The Impacts of Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Polyps on Subsequent Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals: Simulation Study.

BACKGROUND: Computer-aided detection (CADe) of colorectal polyps has been shown to increase adenoma detection rates, which would potentially shorten subsequent surveillance intervals. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to simulate the potential changes in subsequent colonoscopy surveillance intervals after the application of CADe in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: We simulated the projected increase in polyp and adenoma detection by universal CADe application in our patients who had undergone colonoscopy with complete endoscopic and histological findings between 2016 and 2020. The simulation was based on bootstrapping the published performance of CADe. The corresponding changes in surveillance intervals for each patient, as recommended by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (USMSTF) or the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), were determined after the CADe was determined. RESULTS: A total of 3735 patients who had undergone colonoscopy were included. Based on the simulated CADe effect, the application of CADe would result in 19.1% (n=714) and 1.9% (n=71) of patients having shorter surveillance intervals, according to the USMSTF and ESGE guidelines, respectively. In particular, all (or 2.7% (n=101) of the total) patients who were originally scheduled to have 3-5 years of surveillance would have their surveillance intervals shortened to 3 years, following the USMSTF guidelines. The changes in this group of patients were largely attributed to an increase in the number of adenomas (n=75, 74%) rather than serrated lesions being detected. CONCLUSIONS: Widespread adoption of CADe would inevitably increase the demand for surveillance colonoscopies with the shortening of original surveillance intervals, particularly following the current USMSTF guideline.

Risk of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for large rectal neoplasms.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Improvements in the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique have made circumferential ESD in the rectum possible. However, little is known about the clinical course after extensive ESD in the rectum. The aim of this study was to determine the stricture risk in the rectum after total or subtotal circumferential ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 69 patients with 69 rectal tumors that required ≥ 75 % circumferential resection were identified at Kobe University Hospital and an affiliated hospital between April 2005 and May 2014. Among the patients, 61 were available for evaluation of stricture development, either by follow-up colonoscopy or by surgical specimens. The rate and possible risk factors of post-ESD strictures were investigated. RESULTS: Post-ESD rectal strictures developed in 12 patients (19.7 %). Patients who underwent total circumferential ESD developed a stricture (5/7, 71.4 %) more frequently than those with subtotal (≥ 90 %) ESD (7/16, 43.8 %). Patients undergoing an ESD procedure that involved < 90 % of the circumference did not develop strictures. The strictures were membranous or < 10 mm long in all cases. Of the patients with stricture, 11 received endoscopic balloon dilation and one received bougie with short-caliber-tip transparent hood; all strictures improved following dilation therapy. Statistical analysis revealed that ≥ 90 % circumferential resection was an independent risk factor for stricture, whereas morphology and size were not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent total or subtotal circumferential ESD of a rectal tumor had a high risk of stricture formation. Dilation helped to alleviate the stenosis.Study registered at University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN 000016559).

Combined Use of Common Fecal and Blood Markers for Detection of Endoscopically Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring of disease activity is essential in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Although endoscopic remission is the ideal therapeutic goal, noninvasive biomarkers (blood and fecal) are more acceptable to patients and are less costly. We evaluated the performance of combinations of fecal and blood markers on the detection of endoscopically active disease. METHODS: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) on stable medications were recruited. Blood markers included C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), albumin, platelet count (PLT), and hemoglobin. Fecal biomarkers included fecal calprotectin (FCT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT). These markers were compared with the endoscopic Mayo score for UC and the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients (mean age 44.7 years, 63.7% men, 54.9% patients with UC and 45.1% patients with CD) were recruited. FCT correlated well with FIT (r = 0.58), CRP (r = 0.56), ESR (r = 0.40), albumin (r = -0.54), PLT (r = 0.61), and hemoglobin (r = -0.35; all Ps < 0.001). Among 66 patients with endoscopic evaluation, 39.4% with endoscopically active disease had higher FCT, FIT, CRP, ESR, PLT, lower albumin, and hemoglobin compared with those in endoscopic remission (all Ps < 0.01). All 7 markers demonstrated good area under receiver operating characteristics (>0.7), with FCT being the best (0.91) for endoscopically active disease. Combining FCT and FIT improved the specificity to 95%, but the sensitivity decreased to 65.4%. In the subgroup analysis of UC, adding PLT to FIT improved the sensitivity and specificity to 100% and 90.9%, respectively. DISCUSSION: The combined use of fecal biomarkers and blood indexes is superior to the use of fecal biomarkers alone in identifying endoscopically active disease.

Association between body mass index and risk of formation of breast cancer in Chinese women.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the association between body mass index (BMI) and breast cancer risk among Chinese women in Hong Kong. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case control study of breast cancer in June 2002. Standardized questionnaires concerning BMI and other anthropometric data were completed by patients at the Queen Mary Hospital (QMH). The cases were 198 women aged 24-85 years who had documented breast cancer in 1995-2000 by triple assessment criteria, and the controls were 353 women who were followed up at QMH for benign breast disease after breast cancer had been excluded by triple assessment. The controls were frequency-matched to the cases by age. RESULTS: BMI at diagnosis was positively correlated with the risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women (p < 0.001 for trend). Also, when compared with women with a low BMI (< 19), women with a BMI of 23-27 and 27-31 had a 1.73-fold (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.04-2.86) and 2.06-fold (95% CI, 1.08-3.93) increased risk of breast cancer, respectively, after adjustment for non-anthropometric risk factors. BMI at diagnosis, however, was not related to the risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women. The odds ratios for premenopausal women with a BMI of 23-27 and 27-31 were 1.5 (95% CI, 0.82-2.71) and 1.32 (95% CI, 0.39-4.43), respectively. Furthermore, present BMI and BMI 5 years before diagnosis were poorly associated with breast cancer risk among both pre- and postmenopausal women. CONCLUSION: Weight control in obese women may be an effective measure for breast cancer prevention in postmenopausal women.