Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 81
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Heart J ; 267: 70-80, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37871781

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces major cardiovascular events compared with culprit-lesion-only PCI. Whether age influences these results remains unknown. METHODS: COMPLETE was a multinational, randomized trial evaluating a strategy of staged complete revascularization, consisting of angiography-guided PCI of all suitable nonculprit lesions, versus a strategy of culprit-lesion-only PCI. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, treatment effect according to age (≥65 years vs <65 years) was determined for the first coprimary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death or new myocardial infarction (MI) and the second coprimary outcome of CV death, new MI, or ischemia-driven revascularization (IDR). Median follow-up was 35.8 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 27.6-44.3 months). RESULTS: Of 4,041 patients randomized in COMPLETE, 1,613 were aged ≥ 65 years (39.9%). Higher event rates were observed for both coprimary outcomes in patients aged ≥ 65 years comparted with those aged < 65 years (11.2% vs 7.9%, HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.22-1.83; 14.4% vs 11.8%, HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.52, respectively). Complete revascularization reduced the first coprimary outcome in patients ≥ 65 years (9.7% vs 12.5%, HR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.04) and < 65 years (6.7% vs 9.1%, HR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96)(interaction P = .74). The second coprimary outcome was reduced in those ≥ 65 years (HR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.43-0.74) and < 65 years (HR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.37-0.61 (interaction P = .37). A sensitivity analysis was performed with consistent results demonstrated using a 75-year threshold (albeit attenuated). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD, complete revascularization compared with culprit-lesion-only PCI reduced major cardiovascular events regardless of patient age and could be considered as a revascularization strategy in older adults.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Anciano , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Am Heart J ; 271: 112-122, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38395293

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, there has been no independent core lab angiographic analysis of patients with COVID-19 and STEMI. The study characterized the angiographic parameters of patients with COVID-19 and STEMI. METHODS: Angiograms of patients with COVID-19 and STEMI from the North American COVID-19 Myocardial Infarction (NACMI) Registry were sent to a Core Laboratory in Vancouver, Canada. Culprit lesion(s), Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow, Thrombus Grade Burden (TGB), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcome were assessed. RESULTS: From 234 patients, 74% had one culprit lesion, 14% had multiple culprits and 12% had no culprit identified. Multivessel thrombotic disease and multivessel CAD were found in 27% and 53% of patients, respectively. Stent thrombosis accounted for 12% of the presentations and occurred in 55% of patients with previous coronary stents. Of the 182 who underwent PCI, 60 (33%) had unsuccessful PCI due to post-PCI TIMI flow <3 (43/60), residual high thrombus burden (41/60) and/or thrombus related complications (27/60). In-hospital mortality for successful, partially successful, and unsuccessful PCI was 14%, 13%, and 27%, respectively. Unsuccessful PCI was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.96; 95% CI: 1.05-3.66, P = .03); in the adjusted model this estimate was attenuated (RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.65-2.34, P = .51). CONCLUSION: In patients with COVID-19 and STEMI, thrombus burden was pervasive with notable rates of multivessel thrombotic disease and stent thrombosis. Post-PCI, persistent thrombus and sub-optimal TIMI 3 flow rates led to one-third of the PCI's being unsuccessful, which decreased over time but remained an important predictor of in-hospital mortality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Angiografía Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Sistema de Registros , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Canadá/epidemiología
3.
Heart Fail Clin ; 19(2): 197-204, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36863811

RESUMEN

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a significant increase in worldwide morbidity and mortality. Patients with COVID-19 are at risk for developing a variety of cardiovascular conditions including acute coronary syndromes, stress-induced cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis. Patients with COVID-19 who develop ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality when compared with their age- and sex-matched STEMI patients without COVID-19. We review current knowledge on the pathophysiology of STEMI in patients with COVID-19, clinical presentation, outcomes, and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on overall STEMI care.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia
4.
Eur Heart J ; 40(15): 1188-1197, 2019 04 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30698711

RESUMEN

AIMS: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) was underdiagnosed and poorly understood for decades. It is increasingly recognized as an important cause of myocardial infarction (MI) in women. We aimed to assess the natural history of SCAD, which has not been adequately explored. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a multicentre, prospective, observational study of patients with non-atherosclerotic SCAD presenting acutely from 22 centres in North America. Institutional ethics approval and patient consents were obtained. We recorded baseline demographics, in-hospital characteristics, precipitating/predisposing conditions, angiographic features (assessed by core laboratory), in-hospital major adverse events (MAE), and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We prospectively enrolled 750 SCAD patients from June 2014 to June 2018. Mean age was 51.8 ± 10.2 years, 88.5% were women (55.0% postmenopausal), 87.7% were Caucasian, and 33.9% had no cardiac risk factors. Emotional stress was reported in 50.3%, and physical stress in 28.9% (9.8% lifting >50 pounds). Predisposing conditions included fibromuscular dysplasia 31.1% (45.2% had no/incomplete screening), systemic inflammatory diseases 4.7%, peripartum 4.5%, and connective tissue disorders 3.6%. Most were treated conservatively (84.3%), but 14.1% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and 0.7% coronary artery bypass surgery. In-hospital composite MAE was 8.8%; peripartum SCAD patients had higher in-hospital MAE (20.6% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.023). Overall 30-day MACE was 8.8%. Peripartum SCAD and connective tissue disease were independent predictors of 30-day MACE. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection predominantly affects women and presents with MI. Despite majority of patients being treated conservatively, survival was good. However, significant cardiovascular complications occurred within 30 days. Long-term follow-up and further investigations on management are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/complicaciones , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/terapia , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/congénito , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/epidemiología , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/normas , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Displasia Fibromuscular/epidemiología , Hospitales/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/normas , Periodo Periparto , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia
5.
JAMA ; 324(23): 2406-2414, 2020 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33185655

RESUMEN

Importance: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive measurement used to assess the potential of a coronary stenosis to induce myocardial ischemia and guide decisions for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is not known whether established FFR thresholds for PCI are adhered to in routine interventional practice and whether adherence to these thresholds is associated with better clinical outcomes. Objective: To assess the adherence to evidence-based FFR thresholds for PCI and its association with clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, multicenter, population-based cohort study of adults with coronary artery disease undergoing single-vessel FFR assessment (excluding ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) from April 1, 2013, to March 31, 2018, in Ontario, Canada, and followed up until March 31, 2019, was conducted. Two separate cohorts were created based on FFR thresholds (≤0.80 as ischemic and >0.80 as nonischemic). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for treatment selection bias. Exposures: PCI vs no PCI. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined by death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or urgent coronary revascularization. Results: There were 9106 patients (mean [SD] age, 65 [10.6] years; 35.3% female) who underwent single-vessel FFR measurement. Among 2693 patients with an ischemic FFR, 75.3% received PCI and 24.7% were treated only with medical therapy. In the ischemic FFR cohort, PCI was associated with a significantly lower rate and hazard of MACE at 5 years compared with no PCI (31.5% vs 39.1%; hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.63-0.94]). Among 6413 patients with a nonischemic FFR, 12.6% received PCI and 87.4% were treated with medical therapy only. PCI was associated with a significantly higher rate and hazard of MACE at 5 years compared with no PCI (33.3% vs 24.4%; HR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.14-1.65]) in this cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with coronary artery disease who underwent single-vessel FFR measurement in routine clinical practice, performing PCI, compared with not performing PCI, was significantly associated with a lower rate of MACE for ischemic lesions and a higher rate of MACE for nonischemic lesions. These findings support the performance of PCI procedures according to evidence-based FFR thresholds.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Angina Inestable/epidemiología , Angina Inestable/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Pharmacogenet Genomics ; 29(4): 76-83, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30724853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perceptions toward pharmacogenetic testing of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and whether geographical differences in these perceptions exist. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: TAILOR-PCI is the largest genotype-based cardiovascular clinical trial randomizing participants to conventional DAPT or prospective genotyping-guided DAPT. Enrolled patients completed surveys before and 6 months after randomization. RESULTS: A total of 1327 patients completed baseline surveys of whom 28, 29, and 43% were from Korea, Canada and the USA, respectively. Most patients (77%) valued identifying pharmacogenetic variants; however, fewer Koreans (44%) as compared with Canadians (91%) and USA (89%) patients identified pharmacogenetics as being important (P<0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, and country, those who were confident in their ability to understand genetic information were significantly more likely to value identifying pharmacogenetic variants (odds ratio: 30.0; 95% confidence interval: 20.5-43.8). Only 21% of Koreans, as opposed to 86 and 77% of patients in Canada and USA, respectively, were confident in their ability to understand genetic information (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although genetically mediated clopidogrel resistance is more prevalent amongst Asians, Koreans undergoing PCI identified pharmacogenetic variants as less important to their healthcare, likely related to their lack of confidence in their ability to understand genetic information. To enable successful implementation of pharmacogenetic testing on a global scale, the possibility of international population differences in perceptions should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variantes Farmacogenómicas/genética , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/uso terapéutico , República de Corea/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
CMAJ ; 190(12): E347-E354, 2018 03 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29581161

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients who continue to smoke after acute coronary syndrome are at increased risk of reinfarction and death. We previously found use of varenicline to increase abstinence 24 weeks after acute coronary syndrome; here we report results through 52 weeks. METHODS: The EVITA trial was a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of varenicline for smoking cessation in patients admitted to hospital with acute coronary syndrome. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive varenicline or placebo for 12 weeks, in conjunction with low-intensity counselling. Smoking abstinence was assessed via 7-day recall, with biochemical validation using exhaled carbon monoxide. Participants lost to follow-up or withdrawn were assumed to have returned to smoking. RESULTS: Among the 302 participants, abstinence declined over the course of the trial, with 34.4% abstinent 52 weeks after acute coronary syndrome. Compared with placebo, point estimates suggest use of varenicline increased point-prevalence abstinence (39.9% v. 29.1%, difference 10.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01% to 21.44%; number needed to treat 10), continuous abstinence (31.1% v. 21.2%, difference 9.9%, 95% CI -0.01% to 19.8%) and reduction in daily cigarette smoking by 50% or greater (57.8% v. 49.7%, difference 8.1%, 95% CI -3.1% to 19.4%). Varenicline and placebo groups had similar occurrence of serious adverse events (24.5% v. 21.9%, risk difference 2.7%, 95% CI -7.3% to 12.6%) and major adverse cardiovascular events (8.6% v. 9.3%, risk difference -0.7%, 95% CI -7.8% to 6.5%). INTERPRETATION: Varenicline was efficacious for smoking cessation in this high-risk patient population. However, 60% of patients who received treatment with varenicline still returned to smoking. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00794573.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Agonistas Nicotínicos/administración & dosificación , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar/tratamiento farmacológico , Vareniclina/administración & dosificación , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agonistas Nicotínicos/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Vareniclina/efectos adversos
10.
J Electrocardiol ; 51(4): 720-722, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29997020

RESUMEN

In patients with suspected ST elevation myocardial infarction, it is of paramount importance to identify artifacts on the resting electrocardiogram that may be erroneously interpreted as ST segment deviations in order to prevent administration of potentially harmful pharmacotherapy and invasive coronary angiography. In this case report, we describe a pervasive square wave artifact, not previously reported, that was misdiagnosed as ST segment elevation by computer software and initial physician interpretation.


Asunto(s)
Artefactos , Errores Diagnósticos , Electrocardiografía , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Anciano , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Angiografía Coronaria , Diagnóstico por Computador , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática Alcohólica/complicaciones , Masculino , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones
11.
Circulation ; 133(1): 21-30, 2016 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26553744

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Less than one-third of smokers hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain abstinent following discharge. We assessed whether varenicline, begun in-hospital, is efficacious for smoking cessation following ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which smokers hospitalized with an ACS were randomized to varenicline or placebo for 12 weeks. All patients received low-intensity counseling. The primary end point was point-prevalence smoking abstinence assessed at 24 weeks by 7-day recall and biochemical validation using expired carbon monoxide. A total of 302 patients were randomized (mean age 55±9 years; 75% male; 56% ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; 38% non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; 6% unstable angina). Patients smoked a mean of 21±11 cigarettes/d at the time of hospitalization and had been smoking for a mean of 36±12 years. At 24 weeks, patients randomized to varenicline had significantly higher rates of smoking abstinence and reduction than patients randomized to placebo. Point-prevalence abstinence rates were 47.3% in the varenicline group and 32.5% in the placebo group (P=0.012; number needed to treat=6.8). Continuous abstinence rates were 35.8% and 25.8%, respectively (P=0.081; number needed to treat=10.0), and rates of reduction ≥50% in daily cigarette consumption were 67.4% and 55.6%, respectively (P=0.05; number needed to treat=8.5). Adverse event rates within 30 days of study drug discontinuation were similar between groups (serious adverse events: varenicline 11.9%, placebo 11.3%; major adverse cardiovascular events: varenicline 4.0%, placebo 4.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline, initiated in-hospital following ACS, is efficacious for smoking cessation. Future studies are needed to establish safety in these patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00794573.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización , Agonistas Nicotínicos/uso terapéutico , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Vareniclina/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/tendencias
13.
Crit Care Med ; 44(11): 2037-2044, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27509389

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a Post-Arrest Consult Team improved care and outcomes for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of Post-Arrest Consult Team implementation at two hospitals, with concurrent controls from 27 others. SETTING: Twenty-nine hospitals within the Strategies for Post-Arrest Care Network of Southern Ontario, Canada. PATIENTS: We included comatose adult nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients surviving more than or equal to 6 hours after emergency department arrival who had no contraindications to targeted temperature management. INTERVENTION: The Post-Arrest Consult Team was an advisory consult service to improve 1) targeted temperature management, 2) assessment for percutaneous coronary intervention, 3) electrophysiology assessment, and 4) appropriately delayed neuroprognostication. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used generalized linear mixed models to explore the association between Post-Arrest Consult Team implementation and performance of targeted processes. We included 1,006 patients. The Post-Arrest Consult Team was associated with a significant reduction over time in rates of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy within 72 hours of emergency department arrival on the basis of predictions of poor neurologic prognosis (ratio of odds ratios, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.98). Post-Arrest Consult Team was not associated with improved successful targeted temperature management (ratio of odds ratios, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.31-2.65), undergoing angiography (ratio of odds ratios, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.17-21.04), receiving electrophysiology consultation (ratio of odds ratios, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.11-8.16), or functional survival (ratio of odds ratios, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.19-2.94). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a Post-Arrest Consult Team reduced premature withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy but did not improve rates of successful targeted temperature management, coronary angiography, formal electrophysiology assessments, or functional survival for comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos , Coma/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Derivación y Consulta , Anciano , Temperatura Corporal/fisiología , Encéfalo/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Coma/etiología , Angiografía Coronaria , Desfibriladores Implantables , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Potenciales Evocados Somatosensoriales , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Pronóstico , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Am Heart J ; 170(4): 635-640.e1, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26386786

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Patients who continue to smoke after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have a significantly increased risk of reinfarction and death compared with those who quit. Varenicline is a first-line smoking cessation therapy with proven efficacy in the general population. However, its efficacy and safety immediately after an ACS are unknown. METHODS: The EVITA trial is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT00794573). The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of varenicline after ACS in achieving biochemically validated smoking abstinence at 24 weeks. The secondary objectives are to examine the efficacy of varenicline for smoking abstinence and reduction in daily cigarette consumption at 52 weeks and to describe the occurrence of adverse events. Three hundred and two patients motivated to quit smoking were enrolled in the United States and Canada from November 2009 to December 2014 while hospitalized with an ACS. These participants were randomized (1:1) to either varenicline (1.0 mg twice daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. The trial includes follow-ups by telephone at weeks 1, 2, and 8 and clinic visits at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. Data collected include demographic and clinical characteristics, self-reported smoking, exhaled carbon monoxide (an indicator of current smoking), and adverse events. CONCLUSION: The EVITA trial will provide novel information concerning the efficacy and safety of varenicline immediately after ACS. If varenicline is efficacious in this population, it will have a major impact on secondary prevention of recurrent clinical events in patients post-ACS.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar/tratamiento farmacológico , Vareniclina/administración & dosificación , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Agonistas Nicotínicos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fumar/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Curr Opin Cardiol ; 29(1): 1-9, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24284976

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a high thromboembolic event rate. Combined oral anticoagulant (OAC) and antiplatelet therapy (APT) are often used to reduce thromboembolic risk, recurrent coronary ischemic events, and stent thrombosis, despite the high bleeding risk. This review is timely with the recent introduction of novel OACs (NOACs), more potent antiplatelet agents, and second-generation coronary stents with a lower risk of late stent thrombosis, and considers strategies and new opportunities to reduce both thrombotic events and bleeding. RECENT FINDINGS: The benefits of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation have been shown in recent studies. New evidence indicates that single rather than dual APT may be adequate when an OAC is used in a patient with a recent coronary stent. Limited evidence suggests a NOAC is preferable to warfarin when additional APT is also required. SUMMARY: The implications of the new findings are to indicate strategies for more effective antithrombotic therapy, while minimizing the risk of major bleeding in patients with ACS and atrial fibrillation. However, additional research studies are required to further optimize treatment strategies in this high-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Falla de Prótesis , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Tromboembolia/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(12): e032450, 2024 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879459

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the standard of care for severe aortic stenosis treatment. Exponential growth in demand has led to prolonged wait times and adverse patient outcomes. Social marginalization may contribute to adverse outcomes. Our objective was to examine the association between different measures of neighborhood-level marginalization and patient outcomes while on the TAVR waiting list. A secondary objective was to understand if sex modifies this relationship. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 11 077 patients in Ontario, Canada, referred to TAVR from April 1, 2018, to March 31, 2022. Primary outcomes were death or hospitalization while on the TAVR wait-list. Using cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models, we evaluated the relationship between neighborhood-level measures of dependency, residential instability, material deprivation, and ethnic and racial concentration with primary outcomes as well as the interaction with sex. After multivariable adjustment, we found a significant relationship between individuals living in the most ethnically and racially concentrated areas (quintile 4 and 5) and mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.47-0.88] and HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.53-1.00], respectively). There was no significant association between material deprivation, dependency, or residential instability with mortality. Women in the highest ethnic or racial concentration quintiles (4 and 5) had significantly lower risks for mortality (HR values of 0.52 and 0.56, respectively) compared with quintile 1. CONCLUSIONS: Higher neighborhood ethnic or racial concentration was associated with decreased risk for mortality, particular for women on the TAVR waiting list. Further research is needed to understand the drivers of this relationship.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Anciano , Listas de Espera/mortalidad , Ontario/epidemiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Privación Social , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Factores de Tiempo , Características del Vecindario , Factores de Riesgo , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Factores Sexuales
17.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(5): e033768, 2024 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38390797

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has seen indication expansion and thus exponential growth in demand over the past decade. In many jurisdictions, the growing demand has outpaced capacity, increasing wait times and preprocedural adverse events. In this study, we derived prediction models that estimate the risk of adverse events on the waitlist and developed a triage tool to identify patients who should be prioritized for TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included adult patients in Ontario, Canada referred for TAVI and followed up until one of the following events first occurred: death, TAVI procedure, removal from waitlist, or end of the observation period. We used subdistribution hazards models to find significant predictors for each of the following outcomes: (1) all-cause death while on the waitlist; (2) all-cause hospitalization while on the waitlist; (3) receipt of urgent TAVI; and (4) a composite outcome. The median predicted risk at 12 weeks was chosen as a threshold for a maximum acceptable risk while on the waitlist and incorporated in the triage tool to recommend individualized wait times. Of 13 128 patients, 586 died while on the waitlist, and 4343 had at least 1 hospitalization. A total of 6854 TAVIs were completed, of which 1135 were urgent procedures. We were able to create parsimonious models for each outcome that included clinically relevant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: The Canadian TAVI Triage Tool (CAN3T) is a triage tool to assist clinicians in the prioritization of patients who should have timely access to TAVI. We anticipate that the CAN3T will be a valuable tool as it may improve equity in access to care, reduce preventable adverse events, and improve system efficiency.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Listas de Espera , Triaje , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ontario , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Can J Cardiol ; 40(2): 160-181, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104631

