Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 528
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Dis ; 229(2): 413-421, 2024 Feb 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37506264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This drug resistance analysis of a randomized trial includes 234 patients receiving maribavir and 116 receiving investigator-assigned standard therapy (IAT), where 56% and 24%, respectively, cleared cytomegalovirus DNA at week 8 (treatment responders). METHODS: Baseline and posttreatment plasma samples were tested for mutations conferring drug resistance in viral genes UL97, UL54, and UL27. RESULTS: At baseline, genotypic testing revealed resistance to ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir in 56% of patients receiving maribavir and 68% receiving IAT, including 9 newly phenotyped mutations. Among them, 63% (maribavir) and 21% (IAT) were treatment responders. Detected baseline maribavir resistance mutations were UL27 L193F (n = 1) and UL97 F342Y (n = 3). Posttreatment, emergent maribavir resistance mutations were detected in 60 (26%) of those randomized to maribavir, including 49 (48%) of 103 nonresponders and 25 (86%) of the 29 nonresponders where viral DNA initially cleared then rebounded while on maribavir. The most common maribavir resistance mutations were UL97 T409M (n = 34), H411Y (n = 26), and C480F (n = 21), first detected 26 to 130 (median 56) days after starting maribavir. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline maribavir resistance was rare. Drug resistance to standard cytomegalovirus antivirals did not preclude treatment response to maribavir. Rebound in plasma cytomegalovirus DNA while on maribavir strongly suggests emerging drug resistance. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02931539.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Diclororribofuranosil Benzoimidazol , Ribonucleósidos , Humanos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/farmacología , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Citomegalovirus/genética , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diclororribofuranosil Benzoimidazol/análogos & derivados , ADN , Farmacorresistencia Viral/genética , Ganciclovir/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Fosfotransferasas (Aceptor de Grupo Alcohol)/genética , Ribonucleósidos/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Trasplantes
2.
J Infect Dis ; 2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687181

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Within a year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, vaccines inducing a robust humoral and cellular immune response were implemented worldwide. However, emergence of novel variants and waning vaccine induced immunity led to implementation of additional vaccine boosters. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated the temporal profile of cellular and serological responses in a cohort of 639 SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated participants, of whom a large proportion experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection. All participants were infection naïve at the time of their first vaccine dose. Proportions of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific T cells were determined after each vaccine dose using the Activation Induced Markers (AIM) assay, while levels of circulating SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were determined by the Meso Scale serology assay. RESULTS: We found a significant increase in SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses following the third dose of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine as well as enhanced CD8+ T cell responses after the fourth dose. Further, increased age was associated with a poorer response. Finally, we observed that SARS-CoV-2 infection boosts both the cellular and humoral immune response, relative to vaccine-induced immunity alone. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the boosting effect on T cell immunity of repeated vaccine administration. The combination of multiple vaccine doses and SARS-CoV-2 infections maintains population T cell immunity although with reduced levels in the elderly.

3.
J Infect Dis ; 229(3): 671-679, 2024 Mar 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37948759

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (nmAbs) failed to show clear benefit for hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Dynamics of virologic and immunologic biomarkers remain poorly understood. METHODS: Participants enrolled in the Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 trials were randomized to nmAb versus placebo. Longitudinal differences between treatment and placebo groups in levels of plasma nucleocapsid antigen (N-Ag), anti-nucleocapsid antibody, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and D-dimer at enrollment, day 1, 3, and 5 were estimated using linear mixed models. A 7-point pulmonary ordinal scale assessed at day 5 was compared using proportional odds models. RESULTS: Analysis included 2149 participants enrolled between August 2020 and September 2021. Treatment resulted in 20% lower levels of plasma N-Ag compared with placebo (95% confidence interval, 12%-27%; P < .001), and a steeper rate of decline through the first 5 days (P < .001). The treatment difference did not vary between subgroups, and no difference was observed in trajectories of other biomarkers or the day 5 pulmonary ordinal scale. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that nmAb has an antiviral effect assessed by plasma N-Ag among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, with no blunting of the endogenous anti-nucleocapsid antibody response. No effect on systemic inflammation or day 5 clinical status was observed. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04501978.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores
4.
J Infect Dis ; 2024 Sep 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39269490

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Biomarker guided therapy could improve management of COVID-19 inpatients. Although some results indicate that antibody tests are prognostic, little is known about patient management using point-of-care (POC) antibody tests. METHODS: COVID-19 inpatients were recruited to evaluate 2 POC tests: LumiraDX and RightSign. Ease of use data was collected. Blood was also collected for centralized testing using established antibody assays (GenScript cPass). A nested case-control study assessed if POC tests conducted on stored specimens were predictive of time to sustained recovery, mortality, and a composite safety outcome. RESULTS: While both POC tests exhibited moderate agreement with the GenScript assay (both agreeing with 89% of antibody determinations), they were significantly different from the GenScript assay. Treating the GenScript assay as the gold standard, the LumiraDX assay had 99.5% sensitivity and 58.1% specificity while the RightSign assay had 89.5% sensitivity and 84.0% specificity. The LumiraDX assay frequently gave indeterminant results. Both tests were significantly associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although both POC tests deviated moderately from the GenScript assay, they predicted outcomes of interest. The RightSign test was easier to use and was more likely to detect those lacking antibody compared to the LumiraDX test treating GenScript as the gold standard.

5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2024 Sep 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39271151

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Extrapulmonary complications (EPCs) are common in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, but data on their clinical consequences and association with viral replication and systemic viral dissemination is lacking. METHODS: Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and enrolled in the TICO (Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19) platform trial at 114 international sites between August 2020 and November 2021 were included in a prospective cohort study. We categorized EPCs into 39 event types within 9 categories and estimated their frequency through day 28 and their association with clinical outcomes through day 90. We analyzed the association between baseline viral burden (plasma nucleocapsid antigen [N-Ag] and upper airway viral load [VL]) and EPCs, adjusting for other baseline factors. RESULTS: 2,625 trial participants were included in the study. The median age was 57 years (IQR 46-68), 57.7% were male, and 537 (20.5%) had at least one EPC. EPCs were associated with higher day-90 all-cause mortality (HR 9.6, 95% CI 7.3, 12.7) after adjustment for other risk factors. The risk of EPCs increased with increasing baseline plasma N-Ag (HR 1.21 per log10 ng/L increase, 95% CI 1.09, 1.34), and upper airway VL (HR 1.12 per log10 copies/mL increase, 95% CI 1.04, 1.19), after adjusting for comorbidities, disease severity, inflammatory markers, and other baseline factors. Trial treatment allocation had no effect on EPC risk. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic viral dissemination as evidenced by high plasma N-Ag and high respiratory viral burden are associated with development of EPCs in COVID-19, which in turn are associated with higher 90-day mortality.

6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(6): 1490-1503, 2024 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38376212

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Persistent mortality in adults hospitalized due to acute COVID-19 justifies pursuit of disease mechanisms and potential therapies. The aim was to evaluate which virus and host response factors were associated with mortality risk among participants in Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 (TICO/ACTIV-3) trials. METHODS: A secondary analysis of 2625 adults hospitalized for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection randomized to 1 of 5 antiviral products or matched placebo in 114 centers on 4 continents. Uniform, site-level collection of participant baseline clinical variables was performed. Research laboratories assayed baseline upper respiratory swabs for SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA and plasma for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen (viral Ag), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Associations between factors and time to mortality by 90 days were assessed using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Viral Ag ≥4500 ng/L (vs <200 ng/L; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.07; 1.29-3.34), viral RNA (<35 000 copies/mL [aHR, 2.42; 1.09-5.34], ≥35 000 copies/mL [aHR, 2.84; 1.29-6.28], vs below detection), respiratory support (<4 L O2 [aHR, 1.84; 1.06-3.22]; ≥4 L O2 [aHR, 4.41; 2.63-7.39], or noninvasive ventilation/high-flow nasal cannula [aHR, 11.30; 6.46-19.75] vs no oxygen), renal impairment (aHR, 1.77; 1.29-2.42), and IL-6 >5.8 ng/L (aHR, 2.54 [1.74-3.70] vs ≤5.8 ng/L) were significantly associated with mortality risk in final adjusted analyses. Viral Ag, viral RNA, and IL-6 were not measured in real-time. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline virus-specific, clinical, and biological variables are strongly associated with mortality risk within 90 days, revealing potential pathogen and host-response therapeutic targets for acute COVID-19 disease.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales , COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Interleucina-6 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Interleucina-6/sangre , Adulto , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , ARN Viral/sangre , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Antígenos Virales/sangre
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2024 Apr 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663013

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mortality among people with HIV declined with the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy. We investigated trends over time in all-cause and cause-specific mortality in people with HIV from 1999-2020. METHODS: Data were collected from the D:A:D cohort from 1999 through January 2015 and RESPOND from October 2017 through 2020. Age-standardized all-cause and cause-specific mortality rates, classified using Coding Causes of Death in HIV (CoDe), were calculated. Poisson regression models were used to assess mortality trends over time. RESULTS: Among 55716 participants followed for a median of 6 years (IQR 3-11), 5263 participants died (crude mortality rate [MR] 13.7/1000 PYFU; 95%CI 13.4-14.1). Changing patterns of mortality were observed with AIDS as the most common cause of death between 1999- 2009 (n = 952, MR 4.2/1000 PYFU; 95%CI 4.0-4.5) and non-AIDS defining malignancy (NADM) from 2010 -2020 (n = 444, MR 2.8/1000 PYFU; 95%CI 2.5-3.1). In multivariable analysis, all-cause mortality declined over time (adjusted mortality rate ratio [aMRR] 0.97 per year; 95%CI 0.96, 0.98), mostly from 1999 through 2010 (aMRR 0.96 per year; 95%CI 0.95-0.97), and with no decline shown from 2011 through 2020 (aMRR 1·00 per year; 95%CI 0·96-1·05). Mortality due all known causes except NADM also declined over the entire follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Mortality among people with HIV in the D:A:D and/or RESPOND cohorts decreased between 1999 and 2009 and was stable over the period from 2010 through 2020. The decline in mortality rates was not fully explained by improvements in immunologic-virologic status or other risk factors.

8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39076084

RESUMEN

The soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) is a marker of alveolar type I cell injury associated with outcomes COVID-19 pneumonia. How plasma sRAGE changes over time and whether it remains associated with long-term clinical outcomes beyond a single measurement in COVID-19 has not been well-studied. We studied two cohorts in randomized clinical trials of monoclonal antibody treatment for COVID-19 (bamlanivimab and tixagevimab/cilgavimab). We first studied the association between baseline plasma sRAGE and 90-day clinical outcomes, which had been previously demonstrated in the bamlanivimab cohort, among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 supported with high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the tixagevimab/cilgavimab study. Next, we investigated the relationship between day 3 sRAGE and 90-day outcomes and how plasma sRAGE changes over the first 3 days of hospitalization in both clinical trial cohorts. We found that plasma sRAGE in the highest quartile in the HFNO/NIV participants in the tixagevimab/cilgavimab trial was associated with a significantly lower rate of 90-day sustained recovery (recovery rate ratio 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.71, p=0.005) and with a significantly higher rate of 90-day mortality (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.15-5.43, p = 0.021) compared with the lower three quartiles. Day 3 plasma sRAGE in both clinical trial cohorts remained associated with 90-day clinical outcomes. The trajectory of sRAGE was not influenced by treatment assignment. Our results indicate that plasma sRAGE is a valuable prognostic marker in COVID-19 up to three days after initial hospital presentation.

9.
Clin Immunol ; 267: 110336, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39117044

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Overweight and obesity are linked to increased hospitalization and mortality in COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to characterize induced immune responses and deep immune cell profiles stratified by BMI in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational multicenter cohort pilot study included 122 adult patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 in Denmark, stratified by BMI (normal weight, overweight, obese). Inflammation was assessed using TruCulture® and immune cell profiles by flow cytometry with a customized antibody panel (DuraClone®). Patients with obesity had a more pro-inflammatory phenotype with increased TNF-α, IL-8, IL-17, and IL-10 levels post-T cell stimulation, and altered B cell profiles. Patients with obesity showed higher concentrations of naïve, transitional, and non-isotype switched memory B cells, and plasmablasts compared to normal weight patients and healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients may correlate with elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, anti-inflammatory IL-10, and increased B cell subset activation, highlighting the need for further studies.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , COVID-19 , Citocinas , Obesidad , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/inmunología , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/inmunología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Citocinas/inmunología , Citocinas/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Adulto , Hospitalización , Dinamarca , Inmunofenotipificación , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Sobrepeso/inmunología
10.
N Engl J Med ; 384(10): 905-914, 2021 03 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33356051

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: LY-CoV555, a neutralizing monoclonal antibody, has been associated with a decrease in viral load and the frequency of hospitalizations or emergency department visits among outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Data are needed on the effect of this antibody in patients who are hospitalized with Covid-19. METHODS: In this platform trial of therapeutic agents, we randomly assigned hospitalized patients who had Covid-19 without end-organ failure in a 1:1 ratio to receive either LY-CoV555 or matching placebo. In addition, all the patients received high-quality supportive care as background therapy, including the antiviral drug remdesivir and, when indicated, supplemental oxygen and glucocorticoids. LY-CoV555 (at a dose of 7000 mg) or placebo was administered as a single intravenous infusion over a 1-hour period. The primary outcome was a sustained recovery during a 90-day period, as assessed in a time-to-event analysis. An interim futility assessment was performed on the basis of a seven-category ordinal scale for pulmonary function on day 5. RESULTS: On October 26, 2020, the data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping enrollment for futility after 314 patients (163 in the LY-CoV555 group and 151 in the placebo group) had undergone randomization and infusion. The median interval since the onset of symptoms was 7 days (interquartile range, 5 to 9). At day 5, a total of 81 patients (50%) in the LY-CoV555 group and 81 (54%) in the placebo group were in one of the two most favorable categories of the pulmonary outcome. Across the seven categories, the odds ratio of being in a more favorable category in the LY-CoV555 group than in the placebo group was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.29; P = 0.45). The percentage of patients with the primary safety outcome (a composite of death, serious adverse events, or clinical grade 3 or 4 adverse events through day 5) was similar in the LY-CoV555 group and the placebo group (19% and 14%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.78 to 3.10; P = 0.20). The rate ratio for a sustained recovery was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.77 to 1.47). CONCLUSIONS: Monoclonal antibody LY-CoV555, when coadministered with remdesivir, did not demonstrate efficacy among hospitalized patients who had Covid-19 without end-organ failure. (Funded by Operation Warp Speed and others; TICO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04501978.).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/efectos adversos , Antivirales/efectos adversos , COVID-19/mortalidad , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
11.
HIV Med ; 25(2): 212-222, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37775947

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate the impact of pre-existing drug resistance by next-generation sequencing (NGS) on the risk of treatment failure (TF) of first-line regimens in participants enrolled in the START study. METHODS: Stored plasma from participants with entry HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL were analysed using NGS (llumina MiSeq). Pre-existing drug resistance was defined using the mutations considered by the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database (HIVDB v8.6) to calculate the genotypic susceptibility score (GSS, estimating the number of active drugs) for the first-line regimen at the detection threshold windows of >20%, >5%, and >2% of the viral population. Survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between the GSS and risk of TF (viral load >200 copies/mL plus treatment change). RESULTS: Baseline NGS data were available for 1380 antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve participants enrolled over 2009-2013. First-line ART included a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) in 976 (71%), a boosted protease inhibitor in 297 (22%), or an integrase strand transfer inhibitor in 107 (8%). The proportions of participants with GSS <3 were 7% for >20%, 10% for >5%, and 17% for the >2% thresholds, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio of TF associated with a GSS of 0-2.75 versus 3 in the subset of participants with mutations detected at the >2% threshold was 1.66 (95% confidence interval 1.01-2.74; p = 0.05) and 2.32 (95% confidence interval 1.32-4.09; p = 0.003) after restricting the analysis to participants who started an NNRTI-based regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 17% of participants initiated ART with a GSS <3 on the basis of NGS data. Minority variants were predictive of TF, especially for participants starting NNRTI-based regimens.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Seropositividad para VIH , VIH-1 , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , VIH-1/genética , Fármacos Anti-VIH/farmacología , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Transcriptasa Inversa/uso terapéutico , Seropositividad para VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Carga Viral , Farmacorresistencia Viral/genética
12.
Scand J Immunol ; 99(2): e13337, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38168873

RESUMEN

Reliable methods to assess immune function after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are needed to guide dosing of immunosuppression. We hypothesized that toll-like receptor ligand-induced cytokine concentrations would decrease post-transplantation due to the use of immunosuppressive medication. Furthermore, we hypothesized that induced cytokine concentrations pre-transplantation would be higher in recipients with episodes of acute rejection post-transplantation due to underlying immunological dispositions. We aimed to investigate toll-like receptor ligand-induced cytokine concentrations by TruCulture©, a standardized immunoassay, in SOT recipients before and 3 months after SOT and explored associations with methylprednisolone-treated acute rejections. We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study including 123 participants (67 liver, 32 kidney and 24 lung transplant recipients). Whole blood was stimulated for 22 h with: (A) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), (B) Resiquimod, (C) Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (Poly I:C) and (D) a blank control. Cytokine concentrations (TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-17A, IFN-α and IFN-γ) were measured by Luminex. 30 participants developed methylprednisolone-treated acute rejection at a median of 9 days (IQR 5-17) post-SOT. We found that all induced cytokine concentrations decreased post-SOT except from LPS-induced and Poly I:C-induced IL-10. The induced cytokine concentration pre-transplantation did not differ in recipients with or without acute rejection. In conclusion, the induced cytokine concentrations decreased for all stimuli post-SOT, except the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Importantly, recipients developing early acute rejection did not differ in induced cytokine concentrations pre-SOT. Thus, the use of a standardized assay in SOT is feasible in a clinical setting and may provide important information on the immune function post-SOT.


Asunto(s)
Citocinas , Trasplante de Órganos , Humanos , Interleucina-10 , Ligandos , Lipopolisacáridos , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores Toll-Like , Metilprednisolona , Poli I
13.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 19(1): e1010756, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36595537

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) typically results from transmission of a small and genetically uniform viral population. Following transmission, the virus population becomes more diverse because of recombination and acquired mutations through genetic drift and selection. Viral intrahost genetic diversity remains a major obstacle to the cure of HIV; however, the association between intrahost diversity and disease progression markers has not been investigated in large and diverse cohorts for which the majority of the genome has been deep-sequenced. Viral load (VL) is a key progression marker and understanding of its relationship to viral intrahost genetic diversity could help design future strategies for HIV monitoring and treatment. METHODS: We analysed deep-sequenced viral genomes from 2,650 treatment-naive HIV-infected persons to measure the intrahost genetic diversity of 2,447 genomic codon positions as calculated by Shannon entropy. We tested for associations between VL and amino acid (AA) entropy accounting for sex, age, race, duration of infection, and HIV population structure. RESULTS: We confirmed that the intrahost genetic diversity is highest in the env gene. Furthermore, we showed that mean Shannon entropy is significantly associated with VL, especially in infections of >24 months duration. We identified 16 significant associations between VL (p-value<2.0x10-5) and Shannon entropy at AA positions which in our association analysis explained 13% of the variance in VL. Finally, equivalent analysis based on variation in HIV consensus sequences explained only 2% of VL variance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results elucidate that viral intrahost genetic diversity is associated with VL and could be used as a better disease progression marker than HIV consensus sequence variants, especially in infections of longer duration. We emphasize that viral intrahost diversity should be considered when studying viral genomes and infection outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Samples included in this study were derived from participants who consented in the clinical trial, START (NCT00867048) (23), run by the International Network for Strategic Initiatives in Global HIV Trials (INSIGHT). All the participant sites are listed here: http://www.insight-trials.org/start/my_phpscript/participating.php?by=site.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Carga Viral/genética , Mutación , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Genoma Viral/genética , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Variación Genética/genética
14.
Eur J Haematol ; 112(5): 802-809, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38183302

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Improved survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and an increasingly comorbid transplant population may give rise to new trends in the causes of death. METHODS: This study includes all adult allogeneic HCT recipients transplanted at Rigshospitalet between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019. Underlying causes of death were determined using the Classification of Death Causes after Transplantation (CLASS) method. RESULTS: Among 802 HCT recipients, 289 died during the study period. The main causes of death were relapse (N = 133, 46.0%), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (N = 64, 22.1%) and infections (N = 35, 12.1%). Multivariable analyses showed that with increasing transplant calendar year, a decreased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.97) and death from GvHD (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97) was identified, but not for other specific causes. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for all-cause mortality decreased from 23.8 (95% CI 19.1-28.5) to 18.4 (95% CI 15.0-21.9) for patients transplanted in 2010-2014 versus 2015-2019, while SMR for patients who died from GvHD decreased from 8.19 (95% CI 5.43-10.94) to 3.65 (95% CI 2.13-5.18). CONCLUSIONS: As risk of all-cause mortality and death from GvHD decreases, death from relapse remains the greatest obstacle in further improvement of survival after HCT.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Adulto , Humanos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Causas de Muerte , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
AIDS Res Ther ; 21(1): 27, 2024 05 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698440

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Human genetic contribution to HIV progression remains inadequately explained. The type 1 interferon (IFN) pathway is important for host control of HIV and variation in type 1 IFN genes may contribute to disease progression. This study assessed the impact of variations at the gene and pathway level of type 1 IFN on HIV-1 viral load (VL). METHODS: Two cohorts of antiretroviral (ART) naïve participants living with HIV (PLWH) with either early (START) or advanced infection (FIRST) were analysed separately. Type 1 IFN genes (n = 17) and receptor subunits (IFNAR1, IFNAR2) were examined for both cumulated type 1 IFN pathway analysis and individual gene analysis. SKAT-O was applied to detect associations between the genotype and HIV-1 study entry viral load (log10 transformed) as a proxy for set point VL; P-values were corrected using Bonferroni (P < 0.0025). RESULTS: The analyses among those with early infection included 2429 individuals from five continents. The median study entry HIV VL was 14,623 (IQR 3460-45100) copies/mL. Across 673 SNPs within 19 type 1 IFN genes, no significant association with study entry VL was detected. Conversely, examining individual genes in START showed a borderline significant association between IFNW1, and study entry VL (P = 0.0025). This significance remained after separate adjustments for age, CD4+ T-cell count, CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio and recent infection. When controlling for population structure using linear mixed effects models (LME), in addition to principal components used in the main model, this was no longer significant (p = 0.0244). In subgroup analyses stratified by geographical region, the association between IFNW1 and study entry VL was only observed among African participants, although, the association was not significant when controlling for population structure using LME. Of the 17 SNPs within the IFNW1 region, only rs79876898 (A > G) was associated with study entry VL (p = 0.0020, beta = 0.32; G associated with higher study entry VL than A) in single SNP association analyses. The findings were not reproduced in FIRST participants. CONCLUSION: Across 19 type 1 IFN genes, only IFNW1 was associated with HIV-1 study entry VL in a cohort of ART-naïve individuals in early stages of their infection, however, this was no longer significant in sensitivity analyses that controlled for population structures using LME.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , VIH-1 , Interferón Tipo I , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Carga Viral , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Infecciones por VIH/genética , Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , VIH-1/genética , Interferón Tipo I/genética , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Genotipo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptor de Interferón alfa y beta/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Recuento de Linfocito CD4
16.
J Infect Dis ; 228(1): 28-36, 2023 06 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36751730

RESUMEN

Antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections are increasingly an issue in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. How antibiotic treatment impacts antibiotic resistance in the human gut microbiome remains poorly understood in vivo. Here, a total of 577 fecal samples from 233 heavily antibiotic-treated transplant patients were examined using high-resolution prescription data and shotgun metagenomics. The 13 most frequently used antibiotics were significantly associated with 154 (40% of tested associations) microbiome features. Use of broad-spectrum ß-lactam antibiotics was most markedly associated with microbial disruption and increase in resistome features. The enterococcal vanA gene was positively associated with 8 of the 13 antibiotics, and in particular piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin. Here, we highlight the need for a high-resolution approach in understanding the development of antibiotic resistance in the gut microbiome. Our findings can be used to inform antibiotic stewardship and combat the increasing threat of antibiotic resistance.


Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/genética , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana/genética , Bacterias/genética , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos
17.
J Infect Dis ; 227(8): 951-960, 2023 04 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36580481

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an incompletely understood increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among people with HIV (PWH). We investigated if a collection of biomarkers were associated with CVD among PWH. Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to identify potentially causal associations. METHODS: Data from follow-up in 4 large trials among PWH were used to identify 131 incident CVD cases and they were matched to 259 participants without incident CVD (controls). Tests of associations between 460 baseline protein levels and case status were conducted. RESULTS: Univariate analysis found CLEC6A, HGF, IL-6, IL-10RB, and IGFBP7 as being associated with case status and a multivariate model identified 3 of these: CLEC6A (odds ratio [OR] = 1.48, P = .037), HGF (OR = 1.83, P = .012), and IL-6 (OR = 1.45, P = .016). MR methods identified 5 significantly associated proteins: AXL, CHI3L1, GAS6, IL-6RA, and SCGB3A2. CONCLUSIONS: These results implicate inflammatory and fibrotic processes as contributing to CVD. While some of these biomarkers are well established in the general population and in PWH (IL-6 and its receptor), some are novel to PWH (HGF, AXL, and GAS6) and some are novel overall (CLEC6A). Further investigation into the uniqueness of these biomarkers in PWH and the role of these biomarkers as targets among PWH is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Interleucina-6 , Biomarcadores , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones
18.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e82-e89, 2023 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35938291

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many interventional in-patient coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) trials assess primary outcomes through day 28 post-randomization. Since a proportion of patients experience protracted disease or relapse, such follow-up period may not fully capture the course of the disease, even when randomization occurs a few days after hospitalization. METHODS: Among adults hospitalized with COVID-19 in eastern Denmark from 18 March 2020-12 January 2021 we assessed all-cause mortality, recovery, and sustained recovery 90 days after admission, and readmission and all-cause mortality 90 days after discharge. Recovery was defined as hospital discharge and sustained recovery as recovery and alive without readmissions for 14 consecutive days. RESULTS: Among 3386 patients included in the study, 2796 (82.6%) reached recovery and 2600 (77.0%) achieved sustained recovery. Of those discharged from hospital, 556 (19.9%) were readmitted and 289 (10.3%) died. Overall, the median time to recovery was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 3-10), and 19 days (IQR: 11-33) among patients in intensive care in the first 2 days of admission. CONCLUSIONS: Postdischarge readmission and mortality rates were substantial. Therefore, sustained recovery should be favored to recovery outcomes in clinical COVID-19 trials. A 28-day follow-up period may be too short for the critically ill.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente , Alta del Paciente , Cuidados Posteriores , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalización , Hospitales , Mortalidad Hospitalaria
19.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(11): 1511-1520, 2023 11 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37392436

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Continuous evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outpaces monovalent vaccine cross-protection to new viral variants. Consequently, bivalent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines including Omicron antigens were developed. The contrasting immunogenicity of the bivalent vaccines and the impact of prior antigenic exposure on new immune imprinting remains to be clarified. METHODS: In the large prospective ENFORCE cohort, we quantified spike-specific antibodies to 5 Omicron variants (BA.1 to BA.5) before and after BA.1 or BA.4/5 bivalent booster vaccination to compare Omicron variant-specific antibody inductions. We evaluated the impact of previous infection and characterized the dominant antibody responses. RESULTS: Prior to the bivalent fourth vaccine, all participants (N = 1697) had high levels of Omicron-specific antibodies. Antibody levels were significantly higher in individuals with a previous polymerase chain reaction positive (PCR+) infection, particularly for BA.2-specific antibodies (geometric mean ratio [GMR] 6.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.05-7.62). Antibody levels were further significantly boosted in all individuals by receiving either of the bivalent vaccines, but greater fold inductions to all Omicron variants were observed in individuals with no prior infection. The BA.1 bivalent vaccine generated a dominant response toward BA.1 (adjusted GMR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.57) and BA.3 (1.32, 1.09-1.59) antigens in individuals with no prior infection, whereas the BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine generated a dominant response toward BA.2 (0.87, 0.76-0.98), BA.4 (0.85, 0.75-0.97), and BA.5 (0.87, 0.76-0.99) antigens in individuals with a prior infection. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination and previous infection leave a clear serological imprint that is focused on the variant-specific antigen. Importantly, both bivalent vaccines induce high levels of Omicron variant-specific antibodies, suggesting broad cross-protection of Omicron variants.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , Vacunación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Vacunas Combinadas , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes
20.
N Engl J Med ; 383(19): 1813-1826, 2020 11 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32445440

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although several therapeutic agents have been evaluated for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), no antiviral agents have yet been shown to be efficacious. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous remdesivir in adults who were hospitalized with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remdesivir (200 mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 100 mg daily for up to 9 additional days) or placebo for up to 10 days. The primary outcome was the time to recovery, defined by either discharge from the hospital or hospitalization for infection-control purposes only. RESULTS: A total of 1062 patients underwent randomization (with 541 assigned to remdesivir and 521 to placebo). Those who received remdesivir had a median recovery time of 10 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 11), as compared with 15 days (95% CI, 13 to 18) among those who received placebo (rate ratio for recovery, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.49; P<0.001, by a log-rank test). In an analysis that used a proportional-odds model with an eight-category ordinal scale, the patients who received remdesivir were found to be more likely than those who received placebo to have clinical improvement at day 15 (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9, after adjustment for actual disease severity). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were 6.7% with remdesivir and 11.9% with placebo by day 15 and 11.4% with remdesivir and 15.2% with placebo by day 29 (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.03). Serious adverse events were reported in 131 of the 532 patients who received remdesivir (24.6%) and in 163 of the 516 patients who received placebo (31.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults who were hospitalized with Covid-19 and had evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ACTT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04280705.).


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenosina Monofosfato/administración & dosificación , Adenosina Monofosfato/efectos adversos , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Anciano , Alanina/administración & dosificación , Alanina/efectos adversos , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Método Doble Ciego , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA