Tumor recurrence following liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: role of tumor proliferation status.

The selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation is currently based on the size and number of tumors to minimize the risk of recurrence. These criteria measure tumor bulk but may not reflect tumor behavior accurately. A biological marker of tumor behavior could aid with patient selection further. The aims of this study were to determine factors associated with a higher risk of tumor recurrence and to assess the role of tumor proliferation status with respect to recurrence following transplantation. Pathological data on 67 patients who underwent transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma were reviewed, and tumor proliferation was assessed by minichromosome maintenance protein-2 (MCM-2) and cyclin A expression. A Cox regression analysis of factors related to tumor recurrence and overall survival was carried out. Recurrence-free survival was assessed according to compatibility with selection criteria, vascular invasion, and proliferation status. Tumor size, vascular invasion, and highest MCM-2 expression were associated with tumor recurrence by multivariate analysis (P < 0.02). Recurrence-free survival was significantly better for those patients without vascular invasion, those who were within the Milan, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), or Up-to-Seven selection criteria, and those with lower expression of MCM-2. In conclusion, tumors meeting the Milan, UCSF, or Up-to-Seven selection criteria had a lower rate of recurrence following liver transplantation. Vascular invasion and tumor proliferation status were associated with the risk of recurrence independently of tumor size. Biopsy of larger tumors to assess proliferative activity could identify those at lower risk of recurrence who could also benefit from liver transplantation.

A novel immunohistochemical method to estimate cell-cycle phase distribution in archival tissue: implications for the prediction of outcome in colorectal cancer.

An immunohistochemical method for assessing cell-cycle phase distribution in colorectal resection specimens would enable phase data to be incorporated into diagnostic algorithms for the estimation of prognosis and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. In contrast to flow cytometry, an immunohistochemical method would also allow the phase distribution to be examined within morphologically heterogeneous regions of neoplasms. Paraffin sections of normal colon (n = 25), colonic adenoma (n = 15), and colonic adenocarcinoma (n = 30) were analysed by immunohistochemistry using antibodies against markers of cell-cycle entry, Mcm-2 and Ki67, and putative markers of the cell-cycle phase, cyclins D1 and E (putative markers of G1 phase), cyclin A (S phase), cytoplasmic cyclin B1 (G2 phase), and phosphohistone H3 (M phase). The phase specificity of each marker was assessed by examining the degree of co-expression of adjacent phase markers using double-antibody fluorescence confocal microscopy and by comparison with flow cytometric analysis performed on adjacent tissue sections. The S-phase specificity of detectable cyclin A was also assessed in combination with in situ DNA replication using fluorescence confocal microscopy. All cells expressing phase markers co-expressed Mcm-2. Adjacent phase markers were not significantly co-expressed, confirming the relative specificity of these markers in tissue sections of colon. Cell-cycle phase distribution, calculated by immunohistochemistry, compared well with phase analyses obtained by flow cytometry. No cells expressed cyclin A in the absence of active DNA replication. The S-phase labelling index, as defined by detectable cyclin A expression, showed a positive correlation with the Mcm-2 labelling index and increased in the progression from normal colon to adenocarcinoma. In conclusion, a combination of these cell-cycle phase markers can be used to calculate the distribution of cells throughout each phase of the cell cycle in colorectal tissue sections. Detectable cyclin A can be used as a surrogate marker of S phase and may be of value in predicting prognosis and response to adjuvant therapy.