RESUMEN

Antiplatelet therapy (APT) is the foundation of treatment and prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Selecting the optimal APT strategies to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, while balancing bleeding risk, requires ongoing review of clinical trials. Appended, the focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology guidelines for the use of APT provides recommendations on the following topics: (1) use of acetylsalicylic acid in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; (2) dual APT (DAPT) duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high bleeding risk; (3) potent DAPT (P2Y12 inhibitor) choice in patients who present with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and possible DAPT de-escalation strategies after PCI; (4) choice and duration of DAPT in ACS patients who are medically treated without revascularization; (5) pretreatment with DAPT (P2Y12 inhibitor) before elective or nonelective coronary angiography; (6) perioperative and longer-term APT management in patients who require coronary artery bypass grafting surgery; and (7) use of APT in patients with atrial fibrillation who require oral anticoagulation after PCI or medically managed ACS. These recommendations are all on the basis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted as part of the development of these guidelines, provided in the Supplementary Material.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Cardiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Canadá , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Can J Cardiol ; 39(11): 1513-1521, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37399943

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac stress testing (CST) is commonly performed after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet little is known whether such ischemic testing is associated with improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: We studied patients who underwent their first PCI procedure from October 2008 to December 2016 in Ontario, Canada. Patients who underwent CST from 60 days to 1 year after PCI were compared with those who did not undergo CST. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for myocardial infarction (MI) at 3 years after CST. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for potential differences between the study groups. RESULTS: Among the 86,150 included patients, 40,988 (47.6%) underwent CST within 60 days to 1 year after PCI. Patients who underwent CST had higher prescription rates of cardiac medications. At 1 year after CST, rates of cardiac catheterisation and coronary revascularisation were more than double those observed in the nontested group (13.4% vs 5.9%, standardised difference [SD] 0.26, for cardiac catheterisation; 6.6% vs 2.7%, SD 0.19, for PCI). The CST group had a significantly lower primary event rate at 3 years compared without CST (3.9% vs 4.5%, hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study of PCI patients found a small but significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events among patients who received CST. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the specific aspects of care that may be associated with the modestly improved outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Ontario/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia
20.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 12(1): e028144, 2023 01 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36565194

RESUMEN

Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)/intervention has become the standard of care for treatment of severe aortic stenosis across the spectrum of risk. There are socioeconomic disparities in access to TAVR. The impact of these disparities on postprocedural outcomes remains unknown. Our objective was to examine the association between neighborhood-level social deprivation and post-TAVR mortality and hospital readmission. Methods and Results We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of all 4145 patients in Ontario, Canada, who received TAVR from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2020. Our co-primary outcomes were 1-year postprocedure mortality and 1-year postprocedure readmission. Using Cox proportional hazards models for mortality and cause-specific competing risk hazard models for readmission, we evaluated the relationship between neighborhood-level measures of residential instability, material deprivation, and concentration of racial and ethnic groups with post-TAVR outcomes. After multivariable adjustment, we found a statistically significant relationship between residential instability and postprocedural 1-year mortality, ranging from a hazard ratio of 1.64 to a hazard ratio of 2.05. There was a significant association between the highest degree of residential instability and 1-year readmission (hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.01-1.49]). There was no association between material deprivation and concentration of racial and ethnic groups with post-TAVR outcomes. Conclusions Residential instability was associated with increased risk for post-TAVR mortality, and the highest quintile of residential instability was associated with increased post-TAVR readmission. To reduce health disparities and promote an equitable health care system, further research and policy interventions will be required to identify and support economically and socially minoritized patients undergoing TAVR.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Ontario/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA