Differences in cardiac stress testing by sex and race among Medicare beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Although there is a wide literature demonstrating sex and race differences in the receipt of invasive cardiac tests and treatments, much less is known about the influence of such characteristics on receipt of a stress test, the first event in the diagnostic/treatment cascade for many patients. We explored the influence of patient characteristics on receipt of a stress test, with special attention to sex and race. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study of Medicare beneficiaries who were aged 66 years and older during 1999-2001 and were free of cardiac diagnoses and procedures for at least 1 year. Cases were recipients of a stress test. RESULTS: Cases were younger, less likely to be female or black, but more likely to live in high-income, highly educated, and urban areas than controls. Nonblack men were more likely to receive a stress test than women and black men, controlling for age, area characteristics, and clinical characteristics (odds ratio for nonblack men compared with black women 1.71). These results were not explained by physician visit frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts at minimizing disparities in cardiac care must attend to what is, for many patients, the entry into the cardiac care system: the stress test. Our findings suggest that simple "access," as measured by physician visit frequency, is not a rate-limiting factor.

New cardiac surgery programs established from 1993 to 2004 led to little increased access, substantial duplication of services.

Despite decreasing demand for bypass surgery, 301 new cardiac surgery programs opened between 1993 and 2004. We used Medicare data to identify where the new programs opened and to assess their impact on access and efficiency. Forty-two percent of the new programs opened in communities that already had access to cardiac surgery, which suggests that their creation has led to a fight for shares of a shrinking market. New programs were much more likely to open in states that did not require them to show a certificate-of-need. Overall, travel time to the nearest cardiac surgery program changed little, which suggests that these programs have done little to improve geographic access. The duplication of services that resulted in many areas may have engendered competition based on quality, price, or both, but it may also have increased surgical rates, with unknown results. We observe that certificate-of-need requirements may help avoid unnecessary duplication of services by preventing new programs from opening in close proximity to existing ones.