Reduction in US Health Care Spending Required to Meet the Institute of Medicine's 2030 Target.

Objectives. To quantify changes in US health care spending required to reach parity with high-resource nations by 2030 or 2040 and identify historical precedents for these changes.Methods. We analyzed multiple sources of historical and projected spending from 1970 through 2040. Parity was defined as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) median or 90th percentile for per capita health care spending.Results. Sustained annual declines of 7.0% and 3.3% would be required to reach the median of other high-resource nations by 2030 and 2040, respectively (3.2% and 1.3% to reach the 90th percentile). Such declines do not have historical precedent among US states or OECD nations.Conclusions. Traditional approaches to reducing health care spending will not enable the United States to achieve parity with high-resource nations; strategies to eliminate waste and reduce the demand for health care are essential.Public Health Implications. Excess spending reduces the ability of the United States to meet critical public health needs and affects the country's economic competitiveness. Rising health care spending has been identified as a threat to the nation's health. Public health can add voices, leadership, and expertise for reversing this course.

Improving Hypertension Control Population-wide in Minnesota.

CONTEXT: Hypertension is a common and costly risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but just over half of all adults with hypertension have their blood pressure controlled nationally. In Minneapolis-St Paul, Minnesota, the rate of hypertension control is approximately 70% despite a rate of hypertension control similar to the national average as recently as the first half of the 1990s. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to identify factors in Minneapolis-St Paul and state-level policies and programs in Minnesota that may have contributed to the more rapid increase in blood pressure control there than that in the rest of the nation and to identify factors that can potentially be replicated in other jurisdictions. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: The study included analysis of trends in hypertension control since 1980 based on the Minnesota Heart Survey and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, as well as interviews with health care and public health leaders in Minnesota. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prevalence of hypertension control. RESULTS: Probable contributing factors identified include a focus on collaborative and continuous quality improvement; a forum for setting statewide clinical guidelines and measures; the willing participation from the largest health systems, purchasers, and nonprofit health plans; and the use of widely accepted mechanisms for providing feedback to clinicians and reporting performance. The relatively high rate of insurance coverage and socioeconomic status may have contributed but do not fully explain the difference in hypertension control as compared with the rest of the United States. CONCLUSIONS: The experience in Minnesota demonstrates that it is possible to dramatically increase hypertension control at the population level, across health systems, and health plans in a relatively short period of time. Lessons learned may be helpful to informing local, state, and national efforts to improve hypertension control.

Achieving accountability for health and health care.

There is no well-established mechanism at the local level to discuss or manage the balance of investments in health care and the other social determinants of health. We propose the development of voluntary regional organizations and/or use of current organizations to work with stakeholders of the health system to 1) review local data on health, experience and quality of care, and costs of care (Triple Aim); 2) create shared goals, actions and investments to meet the Triple Aim; and 3) involve citizens in local delivery system reform and stewardship of financial resources. These accountable health communities (AHCos) would contribute to co-creating a sustainable health system.

The $64 million question. Invest in good teaching.

University of Minnesota School of Public health, USA.

Potentially Preventable Hospital and Emergency Department Events: Lessons from a Large Innovation Project.

INTRODUCTION: There are few proven strategies to reduce the frequency of potentially preventable hospitalizations and Emergency Department (ED) visits. To facilitate strategy development, we documented these events among complex patients and the factors that contribute to them in a large care-improvement initiative. METHODS: Observational study with retrospective audits and selective interviews by the patients' care managers among 12 diverse medical groups in California, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington that participated in an initiative to implement collaborative care for patients with both depression and either uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, or both. We reviewed information about 373 adult patients with the required conditions who belonged to these medical groups and had experienced 389 hospitalizations or ED visits during the 12-month study period from March 30, 2014, through March 29, 2015. The main outcome measures were potentially preventable hospitalizations or ED visit events. RESULTS: Of the studied events, 28% were considered to be potentially preventable (39% of ED visits and 14% of hospitalizations) and 4.6% of patients had 40% of events. Only type of insurance coverage; patient lack of resources, caretakers, or understanding of care; and inability to access clinic care were more frequent in those with potentially preventable events. Neither disease control nor ambulatory care-sensitive conditions were associated with potentially preventable events. CONCLUSION: Among these complex patients, patient characteristics, disease control, and the presence of ambulatory care-sensitive conditions were not associated with likelihood of ED visits or hospital admissions, including those considered to be potentially preventable. The current focus on using ambulatory care-sensitive conditions as a proxy for potentially preventable events needs further evaluation.

Impact of A National Collaborative Care Initiative for Patients With Depression and Diabetes or Cardiovascular Disease.

(Reprinted with permission from General Hospital Psychiatry 44 (2017) 77-85).

Impact of a national collaborative care initiative for patients with depression and diabetes or cardiovascular disease.

OBJECTIVE: The spread of evidence-based care is an important challenge in healthcare. We evaluated spread of an evidence-based large-scale multisite collaborative care model for patients with depression and diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease (COMPASS). METHODS: Primary care patients with depression and comorbid diabetes or cardiovascular disease were recruited. Collaborative care teams used care management tracking systems and systematic case reviews to track and intensify treatment for patients not improving. Targeted outcomes were depression remission and response (assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and control of diabetes (assessed by HbA1c) and blood pressure. Patients and clinicians were surveyed about satisfaction with care. RESULTS: Eighteen care systems and 172 clinics enrolled 3609 patients across the US. Of those with uncontrolled disease at enrollment, 40% achieved depression remission or response, 23% glucose control and 58% blood pressure control during a mean follow-up of 11 months. There were large variations in outcomes across medical groups. Patients and clinicians were satisfied with COMPASS care. CONCLUSIONS: COMPASS was successfully spread across diverse care systems and demonstrated improved outcomes for complex patients with previously uncontrolled chronic disease. Future large-scale implementation projects should create robust processes to identify and reduce expected variation in implementation to consistently provide improved care.

The COMPASS initiative: description of a nationwide collaborative approach to the care of patients with depression and diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a national effort to disseminate and implement an evidence-based collaborative care management model for patients with both depression and poorly controlled diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease across multiple, real-world diverse clinical practice sites. METHODS: Goals for the initiative were as follows: (1) to improve depression symptoms in 40% of patients, (2) to improve diabetes and hypertension control rates by 20%, (3) to increase provider satisfaction by 20%, (4) to improve patient satisfaction with their care by 20% and (5) to demonstrate cost savings. A Care Management Tracking System was used for collecting clinical care information to create performance measures for quality improvement while also assessing the overall accomplishment of these goals. RESULTS: The Care of Mental, Physical and Substance-use Syndromes (COMPASS) initiative spread an evidence-based collaborative care model among 18 medical groups and 172 clinics in eight states. We describe the initiative's evidence-base and methods for others to replicate our work. CONCLUSIONS: The COMPASS initiative demonstrated that a diverse set of health care systems and other organizations can work together to rapidly implement an evidence-based care model for complex, hard-to-reach patients. We present this model as an example of how the time gap between research and practice can be reduced on a large scale.

Does insurance coverage for drug therapy affect smoking cessation?

Whether insurance coverage for smoking-cessation medicines increases quitting rates is uncertain. In this paper we evaluate the overall effect of a new health plan pharmacy benefit on the use of pharmacotherapy, attempts to quit, and quitting rates. The presence of a smoking-cessation pharmacy benefit as implemented by these health plans produced no change in the use of bupropion, nicotine patches, or nicotine gum, nor did it result in higher rates of quitting smoking. Further studies are needed to test whether greater efforts to make smokers aware of insurance benefits or adding other types of cessation support might lead to any beneficial effects.

Physician smoking-cessation actions: are they dependent on insurance coverage or on patients?

BACKGROUND: Despite good evidence that their smoking-cessation actions can be very effective, physicians have not consistently used the 5A actions (being asked, advised, assessed, assisted, and arranged) recommended in the U.S. Public Health Service tobacco guidelines. We tested the hypothesis that the introduction of coverage for smoking-cessation pharmacotherapy by the health plans covering most of the population in one region would increase physician use of 5A's. METHODS: A cohort of smoking members of two health plans was surveyed before and after the introduction of coverage for smoking cessation. A total of 1560 current smokers with a physician visit in the last year responded to both surveys. The key outcome measures were smoker reports of the guideline 5As for smoking-cessation support during the last physician visit. RESULTS: There were small significant absolute percentage increases only for reports of being assessed (+4.9%, p=0.01) and assisted (set quit date +6.5%, p=0.0004); encouraged to use medications (+8.8%, p=0.03); and given a prescription (+8.6%, p=0.0005). However, these increases were limited to smokers reporting awareness of the coverage, asking for quitting help, or both. CONCLUSION: Coverage for pharmacotherapy alone appears to have had no effect on physician behavior beyond that stimulated by smokers who were aware of the coverage, perhaps because they raised the issue. More research is needed on this suggestion that patients create physician behavior change.

Does a health plan effort to increase smokers' awareness of cessation medication coverage increase utilization and cessation?

PURPOSE: To test whether a mailing describing new coverage for smoking cessation medications increases benefit knowledge, utilization, and quitting. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial assigned participants to benefit communication via (1) standard contract changes or (2) enhanced communication with direct-to-member postcards. A sample of 1930 self-identified smokers from two Minnesota health plans took surveys before and 1 year after the benefit's introduction. The follow-up response rate was 80%. A multilevel logistic estimator tested for differences in benefit knowledge and smoking behavior from baseline. RESULTS: More enhanced than standard communication respondents knew about the benefit (39.0% vs. 22.2%, p < .0001) at follow-up. Groups did not differ on bupropion utilization (24.6% vs. 23.1%, p = .92); nicotine replacement therapy utilization (26.9% vs. 25.9%, p = .26), or cessation (12.8% vs. 15.6%, p = .32). CONCLUSION: Although limited by the low intervention intensity and potential social desirability bias, information about new coverage alone does not appear to increase quitting behaviors.