazard ratio [HR], 6.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1-7.09; P < .0001) when compared to the control group. For the secondary endpoints, the combination group was quicker to negative nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) viral load (VL) (6 vs 8 days; HR, 8.16; 95% CI, 7.79-8.52; P < .0001) and to develop seropositive immunoglobulin G (IgG) (8 vs 10 days; HR, 10.78; 95% CI, 9.98-11.58; P < .0001). All adverse events resolved upon follow-up. Combination group (HR, 4.1 95% CI, 1.9-8.6, P < .0001) was the most significant independent factor associated with NEWS2 = 0 on day 4. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment with interferon beta-1b and remdesivir was safe and better than remdesivir only in alleviating symptoms, and in shortening viral shedding and hospitalization with earlier seropositivity in high-risk COVID-19 patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04647695.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Interferon beta-1b , Anciano , Humanos , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/terapia , Interferon beta-1b/administración & dosificación , Interferon beta-1b/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Lancet ; 395(10238): 1695-1704, 2020 05 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32401715

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effective antiviral therapy is important for tackling the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We assessed the efficacy and safety of combined interferon beta-1b, lopinavir-ritonavir, and ribavirin for treating patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This was a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial in adults with COVID-19 who were admitted to six hospitals in Hong Kong. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to a 14-day combination of lopinavir 400 mg and ritonavir 100 mg every 12 h, ribavirin 400 mg every 12 h, and three doses of 8 million international units of interferon beta-1b on alternate days (combination group) or to 14 days of lopinavir 400 mg and ritonavir 100 mg every 12 h (control group). The primary endpoint was the time to providing a nasopharyngeal swab negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RT-PCR, and was done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04276688. FINDINGS: Between Feb 10 and March 20, 2020, 127 patients were recruited; 86 were randomly assigned to the combination group and 41 were assigned to the control group. The median number of days from symptom onset to start of study treatment was 5 days (IQR 3-7). The combination group had a significantly shorter median time from start of study treatment to negative nasopharyngeal swab (7 days [IQR 5-11]) than the control group (12 days [8-15]; hazard ratio 4·37 [95% CI 1·86-10·24], p=0·0010). Adverse events included self-limited nausea and diarrhoea with no difference between the two groups. One patient in the control group discontinued lopinavir-ritonavir because of biochemical hepatitis. No patients died during the study. INTERPRETATION: Early triple antiviral therapy was safe and superior to lopinavir-ritonavir alone in alleviating symptoms and shortening the duration of viral shedding and hospital stay in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Future clinical study of a double antiviral therapy with interferon beta-1b as a backbone is warranted. FUNDING: The Shaw-Foundation, Richard and Carol Yu, May Tam Mak Mei Yin, and Sanming Project of Medicine.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Interferon beta-1b/uso terapéutico , Lopinavir/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Combinación de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hong Kong , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 109(2 Pt2): 498-501, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17267872

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incarceration of the retroverted gravid uterus is an extremely rare diagnosis in the third trimester that carries significant maternal operative and postoperative morbidity. CASE: The condition was diagnosed clinically in the third trimester of a primigravida. Despite the preoperative diagnosis, operative delivery proved difficult, requiring delivery of the fetus through the posterior wall of the uterus. Thirty-six hours after delivery the patient had a pulmonary embolus. CONCLUSION: This case report discusses the diagnosis and management of the condition incarcerated, retroverted uterus with postpartum pulmonary embolism. Prophylactic low molecular weight heparin in the antepartum period should be a considered for possible venous stasis due to the anatomy of the uterus.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Enfermedades Uterinas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Presentación de Nalgas/diagnóstico por imagen , Cesárea , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Embolia Pulmonar , Enfermedades Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen
4.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 13(2): 88-91, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16527708

RESUMEN

Endometrial ablation is an effective treatment for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. The incidence of pregnancy after endometrial destruction is low and is reported to be 0.7%. We report what is to the best of our knowledge the first case of pregnancy after microwave endometrial ablation and review the outcomes of 74 pregnancies after various methods of endometrial destruction.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Terapéutico/métodos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Endometrio/cirugía , Menorragia/cirugía , Resultado del Embarazo , Adulto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Histeroscopía/métodos , Menorragia/diagnóstico , Mifepristona/uso terapéutico , Misoprostol/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA