RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Physical therapy (PT) is a described first-line treatment option for glenohumeral arthritis, but its efficacy for treating this spectrum of disease is not well understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the opinions of expert providers-orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists-regarding the utility of PT in treating glenohumeral arthritis in different stages of radiographic severity. Our goal is to identify areas of interprofessional majority agreement as well as areas without agreement that warrant further investigation. METHODS: A 35-question survey was created and distributed via email to members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists, collecting information on demographics, professional experience, and the perceived benefit of PT for patients with different stages of glenohumeral arthritis based on radiographic severity. Survey responses were analyzed for inter-professional differences in distribution of answer choices as well as for majority agreement statements. Items with > 50% agreement from a professional group were considered statements of majority agreement. RESULTS: 190 surgeons and 39 physical therapists completed the survey. Surgeons and therapists demonstrated different distribution of answer choices in 25 of the 29 non-demographic related questions (86%). Surgeons and therapists reached the same majority statement in eight items (28%) and reached disagreeing majority statements in four items (14%). They agreed on the benefits of PT for mild arthritis, the benefits of corticosteroid injections, the frequency of strengthening exercises, and that PT failure should not be required for surgical approval in patients with severe arthritis. They disagreed on the whether PT exacerbates symptoms in patients with moderate arthritis, and whether preoperative PT influences postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: Both surgeons and therapists agreed that PT may be less beneficial for patients with more advanced radiographic arthritis and that PT failure should not be required for insurance approval for surgical intervention in patients with severe glenohumeral arthritis. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of PT for patients with moderate arthritis as well as the utility of preoperative PT for improving postoperative outcomes.
RESUMEN
Muscle stem cells (MuSCs) are essential for tissue homeostasis and regeneration, but the potential contribution of MuSC morphology to in vivo function remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that quiescent MuSCs are morphologically heterogeneous and exhibit different patterns of cellular protrusions. We classified quiescent MuSCs into three functionally distinct stem cell states: responsive, intermediate, and sensory. We demonstrate that the shift between different stem cell states promotes regeneration and is regulated by the sensing protein Piezo1. Pharmacological activation of Piezo1 is sufficient to prime MuSCs toward more responsive cells. Piezo1 deletion in MuSCs shifts the distribution toward less responsive cells, mimicking the disease phenotype we find in dystrophic muscles. We further demonstrate that Piezo1 reactivation ameliorates the MuSC morphological and regenerative defects of dystrophic muscles. These findings advance our fundamental understanding of how stem cells respond to injury and identify Piezo1 as a key regulator for adjusting stem cell states essential for regeneration.