A Phase II Open-Label Trial of Binimetinib and Hydroxychloroquine in Patients With Advanced KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In RAS-mutant tumors, combined MEK and autophagy inhibition using chloroquine demonstrated synthetic lethality in preclinical studies. This phase II trial evaluated the safety and activity of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib combined with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with advanced KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Eligibility criteria included KRAS-mutant NSCLC, progression after first-line therapy, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate end-organ function. Binimetinib 45 mg was administered orally (p.o.) bid with HCQ 400 mg p.o. bid. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). A Simon's 2-stage phase II clinical trial design was used, with an α error of 5% and a power ß of 80%, anticipating an ORR of 30% to proceed to the 2-stage expansion. RESULTS: Between April 2021 and January 2022, 9 patients were enrolled to stage I: median age 64 years, 44.4% females, 78% smokers. The best response was stable disease in one patient (11.1%). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 1.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months. Overall, 5 patients (55.6%) developed a grade 3 adverse event (AE). The most common grade 3 toxicity was rash (33%). Pre-specified criteria for stopping the trial early due to lack of efficacy were met. CONCLUSION: The combination of B + HCQ in second- or later-line treatment of patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC did not show significant antitumor activity. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04735068).

Very high PD-L1 expression as a prognostic indicator of overall survival among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapies in routine practice.

PURPOSE: Programmed death or ligand-1 (PD-(L)1) pathway inhibitors confer improved survival as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in patients with PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 + e ≥ 50%) compared to platinum-doublet chemotherapy and have become a standard therapy. Some recent evidence suggests that among aNSCLC patients with PD-L1 + e of ≥50% receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy, very high levels of PD-L1 + e (≥90%) may be associated with better outcomes. We sought to assess whether very high PD-L1 + e (≥90%) compared to high PD-L1 + e (50%-89%) is associated with an overall survival benefit in aNSCLC patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapies. METHODS: We conducted a single-site retrospective cohort study of aNSCLC patients who initiated PD-(L)1 inhibitor monotherapy as the first-line treatment from October 24, 2016, to August 25, 2021, and had a PD-L1 + e ≥ 50%. The primary outcome was overall survival, measured from the start of the first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitor monotherapy (index date) to date of death or last confirmed activity prior to the cohort exit date. Propensity score-based inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to control for confounding in Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-six patients with aNSCLC receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitor monotherapy met inclusion criteria. 54% were female, 90% received pembrolizumab, median age was 68 years, 70% had non-squamous cell carcinoma, 94% had a history of smoking, 29% had a KRAS mutation, and 37% had very high PD-L1 + e. Unweighted covariates at cohort entry were similar between groups (absolute standardized mean differences [SMDs] <0.1) except for race (SMD = 0.2); age at therapy initiation (SMD = 0.13); smoking status (SMD = 0.13), and BRAF mutation status (SMD = 0.11). After weighting, baseline covariates were well balanced (all absolute SMDs <0.1). In the weighted analysis, having a very high PD-L1 + e was associated with lower mortality (weighted hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.90) and longer median survival: 3.85 versus 1.49 years. CONCLUSIONS: Very high PD-L1 + e (≥90%) was associated with an overall survival benefit over high PD-L1 + e (50%-89%) in patients receiving the first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitor monotherapy in a model controlling for potential confounders. These findings should be confirmed in a larger real-world data set.

Impact of telemedicine adoption on accessibility and time to treatment in patients with thoracic malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: To ensure safe delivery of oncologic care during the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has been rapidly adopted. However, little data exist on the impact of telemedicine on quality and accessibility of oncologic care. This study assessed whether conducting an office visit for thoracic oncology patients via telemedicine affected time to treatment initiation and accessibility. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with thoracic malignancies seen by a multidisciplinary team during the first surge of COVID-19 cases in Philadelphia (March 1 to June 30, 2020). Patients with an index visit for a new phase of care, defined as a new diagnosis, local recurrence, or newly discovered metastatic disease, were included. RESULTS: 240 distinct patients with thoracic malignancies were seen: 132 patients (55.0%) were seen initially in-person vs 108 (45.0%) via telemedicine. The majority of visits were for a diagnosis of a new thoracic cancer (87.5%). Among newly diagnosed patients referred to the thoracic oncology team, the median time from referral to initial visit was significantly shorter amongst the patients seen via telemedicine vs. in-person (median 5.0 vs. 6.5 days, p < 0.001). Patients received surgery (32.5%), radiation (24.2%), or systemic therapy (30.4%). Time from initial visit to treatment initiation by modality did not differ by telemedicine vs in-person: surgery (22 vs 16 days, p = 0.47), radiation (27.5 vs 27.5 days, p = 0.86, systemic therapy (15 vs 13 days, p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid adoption of telemedicine allowed timely delivery of oncologic care during the initial surge of the COVID19 pandemic by a thoracic oncology multi-disciplinary clinic.

Combination Immunotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Checkpoint blockade has changed the treatment landscape in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but single-agent approaches are effective for only a select subset of patients. Here, we will review the evidence for combination immunotherapies in NSCLC and the clinical data evaluating the efficacy of this approach. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical trials evaluating combination PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade as well as PD-1 in combination with agents targeting IDO1, B7-H3, VEGF, and EGFR show promising results. Additional studies targeting other immune pathways like TIGIT, LAG-3, and cellular therapies are ongoing. Combination immunotherapy has the potential to improve outcomes in NSCLC. Data from early clinical trials is promising and reveals that these agents can be administered together safely without a significant increase in toxicity. Further studies are needed to evaluate their long-term safety and efficacy and to determine appropriate patient selection.

Patterns of Failure, Low-Volume Relapse, and Subsequent Ablative Management in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation and Consolidation Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to describe the patterns of failure, frequency of low-volume relapse (LVR), and candidacy for ablative therapy at time of disease progression (PD) after chemoradiation and consolidative immunotherapy (CRT + ICI) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 229 consecutive patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with CRT + ICI between October 2017 and December 2021 at a single institution. PD was classified as isolated locoregional failure (LRF), isolated distant failure (DF), or synchronous LRF + DF. Any LRF was subclassified as in-field failure, marginal failure, or out-of-field failure. LVR was defined as 3 or fewer sites of PD in any number of organs. Ablative candidates were defined as having 5 or fewer sites of PD radiographically amenable to high-dose radiation or surgery. Time-to-event data were calculated using cumulative incidence analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox modeling was used to examine the correlations between characteristics of relapse and postprogression survival. RESULTS: Of the 229 patients, 119 (52%) had PD. Of these 119 patients, 20 (21%) had isolated LRF, 28 (24%) had synchronous LRF + DF, and 71 (60%) had isolated DF. Of the 48 patients with any LRF, 28 (58%) had in-field failure, 10 (21%) marginal failure, and 10 (21%) out-of-field failure. The cumulative incidence of LRF and DF was 13% (95% CI, 9.2%-18%) and 32% (95% CI, 26%-38%) at 1 year and 19% (95% CI, 14%-24%) and 39% (95% CI, 33%-46%) at 2 years, respectively. Overall, 64 patients (54%) were considered to have LVR. At time of PD, 60 patients (50%) were eligible for ablative therapy. Patients with LVR had longer median survival versus with high-volume relapse (37.4 vs 15.2 months, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, LVR (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.56; P < .001) was associated with improved postprogression survival. CONCLUSIONS: After CRT + ICI, approximately half of patients experience LVR at time of PD and are candidates for ablative therapies. Prospective trials are needed to validate the optimal treatment strategy for LVR.

Patterns of Failure in Metastatic NSCLC Treated With First Line Pembrolizumab and Use of Local Therapy in Patients With Oligoprogression.

INTRODUCTION: The patterns of failure (POF) for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) treated with immunotherapy are not well established. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mNSCLC that received first-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy at a single academic center from 2015 to 2021. We defined POF with 2 classifications: 1) local, regional, or distant failure, or 2) failure in existing lesions, new lesions, or a combination. Oligoprogression was defined as disease progression (PD) in ≤3 sites of failure. Overall survival (OS) was measured via Kaplan-Meier and modelled with Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 298 patients identified, 198 had PD. Using POF classification 1, most failures were distant (43.9%) or a combination of locoregional and distant (34.4%). For POF classification 2, failures occurred in a combination of new and existing lesions (45.0%), existing lesions alone (33.3%), or in new lesions only (21.7%). Oligoprogression occurred in 39.9% (n = 79) cases. Median OS was higher in the following: PD in existing lesions vs. new or new + existing lesions (28.7 vs. 20.2 vs. 13.9 months, P < .001) and oligoprogression vs. polyprogression (35.1 vs. 12.2 months, P < .001). In oligoprogression, median OS was better for those who received radiation to all sites of PD (62.2 months) than for those who changed systemic therapy (22.9 months, P = .007). On multivariable analysis, radiation for oligoprogression (HR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.20-0.62, P < .001) was associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: In mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab, oligoprogression is relatively common. Randomized data are needed to define the benefits of radiation in oligoprogressive mNSCLC.

Phase 2 Trial of Consolidation Pembrolizumab After Proton Reirradiation for Thoracic Recurrences of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Reirradiation (reRT) with proton beam therapy (PBT) may offer a chance of cure while minimizing toxicity for patients with isolated intrathoracic recurrences of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, distant failure remains common, necessitating strategies to integrate more effective systemic therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a phase 2, single-arm trial (NCT03087760) of consolidation pembrolizumab after PBT reRT for locoregional recurrences of NSCLC. Four to 12 weeks after completion of 60 to 70 Gy PBT reRT, patients without progressive disease received pembrolizumab for up to 12 months. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), measured from the start of reRT. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 toxicity. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2021, 22 patients received PBT reRT. Median interval from prior radiation end to reRT start was 20 months. Most recurrences (91%) were centrally located. Most patients received concurrent chemotherapy (95%) and pencil beam scanning PBT (77%), and 36% had received prior durvalumab. Fifteen patients (68%) initiated consolidation pembrolizumab on trial and received a median of 3 cycles (range, 2-17). Pembrolizumab was discontinued most commonly due to toxicity (n = 5; 2 were pembrolizumab-related), disease progression (n = 4), and completion of 1 year (n = 3). Median follow-up was 38.7 months. Median PFS and OS were 8.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-23.7) and 22.8 months (95% CI, 6.9-not reached), respectively. There was only one isolated in-field failure after reRT. Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 10 patients (45%); 2 were pembrolizumab-related. There were 2 grade 5 toxicities, an aorto-esophageal fistula at 6.9 months and hemoptysis at 46.8 months, both probably from reRT. The trial closed early due to widespread adoption of immunotherapy off-protocol. CONCLUSIONS: In the first-ever prospective trial combining PBT reRT with consolidation immunotherapy, PFS was acceptable and OS favorable. Late grade 5 toxicity occurred in 2 of 22 patients. This approach may be considered in selected patients with isolated thoracic recurrences of NSCLC.

The Efficacy and Safety of Treating Acquired MET Resistance Through Combinations of Parent and MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Oncogene-Driven NSCLC.

Introduction: Acquired MET gene amplification, MET exon 14 skip mutations, or MET fusions can emerge as resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with lung cancer. The efficacy and safety of combining MET TKIs (such as crizotinib, capmatinib, or tepotinib) with parent TKIs to target acquired MET resistance are not well characterized. Methods: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review identified 83 patients with metastatic oncogene-driven NSCLC that were separated into the following two pairwise matched cohorts: (1) MET cohort (n = 41)-patients with acquired MET resistance continuing their parent TKI with a MET TKI added or (2) Chemotherapy cohort (n = 42)-patients without any actionable resistance continuing their parent TKI with a platinum-pemetrexed added. Clinicopathologic features, radiographic response (by means of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1), survival outcomes, adverse events (AEs) (by means of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0), and genomic data were collected. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariate modeling adjusted for lines of therapy, brain metastases, TP53 mutations, and oligometastatic disease. Results: Within the MET cohort, median age was 56 years (range: 36-83 y). Most patients were never smokers (28 of 41, 68.3%). Baseline brain metastases were common (21 of 41, 51%). The most common oncogenes in the MET cohort were EGFR (30 of 41, 73.2%), ALK (seven of 41, 17.1%), and ROS1 (two of 41, 4.9%). Co-occurring TP53 mutations (32 of 41, 78%) were frequent. Acquired MET alterations included MET gene amplification (37 of 41, 90%), MET exon 14 mutations (two of 41, 5%), and MET gene fusions (two of 41, 5%). After multivariate adjustment, the objective response rate (ORR) was higher in the MET cohort versus the chemotherapy cohort (ORR: 69.2% versus 20%, p < 0.001). Within the MET cohort, MET gene copy number (≥10 versus 6-10) did not affect radiographic response (54.5% versus 68.4%, p = 0.698). There was no difference in ORR on the basis of MET TKI used (F [2, 36] = 0.021, p = 0.978). There was no difference in progression-free survival (5 versus 6 mo; hazard ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.34-1.23, p = 0.18) or overall survival (13 versus 11 mo; hazard ratio = 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-1.35, p = 0.34) between the MET and chemotherapy cohorts. In the MET cohort, dose reductions for MET TKI-related toxicities were common (17 of 41, 41.4%) but less frequent for parent TKIs (two of 41, 5%). Grade 3 AEs were not significant between crizotinib, capmatinib, and tepotinib (p = 0.3). The discontinuation rate of MET TKIs was 17% with no significant differences between MET TKIs (p = 0.315). Among pre- and post-treatment biopsies (n = 17) in the MET cohort, the most common next-generation sequencing findings were loss of MET gene amplification (15 of 17, 88.2%), MET on-target mutations (seven of 17, 41.2%), new Ras-Raf-MAPK alterations (three of 17, 17.6%), and EGFR gene amplification (two of 17, 11.7%). Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of combining MET TKIs (crizotinib, capmatinib, or tepotinib) with parent TKIs for acquired MET resistance are efficacious. Radiographic response and AEs did not differ significantly on the basis of the underlying MET TKI used. Loss of MET gene amplification, development of MET on-target mutations, Ras-Raf-MAPK alterations, and EGFR gene amplification were molecular patterns found on progression with dual parent and MET TKI combinations.

Plunging Into the PACIFIC: Outcomes of Patients With Unresectable KRAS-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Definitive Chemoradiation and Durvalumab Consolidation.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) consolidation following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) substantially improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the PACIFIC trial becoming the standard of care in locally-advanced, unresectable NSCLC. KRAS mutation may influence response to ICI. METHODS: In this single-institution, retrospective analysis, we compared treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable KRAS mutated (KRAS-mt) and wild-type (KRAS-wt) NSCLC treated with CRT between October 2017 and December 2021. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted comparing median progression free survival and median overall survival from completion of radiotherapy in all KRAS-mt patients and KRAS-G12C-mutated patients. Outcomes were also compared with and without ICI consolidation. RESULTS: Of 156 patients, 42 (26.9%) were KRAS-mt and 114 (73.1%) were KRAS-wt. Baseline characteristics differed only in histology; KRAS-mt NSCLC more likely to be adenocarcinoma. KRAS-mt patients had worse PFS (median 6.3 vs. 10.7 months, P = .041) but similar OS (median 23.1 vs. 27.3 months, P = .237). KRAS-mt patients were more likely to not receive ICI due to rapid disease progression post-CRT (23.8% vs. 4.4%, P = .007). Among patients who received ICI (n = 114), KRAS-mt was not associated with inferior PFS (8.1 vs. 11.9 months, P = .355) or OS (30.5 vs. 31.7 months, P = .692). KRAS-G12C patients (n = 22) had similar PFS and OS to other KRAS-mt. CONCLUSION: In one of the largest post-CRT KRAS-mt cohort published, KRAS-mt was associated with inferior PFS, largely due to rapid progression prior to ICI consolidation, but did not affect OS. Among those who received ICI consolidation, outcomes were comparable regardless of KRAS-mt status.

Electronic Medical Record-Based Nudge Intervention to Increase Comprehensive Molecular Genotyping in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From a Prospective Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Less than half of the patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergo comprehensive molecular testing. We designed an electronic medical record (EMR)-based "nudge intervention" to prompt plasma-based molecular testing at the time of initial medical oncology consultation. METHODS: A nonrandomized prospective trial was conducted at the University of Pennsylvania's academic practice and two affiliated community practices. Molecular genotyping was performed by tissue- and/or plasma-based next generation sequencing methods. Comprehensive testing was defined as testing for EGFR, ALK, BRAF, ROS1, MET, RET, KRAS, and NTRK. Guideline-concordant treatment was defined as the use of the appropriate first-line (1L) therapy as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Proportion of patients with comprehensive molecular genotyping results available at any time, molecular results available before 1L therapy, and guideline-concordant 1L treatment were compared between the preintervention and postintervention cohorts using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi-squared test. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-three patients were included, 376 in the preintervention cohort and 157 in the postintervention cohort. After implementation of the EMR-based nudge, a higher proportion of patients underwent comprehensive molecular testing in the postintervention versus the preintervention cohort (100% v 88%, P = <.001), had results of comprehensive molecular testing available before initiating 1L treatment (97.3% v 91.6%, P = .026), and received NCCN guideline-concordant care (89.8% v 78.2%, P = .035). CONCLUSION: Across three practice sites in a large health system, implementation of a provider team-focused EMR-based nudge intervention was feasible, and led to a higher number of patients with NSCLC undergoing comprehensive molecular genotyping. These findings demonstrate that behavioral nudges can promote molecular testing and should be studied further as a tool to improve guideline-concordant care in both community and academic sites.

Combined JAK inhibition and PD-1 immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Persistent inflammation driven by cytokines such as type-one interferon (IFN-I) can cause immunosuppression. We show that administration of the Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor itacitinib after anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) immunotherapy improves immune function and antitumor responses in mice and results in high response rates (67%) in a phase 2 clinical trial for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Patients who failed to respond to initial anti-PD-1 immunotherapy but responded after addition of itacitinib had multiple features of poor immune function to anti-PD-1 alone that improved after JAK inhibition. Itacitinib promoted CD8 T cell plasticity and therapeutic responses of exhausted and effector memory-like T cell clonotypes. Patients with persistent inflammation refractory to itacitinib showed progressive CD8 T cell terminal differentiation and progressive disease. Thus, JAK inhibition may improve the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy by pivoting T cell differentiation dynamics.

Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Amivantamab, both in Combination with Lazertinib, in Refractory EGFR-mutated NSCLC: Primary Results from the Phase 3 PALOMA-3 Study.

PURPOSE: Phase 3 studies of intravenous amivantamab demonstrated efficacy across EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A subcutaneous formulation could improve tolerability and reduce administration time while maintaining efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC who progressed following osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous or intravenous amivantamab, both combined with lazertinib. Co-primary pharmacokinetic noninferiority endpoints were trough concentrations (Ctrough; on cycle-2-day-1 or cycle-4-day-1) and cycle-2 area under the curve (AUCD1-D15). Key secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) was a predefined exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Overall, 418 patients underwent randomization (subcutaneous group, n=206; intravenous group, n=212). Geometric mean ratios of Ctrough for subcutaneous to intravenous amivantamab were 1.15 (90% CI, 1.04-1.26) at cycle-2-day-1 and 1.42 (90% CI, 1.27-1.61) at cycle-4-day-1; the cycle-2 AUCD1-D15 was 1.03 (90% CI, 0.98-1.09). ORR was 30% in the subcutaneous and 33% in the intravenous group; median PFS was 6.1 and 4.3 months, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the subcutaneous versus intravenous group (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.92; nominal P=0.02). Fewer patients in the subcutaneous group experienced infusion-related reactions (13% versus 66%) and venous thromboembolism (9% versus 14%) versus the intravenous group. Median administration time for first infusion was reduced to 4.8 minutes (range, 0-18) for subcutaneous amivantamab from 5 hours (range, 0.2-9.9) for intravenous amivantamab. During cycle-1-day-1, 85% and 52% of patients in the subcutaneous and intravenous groups, respectively, considered treatment convenient; end-of-treatment rates were 85% and 35%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous amivantamab-lazertinib demonstrated noninferiority to intravenous amivantamab-lazertinib, offering a consistent safety profile with reduced infusion-related reactions, increased convenience, and prolonged survival.

Chemoimmunotherapy vs. Immunotherapy for First Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With a PD-L1 Expression ≥50% or ≥90.

BACKGROUND: Evidence about the comparative effectiveness of chemoimmunotherapy vs. immunotherapy alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) or very high PD-L1 expression (≥90%) is limited because of the lack of head-to-head clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To compare survival in aNSCLC patients receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy vs. immunotherapy in both the PD-L1 expression ≥50% or ≥90% subgroups, accounting for potential confounders that may influence physician decision-making. METHODS: This cohort study used a nationwide electronic health record derived database to identify newly diagnosed cases of aNSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression of ≥50% who initiated first-line systemic therapy between October 2016 and October 2021. The exposure of interest was first-line therapy with chemoimmunotherapy or immunotherapy among patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% or ≥90%. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. Propensity score-based inverse probability of weighting (IPW) was used to control for confounding. Because of nonproportionality of hazards, we estimated hazard ratios over the first 6 months and after 6 months for the overall cohort, and over the first 12 months and after 12 months for a subgroup of persons with a PD-L1 expression ≥90%. RESULTS: We identified 3086 subjects who met inclusion criteria, of whom 32% received chemoimmunotherapy and 68% received immunotherapy alone. Chemoimmunotherapy was associated with no survival advantage vs. immunotherapy alone during the entire follow-up period (IPW-adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 0.98, 95% CI, 0.86-1.12), but was associated with a survival benefit during the first 6 months (aHR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.61-0.90). Similarly, in the subgroup of patients with a PD-L1 expression ≥90%, chemoimmunotherapy was associated with no overall survival advantage during the entire follow-up period (aHR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.87-1.22), but was associated with a survival benefit during the first 12 months (aHR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.57-0.97). CONCLUSION: Chemoimmunotherapy was not associated with an overall benefit over immunotherapy alone, although was associated with an early survival advantage in both the overall cohort and the subgroup of patients with a PD-L1 expression ≥90%. Future studies should focus on identifying the characteristics of higher risk patients that may benefit from the addition of chemotherapy.

Association Between Duration of Immunotherapy and Overall Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: For patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with frontline immunotherapy-based treatment, the optimal duration of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment is unknown. Objective: To assess practice patterns surrounding ICI treatment discontinuation at 2 years and to evaluate the association of duration of therapy with overall survival in patients who received fixed-duration ICI therapy for 2 years vs those who continued therapy beyond 2 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study included adult patients in a clinical database diagnosed with advanced NSCLC from 2016 to 2020, who received frontline immunotherapy-based treatment. The data cutoff was August 31, 2022; data analysis was conducted from October 2022 to January 2023. Exposures: Treatment discontinuation at 2 years (between 700 and 760 days, fixed duration) vs continued treatment beyond 2 years (greater than 760 days, indefinite duration). Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival from 760 days was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox regression that adjusted for patient-specific and cancer-specific factors was used to compare survival beyond 760 days between the fixed-duration group and the indefinite-duration group. Results: Of 1091 patients in the analytic cohort who were still on ICI treatment at 2 years after exclusion criteria for death and progression were applied, 113 patients (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-75] years; 62 [54.9%] female; 86 [76.1%] White) were in the fixed-duration group, and 593 patients (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-76] years; 282 [47.6%] female; 414 [69.8%] White) were in the indefinite-duration group. Patients in the fixed-duration group were more likely to have a history of smoking (99% vs 93%; P = .01) and be treated at an academic center (22% vs 11%; P = .001). Two-year overall survival from 760 days was 79% (95% CI, 66%-87%) in the fixed-duration group and 81% (95% CI, 77%-85%) in the indefinite-duration group. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients in the fixed-duration and indefinite-duration groups, either on univariate (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26; 95% CI, 0.77-2.08; P = .36) or multivariable (HR 1.33; 95% CI, 0.78-2.25; P = .29) Cox regression. Approximately 1 in 5 patients discontinued immunotherapy at 2 years in the absence of progression. Conclusions and Relevance: In a retrospective clinical cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with immunotherapy and were progression-free at 2 years, approximately only 1 in 5 discontinued treatment. The lack of statistically significant overall survival advantage for the indefinite-duration cohort on adjusted analysis provides reassurance to patients and clinicians who wish to discontinue immunotherapy at 2 years.

Brief Report: Second-line treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with first-line immunotherapy regimens.

CLINICAL PRACTICE POINTS: In the United States of America, nearly all patients with advanced NSCLC, absent oncogenic drivers, receive some form of immunotherapy (IO) as part of initial treatment. Current national guidelines currently recommend against IO re-challenge if there is disease progression on IO in the first line, but re-treatment with IO is attractive given its favorable toxicity profile and descriptions of durable clinical benefit in a subset of patients treated beyond disease progression on initial IO (Gandara, J Thorac Oncol, 2018). Data in the non-clinical trial setting on the efficacy of IO in sequential lines of treatment after initial IO are lacking. In our large cohort study of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immunotherapy regimens in the first-line setting, we find that outcomes after second-line treatment did not differ statistically by type of treatment used in the second line. While current prospective clinical trials are investigating several aspects of the utility of continuing immunotherapy and adding novel agents, our study offers data outside of a clinical trial. In addition, with the increased prevalence of adjuvant immunotherapy we urgently need to wrestle with whether to continue immunotherapy in the first-line metastatic setting if a patient experiences disease progression on adjuvant immunotherapy. While this analysis does not directly investigate that question, it does provide hypothesis-generating evidence for further evaluations.

A Multicenter Retrospective Chart Review of Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With KRAS G12C Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: On May 28, 2021, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to sotorasib for second-line or later treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This was the first FDA-approved targeted therapy for this patient population. Due to a paucity of real world data describing clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C mutated NSCLC in the second-line or later, we sought to compile a large, academic medical center-based historical dataset to clarify clinical outcomes in this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 396 patients with stage IV (n = 268, 68%) or recurrent, metastatic (n = 128, 32%) KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC were evaluated in this multicenter retrospective chart review conducted through the Academic Thoracic Oncology Medical Investigator's Consortium (ATOMIC). Patients treated at 13 sites in the United States and Canada and diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 (30% 2006-2015, 70% 2016-2020) were included. Primary outcomes included real-world PFS (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) from time of stage IV or metastatic diagnosis, with particular interest in patients treated with second-line docetaxel-containing regimens, as well as clinical outcomes in the known presence or absence of STK11 or KEAP1 comutations. RESULTS: Among all patients with stage IV or recurrent, metastatic KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC (n = 201 with KRAS G12C confirmed prior to first line systemic therapy), the median first-line rwPFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.3-11.8 months) and median OS was 16.8 months (95% CI, 12.7-22.3 months). In this historical dataset, first line systemic therapy among these 201 patients included platinum doublet alone (44%), PD-(L)1 inhibitor monotherapy (30%), platinum doublet chemotherapy plus PD-(L)1 inhibitor (18%), and other regimens (8%). Among patients with documented second-line systemic therapy (n = 123), the second-line median rwPFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.1-11.9 months), with median rwPFS 4.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-NA) among 10 docetaxel-treated patients (9 received docetaxel and 1 received docetaxel plus ramucirumab). Within the total study population, 49 patients (12%) had a co-occurring STK11 mutation and 3 (1%) had a co-occurring KEAP1 mutation. Among the 49 patients with a co-occurring KRAS G12C and STK11 mutation, median rwPFS on first-line systemic therapy (n = 23) was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.7-NA), and median OS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 10.8-35.3 months). CONCLUSION: In this large, multicenter retrospective chart review of patients with KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC we observed a relatively short median rwPFS of 4.6 months among 10 patients with KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC treated with docetaxel with or without ramucirumab in the second-line setting, which aligns with the recently reported CodeBreak 200 dataset.

Association Between Availability of Molecular Genotyping Results and Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend molecular genotyping for patients newly diagnosed with metastatic nonsquamous (mNSq) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The association between availability of molecular genotyping before first line (1L) therapy and overall survival (OS) is not known. METHODS: We conducted a real-world cohort study using electronic health records in patients newly diagnosed with mNSq NSCLC. Cox proportional-hazards multivariable regression models were constructed to examine the association between OS and test result availability before 1L therapy, adjusting for covariates. Additional analyses were conducted to assess the consistency and strength of the relationship. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between concurrent tissue and plasma testing (v tissue alone) and result availability. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients were included, 80% (261/326) with results available before 1L (available testing group), and 20% (65/326) without results available (unavailable testing group). With 14.2-month median follow-up, patients in the available testing group had significantly longer OS relative to the unavailable testing group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.62; P < .0001). The adjusted odds of availability of results before 1L therapy was higher with concurrent tissue and plasma testing (v tissue testing alone; adjusted odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.90; P = .026). CONCLUSION: Among patients with mNSq NSCLC in a real-world cohort, availability of molecular genotyping results before 1L therapy was associated with significantly better OS. Concurrent tissue and plasma testing was associated with a higher odds of availability of results before 1L therapy. These findings warrant renewed attention to the completion of molecular genotyping before 1L therapy.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Among Adults With Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Importance: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) represents a rare and clinically distinct entity among malignant mesotheliomas. Pembrolizumab has activity in diffuse pleural mesothelioma but limited data are available for DMPM; thus, DMPM-specific outcome data are needed. Objective: To evaluate outcomes after the initiation of pembrolizumab monotherapy in the treatment of adults with DMPM. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2 tertiary care academic cancer centers (University of Pennsylvania Hospital Abramson Cancer Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center). All patients with DMPM treated between January 1, 2015, and September 1, 2019, were retrospectively identified and followed until January 1, 2021. Statistical analysis was performed between September 2021 and February 2022. Exposures: Pembrolizumab (200 mg or 2 mg/kg every 21 days). Main Outcomes and Measures: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The best overall response was determined using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria, version 1.1. The association of disease characteristics with partial response was evaluated using the Fisher exact test. Results: This study included 24 patients with DMPM who received pembrolizumab monotherapy. Patients had a median age of 62 years (IQR, 52.4-70.6 years); 14 (58.3%) were women, 18 (75.0%) had epithelioid histology, and most (19 [79.2%]) were White. A total of 23 patients (95.8%) received systemic chemotherapy prior to pembrolizumab, and the median number of lines of prior therapy was 2 (range, 0-6 lines). Of the 17 patients who underwent programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing, 6 (35.3%) had positive tumor PD-L1 expression (range, 1.0%-80.0%). Of the 19 evaluable patients, 4 (21.0%) had a partial response (overall response rate, 21.1% [95% CI, 6.1%-46.6%]), 10 (52.6%) had stable disease, and 5 (26.3%) had progressive disease (5 of 24 patients [20.8%] were lost to follow-up). There was no association between a partial response and the presence of a BAP1 alteration, PD-L1 positivity, or nonepithelioid histology. With a median follow-up of 29.2 (95% CI, 19.3 to not available [NA]) months, the median PFS was 4.9 (95% CI, 2.8-13.3) months and the median OS was 20.9 (95% CI, 10.0 to NA) months from pembrolizumab initiation. Three patients (12.5%) experienced PFS of more than 2 years. Among patients with nonepithelioid vs epithelioid histology, there was a numeric advantage in median PFS (11.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to NA] vs 4.0 [95% CI, 2.8-8.8] months) and median OS (31.8 [95% CI, 8.3 to NA] vs 17.5 [95% CI, 10.0 to NA] months); however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this retrospective dual-center cohort study of patients with DMPM suggest that pembrolizumab had clinical activity regardless of PD-L1 status or histology, although patients with nonepithelioid histology may have experienced additional clinical benefit. The partial response rate of 21.0% and median OS of 20.9 months in this cohort with 75.0% epithelioid histology warrants further investigation to identify those most likely to respond to immunotherapy.

Utilization and Factors Precluding Receipt of Checkpoint Inhibitor Consolidation for Stage III NSCLC in a Large US Academic Health System.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the proportion of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who initiate consolidation durvalumab or other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), as well as reasons for nonreceipt and prognostic implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified consecutive patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with definitive cCRT between October 2017 and December 2021 within a large US academic health system. Patients either received consolidation ICIs (ICI group) or did not (no-ICI group). Baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) of the groups were assessed. Factors predictive of ICI nonreceipt were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 333 patients who completed cCRT, 229 (69%) initiated consolidation ICIs; 104 (31%) did not. Reasons for ICI nonreceipt included progressive disease post-cCRT (N = 31, 9%), comorbidity or intercurrent illness (N = 25, 8%), cCRT toxicity (N = 23, 7%; 19/23 pneumonitis), and EGFR/ALK alteration (N = 14, 4%). The no-ICI group had worse performance status and a higher rate of baseline pulmonary comorbidity. Larger planning target volume was associated with post-cCRT progressive disease, and higher lung radiation dose with cCRT toxicity. Median OS was 16 months in the no-ICI group and 34.4 months in the ICI group. In the no-ICI group, OS was superior among those with EGFR/ALK alterations (median 44.5 months) and worst among those with progressive disease (median 5.9 months, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 31% of patients who completed cCRT for stage III NSCLC did not receive consolidation ICIs. Survival amongst these patients is poor, especially for those with progressive disease post-cCRT.

Disparities in outcomes between Black and White patients in North America with thoracic malignancies and COVID-19 infection (TERAVOLT).

BACKGROUND: Patients with thoracic malignancies who develop COVID-19 infection have a higher hospitalization rate compared to the general population and to those with other cancer types, but how this outcome differs by race and ethnicity is relatively understudied. METHODS: The TERAVOLT database is an international, multi-center repository of cross-sectional and longitudinal data studying the impact of COVID-19 on individuals with thoracic malignancies. Patients from North America with thoracic malignancies and confirmed COVID-19 infection were included for this analysis of racial and ethnic disparities. Patients with missing race data or races and ethnicities with fewer than 50 patients were excluded from analysis. Multivariable analyses for endpoints of hospitalization and death were performed on these 471 patients. RESULTS: Of the 471 patients, 73% were White and 27% were Black. The majority (90%) were non-Hispanic ethnicity, 5% were Hispanic, and 4% were missing ethnicity data. Black patients were more likely to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≥ 2 (p-value = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, Black patients were more likely than White patients to require hospitalization (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.69, 95% CI: 1.01-2.83, p-value = 0.044). These differences remained across different waves of the pandemic. However, no statistically significant difference in mortality was found between Black and White patients (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 0.69-2.40, p-value = 0.408). CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with thoracic malignancies who acquire COVID-19 infection are at a significantly higher risk of hospitalization compared to White patients, but there is no significant difference in mortality. The underlying drivers of racial disparity among patients with thoracic malignancies and COVID-19 infection require ongoing investigation.