Abrocitinib versus Placebo or Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: The oral Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor abrocitinib, which reduces interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signaling, is being investigated for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Data from trials comparing JAK1 inhibitors with monoclonal antibodies, such as dupilumab, that block interleukin-4 receptors are limited. METHODS: In a phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with atopic dermatitis that was unresponsive to topical agents or that warranted systemic therapy (in a 2:2:2:1 ratio) to receive 200 mg or 100 mg of abrocitinib orally once daily, 300 mg of dupilumab subcutaneously every other week (after a loading dose of 600 mg), or placebo; all the patients received topical therapy. The primary end points were an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response (defined as a score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] on the IGA [scores range from 0 to 4], with an improvement of ≥2 points from baseline) and an Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) response (defined as ≥75% improvement from baseline in the score on the EASI [scores range from 0 to 72]) at week 12. The key secondary end points were itch response (defined as an improvement of ≥4 points in the score on the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [scores range from 0 to 10]) at week 2 and IGA and EASI-75 responses at week 16. RESULTS: A total of 838 patients underwent randomization; 226 patients were assigned to the 200-mg abrocitinib group, 238 to the 100-mg abrocitinib group, 243 to the dupilumab group, and 131 to the placebo group. An IGA response at week 12 was observed in 48.4% of patients in the 200-mg abrocitinib group, 36.6% in the 100-mg abrocitinib group, 36.5% in the dupilumab group, and 14.0% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both abrocitinib doses vs. placebo); an EASI-75 response at week 12 was observed in 70.3%, 58.7%, 58.1%, and 27.1%, respectively (P<0.001 for both abrocitinib doses vs. placebo). The 200-mg dose, but not the 100-mg dose, of abrocitinib was superior to dupilumab with respect to itch response at week 2. Neither abrocitinib dose differed significantly from dupilumab with respect to most other key secondary end-point comparisons at week 16. Nausea occurred in 11.1% of the patients in the 200-mg abrocitinib group and 4.2% of those in the 100-mg abrocitinib group, and acne occurred in 6.6% and 2.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, abrocitinib at a dose of either 200 mg or 100 mg once daily resulted in significantly greater reductions in signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis than placebo at weeks 12 and 16. The 200-mg dose, but not the 100-mg dose, of abrocitinib was superior to dupilumab with respect to itch response at week 2. Neither abrocitinib dose differed significantly from dupilumab with respect to most other key secondary end-point comparisons at week 16. (Funded by Pfizer; JADE COMPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03720470.).

The Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, and Clearance Mechanisms of Abrocitinib, a Selective Janus Kinase Inhibitor, in Humans.

Abrocitinib is an oral once-daily Janus kinase 1 selective inhibitor being developed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. This study examined the disposition of abrocitinib in male participants following oral and intravenous administration using accelerator mass spectroscopy methodology to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters and characterize metabolite (M) profiles. The results indicated abrocitinib had a systemic clearance of 64.2 L/h, a steady-state volume of distribution of 100 L, extent of absorption >90%, time to maximum plasma concentration of ∼0.5 hours, and absolute oral bioavailability of 60%. The half-life of both abrocitinib and total radioactivity was similar, with no indication of metabolite accumulation. Abrocitinib was the main circulating drug species in plasma (∼26%), with 3 major monohydroxylated metabolites (M1, M2, and M4) at >10%. Oxidative metabolism was the primary route of elimination for abrocitinib, with the greatest disposition of radioactivity shown in the urine (∼85%). In vitro phenotyping indicated abrocitinib cytochrome P450 fraction of metabolism assignments of 0.53 for CYP2C19, 0.30 for CYP2C9, 0.11 for CYP3A4, and ∼0.06 for CYP2B6. The principal systemic metabolites M1, M2, and M4 were primarily cleared renally. Abrocitinib, M1, and M2 showed pharmacology with similar Janus kinase 1 selectivity, whereas M4 was inactive. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study provides a detailed understanding of the disposition and metabolism of abrocitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor for atopic dermatitis, in humans, as well as characterization of clearance pathways and pharmacokinetics of abrocitinib and its metabolites.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of platelet time-courses following administration of abrocitinib.

