Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Chim Acta ; 564: 119928, 2024 Aug 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39163897

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) manifests through various symptoms and systemic manifestations. Diagnosis involves serological markers like rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). Past studies have shown the added value of likelihood ratios (LRs) in result interpretation. LRs can be combined with pretest probability to estimate posttest probability for RA. There is a lack of information on pretest probability. This study aimed to estimate pretest probabilities for RA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 133 consecutive RA patients and 651 consecutive disease controls presenting at a rheumatology outpatient clinic. Disease characteristics, risk factors associated with RA and laboratory parameters were documented for calculating pretest probabilities and LRs. RESULTS: Joint involvement, erosions, morning stiffness, and positive CRP, ESR tests significantly correlated with RA. Based on these factors, probabilities for RA were estimated. Besides, LRs for RA were established for RF and ACPA and combinations thereof. LRs increased with antibody levels and were highest for double high positivity. Posttest probabilities were estimated based on pretest probability and LR. CONCLUSION: By utilizing pretest probabilities for RA and LRs for RF and ACPA, posttest probabilities were estimated. Such approach enhances diagnostic accuracy, offering laboratory professionals and clinicians insights in the value of serological testing during the diagnostic process.

2.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 22(6): 1313-1316.e2, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33549562

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this report was to identify medications that can be used to treat hypoactive delirium. DESIGN: A systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science from inception through September 20, 2020. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Reports evaluating different pharmacologic treatments for hypoactive delirium in adults (age 18 years and older) and geriatric patients were included. METHODS: Three independent investigators reviewed the abstracts, using the Rayyan QCRI review tool to decide which articles were eligible for inclusion. Hereafter, articles were read completely for final inclusion. Study quality was assessed using the guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for cohort studies and randomized control trials. RESULTS: Of the 52 relevant articles, only 4 (8%) met the selection criteria. Two were cohort studies whereas the other 2 were randomized control trials. After further review, one of the reports was excluded because the same data were used as in one of the randomized control trials. In total, 4 different pharmacologic therapies were used in the selected studies: haloperidol, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, and methylphenidate. Aripiprazole showed a complete resolution of hypoactive delirium (P < .001), and methylphenidate showed a significant amelioration in cognitive function (P < .001). Ziprasidone and haloperidol did not show significant differences compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: A limited number of clinical studies on the treatment of hypoactive delirium are available. Aripiprazole and methylphenidate showed promising results in the treatment of hypoactive delirium.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Delirio , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Delirio/tratamiento farmacológico , Haloperidol/uso terapéutico , Humanos
3.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 12(3): 368-374, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33223483

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the occurrence of unplanned hospitalizations in older patients with cancer and to determine predictive factors. METHODS: A prospective Belgian multicentre (n = 22), observational cohort study was performed. Patients ≥70 years with a malignant tumor were included. Patients underwent G8 screening followed by geriatric assessment (GA) if abnormal at baseline and were followed for unplanned hospitalizations at approximately three months. Uni- and multivariable regression models were performed to determine predictive factors associated with unplanned hospitalizations in older patients with an abnormal G8. RESULTS: In total, 7763 patients were included in the current analysis of which 2409 (31%) patients with a normal G8 score and 5354 (69%) with an abnormal G8 score. Patients with an abnormal G8 were hospitalized more frequently than patients with a normal G8 (22.9% versus 12.4%; p < 0.0001). Reasons for unplanned hospitalizations were most frequently cancer related (25.7%) or cancer therapy related (28%). In multivariable analysis, predictive factors for unplanned hospitalizations in older patients with cancer and an abnormal G8 were female gender, absence of surgery, chemotherapy, ADL dependency, malnutrition and presence of comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Older patients with cancer and an abnormal G8 screening present a higher risk (23%) for unplanned hospitalizations. Predictive factors for these patients were identified and include not only patient and treatment related factors but also GA related factors.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica , Neoplasias , Anciano , Bélgica/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA