Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(13): S36-S40, 2024 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561642

RESUMEN

Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen that typically affects patients in healthcare settings. Data on C. auris cases in correctional facilities are limited but are needed to guide public health recommendations. We describe cases and challenges of providing care for 13 patients who were transferred to correctional facilities during January 2020-December 2022 after having a positive C. auris specimen. All patients had positive specimens identified while receiving inpatient care at healthcare facilities in geographic areas with high C. auris prevalence. Correctional facilities reported challenges managing patients and implementing prevention measures; those challenges varied by whether patients were housed in prison medical units or general population units. Although rarely reported, C. auris cases in persons who are incarcerated may occur, particularly in persons with known risk factors. Measures to manage cases and prevent C. auris spread in correctional facilities should address setting-specific challenges in healthcare and nonhealthcare correctional environments.


Asunto(s)
Candida , Candidiasis , Humanos , Candidiasis/microbiología , Candida auris , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Instalaciones Correccionales
2.
Ann Intern Med ; 176(4): 489-495, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36940442

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Candida auris is an emerging fungal threat that has been spreading in the United States since it was first reported in 2016. OBJECTIVE: To describe recent changes in the U.S. epidemiology of C auris occurring from 2019 to 2021. DESIGN: Description of national surveillance data. SETTING: United States. PATIENTS: Persons with any specimen that was positive for C auris. MEASUREMENTS: Case counts reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by health departments, volume of colonization screening, and antifungal susceptibility results were aggregated and compared over time and by geographic region. RESULTS: A total of 3270 clinical cases and 7413 screening cases of C auris were reported in the United States through 31 December 2021. The percentage increase in clinical cases grew each year, from a 44% increase in 2019 to a 95% increase in 2021. Colonization screening volume and screening cases increased in 2021 by more than 80% and more than 200%, respectively. From 2019 to 2021, 17 states identified their first C auris case. The number of C auris cases that were resistant to echinocandins in 2021 was about 3 times that in each of the previous 2 years. LIMITATION: Identification of screening cases depends on screening that is done on the basis of need and available resources. Screening is not conducted uniformly across the United States, so the true burden of C auris cases may be underestimated. CONCLUSION: C auris cases and transmission have risen in recent years, with a dramatic increase in 2021. The rise in echinocandin-resistant cases and evidence of transmission is particularly concerning because echinocandins are first-line therapy for invasive Candida infections, including C auris. These findings highlight the need for improved detection and infection control practices to prevent spread of C auris. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.


Asunto(s)
Candida , Candidiasis , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Candida auris , Candidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidiasis/epidemiología , Candidiasis/diagnóstico , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Equinocandinas/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2023 Dec 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38059527

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Environmental contamination is suspected to play an important role in Candida auris transmission. Understanding speed and risks of contamination after room disinfection could inform environmental cleaning recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter study of environmental contamination associated with C. auris colonization at six ventilator-capable skilled nursing facilities and one acute-care hospital in Illinois and California. Known C. auris carriers were sampled at five body-sites followed by sampling of nearby room surfaces before disinfection and at 0, 4, 8, and 12-hours post-disinfection. Samples were cultured for C. auris and bacterial multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Odds of surface contamination after disinfection were analyzed using multilevel generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Among 41 known C. auris carriers, colonization was detected most frequently on palms/fingertips (76%) and nares (71%). C. auris contamination was detected on 32.2% (66/205) of room surfaces pre-disinfection and 20.5% (39/190) of room surfaces by 4-hours post-disinfection. A higher number of C. auris-colonized body sites was associated with higher odds of environmental contamination at every time point following disinfection, adjusting for facility of residence. In the rooms of 38 (93%) C. auris carriers co-colonized with a bacterial MDRO, 2%-24% of surfaces were additionally contaminated with the same MDRO by 4-hours post-disinfection. CONCLUSIONS: C. auris can contaminate the healthcare environment rapidly after disinfection, highlighting the challenges associated with environmental disinfection. Future research should investigate long-acting disinfectants, antimicrobial surfaces, and more effective patient skin antisepsis to reduce the environmental reservoir of C. auris and bacterial MDROs in healthcare settings.

4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(7): 1485-1487, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37347923

RESUMEN

Using a large US hospital database, we describe 192 Candida auris‒associated hospitalizations during 2017-2022, including 38 (20%) C. auris bloodstream infections. Hospitalizations involved extensive concurrent conditions and healthcare use; estimated crude mortality rate was 34%. These findings underscore the continued need for public health surveillance and C. auris containment efforts.


Asunto(s)
Candida , Candidiasis Invasiva , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candida auris , Candidiasis Invasiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(5): 802-811, 2022 03 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34145450

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented healthcare challenges, and COVID-19 has been linked to secondary infections. Candidemia, a fungal healthcare-associated infection, has been described in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. However, studies of candidemia and COVID-19 coinfection have been limited in sample size and geographic scope. We assessed differences in patients with candidemia with and without a COVID-19 diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a case-level analysis using population-based candidemia surveillance data collected through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program during April-August 2020 to compare characteristics of candidemia patients with and without a positive test for COVID-19 in the 30 days before their Candida culture using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Of the 251 candidemia patients included, 64 (25.5%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Liver disease, solid-organ malignancies, and prior surgeries were each >3 times more common in patients without COVID-19 coinfection, whereas intensive care unit-level care, mechanical ventilation, having a central venous catheter, and receipt of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were each >1.3 times more common in patients with COVID-19. All-cause in-hospital fatality was 2 times higher among those with COVID-19 (62.5%) than without (32.1%). CONCLUSIONS: One-quarter of candidemia patients had COVID-19. These patients were less likely to have certain underlying conditions and recent surgery commonly associated with candidemia and more likely to have acute risk factors linked to COVID-19 care, including immunosuppressive medications. Given the high mortality, it is important for clinicians to remain vigilant and take proactive measures to prevent candidemia in patients with COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Candidemia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19 , Candidemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 60(5): e0080821, 2022 05 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34985980

RESUMEN

Candida auris is an emerging yeast species that has the unique characteristics of patient skin colonization and rapid transmission within health care facilities and the ability to rapidly develop antifungal resistance. When C. auris first started to appear in clinical microbiology laboratories, it could be identified only by using DNA sequencing. In the decade since its first identification outside of Japan, there have been many improvements in the detection of C. auris. These include the expansion of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) databases to include C. auris, the development of both laboratory-developed tests and commercially available kits for its detection, and special CHROMagar for identification from laboratory specimens. Here we discuss the current tools and resources that are available for C. auris identification and detection.


Asunto(s)
Candida , Candidiasis , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candida/genética , Candida auris , Candidiasis/microbiología , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción/métodos
7.
Mycoses ; 65(2): 222-225, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34731508

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the first report of Candida auris in 2016, the Colombian Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS) has implemented a national surveillance of the emerging multidrug-resistant fungus. OBJECTIVES: This report summarises the findings of this laboratory-based surveillance from March 2016 to December 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1720 C. auris cases were identified, including 393 (23%) colonisation cases and 1327 (77%) clinical cases. Cases were reported in 20 of 32 (62%) departments of Colombia and involved hospitals from 33 cities. The median age of patients was 34 years; 317 (18%) cases were children under 16 years, 54% were male. The peak number of cases was observed in 2019 (n = 541). In 2020, 379 (94%) of 404 cases reported were clinical cases, including 225 bloodstream infections (BSI) and 154 non-BSI. Among the 404 cases reported in 2020, severe COVID-19 was reported in 122 (30%). Antifungal susceptibility was tested in 379 isolates. Using CDC tentative breakpoints for resistance, 35% of isolates were fluconazole resistant, 33% were amphotericin B resistant, and 0.3% isolates were anidulafungin resistant, 12% were multidrug resistant, and no pan-resistant isolates were identified. CONCLUSION: For five years of surveillance, we observed an increase in the number and geographic spread of clinical cases and an increase in fluconazole resistance. These observations emphasise the need for improved measures to mitigate spread.


Asunto(s)
Candidiasis , Adulto , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Candida auris , Candidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidiasis/epidemiología , Niño , Colombia/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica , Femenino , Fluconazol , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): 1609-1616, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34079987

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Candidemia is a common opportunistic infection causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Because of an increasing proportion of non-albicans Candida species and rising antifungal drug resistance, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) changed treatment guidelines in 2016 to recommend echinocandins over fluconazole as first-line treatment for adults with candidemia. We describe candidemia treatment practices and adherence to the updated guidelines. METHODS: During 2017-2018, the Emerging Infections Program conducted active population-based candidemia surveillance at 9 US sites using a standardized case definition. We assessed factors associated with initial antifungal treatment for the first candidemia case among adults using multivariable logistic regression models. To identify instances of potentially inappropriate treatment, we compared the first antifungal drug received with species and antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) results from initial blood cultures. RESULTS: Among 1835 patients who received antifungal treatment, 1258 (68.6%) received an echinocandin and 543 (29.6%) received fluconazole as initial treatment. Cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio = 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.29) was the only underlying medical condition significantly associated with initial receipt of an echinocandin (versus fluconazole). More than one-half (n = 304, 56.0%) of patients initially treated with fluconazole grew a non-albicans species. Among 265 patients initially treated with fluconazole and with fluconazole AFST results, 28 (10.6%) had a fluconazole-resistant isolate. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients with candidemia were initially treated with fluconazole, resulting in potentially inappropriate treatment for those involving non-albicans or fluconazole-resistant species. Reasons for nonadherence to IDSA guidelines should be evaluated, and clinician education is needed.


Asunto(s)
Candidemia , Adulto , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candida , Candidemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidemia/epidemiología , Equinocandinas/uso terapéutico , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Espera Vigilante
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(2): 56-57, 2021 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33444298

RESUMEN

In July 2020, the Florida Department of Health was alerted to three Candida auris bloodstream infections and one urinary tract infection in four patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received care in the same dedicated COVID-19 unit of an acute care hospital (hospital A). C. auris is a multidrug-resistant yeast that can cause invasive infection. Its ability to colonize patients asymptomatically and persist on surfaces has contributed to previous C. auris outbreaks in health care settings (1-7). Since the first C. auris case was identified in Florida in 2017, aggressive measures have been implemented to limit spread, including contact tracing and screening upon detection of a new case. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital A conducted admission screening for C. auris and admitted colonized patients to a separate dedicated ward.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candidiasis/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Unidades Hospitalarias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Florida/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
10.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 76(1): 82-89, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32151430

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Compared with conventional (rope-ladder cannulation [RLC]) methods, use of buttonhole cannulation (BHC) to access arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) may be associated with increased risk for bloodstream infection and other vascular access-related infection. We used national surveillance data to evaluate the infection burden and risk among in-center hemodialysis patients with AVFs using BHC. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of infections and related events and retrospective observational cohort study using National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: US patients receiving hemodialysis treated in outpatient dialysis centers. PREDICTORS: AVF cannulation methods, dialysis facility characteristics, and infection control practices. OUTCOMES: Access-related bloodstream infection; local access-site infection; intravenous (IV) antimicrobial start. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Description of frequency and rate of infections; adjusted relative risk (aRR) for infection with BHC versus RLC estimated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: During 2013 to 2014, there were 2,466 access-related bloodstream infections, 3,169 local access-site infections, and 13,726 IV antimicrobial starts among patients accessed using BHC. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen, present in half (52%) of the BHC access-related bloodstream infections. Hospitalization was frequent among BHC access-related bloodstream infections (37%). In 2014, 9% (n=271,980) of all AVF patient-months reported to NHSN were associated with BHC. After adjusting for facility characteristics and practices, BHC was associated with significantly higher risk for access-related bloodstream infection (aRR, 2.6; 95% CI, 2.4-2.8) and local access-site infection (aRR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.6) than RLC, but was not associated with increased risk for IV antimicrobial start. LIMITATIONS: Data for facility practices were self-reported and not patient specific. CONCLUSIONS: BHC was associated with higher risk for vascular access-related infection than RLC among in-center hemodialysis patients. Decisions regarding the use of BHC in dialysis centers should take into account the higher risk for infection. Studies are needed to evaluate infection control measures that may reduce infections related to BHC.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/microbiología , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(32): 1095-1099, 2020 Aug 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32790655

RESUMEN

Undetected infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) contributes to transmission in nursing homes, settings where large outbreaks with high resident mortality have occurred (1,2). Facility-wide testing of residents and health care personnel (HCP) can identify asymptomatic and presymptomatic infections and facilitate infection prevention and control interventions (3-5). Seven state or local health departments conducted initial facility-wide testing of residents and staff members in 288 nursing homes during March 24-June 14, 2020. Two of the seven health departments conducted testing in 195 nursing homes as part of facility-wide testing all nursing homes in their state, which were in low-incidence areas (i.e., the median preceding 14-day cumulative incidence in the surrounding county for each jurisdiction was 19 and 38 cases per 100,000 persons); 125 of the 195 nursing homes had not reported any COVID-19 cases before the testing. Ninety-five of 22,977 (0.4%) persons tested in 29 (23%) of these 125 facilities had positive SARS-CoV-2 test results. The other five health departments targeted facility-wide testing to 93 nursing homes, where 13,443 persons were tested, and 1,619 (12%) had positive SARS-CoV-2 test results. In regression analyses among 88 of these nursing homes with a documented case before facility-wide testing occurred, each additional day between identification of the first case and completion of facility-wide testing was associated with identification of 1.3 additional cases. Among 62 facilities that could differentiate results by resident and HCP status, an estimated 1.3 HCP cases were identified for every three resident cases. Performing facility-wide testing immediately after identification of a case commonly identifies additional unrecognized cases and, therefore, might maximize the benefits of infection prevention and control interventions. In contrast, facility-wide testing in low-incidence areas without a case has a lower proportion of test positivity; strategies are needed to further optimize testing in these settings.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Casas de Salud , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Anciano , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 32(2): 85-92, 2020 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32060520

RESUMEN

QUALITY CHALLENGE: The Sierra Leone (SL) Ministry of Health and Sanitation's National Infection Prevention and Control Unit (NIPCU) launched National Infection and Prevention Control (IPC) Policy and Guidelines in 2015, but a 2017 assessment found suboptimal compliance with standards on environmental cleanliness (EC), waste disposal (WD) and personal protective equipment (PPE) use. METHODS: ICAP at Columbia University (ICAP), NIPCU and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designed and implemented a Rapid Improvement Model (RIM) quality improvement (QI) initiative with a compressed timeframe of 6 months to improve EC, WD and PPE at eight purposively selected health facilities (HFs). Targets were collaboratively developed, and a 37-item checklist was designed to monitor performance. HF teams received QI training and weekly coaching and convened monthly to review progress and exchange best practices. At the final learning session, a "harvest package" of the most effective ideas and tools was developed for use at additional HFs. RESULTS: The RIM resulted in marked improvement in WD and EC performance and modest improvement in PPE. Aggregate compliance for the 37 indicators increased from 67 to 96% over the course of 4 months, with all HFs showing improvement. Average PPE compliance improved from 85 to 89%, WD from 63 to 99% and EC from 51 to 99%. LESSONS LEARNED: The RIM QIC approach is feasible and effective in SL's austere health system and led to marked improvement in IPC performance. The best practices are being scaled up and the RIM QIC methodology is being applied to other domains.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Salud/normas , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Administración de Instituciones de Salud , Servicio de Limpieza en Hospital/métodos , Servicio de Limpieza en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Eliminación de Residuos Sanitarios/métodos , Equipo de Protección Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Eliminación de Residuos/métodos , Sierra Leona
14.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(39): 851-854, 2019 Oct 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31581162

RESUMEN

Infection prevention and control (IPC) in health care facilities is essential to protecting patients, visitors, and health care personnel from the spread of infectious diseases, including Ebola virus disease (Ebola). Patients with suspected Ebola are typically referred to specialized Ebola treatment units (ETUs), which have strict isolation and IPC protocols, for testing and treatment (1,2). However, in settings where contact tracing is inadequate, Ebola patients might first seek care at general health care facilities, which often have insufficient IPC capacity (3-6). Before 2014-2016, most Ebola outbreaks occurred in rural or nonurban communities, and the role of health care facilities as amplification points, while recognized, was limited (7,8). In contrast to these earlier outbreaks, the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola outbreak occurred in densely populated urban areas where access to health care facilities was better, but contact tracing was generally inadequate (8). Patients with unrecognized Ebola who sought care at health care facilities with inadequate IPC initiated multiple chains of transmission, which amplified the epidemic to an extent not seen in previous Ebola outbreaks (3-5,7). Implementation of robust IPC practices in general health care facilities was critical to ending health care-associated transmission (8). In August 2018, when an Ebola outbreak was recognized in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), neighboring countries began preparing for possible introduction of Ebola, with a focus on IPC. Baseline IPC assessments conducted in frontline health care facilities in high-risk districts in Uganda found IPC gaps in screening, isolation, and notification. Based on findings, additional funds were provided for IPC, a training curriculum was developed, and other corrective actions were taken. Ebola preparedness efforts should include activities to ensure that frontline health care facilities have the IPC capacity to rapidly identify suspected Ebola cases and refer such patients for treatment to protect patients, staff members, and visitors.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Administración de Instituciones de Salud , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , República Democrática del Congo/epidemiología , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/epidemiología , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Uganda
15.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(5): 796-805, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28418290

RESUMEN

Invasive nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections may result from a previously unrecognized source of transmission, heater-cooler devices (HCDs) used during cardiac surgery. In July 2015, the Pennsylvania Department of Health notified the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) about a cluster of NTM infections among cardiothoracic surgical patients at 1 hospital. We conducted a case-control study to identify exposures causing infection, examining 11 case-patients and 48 control-patients. Eight (73%) case-patients had a clinical specimen identified as Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). HCD exposure was associated with increased odds of invasive NTM infection; laboratory testing identified patient isolates and HCD samples as closely related strains of M. chimaera, a MAC species. This investigation confirmed a large US outbreak of invasive MAC infections in a previously unaffected patient population and suggested transmission occurred by aerosolization from HCDs. Recommendations have been issued for enhanced surveillance to identify potential infections associated with HCDs and measures to mitigate transmission risk.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Contaminación de Equipos , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/etiología , Micobacterias no Tuberculosas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Micobacterias no Tuberculosas/aislamiento & purificación , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
16.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 69(6): 726-733, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27940061

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clusters of bloodstream infections caused by Burkholderia cepacia and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are uncommon, but have been previously identified in hemodialysis centers that reprocessed dialyzers for reuse on patients. We investigated an outbreak of bloodstream infections caused by B cepacia and S maltophilia among hemodialysis patients in clinics of a dialysis organization. STUDY DESIGN: Outbreak investigation, including matched case-control study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Hemodialysis patients treated in multiple outpatient clinics owned by a dialysis organization. PREDICTORS: Main predictors were dialyzer reuse, dialyzer model, and dialyzer reprocessing practice. OUTCOMES: Case patients had a bloodstream infection caused by B cepacia or S maltophilia; controls were patients without infection dialyzed at the same clinic on the same day as a case; results of environmental cultures and organism typing. RESULTS: 17 cases (9 B cepacia and 8 S maltophilia bloodstream infections) occurred in 5 clinics owned by the same dialysis organization. Case patients were more likely to have received hemodialysis with a dialyzer that had been used more than 6 times (matched OR, 7.03; 95% CI, 1.38-69.76) and to have been dialyzed with a specific reusable dialyzer (Model R) with sealed ends (OR, 22.87; 95% CI, 4.49-∞). No major lapses during dialyzer reprocessing were identified that could explain the outbreak. B cepacia was isolated from samples collected from a dialyzer header-cleaning machine from a clinic with cases and was indistinguishable from a patient isolate collected from the same clinic, by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from 2 reused Model R dialyzers that had undergone the facility's reprocessing procedure. LIMITATIONS: Limited statistical power and overmatching; few patient isolates and dialyzers available for testing. CONCLUSIONS: This outbreak was likely caused by contamination during reprocessing of reused dialyzers. Results of this and previous investigations demonstrate that exposing patients to reused dialyzers increases the risk for bloodstream infections. To reduce infection risk, providers should consider implementing single dialyzer use whenever possible.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Burkholderia/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Desinfección/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Riñones Artificiales/estadística & datos numéricos , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/inmunología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Burkholderia cepacia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Descontaminación , Contaminación de Equipos , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Riñones Artificiales/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(47): 1315-6, 2015 Dec 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26633574

RESUMEN

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are bacteria that are often resistant to most classes of antibiotics and cause health care-associated infections with high mortality rates. Among CRE, strains that carry plasmid-encoded carbapenemase enzymes that inactivate carbapenem antibiotics are of greatest public health concern because of their potential for rapid global dissemination, as evidenced by the increasing distribution of CRE that produce the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase and the New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase. Newly described resistance in Enterobacteriaceae, such as plasmid-mediated resistance to the last-line antimicrobial colistin, recently detected in China, and resistance to the newly approved antimicrobial, ceftazidime-avibactam, identified from a U.S. K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing isolate, highlight the continued urgency to delay spread of CRE. Monitoring the emergence of carbapenemases is crucial to limiting their spread; identification of patients carrying carbapenemase-producing CRE should result in the institution of transmission-based precautions and enhanced environmental cleaning to prevent transmission.* The OXA-48 carbapenemase was first identified in Enterobacteriaceae in Turkey in 2001, and OXA-48-like variants have subsequently been reported around the world. The first U.S. reports of OXA-48-like carbapenemases were published in 2013 and included retrospectively identified isolates from 2009 and two isolates collected in 2012 from patients in Virginia who had recently been hospitalized outside the United States. Although there are limited additional published reports from the United States, CDC continues to receive reprots of these organisms. This report describes patients identified as carrying CRE producing OXA-48-like carbapenemases in the United States during June 2010-August 2015.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/biosíntesis , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , beta-Lactamasas/biosíntesis , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Análisis por Conglomerados , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Viaje , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA