Primary Intrathoracic Sarcomas: A Review of Cross-sectional Imaging and Pathology.

The most common sarcomas in the thorax are metastasis from an extrathoracic primary malignancy. Primary intrathoracic sarcomas are rare albeit aggressive malignancies that are diagnosed on histopathology. Although a few imaging characteristics have been described that are common to sarcomas, it is still a diagnosis of exclusion as other tumors are much more common. Like elsewhere, primary thoracic sarcomas are also classified according to their histologic features. They are a rare group of tumors that can arise from the mediastinal structures, lung, pleura, or chest wall. On imaging, differentiating these from more common malignancies like lung cancer is difficult and often requires multimodality workup and tissue sampling. A few sarcomas are very specific to their locations, such as angiosarcoma in the right atrium, leiomyosarcoma in the pulmonary artery, where imaging has high accuracy for the diagnosis. Despite being nonspecific in a majority of cases, imaging plays a pivotal role in determining the organ of origin, tumor extent, invasion of adjacent structures, and thus help to assess the surgical resectability. Although sarcomas arising from chest wall are the most common primary sarcomas in the chest, they are excluded from this review to focus only on primary intrathoracic sarcomas. The article provides a comprehensive imaging and pathology review of the rare primary intrathoracic sarcomas, including but not limited to angiosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, malignant transformation of fibrous tumor of pleura, sarcomatoid mesothelioma, leiomyosarcoma, and malignant small round blue cell tumors.Key points:Primary intrathoracic sarcomas are rare but clinically important.Imaging helps to determine local extent, invasion, metastases and appropriate site/mode of biopsy.Role of pathology is paramount in diagnosis and guiding treatment based on immunogenetic/molecular typing.

PET Cardiac Imaging (Perfusion, Viability, Sarcoidosis, and Infection).

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Given the increased availability of radiopharmaceuticals, improved positron emission tomography (PET) camera systems and proven higher diagnostic accuracy, PET is increasingly utilized in the management of various cardiovascular diseases. PET has high temporal and spatial resolution, when compared to Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography. In clinical practice, hybrid imaging with sequential PET and Computed Tomography acquisitions (PET/CT) or concurrent PET and Magnetic Resonance Imaging are standard. This article will review applications of cardiovascular PET/CT including myocardial perfusion, viability, cardiac sarcoidosis/inflammation, and infection.

Effect of a dedicated inferior vena cava filter retrieval program on retrieval rates and number of patients lost to follow-up.

PURPOSE We aimed to assess the efficacy of a dedicated inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval program on filter retrieval rates and number of patients lost to follow-up. METHODS A dedicated IVC filter retrieval program began in July 2016. This consisted of tracking all patients with retrievable filters placed by interventional radiology (IR). At the time of filter placement, patients were scheduled for a retrieval consult in the IR clinic. Any missed appointments were followed up by a physician assistant. The program was overseen by a single IR physician. To assess this program's efficacy, we reviewed the records of all patients who had retrievable IVC filters placed by IR nine months prior to and nine months after program initiation. Demographics and clinical factors were then collected and compared. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Prior to the program, 76 patients (31 males, 45 females; mean age, 64.2 years) had retrievable filters placed; 75% were placed due to a contraindication to anticoagulation. From this group, five filters were removed (6.6%), 42 patients were lost to follow-up (55.3%), 22 patients died (29.0%), and seven filters were deemed permanent by a physician after placement (9.2%). All five retrievals were successful and no complications were reported. After program initiation, 106 patients (59 males, 47 females; mean age, 58.8 years) had retrievable filters placed; 75.5% were placed due to a contraindication to anticoagulation. In this group, 30 filters were retrieved (retrieval rate 28.3%), 17 patients were lost to follow-up (16%), 23 patients died (21.7%), 28 filters were deemed permanent by a physician after placement (26.4%), and decisions were still pending in eight patients (7.5%). One patient (3.3%) had a minor complication during filter retrieval. Initiation of a filter retrieval program increased our retrieval rate (6.6% vs. 28.3%; P < 0.001) and reduced the number of patients with filters that were lost to follow-up (55.3% vs. 16%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Dedicated filter retrieval program is effective in increasing filter retrieval rates and decreasing the number of patients lost to follow-up.