Are all ADHD medications created equal? Exploring the differences that enable evening dosing.

With more than 30 available stimulant medications, choosing among therapeutic options for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has become increasingly complex and patient specific. All ADHD stimulants owe their action to variants of either amphetamine or methylphenidate, yet formulation and delivery system differences create unique pharmacokinetic and clinical profiles for each medication. A benefit of the diversity within ADHD pharmacotherapy is that it facilitates tailoring treatment to meet patient needs. Historically, there has been a constant among long-acting stimulant options, regardless of formulation, which was morning dosing. The introduction of delayed-release and extended-release methylphenidate (DR/ER-MPH) is the first long-acting stimulant that patients take in the evening, with the clinical effect delayed until awakening in the morning. This paradigm shift has generated questions among clinicians and continued interest in real-world experience and data. This review used available clinical data, real-world evidence, emerging analyses, and clinical experience to evaluate the characteristics of DR/ER-MPH and its clinical utility within the greater context of ADHD medications and to provide clinicians with practical guidance on the use of DR/ER-MPH in children, adolescents, and adults with ADHD.

A Post-Hoc Analysis of Emotional Lability With Delayed-Release/Extended-Release Methylphenidate in Children Aged 6 to 12 Years of Age Participating in Two Phase 3 Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVE: DR/ER-MPH (formerly HLD200) is an evening-dosed delayed-release and extended-release methylphenidate approved for the treatment of ADHD in patients ≥6 years. Post hoc analyses of two pivotal Phase 3 trials: HLD200-107 (NCT02493777) and HLD200-108 (NCT02520388) evaluated emotional lability (EL) with DR/ER-MPH treatment. METHODS: Differences in Conners Global Index-Parent (CGI-P) EL subscale scores and age- and gender-adjusted T-scores over an open-label titration phase (HLD200-107) and between treatment and placebo groups at endpoint (HLD200-108) were evaluated. RESULTS: In HLD200-107 (N = 117) mean CGI-P EL subscale scores improved from 5.3 to 1.3 (p < .0001) after 6 weeks; in HLD200-108 significant improvements were observed in the treatment group (n = 81) versus placebo (n = 80; 3.11 vs. 4.08; p = .0053). T-scores showed an improvement with DR/ER-MPH treatment in both trials. Few emotional adverse events (AEs) were reported. CONCLUSION: DR/ER-MPH treatment resulted in statistically significant improvements in EL to the level of non-ADHD peers as contextualized by T-scores.

Effect of Delayed-Release and Extended-Release Methylphenidate on Caregiver Strain and Validation of Psychometric Properties of the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire: Results from a Phase 3 Trial in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objectives: Inadequately controlled symptoms and associated impaired functioning have a significant negative impact on caregivers of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study aimed to assess the impact of evening-dosed, delayed-release and extended-release methylphenidate (DR/ER-MPH) treatment on caregiver strain, measured by the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ), and present post hoc psychometric analyses assessing the reliability and validity of the CGSQ, its ability to detect change (responsiveness), and to derive responder definitions. Methods: The CGSQ was an exploratory efficacy endpoint in a phase 3, 3-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, forced-dose titration trial of DR/ER-MPH in children aged 6-12 years with ADHD (NCT02520388). Psychometric properties of the CGSQ evaluated post hoc included internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha; test/retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs); construct validity (known groups and convergent/divergent validity); responsiveness to changes in assessments of ADHD severity (ADHD Rating Scale-IV [ADHD-RS-IV], Conners' Global Index-Parent [CGI-P], and Clinical Global Impression-Severity [CGI-S]/CGI-Improvement [CGI-I]); and meaningful change threshold (MCT) using receiver operating characteristic curves, which were used to compare response between DR/ER-MPH and placebo groups. Results: Randomized DR/ER-MPH (54.5) and placebo (54.9) groups had similar mean CGSQ scores at screening. Caregivers of children on DR/ER-MPH reported significant reductions in CGSQ scores after 3 weeks of DR/ER-MPH treatment versus placebo (least-squares mean: 41.2 vs. 49.1; p < 0.001). The CGSQ demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93) and good test/retest reliability (ICC = 0.72). Known groups, convergent/divergent validity, and responsiveness were demonstrated from relationships between the CGSQ and the CGI-S, ADHD-RS-IV, and CGI-P. The mean anchor-based MCT for CGSQ total score was estimated as -9.0 (DR/ER-MPH vs. placebo: 53.2% vs. 29.9% p = 0.003). Conclusions: CGSQ scores significantly decreased after 3 weeks of DR/ER-MPH treatment versus placebo, and the CGSQ was found to be a valid and reliable measure of strain in caregivers of children with ADHD. Clinical trial registration identification number: NCT02520388.

Assessing effects of treatment with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate for pediatric ADHD using a parental survey.

INTRODUCTION: Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a prodrug stimulant approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults and children 6-12 years of age. Parent surveys provide valuable information regarding the impact of ADHD treatments. METHODS: Parents of children with ADHD beginning treatment with LDX voluntarily completed surveys through an automated telephone system or the Internet before and 6 weeks after LDX treatment initiation. Prescribing physicians received individual reports of the responses for each survey completed by their patients' parents. All patients whose parents completed both baseline and 6 week surveys were included in the analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted for those previously treated with medications to treat ADHD, including mixed amphetamine salts-extended release. RESULTS: LDX treatment was associated with a significant decrease in ADHD symptom interference with school activities, family interactions, homework, and social interactions (P<.01; N=11,576). Parents rated satisfaction with LDX as significantly higher than with their child's previous treatment (P<.01). On average, global improvement, tolerability, convenience, and satisfaction with LDX were all highly rated. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with LDX showed significant symptom improvement and parents reported significantly greater satisfaction than with prior treatment.

Effects of once-daily oral and transdermal methylphenidate on sleep behavior of children with ADHD.

OBJECTIVE: Methylphenidate is a leading first-line treatment for ADHD (AD/HD). This stimulant has long been suspected to adversely affect sleeping patterns of treated individuals, especially children. There are few studies on the effects of recently developed longer-acting methylphenidate treatments, such as once-daily oral or transdermal formulations, on sleep. METHOD: The authors examined eight indices of sleep behavior among children treated with either of these two methylphenidate preparations or placebo in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study. RESULTS: The main predictor of sleep problems was baseline numbers or severity of preexisting sleep problems, whereas the different treatments and placebo varied little in their propensity to elicit such problems. There was no significant relationship between dosage and severity or frequency of sleep problems. CONCLUSION: The authors found little evidence that methylphenidate treatment (at least in sustained-release forms) was a significant cause of sleep problems in treated children who were carefully titrated to an optimal dose.

A randomized, double-blind, crossover study of once-daily dexmethylphenidate in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: rapid onset of effect.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting methylphenidate formulations provide control of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms for up to 12 hours; however, not all formulations have rapid onset of therapeutic effect, which is essential for providing symptom control during morning hours. The primary objective of this randomized, double-blind, crossover study was to assess the efficacy of dexmethylphenidate extended release (ER) versus placebo by measuring the change from pre-dose to 0.5 hours post-dose on the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn and Pelham (SKAMP) rating scale. METHODS: Eighty-six children (6-12 years) with ADHD diagnosed using the DSM-IV criteria were randomized to receive dexmethylphenidate ER 20 mg/day or placebo, sequentially, for 7 days, with the final dose administered in a laboratory classroom setting on day 7 of each treatment period. The primary efficacy comparison was change in the SKAMP-Combined score from pre-dose to 0.5 hours post-dose, with additional secondary assessments at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose. Secondary efficacy measures included change from pre-dose at all timepoints in the SKAMP-Attention and SKAMP-Deportment, Math Test-Attempted and Math Test-Correct scores, and change from baseline on the Conners' ADHD/DSM-IV Scale for Parents (CADS-P). In an exploratory analysis, a daily diary card was completed by parents on the children's in-home behaviour before school. Safety was assessed by occurrence of adverse events, monitoring of vital signs and interpretation of ECGs. RESULTS: Significant improvements were noted at 0.5 hours and at all timepoints post-dose throughout the 8-hour laboratory classroom day for dexmethylphenidate ER vs placebo in the primary outcome measure of the SKAMP-Combined scores (p < 0.001), as well as SKAMP-Attention, SKAMP-Deportment, Math Test-Attempted and Math Test-Correct scores (p < 0.05). The changes from baseline in CADS-P scores were significantly greater with dexmethylphenidate ER than placebo (-16.382 vs -4.622; p < 0.001). Responses to all diary questions indicated significant improvement with dexmethylphenidate ER treatment versus placebo (all p < 0.001). The most common adverse events were abdominal pain (dexmethylphenidate ER 3.5%; placebo 4.7%), headache (dexmethylphenidate ER 3.5%; placebo 2.3%) and increased appetite (dexmethylphenidate ER 0%; placebo 3.5%). CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, once-daily dexmethylphenidate ER 20 mg provided rapid and significant improvement at 0.5 hours post-dose in attention, deportment and academic performance, which was sustained for 8 hours post-dose. Overall, once-daily dexmethylphenidate ER 20 mg was well tolerated. In an analysis of parental assessment of diary responses, children appeared more organized, and morning preparation for school was smoother and less frustrating with once-daily dexmethylphenidate ER compared with placebo.

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in children with ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover analog classroom study.

BACKGROUND: Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a therapeutically inactive prodrug in which d-amphetamine is covalently bound to l-lysine, a naturally occurring amino acid. Pharmacologically active d-amphetamine is released from lisdexamfetamine following oral ingestion. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover study compared the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine (LDX: 30, 50, or 70 mg) with placebo, with mixed amphetamine salts extended-release (MAS XR: 10, 20, or 30 mg) included as a reference arm of the study, in 52 children aged 6 to 12 years with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an analog classroom setting. The primary efficacy measure was the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Rating Scale; secondary efficacy measures included the Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Derived Measures, and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale. RESULTS: LDX treatment significantly improved scores on SKAMP-deportment, SKAMP-attention, PERMP-attempted, PERMP-correct, and CGI-improvement from baseline. Adverse events were similar for both active treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In a laboratory classroom environment, LDX significantly improved ADHD symptoms versus placebo in school-age children with ADHD.

ADHD Symptom Rebound and Emotional Lability With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children Aged 6 to 12 Years.

OBJECTIVE: To describe symptom rebound in children with ADHD treated with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) or placebo. METHOD: During a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of LDX, parents/caregivers completed the Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Short Form symptom rating scale throughout the day. Response, rebound, and emotional lability (EL) were assessed post hoc based on predefined criteria. RESULTS: Most participants given LDX ( n = 207) were responders throughout the day (50.7%-55.6%) versus placebo ( n = 72; 11.1%-22.2%). A total of seven (3.4%) LDX participants showed rebound in the afternoon and/or evening versus seven (9.7%) with placebo. In both groups, most incidences of rebound occurred in the evening. EL (mean) was higher in LDX rebounders and nonresponders (range = 4.2-9.0) versus LDX responders (range = 1.3-1.6) and versus placebo rebounders (range = 0.7-1.9). CONCLUSION: ADHD symptom rebound occurred in few participants (3.3%) given LDX (accompanied by clinically significant EL). Overall, more participants given LDX versus placebo responded throughout the day.

Efficacy and Safety of HLD200, Delayed-Release and Extended-Release Methylphenidate, in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Evening-dosed HLD200 is a delayed-release and extended-release methylphenidate (DR/ER-MPH) formulation consisting of uniform, dual-layered microbeads with an inner drug-loaded core. DR/ER-MPH is designed to delay the initial release of drug by 8-10 hours, and thereafter, provide a controlled, extended drug release to target onset of effect upon awakening that lasts into the evening. This phase 3 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of DR/ER-MPH on symptoms and temporal at-home functional impairment in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: This 3-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, forced-dose titration trial evaluated DR/ER-MPH (40-80 mg/day) in children aged 6-12 years with ADHD. Primary efficacy endpoint was the ADHD rating scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV), and the key secondary endpoints were the Before-School Functioning Questionnaire (BSFQ), and Parent Rating of Evening and Morning Behavior-Revised, morning (PREMB-R AM) and evening (PREMB-R PM). Safety measures included spontaneously reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and two TEAEs of special interest, appetite suppression and insomnia (with direct questioning on sleep disturbance). RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one participants were included in the intent-to-treat population (DR/ER-MPH, n = 81; placebo, n = 80). After 3 weeks, DR/ER-MPH achieved significant improvements versus placebo in ADHD symptoms (least-squares [LS] mean ADHD-RS-IV: 24.1 vs. 31.2; p = 0.002), and at-home early morning (LS mean BSFQ: 18.7 vs. 28.4; p < 0.001; LS mean PREMB-R AM: 2.1 vs. 3.6; p < 0.001) and late afternoon/evening (LS mean PREMB-R PM: 9.4 vs. 12.2; p = 0.002) functional impairment. Commonly reported TEAEs (≥10%) were insomnia and decreased appetite. CONCLUSIONS: DR/ER-MPH was generally well tolerated and demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo in ADHD symptoms and at-home functional impairments in the early morning, late afternoon, and evening in children with ADHD.

A comparison of once-daily and divided doses of modafinil in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of several modafinil dosing regimens in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to determine whether modafinil can be given once daily in pediatric ADHD. METHOD: Children and adolescents (age range, 6-13 years) (N = 248) with DSM-IV-defined ADHD were enrolled in a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted February-May 2002. The group was assigned to receive oral (100-mg tablets) modafinil 300 mg once daily (300 mg in the morning followed by placebo at midday), modafinil 300 mg as a divided dose (100/200 mg or 200/100 mg), or matching placebo. In children weighing > or = 30 kg, a higher dose of 400 mg (200/200 mg) was evaluated. Efficacy measures included the teacher-rated School Version and clinician-rated Home Version of the ADHD Rating Scale-IV and the parent-completed Conners' ADHD/DSM-IV Scales. RESULTS: 223 children completed the study. Those who received modafinil 300 mg once daily showed a significantly greater improvement (change from baseline) than those who received placebo in symptoms of ADHD across all rating scales and subscales (all p < .05). Divided 300-mg doses of modafinil provided some significant but inconsistent improvements in ADHD symptoms. In children weighing > or = 30 kg, modafinil 400 mg (200/200 mg) was significantly superior to placebo on clinician- and parent-completed scales (all p < .05). Insomnia was the only adverse event to occur with significantly greater frequency in a modafinil group (200/100) than in the placebo group (14% vs. 2%) (p = .03). CONCLUSION: Modafinil significantly improved ADHD symptoms in children. Once-daily dosing (300 mg) provided the most consistent improvement in symptoms. All dosing regimens of modafinil were well tolerated.

Modafinil film-coated tablets in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study followed by abrupt discontinuation.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this fixed-dose study was to determine the efficacy and safety of a new formulation of modafinil (modafinil film-coated tablets) in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In addition, the effect of abrupt discontinuation of modafinil was evaluated in a 2-week observation period. METHOD: Patients aged 6 to 17 years with DSM-IV-TR-defined ADHD were randomly assigned to 7 weeks of double-blind treatment with modafinil or placebo in a 2:1 ratio, followed by abrupt discontinuation of modafinil and a 2-week, double-blind observation period in which 46% of patients receiving modafinil were switched to placebo without tapering and half continued to receive modafinil. Study drug was administered once daily and titrated over the first 7 to 9 days to daily doses of 340 mg for patients < 30 kg or 425 mg for patients > or = 30 kg. Assessment instruments included the Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) School and Home Versions and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I). The study was conducted from November 2003 to June 2004. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were randomly assigned to receive modafinil (340 mg, N = 44; 425 mg, N = 82) or placebo (N = 64). 189 patients were evaluated for safety. Modafinil significantly improved symptoms of ADHD as shown by reductions in ADHD-RS-IV School Version total scores compared with placebo at all visits (p < or = .009), including the final visit of the double-blind phase (p < .0001). With modafinil, ADHD-RS-IV School Version mean total scores changed from 37.8 at baseline to 29.3 at week 1 and 20.7 at final visit; corresponding placebo values were 36.6, 32.8, and 28.4, respectively; effect size at final visit was 0.76 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.88). Total scores on the ADHD-RS-IV Home Version were also significantly reduced at all visits (p < or = .022) and final visit (p = .001) in patients receiving modafinil compared with those receiving placebo. Significantly higher proportions of patients receiving modafinil were rated "much improved" or "very much improved" in overall clinical condition (CGI-I) at all visits compared with patients receiving placebo (p < .001). No withdrawal symptoms were observed when modafinil was abruptly discontinued at the beginning of the final 2-week observation period. Modafinil was generally well tolerated. Insomnia, headache, and decreased appetite were the most commonly reported adverse events. Sixty-three percent of patients who received modafinil completed the study; 13% discontinued because of lack of efficacy; 10%, because of adverse events; and 13%, for other reasons (e.g., consent withdrawn, lost to follow-up). CONCLUSION: Modafinil significantly improved symptoms of ADHD both at school and at home and was well tolerated by children and adolescents. Abrupt discontinuation of modafinil was not associated with symptoms of withdrawal or with rebound of symptoms of ADHD.

A community assessment, open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of mixed amphetamine salts extended release in school-age children with ADHD.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (MAS XR) in school-age children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treated in a community practice setting. METHODS: Children aged 6-12 years (N = 2968) with DSM-IV-defined ADHD entered a 9-week prospective, open-label, non-comparative study of MAS XR at 386 sites. For at least 2 weeks before enrollment, subjects with well-controlled ADHD received their consistent dose of previously prescribed psychostimulant. Subsequently, this regimen was converted to an equivalent once-daily dose of 10-, 20-, or 30-mg MAS XR, according to a conversion algorithm. Tolerability and safety were assessed based on reported treatment-emergent adverse events and observed changes in vital signs and body weight. Effectiveness was assessed using a parent-completed Conners' Global Index Scale (CGIS-P) measured 8 and 12 h postdose and a clinician-scored Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale after 1, 3, and 7 weeks of treatment. The dose of study medication could be adjusted at weeks 1 and 3 to a maximum of 40 mg/day. Outcome analyses used an intent-to-treat methodology, with last observations carried forward. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvement in ADHD behavior 8 and 12 h postdose occurred during the first week of treatment and was maintained through study endpoint (p < 0.0001). Results of the investigator-rated CGI-I at weeks 1, 3, and 7 were consistent with the parent-rated CGIS-P results, indicating that MAS XR treatment significantly improved symptoms compared with the baseline stimulant regimen (p < 0.0001). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was low, and most AEs were mild in intensity. CONCLUSION: MAS XR 10-40 mg is a safe and effective once-daily medication for treatment of children with ADHD in a community practice setting. ADHD symptoms may be further reduced by converting from current pharmacotherapy to an optimally titrated dose of MAS XR.

Efficacy and duration of effect of extended-release dexmethylphenidate versus placebo in schoolchildren with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess changes in symptomatology of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with extended-release dexmethylphenidate (d-MPHER) versus placebo in a laboratory classroom setting. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study randomized 54 children 6-12 years of age, stabilized on methylphenidate 20-40 mg/day. Patients participated in a practice day, then received 5 days of treatment with d-MPH-ER 20 mg/day or placebo. After a 1-day wash-out, they returned to the classroom and received 1 dose of their assigned treatment. Evaluations occurred predose and at postdose hours 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12. Children were then crossed over to the alternate treatment, using identical protocol. Primary efficacy variable was the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham rating scale (SKAMP)-Combined scores, and primary analysis time point was 1 hour postdose; secondary efficacy variables over 12 hours included SKAMP-Attention and -Deportment scores and written math test results. Safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) recording following each period. Vital signs were recorded at each visit; laboratory tests were conducted at screening and final visit. RESULTS: D-MPH-ER 20 mg/day showed a significant advantage over placebo as early as 1 hour postdose on SKAMP-Combined scores (p < 0.001). When analyzing the entire sample of 54 children, d-MPH-ER maintained significant superiority over placebo from hours 1 through 12 (p-values ranged from < 0.001 to 0.046). D-MPH-ER was well tolerated, with no severe AEs reported. CONCLUSIONS: D-MPH-ER is safe and effective and improves classroom attention, deportment, and performance in children with ADHD.

ADHD: new pharmacological treatments on the horizon.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioral disorder affecting school-age children. In many cases, symptoms persist into adolescence and adulthood, causing significant lifelong impairments in academic, career, and social functioning. The stimulants methylphenidate and amphetamines have been used for decades as first-line therapy for the treatment of ADHD. Short-acting stimulant formulations control symptoms only for a few hours, creating the need for multiple daily doses of the medication. For school-age children, this necessitates administering medication during school hours, creating the potential for embarrassment and noncompliance. To offset these problems, longer acting stimulant formulations have been developed. Long-acting medications often control symptoms for up to 8 hours with only one daily dose of the medication, eliminating the need for in-school administration. Some long-acting stimulants are designed to control symptoms for up to 10 to 12 hours. Although stimulants are effective in most cases, some children are unable to tolerate these medications. Nonstimulant options are available for the treatment of ADHD and include atomoxetine, alpha-adrenergic agents, and antidepressants. Of these, atomoxetine is the only medication approved to treat ADHD. In spite of the number of medications available for the management of ADHD, treatment options with greater flexibility and reduced side effects are still desirable. A transdermal methylphenidate patch has recently been approved, and advances to existing stimulants currently under development include an amphetamine prodrug and a longer acting formulation of amphetamine. In addition, a number of nonstimulant entities, including guanfacine and modafinil, are under development for the treatment of ADHD.

Long-term tolerability and effectiveness of once-daily mixed amphetamine salts (Adderall XR) in children with ADHD.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term tolerability and effectiveness of extended-release mixed amphetamine salts (MAS XR; Adderall XR) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: This was a 24-month, multicenter, open-label extension of TWO placebo-controlled studies of MAS XR in children with ADHD aged 6 to 12 years. Subjects (N=568) began treatment with MAS XR 10 mg once daily, with 10-mg weekly dose increases to optimal effectiveness (maximum dose, 30 mg/d). Effectiveness was assessed with analysis of quarterly Conners Global Index Scale, Parent version (CGIS-P) scores. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical examinations, and serial laboratory tests. RESULTS: Significant improvements (>30%, p < .001) in CGIS-P scores were maintained during long-term treatment. Treatment was well tolerated, and most AEs were mild. The most frequently reported drug-related AEs included anorexia, insomnia, and headache. The incidence of drug-related AEs increased with increasing MAS XR dose, suggesting a dose relationship. Changes in laboratory values and vital signs were modest and not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: In children with ADHD, once-daily 10 mg-30 mg MAS XR was well tolerated and significant behavioral improvements were consistently maintained during 24 months of treatment.

Efficacy of two long-acting methylphenidate formulations in children with attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a laboratory classroom setting.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of two long-acting formulations of methylphenidate (MPH) for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in school-age children. METHODS: Children 6-12 years of age diagnosed with ADHD and stabilized on MPH (20-40 mg/day) participated in a five-way, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, crossover study conducted in a laboratory classroom setting. Children alternately received single doses of extended-release MPH (ER-MPH) 20 and 40 mg, modified-release MPH (OROS-MPH) 18 and 36 mg, and placebo over 6 consecutive weeks. Efficacy was assessed using SKAMP rating subscales and written math tests. Data were examined using between-treatment comparisons of area under the curve (AUC) for change from predose values during hours 0-4, 0-8, 8-12, and 0-12. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-three children completed the study. For all efficacy measures, improvements from predose were significantly greater with ER-MPH 40 mg than with OROS-MPH 36 mg in terms of AUC(0-4) (p < or = 0.005), AUC(0-8) (p < or = 0.006), and AUC(0-12) (p < or = 0.035). For most measures, ER-MPH 20 mg was equivalent to both doses of OROS-MPH in AUC(0-4), AUC(0-8), and AUC(0-12). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ER-MPH 20 mg is similar to that of OROS-MPH 18 and 36 mg during the first 8 hours postdose. Statistically greater benefits are observed with ER-MPH 40 mg than with OROS-MPH 36 mg and persist through hour 8. Active treatments show comparable efficacy from 8 to 12 hours postdose. Both doses of each MPH formulation are well tolerated.

The effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate on emotional lability in children 6 to 12 years of age with ADHD in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) on emotional lability (EL) in children with ADHD. METHOD: Post hoc analyses of a placebo-controlled trial of LDX-stratified children (aged 6-12 years) with ADHD to prominent and not prominent EL at baseline (score >3 or ≤3, respectively, on Conners' Parent Rating Scale [CPRS] items of anger, loss of temper, and irritability). Efficacy was assessed by change in CPRS EL scores and ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total and subscale scores. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: LDX showed improvement versus placebo (p < .0005) for EL item least squares (LS) mean change scores at endpoint and throughout the day. At baseline, 138 and 73 participants randomized to LDX treatment and having baseline and endpoint CPRS scores were categorized with CPRS-derived prominent and not prominent baseline EL, respectively; 41 and 31 participants randomized to placebo were categorized with CPRS-derived prominent and not prominent baseline EL, respectively. ADHD-RS-IV total and subscale scores decreased with LDX regardless of baseline EL severity. TEAEs included decreased appetite, insomnia, upper abdominal pain, headache, and irritability. CONCLUSION: EL and ADHD symptoms improved with LDX regardless of baseline EL symptom severity. LDX demonstrated a safety profile consistent with long-acting psychostimulant use.

Long-acting stimulants for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a focus on extended-release formulations and the prodrug lisdexamfetamine dimesylate to address continuing clinical challenges.

Individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) show pervasive impairments across family, peer, and school or work functioning that may extend throughout the day. Psychostimulants are highly effective medications for the treatment of ADHD, and the development of long-acting stimulant formulations has greatly expanded the treatment options for individuals with ADHD. Strategies for the formulation of long-acting stimulants include the combination of immediate-release and delayed-release beads, and an osmotic-release oral system. A recent development is the availability of the first prodrug stimulant, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX). LDX itself is inactive but is cleaved enzymatically, primarily in the bloodstream, to release d-amphetamine (d-AMP). Several clinical trials have demonstrated that long-acting stimulants are effective in reducing ADHD symptoms compared with placebo. Analog classroom and simulated adult workplace environment studies have shown that long-acting stimulants produce symptom reduction for at least 12 h. Long-acting stimulants exhibit similar tolerability and safety profiles to short-acting equivalents. While variations in gastric pH and motility can alter the availability and absorption of stimulants released from long-acting formulations, the systemic exposure to d-AMP following LDX administration is unlikely to be affected by gastrointestinal conditions. Long-acting formulations may also improve adherence and lower abuse potential compared with their short-acting counterparts. The development of long-acting stimulants provides physicians with an increased range of medication options to help tailor treatment for individuals with ADHD.