Total Versus Subtotal Gastrectomy for Distal Gastric Poorly Cohesive Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Gastric poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) in advanced stages has a poor prognosis. Total gastrectomy (TG) remains the common treatment for distal gastric PCC, but subtotal gastrectomy (SG) may improve quality of life without compromising outcomes. Currently, no clear recommendation on the best surgical strategy for distal PCC is available. This study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years for patients with antropyloric PCC treated by total versus subtotal gastrectomy. METHODS: A large retrospective European multicenter cohort study analyzed 2131 patients treated for gastric cancer between 2007 and 2017 by members of the French Association of Surgery (AFC). The study compared a group of patients who underwent TG with a group who underwent SG for antropyloric PCC. The primary outcomes were 5 year OS and DFS. RESULTS: The study enrolled 269 patients: 140 (52.0%) in the TG group and 129 (48.0%) in the SG group. The baseline characteristics and pTNM stage were similar between the two groups. According to Dindo-Claven classification, the patients treated with TG had more postoperative complications than the patients treated with SG (p < 0.001): grades I to IIIa (77.1% vs 59.5%) and grades IIIb to IVb (14.4% vs 9.0%). No difference in 5-year OS was observed between TG (53.8%; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 43.2-63.3%) and SG (53.0%; 95% CI, 41.4-63.3%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.68-1.29). The same was observed for 5-year DFS: TG (46.0%; 95% CI, 35.9-55.5%) versus SG (45.3%; 95% CI, 34.3-55.6%) (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.70-1.34). CONCLUSIONS: At 5 years, SG was not associated with worse OS and DFS than TG for distal PCC. Surgical morbidity was higher after TG. Subtotal gastrectomy is a valuable option for distal PCC gastric cancer.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Survival in cT2N0M0 Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score Analysis.

BACKGROUND: According to current international guidelines, stage cT2N0M0 gastric adenocarcinoma warrants preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery. However, upfront surgery is often preferred in clinical practice, depending on patient clinical status and local treatment preferences. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of cT2N0M0 patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed among 32 centers, including gastric adenocarcinoma patients operated between January 2007 and December 2017. Patients with cT2N0M0 stage were divided into upfront surgery (S) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS) groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to compensate for baseline differences between the groups. RESULTS: Among the 202 patients diagnosed with cT2N0M0 stage, 68 (33.7%) were in the CS group and 134 (66.3%) were in the S group. CS patients were younger (mean age 62.7 ± 12.8 vs. 69.8 ± 12.1 years for S patients; p < 0.001) and had a better health status (World Health Organization performance status = 0 in 60.3% of CS patients vs. 34.5% of S patients; p = 0.006). During follow-up, recurrence occurred in 27.2% and 19.6% of CS and S patients, respectively, after IPTW (p = 0.32). Five-year OS was similar between CS and S patients (78.9% vs. 68.3%; p = 0.42), as was 5-year DFS (70.4% vs. 68.5%; p = 0.96). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with neither OS nor DFS in multivariable analysis after IPTW. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cT2N0M0 gastric adenocarcinoma did not present a survival or recurrence benefit if treated with perioperative chemotherapy followed by surgery as opposed to surgery alone.

Low-Dose Radiation Yields Lower Rates of Pathologic Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by surgery is standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (E/GEJ) cancer, the optimal radiation dose is still under debate. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different preoperative radiation doses (41.4 Gy, 45 Gy or 50.4 Gy) on pathologic response and survival in E/GEJ cancer patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients with E/GEJ tumors, treated with curative intent between January 2009 and December 2016 in two referral centers were divided into three groups (41.4 Gy, 45 Gy and 50.4 Gy) according to the dose of preoperative radiotherapy. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, postoperative morbidity, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared among the three groups, with separate analyses for adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). RESULTS: From the 326 patients analyzed, 48 were included in the 41.4 Gy group (14.7%), 171 in the 45 Gy group (52.5%) and 107 in the 50.4 Gy group (32.8%). Postoperative complication rates were comparable (p = 0.399). A pCR was observed in 15%, 30%, and 34% of patients in the 41.4 Gy, 45 Gy and 50.4 Gy groups, respectively (p = 0.047). A 50.4 Gy dose was independently associated with pCR (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.10-7.99) in multivariate analysis. Within AC patients, pCR was observed in 6.2% of patients in the 41.4 Gy group, 29.2% of patients in the 45 Gy group, and 22.7% of patients in the 50.4 Gy group (p = 0.035). No OS or DFS differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A pCR was less common after a preoperative radiation dose of 41.4 Gy in AC patients. Radiation dose had no impact on postoperative morbidity, long-term survival, and recurrence.

Prognostic value of tumor regression grade (TRG) after oncological gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Perioperative chemotherapy combined with surgical resection represent the gold standard in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. The Mandard tumor regression score (TRG) is widely used to evaluate pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of TRG in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DFS). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent oncological gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2007 to December 2019 for gastric adenocarcinoma was performed. Based on their TRG status they were categorized into two groups: good responders (TRG 1-2) and poor responders (TRG 3-5). Subsequent multivariable analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included, whereby 15 (20.3%) were TRG 1-2. Neoadjuvant regimens for TRG 1-2 vs. TRG 3-5 were similar: MAGIC (53% vs. 39%), FLOT (40% vs. 36%), FOLFOX (7% vs. 15%, p = 0.462). Histologic types according to Lauren classification for TRG 1-2 vs. TRG 3-5 were: 13% vs. 29% intestinal, 53% vs. 44% diffuse and 34% vs. 27% indeterminate (p = 0.326). TRG 1-2 group exhibited significantly less advanced ypT (46% vs. 10%, p = 0.001) and ypN stages (66% vs. 37%, p = 0.008), alongside a diminished recurrence rate (20% vs. 42%, p = 0.111). The 3-year DFS was significantly better in this group (81% vs. 47%, p = 0.041) whereas the disparity in three-year OS (92% vs. 55%, p = 0.054) did not attain statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: TRG 1-2 was associated with less advanced ypT and ypN stage and better DFS compared to TRG 3-5 patients, without a significant impact on OS.

Functional results after hiatal repair and gastropexy without fundoplication in patients with paraoesophageal hernia.

PURPOSE: Paraoesophageal hernias (PEH) are associated with a high complication rate and often occur in elderly and fragile patients. Surgical gastropexy without fundoplication is an accepted alternative procedure; however, outcomes and functional results are rarely described. Our study aims to evaluate short-term outcomes and the long-term quality of life after gastropexy as treatment for PEH. METHODS: Single center cohort analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent gastropexy for PEH without fundoplication. Postoperative outcomes and functional results were retrospectively collected. Reflux symptoms developed postoperatively were reported using the validated quality of life questionnaire: GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Qestionnaire (GERD-HRQL). RESULTS: Thirty patients (median age: 72 years (65-80)) were included, 40% classified as ASA III. Main PEH symptoms were reflux (63%), abdominal/thoracic pain (47%), pyrosis (33%), anorexia (30%), and food blockage (26%). Twenty-six laparoscopies were performed (86%). Major complications (III-IVb) occurred in 9 patients (30%). Seven patients (23%) had PEH recurrence, all re-operated, performing a new gastropexy. Median follow-up was 38 (17-50) months. Twenty-two patients (75%) reported symptoms resolution with median GERD-HRQL scale of 4 (1-6). 72% (n = 21) reported operation satisfaction. GERD-HRQL was comparable between patients who were re-operated for recurrence and others: 5 (2-19) versus 3 (0-6), p = 0.100. CONCLUSION: Gastropexy without fundoplication was performed by laparoscopy in most cases with acceptable complications rates. Two-thirds of patients reported symptoms resolution, and long-term quality-of-live associated to reflux symptoms is good. Although the rate of PEH recurrence requiring a new re-intervention remained increased (23%), it does not seem to affect long-term functional results.

[Surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of gastric origin]. / Prise en charge chirurgicale des tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales d'origine gastrique.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) account for 1 to 2% of gastrointestinal malignant tumors. They are characterized by overexpression of the tyrosine kinase (KIT). 60% of GISTs originate in the stomach. Managing them remains complex and varies depending on several factors such as location, size, molecular biology, type of clinical presentation, and the risks/benefits of surgical treatment. Surgery remains the only curative treatment, while tyrosine kinase inhibitors have demonstrated their efficacy as systemic treatment in the perioperative context. Risk stratification for recurrence guides the choice of adjuvant treatment, with a recommended duration of 3 years for high-risk patients.

Les tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales (GIST) constituent entre 1 et 2 % des tumeurs malignes gastro-intestinales. Elles se caractérisent par une surexpression de la tyrosine kinase (KIT). 60 % des GIST sont d'origine gastrique. Leur prise en charge reste complexe et varie selon plusieurs facteurs tels que la localisation, la taille, la biologie moléculaire, le type de manifestation clinique et les risques/bénéfices du traitement chirurgical. La chirurgie demeure le seul traitement curatif, tandis que les inhibiteurs de tyrosine kinase ont démontré leur efficacité comme traitement systémique dans le contexte périopératoire. La stratification du risque de récidive guide le choix du traitement adjuvant, avec une durée recommandée de 3 ans pour les patients à haut risque.

[Pregnancy and bariatric surgery : from pre-conception to postpartum]. / Grossesse et chirurgie bariatrique : du préconceptionnel au postpartum.

Bariatric surgery is regularly offered to women of childbearing age. Pregnancy after such surgery should be planned and requires special attention. Some complications associated with obesity during pregnancy are reduced after bariatric surgery, but reduced dietary intake and malabsorption can cause nutritional deficiencies, that need to be carefully screened for and supplemented. Dietary management is recommended, and any unusual abdominal pain should be referred to a bariatric surgeon. We offer a summary of recommendations for appropriate follow-up of these pregnancies.

La chirurgie bariatrique est régulièrement proposée à des femmes en âge de procréer. Une grossesse après une telle chirurgie devrait être planifiée et demande une attention particulière. Certaines complications liées à l'obésité durant la grossesse sont réduites après une chirurgie bariatrique mais une diminution des apports alimentaires et la malabsorption peuvent engendrer des carences nutritionnelles qui doivent être attentivement dépistées et supplémentées. Une prise en charge diététique est recommandée et toute douleur abdominale inhabituelle doit faire demander l'avis d'un chirurgien bariatrique. Nous proposons une synthèse des recommandations pour un suivi adéquat de ces grossesses.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the European Multicenter ENSURE Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare clinicopathologic, oncologic, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) and chemotherapy (nCT) in the ENSURE international multicenter study. BACKGROUND: nCT and nCRT are the standards of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) treated with curative intent. However, no published randomized controlled trial to date has demonstrated the superiority of either approach. METHODS: ENSURE is an international multicenter study of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for LAEC (2009-2015) across 20 high-volume centers (NCT03461341). The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS), secondary outcomes included histopathologic response, recurrence pattern, oncologic outcome, and HRQL in survivorship. RESULTS: A total of 2211 patients were studied (48% nCT, 52% nCRT). pCR was observed in 4.9% and 14.7% ( P <0.001), with R0 in 78.2% and 94.2% ( P <0.001) post nCT and nCRT, respectively. Postoperative morbidity was equivalent, but in-hospital mortality was independently increased [hazard ratio (HR)=2.73, 95% CI: 1.43-5.21, P= 0.002] following nCRT versus nCT. Probability of local recurrence was reduced (odds ratio=0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.93, P =0.012), and distant recurrence-free survival time reduced (HR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.37, P =0.023) after nCRT versus nCT, with no difference in OS among all patients (HR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.98-1.25, P =0.113). On subgroup analysis, patients who underwent R0 resection following nCT as compared with nCRT had improved OS (median: 60.7 months, 95% CI: 49.5-71.8 vs 40.8 months, 95% CI: 42.8-53.4, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this European multicenter study, nCRT compared with nCT was associated with reduced probability of local recurrence but reduced distant recurrence-free survival for patients with LAEC, without differences in OS. These data support tailored patient-specific decision-making in the overall approach to achieving optimum outcomes in LAEC.

[Stigmatization of people with obesity: understanding and confronting societal prejudice]. / Stigmatisation des personnes atteintes d'obésité : comprendre et affronter les préjugés sociétaux.

Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) has been officially classified as a disease by the WHO since 2008, yet individuals affected by obesity often face blame and negative stereotypes from society and healthcare providers. This stigmatization can lead to negative impacts on both mental and physical health. This phenomenon can also lead the stigmatized person to internalize the prejudice, considering their fate as deserved. This article aims to provide healthcare professionals with the tools to better understand and care for patients with obesity.

L'OMS reconnaît officiellement l'obésité (IMC ≥ 30 kg/m2) comme une maladie depuis 2008. Pourtant, les personnes touchées par l'obésité font souvent l'objet de reproches et de stéréotypes négatifs de la part de la société et des prestataires de soins de santé. Cette stigmatisation peut avoir des répercussions négatives sur la santé mentale comme physique. Ce phénomène peut aussi conduire le stigmatisé à intérioriser le préjudice, considérant son sort comme normal. Cet article vise à fournir aux professionnels de santé les outils nécessaires pour comprendre et aborder cette question, afin de mieux soigner les patients touchés par l'obésité.

[Interdisciplinary Center for Obesity: a single-entry point for personalized care]. / Centre interdisciplinaire de l'obésité : une porte d'entrée unique pour une prise en charge personnalisée.

Obesity is a chronic disease that seriously affects physical and psychological health. However, its management is insufficiently coordinated. The lack of defined therapeutic strategies is particularly evident since the arrival of new drug treatments. Coordination between the professionals involved- obesity specialists, general practitioners and other caregivers - and the involvement of the patient are all issues at the heart of an evaluation necessary for the construction of a personalized care project. Interdisciplinary centers must guarantee access to information and offer the full range of therapies currently available. An early psychological evaluation allows for the orientation of care, taking into account the vulnerability and resources of patients.

L'obésité est une maladie chronique qui affecte gravement la santé physique et psychologique, mais sa prise en charge est insuffisamment coordonnée. L'absence de stratégies thérapeutiques définies est particulièrement évidente depuis l'arrivée de nouveaux traitements médicamenteux. La coordination entre les professionnels impliqués (spécialistes de l'obésité, médecins généralistes et autres soignants) et l'implication du patient sont autant d'enjeux au cœur d'une évaluation nécessaire pour la construction d'un projet de soins personnalisés. Les centres interdisciplinaires doivent garantir un accès à l'information et offrir l'ensemble des thérapies actuellement disponibles. Une évaluation psychologique précoce permet d'orienter la prise en charge en tenant compte de la vulnérabilité et des ressources des patients.

[Surgery: what's new in 2022]. / Chirurgie : ce qui a changé en 2022.

During 2022 a lot of efforts were developed to reduce health-costs by reducing complications and length of hospital stay. Same-day surgery is becoming the standard for all patients scheduled for elective surgery in CHUV. Outpatient colectomy also become a new standard. During 2022, endoscopic bariatric surgery became increasingly used. Not widely performed yet in Switzerland, these treatments deserve to be recognized and considered in various situations. Finally, 2022 saw a promising development of robotic surgery with the acquisition of Da Vinci and Dexter robots after allowing various high-precision surgical procedures.

2022 a été marquée par les efforts déployés pour réduire les coûts de la santé en diminuant les complications et en raccourcissant les durées d'hospitalisation. L'admission le jour même (Same Day Surgery (SDS)) va à moyen terme devenir le nouveau standard pour tous les patients admis pour une chirurgie en électif au CHUV, il en va de même avec le concept de la colectomie en ambulatoire. 2022 est aussi marquée par le développement de la chirurgie endoscopique bariatrique à l'échelle globale. Non encore pratiqués largement en Suisse, ces traitements méritent d'être connus et considérés dans certaines situations particulières. Finalement, 2022 voit aussi le développement de la chirurgie robotique à la suite de l'acquisition des robots Da Vinci et Dexter, permettant la réalisation de nombreuses interventions chirurgicales de haute précision.

Venous thromboembolism after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature to evaluate incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis.

PURPOSE: Although esophagectomy remains the preferred treatment for esophageal cancer, it is still associated with a number of complications, including post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to summarize the reported incidence of VTE after esophagectomy, its risk factors, and prevention strategies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria and were selected in the present review. Overall, we identified 9768 patients who underwent esophagectomy, with a post-operative VTE rate of 4% (440 patients). The reported risk factors for VTE included advanced age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III or IV, a history of cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, and the implementation of preoperative chemo-radiotherapy. Postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome was also associated with VTE. No universally applied prevention strategies for VTE after esophagectomy were identified in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in perioperative care, VTE after esophagectomy still represents a source of morbidity for about 4% of patients. Low molecular weight heparin is suggested as the routine standard prophylactic regimen after esophageal cancer surgery.

Early postoperative outcomes of staging laparoscopy for peritoneal metastases with or without pressurized intra-peritoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).

BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been introduced for palliative treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) and is currently tested also in the neoadjuvant and prophylactic setting. The aim was therefore to compare safety and tolerance of staging laparoscopy with or without PIPAC. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compared consecutive patients undergoing staging laparoscopy alone for oesogastric cancer with patients having PIPAC for suspected PSM of various origins from January 2015 until January 2020. Safety was assessed by use of the Clavien classification for complications and CTCAE for capturing of adverse events. Pain and nausea were documented by use of a visual analogue scale (VAS: 0-10: maximal intensity). RESULTS: Overall, 25 PIPAC procedures were compared to 24 staging laparoscopies. PIPAC procedures took a median of 35 min (IQR: 25-67) longer. Four patients experienced at least one complication in either group (p = 0.741). No differences were noted for postoperative nausea (p = 0.961) and pain levels (p = 0.156). Median hospital stay was 2 (IQR: 1-3) for PIPAC and 1 (IQR: 1-2) for the laparoscopy group (p = 0.104). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of PIPAC did not jeopardize safety and postoperative outcomes of staging laparoscopy alone. Further studies need to clarify its oncological benefits.

[Bariatric surgery: role of sleeve gastrectomy in 2022]. / Chirurgie bariatrique : place de la gastrectomie en manchon (sleeve gastrectomy) en 2022.

Two main procedures currently dominate the panel of bariatric interventions. Sleeve gastrectomy is technically easier and the most widely performed in the world. It shows slightly inferior results and is also associated with a slightly lower morbidity compared to gastric bypass. This is counterbalanced by its irreversibility and a high prevalence of postoperative gastro-esophageal reflux. For this reason, gastric bypass remains the dominant procedure in Switzerland, thanks to its good long-term weight and metabolic results. Sleeve gastrectomy is also an important option in bariatric surgery, with some specific indications.

Deux procédures principales dominent actuellement la chirurgie bariatrique: la gastrectomie en manchon (ou sleeve gastrectomy) et le bypass gastrique. La première, la plus pratiquée dans le monde, est techniquement plus simple. Elle donne des résultats légèrement inférieurs à ceux du bypass gastrique, avec une morbidité aussi légèrement inférieure. Son irréversibilité et la fréquence du reflux gastro-œsophagien postopératoire représentent des facteurs limitants. Pour cette raison, le bypass gastrique reste en Suisse l'intervention de choix grâce à ses bons résultats pondéraux et métaboliques à long terme. En 2022, la gastrectomie en manchon est aussi une option importante dans l'arsenal bariatrique, avec quelques indications spécifiques.

[Surgery Sustainability in surgical practice : the "green surgery" concept and its innovations]. / Chirurgie - Pratique chirurgicale et durabilité : le concept de chirurgie verte et ses innovations.

Awareness of climate change grows in the population and people develop eco-responsible habits in their daily and professional life. The health care system is nowadays responsible for 4.6% of global greenhouse gases emissions, and most of them comes from hospital activity. The operating room is one of the greatest contributors of the overall energetic cost and generates a large amount of hospital waste. As an example, all laparoscopic procedures in the US has an energy cost similar to an 80'000 inhabitants city during one year. A better understanding of the environmental impact of surgery is necessary to identify what can be done to limit the ecological impact of surgery without compromising standards of care.

La population est de plus en plus sensibilisée au changement climatique et développe des habitudes écoresponsables dans la vie quotidienne et professionnelle. Le système de santé est aujourd'hui responsable de 4,6 % des émissions de gaz à effet de serre dans les pays développés, dont la plupart proviennent de l'activité hospitalière. Le bloc opératoire est l'un des plus grands contributeurs au coût énergétique global et génère une grande quantité de déchets hospitaliers. À titre d'exemple, aux États-Unis, l'ensemble des laparoscopies a un coût énergétique annuel similaire à celui d'une ville de 80 000 habitants. Une meilleure compréhension de l'impact écologique de la chirurgie est nécessaire pour identifier ce qui peut être fait pour limiter l'impact écologique de la chirurgie sans compromettre les normes de soins.

Defining Global Benchmarks in Elective Secondary Bariatric Surgery Comprising Conversional, Revisional, and Reversal Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To define "best possible" outcomes for secondary bariatric surgery (BS). BACKGROUND: Management of poor response and of long-term complications after BS is complex and under-investigated. Indications and types of reoperations vary widely and postoperative complication rates are higher compared to primary BS. METHODS: Out of 44,884 BS performed in 18 high-volume centers from 4 continents between 06/2013-05/2019, 5,349 (12%) secondary BS cases were identified. Twenty-one outcome benchmarks were established in low-risk patients, defined as the 75th percentile of the median outcome values of centers. Benchmark cases had no previous laparotomy, diabetes, sleep apnea, cardiopathy, renal insufficiency, inflammatory bowel disease, immunosuppression, thromboembolic events, BMI> 50 kg/m2 or age> 65 years. RESULTS: The benchmark cohort included 3143 cases, mainly females (85%), aged 43.8 ±â€Š10 years, 8.4 ±â€Š5.3 years after primary BS, with a BMI 35.2 ±â€Š7 kg/m2. Main indications were insufficient weight loss (43%) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease/dysphagia (25%). 90-days postoperatively, 14.6% of benchmark patients presented ≥1 complication, mortality was 0.06% (n = 2). Significantly higher morbidity was observed in non-benchmark cases (OR 1.37) and after conversional/reversal or revisional procedures with gastrointestinal suture/stapling (OR 1.84). Benchmark cutoffs for conversional BS were ≤4.5% re-intervention, ≤8.3% re-operation 90-days postoperatively. At 2-years (IQR 1-3) 15.6% of benchmark patients required a reoperation. CONCLUSION: Secondary BS is safe, although postoperative morbidity exceeds the established benchmarks for primary BS. The excess morbidity is due to an increased risk of gastrointestinal leakage and higher need for intensive care. The considerable rate of tertiary BS warrants expertise and future research to optimize the management of non-success after BS.

The "Real R0": A Resection Margin Smaller Than 0.1 cm is Associated with a Poor Prognosis After Oncologic Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Although resection margin (R) status is a widely used prognostic factor after esophagectomy, the definition of positive margins (R1) is not universal. The Royal College of Pathologists considers R1 resection to be a distance less than 0.1 cm, whereas the College of American Pathologists considers it to be a distance of 0.0 cm. This study assessed the predictive value of R status after oncologic esophagectomy, comparing survival and recurrence among patients with R0 resection (> 0.1-cm clearance), R0+ resection (≤ 0.1-cm clearance), and R1 resection (0.0-cm clearance). METHODS: The study enrolled all eligible patients undergoing curative oncologic esophagectomy between 2012 and 2018. Clinicopathologic features, survival, and recurrence were compared for R0, R0+, and R1 patients. Categorical variables were compared with the chi-square or Fisher's test, and continuous variables were compared with the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, whereas the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Among the 160 patients included in this study, 113 resections (70.6%) were R0, 34 (21.3%) were R0+, and 13 (8.1%) were R1. The R0 patients had a better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than the R0+ and R1 patients. The R0+ resection offered a lower long-term recurrence risk than the R1 resection, and the R status was independently associated with DFS, but not OS, in the multivariate analysis. Both the R0+ and R1 patients had significantly more adverse histologic features (lymphovascular and perineural invasion) than the R0 patients and experienced more distant and locoregional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Although R status is an independent predictor of DFS after oncologic esophagectomy, the < 0.1-cm definition for R1 resection seems more appropriate than the 0.0-cm definition as an indicator of poor tumor biology, long-term recurrence, and survival.

Early postoperative decrease of albumin is an independent predictor of major complications after oncological esophagectomy: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Serum albumin perioperative decrease (∆Alb) may reflect the magnitude of the physiological stress induced by surgery. Studies highlighted its value to predict adverse postoperative outcomes, but data in esophageal surgery are scant. This study aimed to investigate the role of ∆Alb to predict major complications after esophagectomy for cancer. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study conducted in five high-volume centers, including consecutive patients undergoing an esophagectomy for cancer between 2006 and 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to a training (n = 696) and a validation (n = 350) cohort. Albumin decrease was calculated on postoperative day 1 and defined as ΔAlb. The primary endpoint was major complications according to Clavien classification. RESULTS: In the training cohort, esophagectomy induced a rapid drop of albumin. Cut-off of ΔAlb was established at 11 g/L and allowed to distinguish patients with adverse outcomes. On multivariable analysis, ΔAlb was identified as an independent predictor of major complications (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11; p = .014). Higher BMI and laparoscopy were associated with lower ΔAlb. Analysis of the validation cohort provided consistent findings. CONCLUSIONS: ΔAlb appeared as a promising biomarker after oncological esophagectomy, allowing prediction of potential adverse outcomes.

Cost-Benefit Analysis of an Enhanced Recovery Program for Gastrectomy A Retrospective Controlled Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery programs (ERP) demonstrated decreased postoperative complication rate and reduced length of stay (LOS). Recently, data on the financial impact revealed cost reduction for colorectal, liver and pancreatic surgery. The present study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of ERP in gastric surgery. METHODS: ERP based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines was implemented in our institution, in June 2014. Consecutive patients undergoing gastric surgery after ERP implementation (n = 71) were compared to a control group of consecutive patients operated before ERP implementation (n = 58). Primary endpoint was cost-effectiveness including detailed perioperative costs. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications and LOS. Standard statistical testing (means, Mann-Whitney Fisher's exact T test or Pearson Chi-square test) was used. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding demographic details. Mean (SD) overall costs per patient were lower in the ERP group (€33,418 (17,901) vs €39,804 (27,288), P = 0.027). Lower costs were found for anesthesia and operating room (-€2 356), intensive or intermediate care (-€8 629), medication (-€1 196)), physiotherapy (-€611), laboratory (-€1 625)) and blood transfusion (-€977). Overall complication rates in ERP and control group (51% vs 62%, P = 0.176) were similar. Mean length of stay (SD) (14(13) days vs 17(11) days, P = 0.037) was shorter in the ERP group. CONCLUSION: ERP significantly reduces overall, preoperative and postoperative costs in patients undergoing major gastric surgery.

[Super obesity, an exponentially growing epidemic : surgical treatment options and expectations]. / Superobésité, une épidémie en croissance exponentielle : options thérapeutiques chirurgicales et attentes.

Obesity is a major health problem with a prevalence that has tripled since 1976, affecting a large portion of the population across all ages. Bariatric surgery is currently considered as the most efficient and durable treatment in terms of weight loss and remission of long-term co-morbidities. The objective of this article is to describe briefly the different surgical options for patients with severe obesity and to report their effectiveness, as well as to provide primary care physicians with simple instructions, regarding initial management and the appropriate guidance of their patients to a specialized service.

L'obésité représente un problème de santé publique majeur avec une prévalence qui a triplé depuis 1976 et qui touche une grande partie de la population, tous âges confondus. La chirurgie bariatrique est actuellement considérée comme le traitement le plus efficace et le plus durable en termes de perte de poids et de rémission des comorbidités à long terme. L'objectif de cet article est de décrire brièvement les différentes options chirurgicales pour les patients souffrant d'une obésité sévère, de rapporter leur efficacité, ainsi que de fournir aux médecins de premier recours des instructions simples en ce qui concerne la prise en charge initiale et l'orientation appropriée de leurs patients vers un service spécialisé.