AIMS: Abrocitinib is a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Herein we describe the time-course of drug-induced platelet reduction following abrocitinib administration, identify covariates affecting platelet counts, and determine the probability of patients experiencing thrombocytopaenia while receiving abrocitinib. METHODS: This analysis included data from two Phase 2 and three Phase 3 studies in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patient populations administered abrocitinib 10-400 mg QD orally for up to 12 weeks, with platelet counts determined up to week 16. A semi-mechanistic model was developed to assess the impact of baseline platelet counts (170, 220 and 270 × 1000/µL), age and race on the platelet nadir and week 12 counts with once-daily abrocitinib 200 mg or 100 mg. RESULTS: Decreases in platelet counts were transient with the nadir occurring on average 24 days (95% prediction interval, 23-24) after continuous administration of abrocitinib 200 mg QD. Following administration of once-daily abrocitinib 200 mg, the probabilities of thrombocytopaenia (<150 × 1000/µL) at the nadir were 8.6% and 95.5% for the typical patient with baseline platelet count of 270 × 1000/µL or 170 × 1000/µL, respectively. Adolescents had a lower probability of thrombocytopaenia compared with adults; platelet count distribution was similar in Asian and Western patients at the nadir and at week 12. CONCLUSION: This analysis supports the safety of once-daily abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg dosing regimens, with low probability of thrombocytopaenia during treatment, except for higher risk of low-grade thrombocytopaenia that diminished after 4 weeks in patients with low baseline platelet counts.

Abuse Potential Study of ALO-02 (Extended-Release Oxycodone Surrounding Sequestered Naltrexone) Compared with Immediate-Release Oxycodone Administered Orally to Nondependent Recreational Opioid Users.

Objective: To evaluate the abuse potential of ALO-02, an abuse-deterrent formulation comprising pellets of extended-release oxycodone hydrochloride surrounding sequestered naltrexone hydrochloride. Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-/active-controlled, 6-way crossover study, with naloxone challenge, drug discrimination, and treatment phases. Subjects: Nondependent, recreational opioid users. Methods: Oral administration of crushed and intact ALO-02, crushed immediate-release (IR) oxycodone, and placebo. Primary endpoints were Drug Liking and High measured on visual analog scales and reported as maximum effect (E max ) and area-under-the-effect-curve from 0 to 2 hours (AUE 0-2h ). Other pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were included. Results: Drug Liking and High (E max ) for crushed oxycodone IR 40 mg were significantly higher compared with placebo, confirming study validity ( P < 0.0001). Drug Liking and High (E max, AUE 0-2h ) for crushed ALO-02 (40 mg/4.8 mg and 60 mg/7.2 mg) were significantly lower compared to corresponding doses of crushed oxycodone IR (40 and 60 mg; P < 0.0001). Likewise, Drug Liking and High (E max and AUE 0-2h ) for intact ALO-02 60 mg/7.2 mg were significantly lower compared with crushed oxycodone IR 60 mg ( P < 0.0001). Secondary pharmacodynamic endpoints and plasma concentrations of oxycodone and naltrexone were consistent with these results. Fewer participants experienced adverse events (AEs) after ALO-02 (crushed or intact: 71.1-91.9%) compared with crushed oxycodone IR (100%). Most common AEs following crushed ALO-02 and oxycodone IR were euphoric mood, pruritus, somnolence, and dizziness. Conclusions: The results suggest that ALO-02 (crushed or intact) has lower abuse potential than crushed oxycodone IR when administered orally in nondependent, recreational opioid users.

Intravenous abuse potential study of oxycodone alone or in combination with naltrexone in nondependent recreational opioid users.

BACKGROUND: ALO-02, comprising pellets of extended-release oxycodone surrounding sequestered naltrexone, is intended to deter abuse. OBJECTIVE: Determine the abuse potential of intravenous oxycodone combined with naltrexone, which represents simulated crushed ALO-02 in solution, compared with intravenous oxycodone in nondependent, recreational opioid users. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study with naloxone challenge, drug discrimination, and treatment phases. Intravenous treatments included oxycodone hydrochloride 20 mg, oxycodone hydrochloride 20 mg plus naltrexone hydrochloride 2.4 mg (simulated crushed ALO-02 20 mg/2.4 mg), or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride for injection). Primary end points were peak effects (Emax) and area under the effects curve within 2 h postdose (AUE0-2h) on drug liking and high visual analog scales. RESULTS: Thirty-three participants were randomized into treatment phase, and 29 completed all treatments. Study validity was confirmed with statistically significant differences in Emax for drug liking and high (p < 0.0001) between intravenous oxycodone and placebo. Intravenous simulated crushed ALO-02 resulted in significantly lower scores than oxycodone on drug liking (Emax: 58.2 vs. 92.4; AUE0-2h: 104.3 vs. 152.4) and high (Emax: 17.2 vs. 93.1; AUE0-2h: 12.0 vs. 133.6), respectively (p < 0.0001, all comparisons). More participants experienced adverse events after intravenous oxycodone (n = 27 [90%]) versus intravenous simulated crushed ALO-02 (n = 4 [12.5%]) or placebo (n = 2 [6.5%]). CONCLUSION: Intravenous administration of simulated crushed ALO-02 resulted in significantly lower abuse potential, as assessed by subjective ratings of drug liking and high, than intravenous oxycodone in nondependent, recreational opioid users. This suggests that injection of ALO-02 may not be as desirable to recreational opioid users compared with oxycodone taken for nonmedical reasons.

Assessment of the Effects of Abrocitinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Probe Substrates of Cytochrome P450 1A2, 2B6 and 2C19 Enzymes and Hormonal Oral Contraceptives in Healthy Individuals.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abrocitinib is an oral small-molecule Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. In vitro studies indicated that abrocitinib is a weak time-dependent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19/3A and a weak inducer of CYP1A2/2B6/2C19/3A. To assess the potential effect of abrocitinib on concomitant medications, drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies were conducted for abrocitinib with sensitive probe substrates of these CYP enzymes. The impact of abrocitinib on hormonal oral contraceptives (ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel), as substrates of CYP3A and important concomitant medications for female patients, was also evaluated. METHODS: Three Phase 1 DDI studies were performed to assess the impact of abrocitinib 200 mg once daily (QD) on the probe substrates of: (1) 1A2 (caffeine), 2B6 (efavirenz) and 2C19 (omeprazole) in a cocktail study; (2) 3A (midazolam); and (3) 3A (oral contraceptives). RESULTS: After multiple doses of abrocitinib 200 mg QD, there is a lack of effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, efavirenz and contraceptives. Abrocitinib increased the area under the concentration time curve from 0 to infinity (AUCinf) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) of omeprazole by approximately 189 and 134%, respectively. Abrocitinib increased the AUCinf of caffeine by 40% with lack of effect on Cmax. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the study results, abrocitinib is a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C19. Caution should be exercised when using abrocitinib concomitantly with narrow therapeutic index medicines that are primarily metabolized by CYP2C19 enzyme. Abrocitinib is a mild inhibitor of CYP1A2; however, the impact is not clinically relevant, and no general dose adjustment is recommended for CYP1A2 substrates. Abrocitinib does not inhibit CYP3A or induce CYP1A2/2B6/2C19/3A and does not affect the pharmacokinetics of contraceptives. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration IDs: NCT03647670, NCT05067439, NCT03662516.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Fesoterodine in Pediatric Patients with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Fesoterodine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in adults and neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in pediatric patients. This work aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT, the active metabolite of fesoterodine) and its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship in pediatric patients with OAB or NDO following administration of fesoterodine. METHODS: 5-HMT plasma concentrations from 142 participants of age ≥ 6 years were analyzed, and a nonlinear mixed-effects model was developed. Weight-based simulations of 5-HMT exposure and maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) were conducted using the final models. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag time, which included the effects of body weight, sex, cytochrome (CYP) 2D6 metabolizer status and fesoterodine formulation on pharmacokinetic parameters, best described the 5-HMT pharmacokinetics. An Emax model described the exposure-response relationship adequately. The median maximum concentration at steady state for pediatric patients weighing 25-35 kg and receiving 8 mg once daily (QD) was estimated to be 2.45 times greater than that in adults receiving 8 mg QD. Furthermore, simulation results showed dosing with fesoterodine 4 mg QD to pediatric patients weighing 25-35 kg and 8 mg QD to pediatric patients weighing >35 kg would achieve adequate exposure to demonstrate a clinically meaningful change from baseline (CFB) MCC. CONCLUSIONS: Population models were developed for 5-HMT and MCC in pediatric patients. Weight-based simulations indicated that 4 mg QD for pediatric patients weighing 25-35 kg and 8 mg QD for those weighing > 35 kg provided similar exposures to those in adults following 8 mg QD and a clinically meaningful CFB MCC. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: NCT00857896, NCT01557244.

Fesoterodine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in adults and neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in pediatric patients in the US. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models were developed for 5-HMT based on data from two pediatric clinical trials that included 142 patients of age ≥ 6 years with OAB or NDO. Weight-based simulations of 5-HMT exposure and maximum cystometric capacity were conducted using the final models to examine the impact of covariates on 5-HMT exposure and the exposure­response profile. The results of these simulations indicate that 4 mg QD for pediatric patients weighing 25­35 kg and 8 mg QD for those weighing > 35 kg provide similar exposures to those in adults following 8 mg QD.

Fesoterodine treatment of pediatric patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: A 24-week, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) can damage the upper urinary tract leading to chronic renal impairment. Antimuscarinic therapy is used to improve urinary incontinence and protect the upper urinary tract in patients with NDO. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated safety and efficacy of fesoterodine, a muscarinic receptor antagonist, in 6‒<18-year-old patients with NDO (NCT01557244). STUDY DESIGN: This open-label phase 3 study included 2 pediatric cohorts. Patients in Cohort 1 (bodyweight >25 kg) were randomized to fesoterodine 4 or 8 mg extended-release tablets or oxybutynin XL tablets administered over the 12-week active comparator-controlled phase. The safety extension phase evaluated fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg for a further 12 weeks, with patients in the oxybutynin arm allocated to fesoterodine 4 or 8 mg. Patients in Cohort 2 (bodyweight ≤25 kg) were randomized to fesoterodine 2 or 4 mg extended-release beads-in-capsule (BIC) administered over a 12-week efficacy phase and 12-week safety extension phase. Patients with stable neurologic disease and clinically or urodynamically proven NDO were included. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Week 12 in maximum cystometric bladder capacity (MCC). Secondary efficacy endpoints included detrusor pressure at maximum bladder capacity, bladder volume at first involuntary detrusor contraction, bladder compliance, and incontinence episodes. Safety endpoints included adverse event incidence, and specific assessments of cognition, behavior and vision. The pharmacokinetics of 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT; fesoterodine's active metabolite) was determined using population-pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: In Cohort 1 (n = 124), fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg treatment resulted in significant increases from baseline in the primary endpoint of MCC at Week 12. In Cohort 2 (n = 57), fesoterodine 2 and 4 mg BIC treatment resulted in improvements in MCC from baseline. Fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg and fesoterodine 4 mg BIC led to improvements in some secondary efficacy endpoints. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were gastrointestinal effects, such as dry mouth, which occurred more frequently with oxybutynin than fesoterodine. No detrimental effects on visual accommodation or acuity, or on cognitive function or behavior were observed. DISCUSSION: These safety and efficacy results are consistent with limited published data on fesoterodine treatment in pediatric populations with overactive bladder or NDO. Study limitations include the lack of placebo control and the small sample size, which limits the ability to make formal efficacy comparisons and detect rare adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: Fesoterodine has a favorable benefit-risk profile in 6‒<18-year-old patients with NDO and may represent an additional option for pediatric NDO treatment.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Abrocitinib in Healthy Individuals and Patients with Psoriasis or Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abrocitinib is a Janus kinase 1 inhibitor in development for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). This work characterized orally administered abrocitinib population pharmacokinetics in healthy individuals, patients with psoriasis, and patients with AD and the effects of covariates on abrocitinib exposure. METHODS: Abrocitinib concentration measurements (n = 6206) from 995 individuals from 11 clinical trials (seven phase I, two phase II, and two phase III) were analyzed, and a non-linear mixed-effects model was developed. Simulations of abrocitinib dose proportionality and steady-state accumulation of maximal plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) were conducted using the final model. RESULTS: A two-compartment model with parallel zero- and first-order absorption, time-dependent bioavailability, and time- and dose-dependent clearance best described abrocitinib pharmacokinetics. Abrocitinib coadministration with rifampin resulted in lower exposure, whereas Asian/other race coadministration with fluconazole and fluvoxamine, inflammatory skin conditions (psoriasis/AD), and hepatic impairment resulted in higher exposure. After differences in body weight are accounted for, Asian participants demonstrated a 1.43- and 1.48-fold increase in Cmax and AUC, respectively. The overall distribution of exposures (Cmax and AUC) was similar in adolescents and adults after accounting for differences in total body weight. CONCLUSIONS: A population pharmacokinetics model was developed for abrocitinib that can be used to predict abrocitinib steady-state exposure in the presence of drug-drug interaction effects or intrinsic patient factors. Key covariates in the study population accounting for variability in abrocitinib exposures are Asian race and adolescent age, although these factors are not clinically meaningful. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: NCT01835197, NCT02163161, NCT02201524, NCT02780167, NCT03349060, NCT03575871, NCT03634345, NCT03637790, NCT03626415, NCT03386279, NCT03937258.

Abrocitinib is a drug approved in the UK and Japan for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. A population pharmacokinetic model for abrocitinib was developed based on data from 11 clinical trials that included 995 healthy individuals or patients with atopic dermatitis or psoriasis. Simulations of different patient factors, such as age, race, sex, body weight, liver function, and drug­drug interactions, were tested to examine differences in abrocitinib drug levels achieved in the body. The results of these simulations indicate that although there are some differences in abrocitinib exposure, no dose adjustments of abrocitinib are necessary based on these factors.

Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Effect of Abrocitinib on QT Intervals in Healthy Volunteers.

Abrocitinib is a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). To assess the relationship between abrocitinib plasma concentrations and heart rate (HR)-corrected QT (QTc) and HR and calculate the effect of abrocitinib on these parameters at supratherapeutic concentrations, 36 healthy volunteers received single doses of abrocitinib 600 mg, placebo, and moxifloxacin 400 mg in a 3-period crossover study. The relationship between change from baseline in Fridericia-corrected QTc (∆QTcF) values and abrocitinib plasma concentrations was modeled using a prespecified linear mixed-effects model. The 90%CIs for time-matched placebo-corrected ∆QTcF (∆∆QTcF) were calculated from model parameter estimates and assessed against the regulatory threshold (10 millisecond) at the predicted supratherapeutic concentration in patients with atopic dermatitis (2156 ng/mL). Mean (90%CI) time-matched placebo-corrected change from baseline in HR (∆∆HR) was calculated similarly. At the supratherapeutic concentration, mean (90%CI) estimates for ∆∆QTcF and ∆∆HR were 6.00 (4.52-7.49) milliseconds and 6.51 (5.23-7.80) bpm, respectively. Despite a concentration-dependent effect on ∆QTcF and ∆HR, with statistically significant slopes (90%CI) of 0.0026 (0.0018-0.0035) milliseconds/(ng/mL) and 0.0031 (0.0024-0.0038) bpm/(ng/mL), respectively, abrocitinib does not have a clinically significant effect on QTc interval or HR at supratherapeutic exposures.

Effects of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Abrocitinib and Its Metabolites.

Abrocitinib, an oral once-daily Janus kinase 1 selective inhibitor, is under development for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. This phase 1, nonrandomized, open-label, single-dose study (NCT03660241) investigated the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of abrocitinib and its metabolites following a 200-mg oral dose. Twenty-three subjects with varying degrees of renal function (normal, moderate, and severe impairment) were enrolled. Active moiety exposures were calculated as the sum of unbound exposures for abrocitinib and its active metabolites. For abrocitinib, the adjusted geometric mean ratios (GMRs; %) for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time and maximum plasma concentration were 182.91 (90% confidence interval [CI], 117.09-285.71) and 138.49 (90% CI, 93.74-204.61), respectively, for subjects with moderate renal impairment vs normal renal function; corresponding GMRs were 121.32 (90% CI, 68.32-215.41) and 99.11 (90% CI, 57.30-171.43) for subjects with severe impairment vs normal renal function. Metabolite exposures generally increased in subjects with renal impairment. The GMRs of unbound area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time and maximum plasma concentration of active moiety were 210.20 (90% CI, 154.60-285.80) and 133.87 (90% CI, 102.45-174.92), respectively, for subjects with moderate renal impairment vs normal renal function. Corresponding values were 290.68 (90% CI, 217.39-388.69) and 129.49 (90% CI, 92.86-180.57) for subjects with severe renal impairment vs normal renal function. Abrocitinib was generally safe and well tolerated. Both moderate and severe renal impairment led to higher exposure to abrocitinib active moiety, suggesting that abrocitinib dose should be reduced by half for patients with moderate or severe renal impairment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03660241.

Assessment of the Effects of Inhibition or Induction of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 Enzymes, or Inhibition of OAT3, on the Pharmacokinetics of Abrocitinib and Its Metabolites in Healthy Individuals.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abrocitinib is a Janus kinase 1-selective inhibitor for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Abrocitinib is eliminated primarily by metabolism involving cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. Abrocitinib pharmacologic activity is attributable to the unbound concentrations of the parent molecule and 2 active metabolites, which are substrates of organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3). The sum of potency-adjusted unbound exposures of abrocitinib and its 2 active metabolites is termed the abrocitinib active moiety. We evaluated effects of CYP inhibition, CYP induction, and OAT3 inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of abrocitinib, its metabolites, and active moiety. METHODS: Three fixed-sequence, open-label, phase I studies in healthy adult volunteers examined the drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of oral abrocitinib with fluvoxamine and fluconazole, rifampin, and probenecid. RESULTS: Co-administration of abrocitinib with fluvoxamine or fluconazole increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) of the unbound active moiety of abrocitinib by 91% and 155%, respectively. Co-administration with rifampin decreased the unbound active moiety AUCinf by 56%. The OAT3 inhibitor probenecid increased the AUCinf of the unbound active moiety by 66%. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to consider the effects of DDIs on the abrocitinib active moiety when making dosing recommendations. Co-administration of strong CYP2C19/2C9 inhibitors or CYP inducers impacted exposure to the abrocitinib active moiety. A dose reduction by half is recommended if abrocitinib is co-administered with strong CYP2C19 inhibitors, whereas co-administration with strong CYP2C19/2C9 inducers is not recommended. No dose adjustment is required when abrocitinib is administered with OAT3 inhibitors. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION IDS: NCT03634345, NCT03637790, NCT03937258.

Evaluation of the Effect of Abrocitinib on Drug Transporters by Integrated Use of Probe Drugs and Endogenous Biomarkers.

Abrocitinib is an oral Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor currently approved in the United Kingdom for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). As patients with AD may use medications to manage comorbidities, abrocitinib could be used concomitantly with hepatic and/or renal transporter substrates. Therefore, we assessed the potential effect of abrocitinib on probe drugs and endogenous biomarker substrates for the drug transporters of interest. In vitro studies indicated that, among the transporters tested, abrocitinib has the potential to inhibit the activities of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3), organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1), and multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 and 2K (MATE1/2K). Therefore, subsequent phase I, two-way crossover, open-label studies in healthy participants were performed to assess the impact of abrocitinib on the pharmacokinetics of the transporter probe substrates dabigatran etexilate (P-gp), rosuvastatin (BCRP and OAT3), and metformin (OCT2 and MATE1/2K), as well as endogenous biomarkers for MATE1/2K (N1 -methylnicotinamide (NMN)) and OCT1 (isobutyryl-L -carnitine (IBC)). Co-administration with abrocitinib was shown to increase the plasma exposure of dabigatran by ~ 50%. In comparison, the plasma exposure and renal clearance of rosuvastatin and metformin were not altered with abrocitinib co-administration. Similarly, abrocitinib did not affect the exposure of NMN or IBC. An increase in dabigatran exposure suggests that abrocitinib inhibits P-gp activity. By contrast, a lack of impact on plasma exposure and/or renal clearance of rosuvastatin, metformin, NMN, or IBC suggests that BCRP, OAT3, OCT1, and MATE1/2K activity are unaffected by abrocitinib.

Comparing abrocitinib and dupilumab in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a plain language summary.

Atopic dermatitis (AD, also called atopic eczema) is a long-term skin disease that causes intensely itchy, red skin. Healthcare providers can prescribe medicated creams and ointments to reduce the signs and symptoms of AD. However, these treatments are not always enough to provide relief. A new medicine called abrocitinib, which is taken every day as a tablet, reduces part of the body's immune response that happens in AD. The clinical study described in this plain language summary, called JADE COMPARE, investigated how well and how safely 16 weeks of treatment with abrocitinib worked in adults with AD compared to placebo ('dummy treatment') and a medicine that is already approved for AD, called dupilumab. The study showed that abrocitinib was better than placebo in improving the signs and symptoms of AD after 16 weeks. In addition, patients who were taking abrocitinib 200 mg for 2 weeks experienced greater relief from itch than patients who were taking abrocitinib 100 mg, placebo, or dupilumab. More people who took abrocitinib 200 mg reported side effects than those taking abrocitinib 100 mg, placebo, or dupilumab, but most of these side effects were mild or moderate. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT number: NCT03720470.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic variability of fesoterodine vs. tolterodine extended release in cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Tolterodine and 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT) are equipotent active moieties of tolterodine; 5-HMT is the singular active moiety of fesoterodine. The formation of 5-HMT from tolterodine occurs via CYP2D6, and some subjects are poor metabolizers CYP2D6. On the other hand, the formation of 5-HMT from fesoterodine occurs via ubiquitous esterases. Cross-study comparisons of data from phase 1 studies suggest that active moiety exposures are considerably more variable following tolterodine extended release vs. fesoterodine. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This head-to-head study confirmed the findings of reduced pharmacokinetic variability of fesoterodine and further delineates that tolterodine, and not 5-HMT, was the principal source of variability after administration of tolterodine extended release. The data suggest that fesoterodine delivers 5-HMT consistently, regardless of CYP2D6 status, with up to 40% higher bioavailability compared with tolterodine. AIMS: Tolterodine and 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT) are equipotent active moieties of tolterodine; 5-HMT is the singular active moiety of fesoterodine. Formation of 5-HMT from fesoterodine and tolterodine occurs via esterases and CYP2D6 respectively. This randomized, crossover, open-label, multiple-dose study in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs) compared the pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine vs. tolterodine extended release (ER). METHODS: Subjects received fesoterodine and tolterodine ER with a ≥3-day washout period. Treatment comprised 4-mg once daily doses for 5 days escalated to 8-mg once daily for 5 days. Pharmacokinetics of active moieties were compared by drug, dose and genotype. RESULTS: Active moiety exposures following fesoterodine and tolterodine ER increased proportional to dose in EMs and PMs. In EMs only, coefficients of variation for AUC and C(max) following fesoterodine (up to 46% and 48% respectively) were lower than those following tolterodine ER (up to 87% and 87% respectively). Following fesoterodine and tolterodine ER administration, active moiety exposures ranged up to sevenfold and 40-fold respectively. Mean urinary excretion of 5-HMT following fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg, respectively, was 0.44 and 0.89 mg in EMs and 0.60 and 1.32 mg in PMs. Following tolterodine ER 4 and 8 mg, it was 0.38 and 0.71 mg respectively (EMs only). Renal clearance was similar regardless of administered drug, dose or genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Tolterodine, not 5-HMT, was the principal source of variability after tolterodine ER administration. Fesoterodine delivers 5-HMT with less variability than tolterodine, regardless of CYP2D6 status, with up to 40% higher bioavailability. The pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine were considerably less variable than TER.

Effects of the moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, fluconazole, on the pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine in healthy subjects.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Available data suggest that fesoterodine dosage should not exceed 4 mg once daily when taken concomitantly with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors, such as ketoconazole. Currently, no information is available on whether dose adjustment is necessary when fesoterodine is administered with a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study shows that adjustment of fesoterodine dose is not warranted when co-administered with a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor. AIMS: To assess the effects of fluconazole, a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety/tolerability of fesoterodine. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study, 28 healthy subjects (18-55 years) received single doses of fesoterodine 8 mg alone or with fluconazole 200 mg. PK endpoints, including the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC(0,∞)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max) ), time to C(max) (t(max) ), and half-life (t(1/2) ), were assessed for 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), the active moiety of fesoterodine. RESULTS: Concomitant administration of fesoterodine with fluconazole increased AUC(0,∞) and C(max) of 5-HMT by approximately 27% and 19%, respectively, with corresponding 90% confidence intervals of (18%, 36%) and (11%, 28%). There was no apparent effect of fluconazole on 5-HMT t(max) or t(½) . Fesoterodine was generally well tolerated regardless of fluconazole co-administration, with no reports of death, serious adverse events (AEs) or severe AEs. Following co-administration of fesoterodine with fluconazole, 13 subjects (48%) experienced a total of 40 AEs; following administration of fesoterodine alone, six subjects (22%) experienced a total of 19 AEs. The majority of AEs were of mild intensity. There were no clinically significant changes in laboratory or physical examination parameters. CONCLUSION: Fesoterodine 8 mg single dose was well tolerated when administered alone or with fluconazole. Based on the observed increase in 5-HMT exposures being within the inherent variability of 5-HMT pharmacokinetics, adjustment of fesoterodine dose is not warranted when co-administered with a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor provided they are not also inhibitors of transporters.

Effects of fesoterodine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Drug-drug interactions with warfarin are common with potentially harmful consequences. Preclinical in vitro studies suggest that fesoterodine or 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine are not likely to affect warfarin metabolism, but a lack of interaction has not been demonstrated in a clinical study. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study shows that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin 25 mg in healthy adults are unaffected by fesoterodine 8 mg, and that co-administration of warfarin 25 mg and fesoterodine 8 mg is safe and well tolerated. AIMS: To confirm the lack of an interaction of fesoterodine 8 mg with warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adults. METHODS: In this open-label, two-treatment, crossover study, subjects (n= 14) aged 20-41 years with normal prothrombin time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR) were randomized to receive a single dose of warfarin 25 mg alone in one period and fesoterodine 8 mg once daily on days 1-9 with a single dose of warfarin 25 mg co-administered on day 3 in the other period. There was a 10-day washout between treatments. Pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0,∞)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), AUC from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0,last)), time to C(max) (t(max) ), and half-life (t(1/2)) for S- and R-warfarin. Pharmacodynamic endpoints were area under the INR-time curve (AUC(INR) ), maximum INR (INR(max)), area under the PT-time curve (AUC(PT)) and maximum PT (PT(max)). RESULTS: Across all pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparisons, the point estimates of treatment ratio (warfarin co-administered with fesoterodine vs. warfarin alone) were 92-100%. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the adjusted geometric means were contained within (80%, 125%). There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs or ECG recordings. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin 25 mg in healthy adults are unaffected by fesoterodine 8 mg. Concomitant administration of fesoterodine and warfarin was well tolerated.

A comprehensive non-clinical evaluation of the CNS penetration potential of antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of overactive bladder.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: This study provides antimuscarinic agents for overactive bladder (OAB) display variable association with side effects mediated by the central nervous system (CNS), which may be of particular concern in the elderly. Adverse effects on CNS functioning are related to muscarinic receptor subtype selectivity and the ability of the agent to cross the blood-brain barrier, where P-gp plays a role in limiting permeability. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study provides a parallel investigation of CNS penetration of antimuscarinic OAB agents in vivo and assessment of physical properties and permeability in cell monolayers in vitro. It adds further understanding of the roles of passive transcellular permeability and P-gp in determining CNS penetration of antimuscarinic OAB agents. It also enables a comparison of CNS side-effect profiles of OAB agents with preclinical CNS penetration data. AIMS: To assess and compare the mechanisms of central nervous system (CNS) penetration of antimuscarinic overactive bladder (OAB) agents. METHODS: Physical properties were computed or compiled from the literature. Rats were administered 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (HMT), darifenacin, oxybutynin, solifenacin, tolterodine or trospium subcutaneously. At 1 h postdose, plasma, brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations were determined using LC-MS/MS assays. Brain and plasma protein binding were determined in vitro. Permeability in the presence and absence of the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) was assessed in RRCK and MDCK-MDR1 transwell assays. RESULTS: Oxybutynin displayed extensive CNS penetration, with brain:plasma ratios (B:P), unbound brain:unbound plasma ratios (Kp,free) and CSF:free plasma ratios each >1. Tolterodine (B:P = 2.95, Kp,free = 0.23 and CSF:free plasma = 0.16) and solifenacin (B:P = 3.04, Kp,free = 0.28 and CSF:free plasma = 1.41) showed significant CNS penetration but with some restriction from CNS as indicated by Kp,free values significantly <1. 5-HMT, darifenacin and trospium displayed much lower B:P (0.03-0.16), Kp,free (0.01-0.04) and CSF:free plasma (0.004-0.06), consistent with poor CNS penetration. Permeability in RRCK cells was low for trospium (0.63 × 10(-6) cm s(-1) ), moderate for 5-HMT (11.7 × 10(-6) cm s(-1) ) and high for darifenacin, solifenacin, tolterodine and oxybutynin (21.5-38.2 × 10(-6) cm s(-1) ). In MDCK-MDR1 cells 5-HMT, darifenacin and trospium, were P-gp substrates, whereas oxybutynin, solifenacin and tolterodine were not P-gp substrates. CONCLUSIONS: Brain penetration was low for antimuscarinics that are P-gp substrates (5-HMT, darifenacin and trospium), and significant for those that are not P-gp substrates (oxybutynin, solifenacin and tolterodine). CNS adverse events reported in randomized controlled clinical trials show general alignment with the preclinical data described in this study.

Effects of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Abrocitinib and Its Metabolites.

Abrocitinib, an oral once-daily Janus kinase 1 selective inhibitor, is under development for treatment of atopic dermatitis. This phase 1, nonrandomized, open-label, single-dose study (NCT03626415) investigated the effect of hepatic impairment on pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of abrocitinib and its metabolites after a 200-mg oral dose. Twenty-four subjects with varying degrees of hepatic function (normal, mild, and moderate impairment) were enrolled (N = 8/group). Active moiety PK parameters were calculated as the sum of unbound PK parameters for abrocitinib and its active metabolites. For abrocitinib, the ratios (percentages) of adjusted geometric means for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) were 133.33 (90% confidence interval [CI], 86.17-206.28) and 94.40 (90%CI, 62.96-141.55), respectively, for subjects with mild hepatic impairment vs normal hepatic function. The corresponding comparisons of ratios (percentages) for AUCinf and Cmax were 153.99 (90%CI, 99.52-238.25) and 105.53 (90%CI, 70.38-158.24), respectively, for subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Exposures of the metabolites were generally lower in subjects with hepatic impairment. For abrocitinib active moiety, the ratios (percentages) of adjusted geometric means of unbound AUCinf were 95.74 (90%CI, 72.71-126.08) and 114.82 (90%CI, 87.19-151.20) in subjects with mild and moderate impairment vs normal hepatic function, respectively. Abrocitinib was generally safe and well tolerated. Hepatic impairment had no clinically relevant effect on the PK and safety of abrocitinib and the exposure of abrocitinib active moiety. These results support the use of abrocitinib without dose adjustment in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Effect of the CYP2D6*10 genotype on tolterodine pharmacokinetics.

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of the reduced function allele CYP2D6*10, which can be the cause of an intermediate metabolizer (IM), on tolterodine pharmacokinetics. Tolterodine is mainly metabolized to an active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite (5-HM) by CYP2D6, and 5-HM is also metabolized by CYP2D6. Asian and white healthy volunteers (n = 108) received once daily multiple doses of tolterodine, and the serum concentrations of tolterodine and 5-HM were measured. All subjects were genotyped for CYP2D6. Tolterodine exposures [area under the curve (AUC)] increased in order of CYP2D6*1/*1 [extensive metabolizer (EM)] < CYP2D6*1/*10 < CYP2D6*10/*10 < CYP2D6*5/*10. It was expected that the order of 5-HM exposure would be reversed. However, the 5-HM AUC increased in the same order as that of tolterodine. This phenomenon was explained by considering CYP2D6 mediation of both production and elimination of 5-HM. The tolterodine and 5-HM exposures in CYP2D6*10/*10 were statistically higher than those for CYP2D6*1/*1 (3- and 1.5-fold, respectively). In CYP2D6*4/*4 [poor metabolizer (PM)], 5-HM was not produced and tolterodine exposure was 20-fold higher than that in CYP2D6*1/*1. With consideration for higher protein binding of tolterodine than 5-HM, the exposure as a sum of the unbound fraction of tolterodine and 5-HM (active moiety) in CYP2D6*10/*10 was 1.8-fold higher than that in CYP2D6*1/*1 and was also higher than that in CYP2D6*4/*4. Simulation using the values of EM and PM demonstrated that the maximum possible active moiety exposure was around the observed values of CYP2D6*5/*10, which were 1.9-fold higher than those for CYP2D6*1/*1. This is the first report to provide an example in which the IM shows higher exposure to pharmacological active moiety than the EM and PM.