Inconsistent Counselor Fidelity in Delivering an Evidence-Based Adherence Intervention During a PrEP Trial.

Evidence-based adherence counseling interventions must be delivered with fidelity to ensure that their effectiveness is retained, but little is known regarding how counselors in biomedical HIV trials deliver these interventions. Forty-two counselors from the MTN-025/HOPE Study, which was conducted in 14 sites in sub-Saharan Africa, participated. They completed a quantitative assessment and consented for their HOPE counseling session ratings to be analyzed. Twenty-two (52%) self-identified as research nurses and 20 (48%) as counselors. Of 928 session ratings, 609 (66%) were classified as Good, 188 (20%) as Fair, and 131 (14%) as Poor, based on pre-established criteria. Overall mean ratings for session tasks and global components (each rated from 1 to 5) were 4.12 (SD = 0.45; range 2.46-4.73) and 4.02 (SD = 0.64; range 1.75-4.79), respectively. Twenty-six (62%) counselors attained Good or Fair ratings on at least 85% of their sessions, but 33% of counselors had more than 25% of their sessions rated as Poor; three counselors (7%) never met criteria for a Good session. Even after extensive training, counselors' fidelity to the intervention varied. Our findings highlight the value of fidelity monitoring using session audio-recordings, the importance of ongoing coaching and support, and the need to plan for counselors with consistently poor fidelity.

RESUMEN: Las intervenciones de consejería de adherencia basadas en la evidencia deben ser realizadas con fidelidad para asegurar que retengan su efectividad, pero se sabe poco sobre cómo los consejeros en ensayos biomédicos de VIH realizan estas intervenciones. Cuarenta y dos consejeros participaron del Estudio MTN-025/HOPE, el cual se llevó a cabo en 14 sitios en África subsahariana. Completaron un cuestionario cuantitativo y dieron su consentimiento para el análisis de las calificaciones de sus sesiones de consejería para HOPE. Veintidós (52%) se identificaron como enfermeras investigadoras y 20 (48%) como consejeros. De 928 sesiones calificadas, 609 (66%) fueron clasificadas como Buenas, 188 (20%) como Suficientes, y 131 (14%) como Mediocres, basado en criterios preestablecidos. Las calificaciones promedias de las tareas de las sesiones y de los componentes globales (calificados de 1 a 5) fueron de 4.12 (SD = 0.45; rango 2.46­4.73) y de 4.02 (SD = 0.64; rango 1.75­4.79), respectivamente. Veintiséis (62%) consejeros lograron calificaciones Buenas o Suficientes en al menos el 85% de sus sesiones, pero para el 33% de los consejeros, más del 25% de sus sesiones fueron calificadas como Mediocres; tres consejeros (7%) nunca cumplieron con los criterios de una Buena sesión. Aún después de una capacitación intensiva, la fidelidad a la intervención variaba. Nuestros hallazgos destacan el valor de monitorear para la fidelidad usando audio-grabaciones de las sesiones, la importancia de la instrucción y el apoyo continuo, y la necesidad de planear qué medidas tomar cuando hay consejeros que no son fieles a la intervención.

Client-Centered Adherence Counseling with Adherence Measurement Feedback to Support Use of the Dapivirine Ring in MTN-025 (The HOPE Study).

Fostering adherence and open communication about adherence challenges is key to harnessing the potential of biomedical HIV prevention products. We describe the counseling intervention and objective adherence measure feedback process implemented to support adherence to the dapivirine vaginal ring among participants in four sub-Saharan countries and present findings on the counselors' likeability and acceptability of the intervention. Most counselors (N = 42; 86%) liked Options counseling "very much" and during in-depth interviews (N = 22), reported that the intervention reshaped their adherence counselling approach by emphasizing understanding participants' experiences using the ring, which facilitated open discussion of adherence challenges. Counselors found that reframing residual drug level (RDL) discussions from the "adherence" to "protection" perspective encouraged adherence among consistent users and facilitated decisions to switch to a different HIV prevention approach among infrequent users. Among counselors, 24% said participants "liked it very much" while 26% said that participants "liked it a little" possibly due to two main complaints: perceived repetitiousness of sessions and variability in the RDL assay, which at times resulted in unexpected low RDLs.

RESUMEN: Fomentar la adherencia y la comunicación abierta sobre los desafíos con la adherencia es clave para aprovechar el potencial de los productos biomédicos de prevención del VIH. Describimos la intervención de consejería y el proceso de compartir los resultados de medidas objetivas de adherencia con participantes en cuatro países subsaharianos para apoyar la adherencia al anillo vaginal de dapivirine y presentamos los resultados sobre la agradabilidad y la aceptabilidad de la intervención a los consejeros. A la mayoría de los consejeros (N=42; 86%) "les gustó mucho" la consejería quienes, durante entrevistas en profundidad (N=22) y reportaron que la intervención cambió su aproximación a la consejería sobre la adherencia. Se enfocaban más en comprender la experiencia de uso del anillo entre las participantes, lo cual facilitaba una conversación abierta sobre posibles desafíos a la adherencia. Los consejeros encontraron que cambiar el enfoque de "adherencia" a "protección" en las conversaciones sobre los niveles residuos de drogas fomentaba la adherencia entre las mujeres que usaban el anillo consistentemente y facilitaba la decisión de cambiar a otro método de prevención del VIH entre las mujeres que lo usaban con poca frecuencia. Entre los consejeros, 24% dijeron que a las participantes "les gustó mucho" la consejería y 26% que a las participantes "les gustó un poco". Es posible que esto se deba a dos quejas principales: la percepción de que las sesiones sean repetitivas y la variabilidad en el ensayo de los niveles residuos de drogas, lo cual a veces resultaba en niveles bajos inesperados.

Impact and experience of participant engagement activities in supporting dapivirine ring use among participants enrolled in the phase III MTN-020/ASPIRE study.

BACKGROUND: Low adherence to investigational products can negatively impact study outcomes, limiting the ability to demonstrate efficacy. To continue advancing potential new HIV prevention technologies, efforts are needed to improve adherence among study participants. In MTN-020/ASPIRE, a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the dapivirine vaginal ring carried out across 15 sites in sub-Saharan Africa, a multifaceted approach to adherence support was implemented, including a strong focus on participant engagement activities (PEAs). In this manuscript, we describe PEAs and participant attendance, and analyze the potential impact of PEAs on ring use. METHODS: All sites implemented PEAs and submitted activity and attendance reports to the study management team throughout the study. Participant demographics were collected via case report forms. Residual dapivirine remaining in the last ring returned by each participant was used to estimate drug released from the ring, which was then adjusted for time participants had the ring to calculate probable use categorized into three levels (low/intermittent/high). Product use was connected to PEA attendance using participant identification numbers. We used multivariate Poisson regression with robust standard errors to explore differences in ring use between PEA attendance groups and reviewed qualitative reports for illustrative quotes highlighting participant experiences with PEAs. RESULTS: 2312 of 2629 study participants attended at least one of 389 PEAs conducted across sites. Participant country and partner knowledge of study participation were most strongly associated with PEA attendance (p < 0.005) with age, education, and income status also associated with event attendance (p < 0.05). When controlling for these variables, participants who attended at least one event were more likely to return a last ring showing at least some use (RR = 1.40) than those who never attended an event. There was a stronger correlation between a last returned ring showing use and participant attendance at multiple events (RR = 1.52). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis supports the growing body of work illustrating the importance of meaningfully engaging research participants to achieve study success and aligns with other analyses of adherence support efforts during ASPIRE. While causation between PEA attendance and product use cannot be established, residual drug levels in returned rings strongly correlated with participant attendance at PEAs, and the benefits of incorporating PEAs should be considered when designing future studies of investigational products.