Diagnostic performance of DIXON sequences on low-field scanner for the evaluation of knee joint pathology.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recently, there has been a growing interest in the use of Dixon sequence for knee MRI in order to save time spent on the scanner, and improving diagnostic utility. Our purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of Dixon sequence on low-field MRI with the proton-density sequence on high-field MRI. METHODS: This prospective study included 40 patients who underwent 0.25T knee MRI, using the routine protocol with the addition of a sagittal 4-point Dixon sequence (SPED), and an additional sequence on 1.5T scanner, consisting in a fat-suppressed proton-density fast-spin-echo (FS PD-FSE). Two radiologists independently examined the images, evaluating the anatomic identification score and diagnostic performances of the two sequences. Interreader agreement was evaluated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Final population counted 34 patients (36 knee MR images) with a mean age of 52.9 years (range, 18-75 years). Interreader agreement was very high except for cartilage injuries at medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau (ICC SPED: 0.757, ICC FS PD-FSE: 0.746), even if not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in mean signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), artifacts presence and diagnostic confidence between SPED and PD-FS sequence. CONCLUSIONS: Dixon sequences on low-field scanner have a comparable diagnostic accuracy to PD-FS sequence obtained on a high field scanner for knee MR imaging. (www.actabiomedica.it).

The role of interventional radiology in hepatic and renal hemorrhage embolization: single center experience and literature review.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Intraabdominal hemorrhage secondary to liver and kidney injury is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Endovascular arterial embolization is an established interventional radiology technique used to treat active bleeding, and its role in managing abdominal hemorrhages is growing, given the increasing trend for conservative treatment. Our study aims to retrospectively evaluate the technical and clinical results and the possible complications of arterial embolization procedures performed in emergency, in post-traumatic, iatrogenic, and pathological hepatic and renal bleedings. METHODS: We performed a ten-year, single-center retrospective survey (from January 2010 to December 2019) of all patients treated in emergency by intra-arterial embolization of liver and kidney bleeding. Preliminary CT angiography studies were evaluated, as well as the angiographic findings. Materials used, procedural data, and clinical outcomes, including complications, were recorded. RESULTS: The diagnostic angiography showed a single source of bleeding in 20 cases (66.7%), two bleeding vessels in 4 cases (13.3%), and multiple hemorrhagic sources in 6 cases (20%). All bleeding sources were successfully embolized; in 12 patients (40%), complete embolization was achieved with coils and 18 patients (60%) with hemostatic sponges. In one case, a second embolization procedure was performed for the persistence of hemodynamic instability. No major post-procedural complications were recorded. The mean procedure duration was 65.1 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience and literature data, the treatment of endovascular embolization in acute abdominal bleeding of hepatic and renal origin represents the treatment of choice, as it can provide complete therapeutic success in hemodynamically stable patients. (www.actabiomedica.it).