Asthma education and its impact on pediatric asthma severity: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Asthma education has been shown to improve asthma control. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of asthma education on the frequency of utilization of health-care services, lung function results, degree of asthma severity, and quality of life (QOL) level in children with asthma. METHODS: A single-arm prospective interventional trial was conducted in a tertiary facility. Thirty children with asthma and their parents were recruited for the research. Following an assessment of the participants' and caregivers' knowledge about asthma using an asthma knowledge questionnaire, degree of asthma control using asthma control test, inhaler technique using standardized inhaler technique checklists, and QOL using pediatric asthma QOL questionnaires, they participated in a three-month education program in the form of monthly live interactive sessions followed by weekly phone interviews. Measures taken before and after the intervention were compared. RESULTS: The educational intervention improved asthma control dramatically including daytime asthma symptoms, night awakenings, and frequency of use of short-acting beta2- adrenergic receptor agonists. Furthermore, the number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations fell considerably after the intervention (p < 0.001 for all). Asthma education was also linked to better inhalation technique and lung function (p < 0.001). Furthermore, all quality-of-life measures increased (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an asthma education program that included both children with asthma and their parents improved asthma control levels, lung function measures, and overall quality of life. Furthermore, it increased asthma awareness, decreased the use of health-care resources, and reduced asthma severity, resulting in better asthma management.

Peptide-based formula versus standard-based polymeric formula for critically ill children: is it superior for patients' tolerance?

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition affects 50% of hospitalized children and 25-70% of critically ill children. Enteral tube feeding is generally considered the preferred modality for critically ill pediatric patients. Clinical advantages of using peptide-based formulas are still controversial in critically ill children. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a peptide-based formula versus a standard polymeric formula on feeding tolerance and whether this will affect the outcome among critically ill children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single blind case control study was conducted on 180 randomly selected critically ill children in the pediatric critical care unit (PICU) of Ain Shams University. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a group receiving a standard polymeric formula (group 1; 90 patients) and a group receiving a peptide-based formula (group II; 90 patients). Nutritional requirements, days to reach full enteral feeding, feeding intolerance symptoms and anthropometric measurements were recorded for all patients at admission together with their pediatric risk of mortality score (PRISM). Length of PICU stay, occurrence of sepsis together with survival were analyzed at discharge as outcome measures. RESULTS: Patients receiving a peptide-based formula showed a significant decrease in feeding interruptions and abdominal distention (p < 0.000), reached full enteral feeding faster (2.60 ±0.74 days versus 5.36 ±1.00 days in patients received polymeric standard formula; p < 0.001) and improved weight gain (p < 0.028). Moreover, duration of sepsis was significantly shorter (p < 0.045), but no difference in mortality was recorded between patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peptide-based formula feeding was better tolerated than standard polymeric formula feeding in critically ill pediatric patients. However, the choice of patients receiving the peptide-based formula needs to be further evaluated.

Regional expression of cyclooxygenase isoforms in the rat kidney in complete unilateral ureteral obstruction.

PURPOSE: The cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway is activated in unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO), contributing to renal hemodynamic alterations in different regions of the kidney. After the release of 24-hour UUO cortical vasoconstriction occurs but medullary hyperemia is seen. We examined the expression of the 2 COX isoforms COX-1 and COX-2 in different regions of the kidney in rats subjected to UUO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clearance experiments were performed after ureteral obstruction release in rats with 24-hour UUO or sham operated rats. COX-1 and COX-2 expression in the cortex and medulla were examined by Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: After UUO release the glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow were markedly lower in post-obstructed kidneys than in contralateral kidneys or in kidneys in sham operated rats (p <0.001). Western blot analysis showed that COX-2/beta-actin in the cortex of the obstructed kidney was 0.28 +/- 0.02 densitometry units, significantly lower than 0.67 +/- 0.12 densitometry units in the contralateral unobstructed kidney. In contrast, COX-2/beta-actin in the outer and inner medullae of the obstructed kidney was 7.85 +/- 1.09 and 2.51 +/- 0.14 densitometry units, significantly greater than 3.03 +/- 0.22 and 0.66 +/- 0.14 densitometry units, respectively, in the contralateral unobstructed kidney. The expression of COX-1/beta-actin in the obstructed kidney was similar to that in the contralateral unobstructed kidney in the cortex and medulla. CONCLUSIONS: Renal COX-2 expression is markedly altered in UUO. Decreased cortical expression of COX-2 and markedly increased expression in the medulla may contribute to disparate regional hemodynamic alterations in UUO.